Hi Neil,
I think you should reread my post. I did not say there were more than one gunmen; I said "one or more."
I did not say he had machine guns; I said "automatic weapons."
Regarding the law as it applies to firearms; I am not opposed at all to the responsible ownership of firearms. I personally own a number of legal and registered firearms, myself, which I have used both for hunting and for target shooting. I am adamantly opposed to any law that would ban the legal ownership of firearms. (They can take my firearms away when they can prise them out of my cold, dead fingers...)
Furthermore, I am also fully aware of what happened in Nazi Germany, and I wish a lot more of the people who keep naively pushing to ban firearms were aware of those facts. I also wish they would see past their fear and recognize the fact that banning firearms will not stop firearms-related crimes. Criminals are rather notorious for ignoring the law!
What I am against is the idea that it's perfectly OK to leave functional firearms lying around unlocked, along with the ammunition that goes in them, or worse, loaded and unlocked firearms where any kid from 3 years of age and up can get his or her hands on them.
While I often agree with you on many things, I cannot agree with the idea of students and teachers carrying loaded firearms in a school. That's a great way to get a whole lot more people killed in a situation like the one that happened at Virginia Tech.
If, on the other hand, you are recommending that people be required to take specialized training and carry licenses to prove that they are properly trained for a situation like today (perhaps SWAT training?), then it might work. However, you must remember that even highly trained military and police personnel STILL sometimes shoot the wrong people.
God bless,
Dave
|