Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: IS THERE SUCH A THING AS A COSMIC RELIGION?
10/16/2010 10:51:04 AM

My Friends,

As promised, the article below is simply extraordinary. Robert Talmadge posted it yesterday at NewAgeU within his 'Healing Revolution' forum, and it was a revelation to me. I was aware of the recent discoveries in the DNA field, but nothing that could prepare me for what you are about to read.

And I hope you read it through. It is really worth it, a symphony in words, and a confirmation of the ancient Hindu teaching that at the center of every living being, as at the center of every state of existence, there is a reflection of the Supreme Principle. And
of the biblical precept that we have been created in the image of God.

Luis Miguel Goitizolo


Announced with great fanfare in late November, 2006, scientists have discovered that human DNA is far more variable than previously thought. Contrary to previous beliefs, as much as 10 percent of human genes vary wildly from one person to the next. The mainstream press is hailing the discovery and some sort of breakthrough that will shed light on so-called "incurable" diseases and give researchers the ability to create more targeted medicines. (There's always a pro-Pharma slant in the mainstream media isn't there?) In reality, this new

DNA discovery explains why most pharmaceuticals don't work for most people
.

More importantly, this discovery humbles us, and shows us that even our top scientists know less about human DNA than they once thought. Researching DNA is a lot like researching astronomy: the more we learn, the less we realize we know. It's as if every newly discovered fact unveils the existence of ten new questions we never knew existed.

The mainstream media, in its usual limited view, is reporting this discovery as a breakthrough that will help scientists develop new drugs to treat disease. Every "Eureka!" moment having anything to do with the genetic code seems to lead the mainstream media to the same advertiser-pleasing conclusion, butthey haven't even begun to realize the big story here. The real news in this discovery, you see, has nothing to do with pharmaceuticals or even medical science. It is larger and more profound than any of us could have possibly imagined.

Allow me to explain...


Where are all the missing blueprints?

Until today, it was widely believed that individual genes directly controlled physical traits in the human body (and even mental and behavioral trait , according to some), but now it turns out that a surprisingly large number of individuals have wild variations in their genetic code, such as multiple copies of the same gene or even entire genes that are missing from their DNA. And yet they're not walking around without a kidney, for example, or missing their left eyeball.

It's all quite shocking and rather difficult to explain from a Western point of view where scientists believe that DNA is like a computer program containing sequential instructions for building a physical organism. Truth is, there aren't enough genes in the human genome to even build a human being in the first place. A human has about 30,000 genes, yet an adult human has trillions of specialized cells governed by millions of different chemical reactions. How do 30,000 genes control all this?

Only a few years ago (2001), humans were believed to have 100,000 genes while all simple life forms contained far fewer. But this assumption of humans being some "advanced" life form turned out to be utterly false. It turns out that the mustard weed contains the same number of genes as humans, and even the common mouse has nearly as many. From certain types of worms to common trees, there are many organisms on the planet that have very nearly the same number of genes as human beings (and some have more).

Even more surprising to most, human beings appear to actually be human-bacteria hybrids. We are not all human, in other words. At least 200 genes in our genetic code were mysteriously borrowed frombacteria, we now know. Nobody is sure how they got there (did early humans mate with bacteria? Odd...), but we are sure that they exist.

Furthermore, if you look at the composition of cells in the typical human body, and you start counting them all, you realize that most of the cells in the typical human body are not human. Read that again, if you need to. It's a shocking statement, but it's entirely true. The vast majority of cells contained in the human body are bacteria cells -- about 100 trillion of them for a typical human being.

In other words, when you walk around, most of the cells you're carrying with you are not even you. The importance of this is in understanding that the human organism does not exist in isolation to the world around it. Regardless of what we believe, we are all closer to nature than we think. In fact, we are literally living with nature inside us, permeating our cells and accounting for more of us than us ourselves.


Epigenetic factors

There's also no mention of epigenetics in all this news about the human genome. As recently understood -- to the great surprise of the hard science community, no doubt -- epigenetic factors control theexpression of genes, activating or deactivating them based on environmental factors such as nutrition or exposure to synthetic chemicals.

Epigenetic factors are inherited, too, and passed from one generation to the next, meaning that if one woman suffers from chronic nutritional deficiencies when she conceives a child, the detrimental side effects of that nutritional deficiency will be passed down through multiple generations (at least four generations, according to Pottenger, but perhaps as many as seven according to others).

So DNA is not the only archive of information that's passed from mother to child. Even if we understood everything about DNA, we would still lack the big picture unless we also understood epigenetic factors -- and most old-school researchers and Western scientists don't even believe in epigenetic factors, adhering to the outdated point of view that genes alone control everything, and that all disease is predetermined, with environmental factors having little or no effect.


The human genome reflects the patterns of nature

Most Western scientists currently believe the human genome is sort of like a biological computer program; a series of instructions that tells the cells how to construct a complete organism containing trillions of new cells. Of course, there's no real explanation as to how a mere 30,000 genes could oversee the construction, maintenance and operation of such a highly complex organism. As Francis Collins, director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, said, "It's astounding that we get by with so few protein-coding genes, but that seems to be sufficient because here we all are." It's hard to argue with logic like that.

Indeed, it does work. But not in the way Western scientists believe. My own personal theory of the human genome takes special note of the multiple copies of many genes that have now been observed across a wide spectrum of the human population. Some people carry one, two, three or even four copies of the same gene.

If you look around in nature, where else do you notice copies of the same information? In harmonics, of course. A complex sound such as a single note on a violin is not made up of a simple square wave tone, it's made up of highly complex harmonics which give the violin its own tone and timbre, a sort of auditory personality. On an oscilloscope, these often appear as copies of the same underlying waveforms.

They're also called "overtones," and they're present throughout the human experience. Simple saying the word, "we," for example, involves shaping the mouth and tongue into an arrangement that creates complex, high-frequency overtones. The "ee" sound is the highest multi-frequency overtone sound created in human speech, but every vowel sound has its own unique pattern of repeating information. From low to high, it's "uuu" "ooo" "aaah" "eh" "eee."

Physically, a human being is more like musical expression than a set of construction blueprints. The human body has near-perfect symmetry and economies of expression through fractal geometry that are quite evident in the structure of the circulatory system, for example, or the nervous system. Just look at a drawing of veins and arteries and you'll notice the fractal patterns of geometry -- the same patterns you'll see drawn in the underside of a leaf, by the way.

The same is also true with human hair and skin cells. Every police detective knows that the human fingerprint is made up of readily identifiable patterns that are connected through a sort of biological artistry. In any human fingerprint, you'll notice the loops, swishes and curves that give strong clues to the underlying fractal geometry. Fingerprints aren't built with cellular bricks, they're built with repeating patterns that give us strong clues about the true structure of our DNA.

(Fractal geometry is also the dominant form of physical structure in nature, by the way. In fact, it was the study of plant leaves and mollusk shells that led to the discovery of fractal geometry.)

Throughout the human body, from the lining of the cells of the stomach to the structure of the eye, you find patterns that go way beyond mere construction blueprints. The human body is a symphony, a grand musical masterpiece played out in billions of variations across the planet.

And the DNA, in my view, is a holographic reflection of the whole being. The repeating patterns of genes and the symmetry of the double helix are all expressions of music. The human genome is a symphony, and it is through this symphony that we play the music of life. Combined with environmental factors and energetic factors (such as parental love), the symphony of human DNA creates a physical being. But it doesn't stop there. It also helps create the framework for an emotional being, an energetic being and a spiritual being.

Some scientists see nothing but cold, hard construction blueprints in that DNA. Others see God in the symphony, or Mother Nature directing the orchestra. What I see is a miracle of life, created with such masterful poetry and music that it is something to behold, to honor and to be humbled by. It is the ultimate statement of our connection to nature, for everywhere you look in nature, you see the same patterns we express, carried out in a range of melodies through the plants, animals and even the waters and skies. Looking closely at ourselves, we cannot help but notice nature. If we are keen observers, that is.


Western scientists refuse to hear the music

For Western scientists to think they've figured out the Human Genome, and that they can now use it to design new synthetic drugs that hijack the biochemical orchestra of the human body, is the epitome of medical arrogance. They refuse to recognize the miracle of human life, believing instead in the superiority of Man over nature. They would destroy a thousand symphonies to sell another million dollars worth of pharmaceuticals. Every day, they pad their fragile egos with "heroic" surgical procedures and organ transplants that grind the orchestra to a halt.

They are the music stoppers, the nature deniers... the rationalists. They believe all things are compartmentalized and separated. There is no connection between living things, according to the rationalists, and living creatures are nothing more than players in some cruel game called survival of the fittest.

But I say we are all unique, creative expressions of the same universal tune. Even our very blueprint -- our DNA -- is a symphony of expression that will never be understood until researchers start to think holographically rather than sequentially. DNA is a wonderful mystery, as is any good symphony, or novel, or collection of poetry. And just as a novel is more than the sum of its words, a human being is more than the accounting of her DNA. Let me give you a simple example to make this all more apparent.

In the paragraph below, each word represents a gene. What is this paragraph trying to say?

a, a, a, above, air, all, almost, alone, and, and, and, anywhere, as, breadth, brought, by, cluster, color, combining, crate, crooked, dropped, evening, fine, first-water, follow, freedom, from, glossy, greater, hair, hazy, i, i, image, in, in, in, in, it, it, it, it, it, i've, i've, i've, jewel, later, little, luster, might, moon, moon, new, of, of, of, of, on, one, one, or, ornament, over, please, pulled, put, run, seen, shining, shining, slowly, some, sorts, start, the, the, the, the, the, the, tilted, tree-and-farmhouse, trees, tried, tried, try, walking, wallow, water, with, with, wonder, you, your.

Presented as such, it seems to be nonsense, right? This is the Western view of the human genome, where each "word" (or gene) stands on its own, existing in some isolated way for the purpose of governing the construction of some correlated physical structure. Western scientists even use the term, "words" to describe genes, and they describe the variation in the proteingrammar of those words: the music, the poetry, the linguistics. sequences as different "spellings" of those words. Yet they completely miss the point.

So let's take those same words (genes) and rearrange them to create music. Or poetry, as it were, thanks to Robert Frost:

The Freedom of the Moon

I've tried the new moon tilted in the air
Above a hazy tree-and-farmhouse
cluster
As you might try a jewel in your hair.
I've tried it fine with little breadth of luster,
Alone, or in one ornament combining
With one first-water start almost shining.

I put it shining anywhere I please.
By walking slowly on some evening
later,
I've pulled it from a crate of crooked trees,
And brought it over glossy water, greater,
And dropped it in, and seen the image wallow,
The color run, all sorts of wonder follow.


Do you see the difference? They are the same words as the nonsense paragraph shown earlier, but now suddenly the words create something far more complex and intelligent than the sum of their parts. Through the arrangement of the words, or the symphony of words, Robert Frost takes us on a journey that touches on the human experience, our relationship with nature and the meaning of life itself. All this has been brought forth by a set of words that seemed meaningless when read in isolated, absent the context of their interrelationships (or holographic relationships).

DNA is poetry, you see. And as long as Western scientists continue to look at genes in isolation, they will only see a scramble of isolated words whose meaning remains forever elusive. But genuine, curious scientists who are true enough to their own hearts to take a leap of faith at believing in the symphony of nature will find something far different in human DNA. They will find poetry, symmetry, harmonics... and a song of life that, if truly understood, would humble even the most brilliant among us.

You see, this year's discovery of widespread variability in the genetic code -- and gene copies, and missing genes -- is not something to be viewed as a way to sell more drugs. That view is childish. It is insulting to nature herself. This discovery is far more profound. It gives us an important clue that can help humankind remember where it came from. It reminds us that we are part of nature, not its conquerors or masters. We are, in fact, an expression of the very phenomena we are attempting to understand, and if we read the poetry of DNA correctly, we will realize that life itself is not about the accumulation of wealth, or stuff, or power over others, but rather the discovery of self.

And "self" does not exist in isolation. We are, in every way imaginable, intertwined. We are all made of the same stuff, wrought from the same patterns of nature, and in fact, formulated from the same musical notes played out in five billion unique but compatible tunes. With this discovery, Western science has concluded we are all more different from each other than previously thought, but I believe it is evidence that we are all just unique verses of the same universal poem.

______________________

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: IS THERE SUCH A THING AS A COSMIC RELIGION?
10/16/2010 5:56:06 PM
Dear Friends,


THE SPHINX OF
GIZA

"Unto you it is given to know the mystery of the kingdom of God: but unto them that are without, all these things are done in parables: That seeing they may see, and not perceive; and hearing they may hear, and not understand; lest at any time they should be converted, and their sins should be forgiven them." - St. Mark 4:11,12



The Sphinx at Giza with the
Great Pyramid looming on the background


The Mystery of the Sphinx

Among the world’s most revered symbols, the Sphinx at Giza, in Egypt, is one of the few that still challenge humanity with their dense mystery. The image of a huge reclining lion with a human head facing due east, this strangely beautiful monument, like the nearby pyramids of Kheops, Kafhre and Menkaura, has never ceased to exert a profound fascination over the thousands of people that come every year to pay it a visit or, for that matter, to anyone who happens to know about it. But unlike the massive pyramids, which remain deeply immersed in their dream of millennia, the great Sphinx appears to stare at us and the entire world in an eternal watch. Why?

That this highly enigmatic and exotic monument, in fact the world’s biggest and heaviest monolithic statue, IS a symbol, seems beyond doubt to almost everyone. But a symbol of what is not, paradoxically, at all clear, and a number of people have even wanted to see in it rather a representation of this or that Pharaoh. This aspect of the problem is in turn connected with the Sphinx's age, over which there is as well strong controversy, though I personally believe it goes far back than any of the oldest Egyptian dynasties - in fact to approximately 12,500 years ago, as the glaciers of the Ice Age were already melting, very probably by the time the biblical Flood occurred.

At least for a few moments, then, let us focus rather on its symbolic meaning, maybe not as mysterious as the Sphinx itself or its antiquity but all the same most intriguing, and let us leave the problem of its age for the final part of this collaboration. Several questions arise here: What kind of symbol or symbols are we talking about? If the Sphinx IS a symbol, what kind of symbol does it evoke? Is that symbol contained in it? And ultimately, what does that symbol stand for?

Before we examine these questions, however, we will assume, as a general observation based on the monumentality of the statue, that the importance of such symbol (or symbols) must have been huge - at least for its builders. And based on what first comes to mind on viewing it (apart of course from the Sphinx’s great, terrific beauty), and in order to make a first approach to its probable meaning as a symbol, we will incorporate into the equation, naturally associated to the impression of monumentality, the idea of permanence, as the Sphinx quite obviously, like the pyramids themselves, was built to remain forever.

In this way, we know the answer to the first question: if the Sphinx is a symbol, then it had to be not only one apt to be expressed visually - for example, by a big monument such as the sphinx actually is - but also one that is or was greatly important. This is not much, as most symbols are both things. But since most of these symbols can usually be expressed as well by other similar visual representations, we may go from it on to the subsequent questions and see first what other similar monuments, statues and the like exist that may be likely to evoke similar things (and more precisely if the symbol is actually contained in it) and, second, what those representations stand for.

The Sphinx and the Four Elements

Here immediately comes to mind that other famous sphinx, the Greek sphinx of Thebes, which appears to have inspired past travelers and visitors to the Sphinx of Giza to call it also a ‘Sphinx’, since the real original name of this latter has actually never been known; and along with it its famous question to Oedipus: “What walks on four legs in the morning, two legs at noon, and three legs in the evening?”, so famous in fact that even now is mentioned in our schools as an example of an ingenious riddle. However, neither the question, nor Oedipus’ answer: “Man, as he crawls on all fours in infancy, walks upright on two legs in adulthood, and uses a cane as a third leg in old age,” can actually satisfy our need for a really meaningful symbol, as they simply posit little more than a clever riddle within an imaginative legend - and we need far more than that.



The Theban Sphinx


The next obviously symbolic images that we may turn our eyes to for an answer are also well known. They are the Mesopotamian so-called Winged Bulls and Winged Lions that are represented on walls, slabs and stela, all of which are most analogous in their conception to the Sphinx of Giza -in fact, they are said to have originally inspired it. Moreover, they are supposed by a good number of scholars to be the origin of the two angelic beings that were part of the old Israelites’ Ark of the Covenant, from between which God reportedly used to speak to Moses whenever they made a stop in the midst of the desert during their flee from Egypt (see the Book of Numbers 7:89): they are the cherubs or cherubim, described by the prophet Ezekiel (and similarly by other prophets) as “a tetrad of living creatures, each having four faces:of a lion, an ox, an eagle, and a man.”


The Mesopotamian winged bulls, like their winged lions counterpart, incorporated
three of the four elements in them. When bulls and lions are combined into
one animal, it passes to be a symbol of all four elements

We can also note a correlation with the early Christian tradition, in part an inheritor of the old Hebrew tradition, which figured the four evangelists with the heads of a lion, an ox, an eagle, and a man - in turn symbolic of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.

The Four Evangelists with their symbols. Ivory relief, Germany, c.800 AD. In the
St. Cecilia Church and Schnütgen Museum, Cologne. “… the four cherubim:
one like a human, i.e. the Gospel according to Matthew; the second
like a calf, i.e. the Gospel according to Mark; another like a lion,
i.e. the Gospel according to Luke; and the fourth like an
eagle, i.e. the Gospel according to John
(Pseudo Athanasius).


And with this we are seemingly closer to solving the puzzle, as each of this tetrad of creatures are the symbols of each of the four traditional elements - respectively Fire, Air, Earth, and Water (the order of the elements may vary according to the different traditions). Of enormous significance for all ancient societies and more specifically for such traditional sciences as astrology, alchemy and numerology, these elements are in fact only second to the so-called fifth element orquintessence, ether (or better space) from which they all derive, though this latter is not precisely material but rather spiritual and intrinsically divine. But however it may be, they have always been at the root of not only those disciplines but of the main traditional sciences such as medicine and physics. Still more, from most remote times they have been closely intermingled with the entire corpus of the ancients’ traditional lore both in the East and the West.

In the Americas, for example, the four elements were as well omnipresent, yet with the logical variations born of the particularities of the land and the animal life of the region. Thus, at least in the South of the continent, fire was symbolized by the jaguar instead of a lion, which did not exist here, and for the same reason earth was represented by a snake rather than a cow. To represent air, an eagle or a condor was resorted to. A special case was that of water, which was not represented by a man but by either a fish or an alligator.

Yet the problem in the Americas was not the symbols. Like elsewhere, the problem here is, and always has been, the scientists who study the traces left, in this case, by the American cultures. See the image of the famous Raimondi stela of the Chavin culture (North of Peru) below for an example of this.


The Raimondi Stela is a major piece of art of the Chavín culture in the central Andes. It is housed
in the courtyard of the Museo Nacional de Arqueología Antropología e Historia del Perú.

The stela is seven feet high, made of highly polished granite, with a lightly incised
design which is almost unnoticeable on the actual sculpture. For this reason,
the design is best viewed from a drawing. (see below)


“…In the case of the Raimondi Stela, when viewed one way, the image depicts a fearsome
deity holding two staffs. His eyes look upward toward his large, elaborate headdress
of snakes and volutes. This same image, when flipped upside-down, takes on a
completely new life. The headdress now turns into a stacked row of smiling,
fanged faces, while the deity's face has turned into the face of a smiling
reptile as well. Even the deity's staffs now appear to be rows of
stacked faces.” (Wikipedia)


Instead of seeing a harmonious symbolic representation of the four elements in the fabulous creature figured, archaeologists and anthropologists alike argued for years whether it represented a condor (air), an alligator (water), a snake (earth), or finally, a jaguar (fire); and for all I know, they are still arguing. But in truth, the amazing image represents all four animals in the abstract form that was typical of that and other cultures like the Sechin culture, also in Peru, and the Mayan in Mesoamerica.

If this occurs among scientists of similar specialties (mostly archaeologists and anthropologists) studying the same cultures in the same countries, we can just imagine how much worse can be the case with scientists arrived from different countries and specialties to study an alien culture. Only by exception will they ever arrive at valid conclusions about anything.


The Universe as a Symbol

But first and foremost, they will never understand the fact that everything was sacred for the ancients. All their science was sacred, and the four elements, which were at the root of and permeated all reality as an essential framework, were a divine manifestation of cosmic and spiritual forces - actually the most powerful of them all - supporting and articulating all that exists, even time. In order to teach this fundamental truth, they resorted to symbols that made it easier to remember it permanently. And the more visible and permanent they were, the easier it was to achieve that end.

In addition to their material meaning, the four material elements have always been associated with the seasons of the year and, by extension, with the course of the cyclic ages. In this way, air becomes the element of spring, fire is that of summer, earth is of fall, and water is of winter. And taking the correlations on to the next level, that of the cyclic ages, air becomes the element of the first age or Golden age (Satya yuga in the Hindu denomination), fire symbolizes the second age or Silver age (Treta yuga), Earth represents the third age or Bronze age (Dvapara yuga), and water is the element of the fourth and last age, the Iron age (or Kali yuga) in which we are at present.

There is one apparent flaw, however, in all of the above, as for one thing, the Mesopotamian winged bulls and lions evidently fall short by at least one of the four elements - in effect, if the bull and the lion are considered separately, then they each lack one element: the former the element fire, and the latter the element earth. However, the difficulty is not such, as a fair proportion of these images have been found to combine the two animals in one - a lion that has for its hind quarters those of an ox, so that actually it is the four elements, and all that they represent, which are symbolized by them.

And what about the Sphinx itself? It apparently only contains two of the four symbols, namely air (man’s head) and fire (the lion’s body), and I don’t think that even Edgar Cayce’s eventual efforts or the efforts of any other Egyptologists or visionaries (see http://crystalinks.com/sphinxtheories.html), apparently completely discredited by now, could possibly make sprout from the lion’s body either wings or an ox’s feet, let alone both. In my opinion, not even regarding the headdress as wings, as some have proposed for an alternative symbol for air, would do - and even if it did, there still would be missing the symbol for earth.

So it must be recognized, we seem to be at a loss here. For unlikely as it may look to even the average person, it might simply be that the Sphinx’s builders had no special symbol in mind as they initially set to the task of carving it, but only the intention to create the image of a beautiful, most impressive and enigmatic creature in order to represent the person and the feats of one particular Pharaoh - possibly Kaphre (c. 2550 BC), as most specialists claim. And all things considered, at this juncture we can make one of two things: we may dismiss the whole matter and admit the possibility that they did want to only figure a man (Pharaoh Kaphre) with the strength and the ferocity of a lion. Or we may try to find what other facts or clues, or both, are apt to account for the fact that the Sphinx builders decided to include only the earth and fire elements, and not all four elements, in their equation.

In effect, there are other possibilities that suggest something completely different which might, in fact, have been at the root of their conception.

Can it be, for example, that the two elements symbolized in the Sphinx, fire and water, were regarded as the only ones that could endanger the Earth and the entire humanity during its now millenary guardianship of probably 12,000 years or more?

What can we make of the fact that the old Olmecs, Teotihuacans and Aztecs differentiated four “Suns” or cycles that ended in an equal number of destructions of the World, of which the third was by a shower of fire (or by the “God of Fire”), and the fourth by a great deluge (although the order is not very clear and varies according to the different traditions and sources)?



The Aztecs' Sun Stone

What can be said, finally, of a certain disquieting passage in the Gospels (2 Peter 2:5, 3:6) that after talking about the world of the days of Noah and how it was destroyed by water, goes on to say (2 Peter 3:7) that “the skies and the earth existing now are in turn reserved to be destroyed by fire”?

Was Peter talking about a secret revealed to him by Jesus Christ himself?

Maybe a secret that for the last 12,000 years or more has been contained in the Sphinx?


Thank you,

Luis Miguel Goitizolo

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Roger Macdivitt .

3169
7333 Posts
7333
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: IS THERE SUCH A THING AS A COSMIC RELIGION?
10/16/2010 9:19:02 PM

Luis,

All I can say at this point is thank you.

There is much to read and digest.

Roger

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: IS THERE SUCH A THING AS A COSMIC RELIGION?
11/5/2010 2:43:45 AM

Dear Friends,
The Sacred Science - Part 5

"The beginning of a circle is also its end. Not I, but the world says it: all is one.
And yet everything comes in season"
Heraclitus of Ephesus

We started this series on symbolism with the circle as a symbol of the world (and variously of the cosmos, the universe, etc) and with its center, in as much as an image of the Center of the Universe, as a symbol of God as the Principle of everything else.

The center of he circle, on the other hand, is the only element in it that is immutable and hence the only point that is ‘real’ in metaphysical terms, as corresponds to an Absolute Principle that is essentially the point of equilibrium of everything else in the world. This ‘everything else’, on its part, is to be considered as ever rotating around the center, which introduces the idea of time into the equation - thus somehow making us depart from the metaphysical realm of the Absolute, as represented by the center, to enter into the cosmological realm of the Relative - in terms of the old scholastic philosophy, the ‘realm of this world’.

However, there is another way to represent this opposition, or rather complementariness, between the metaphysical and the cosmological realms - or in more familiar terms, between the realms of ‘Above’ and ‘Below’.

In effect, if a circle's circumference can represent time, and more specifically cyclic time, then if we divide that circle into its lower and upper halves, they will respectively represent the darker part of a cycle, for example the night in the course of a day and the fall and the winter season of a year, and the luminous part of that cycle, for example the diurnal hours of a day and the spring and the summer season of a year. Something like yin and yang, only specifically referred to time.

BelowAbove

Now one of the most fascinating characteristics of a symbol, as seen in a previous part of this series, is the multiplicity of meanings that it can convey to the observer. For example, the lower half of a circle will also be apt to variously represent the Earth and everything it contains, and more specifically a vessel, any kind of vessel, as corresponds to the microcosmic level; also, it is known to be one of the oldest symbols for the human heart (though not necessarily with a dot, but if so, the dot will represent the divine spark, or God, who dwells in it and radiates life and love to the entire body), and finally, an arcane symbol of the Holy Grail. But in general, it will always be a symbol of earthly things and above all, of those apt to contain valuable objects, as properly corresponds to its form and to the term ‘below’.

As to a circle’s upper part, it will represent the sky and everything it may contain and, above it, the spiritual sky, or the Heavenly Realm, as properly corresponds to its dome-shaped form; while in the microcosmic level it will be a symbol of a human head and also, on top of it, of the brahmanda or sahasrara - the highest chakra or wheel, in Sanskrit - also called ‘fontanel’.

The most fascinating part in all this, however, is that the lower half of the circle has from old also been a symbolic representation of Noah’s Ark, the sacred vessel that during the biblical Flood was a shelter for not only a couple of all living animals on Earth, as the account in Genesis states, but also, according to certain esoteric sources, for the arcane treasure of divine knowledge that subsisted at the end of the dark cycle. In effect, legend has it that this knowledge was kept from harm from the dark forces by carrying it over the ocean and safely delivering it into the new, luminous Golden Age represented, of all possible symbols, by the Rainbow in the form of the upper half of the circle - symbolizing God’s promise to humans in Genesis, 9:13, that the world would never more be destroyed by water. (1)

Noah’s ArkRainbow

In all this, the dot is the Germ or essential principle of all things and more specifically the esoteric, divine knowledge saved from the abyss of mundane ignorance during the dark times; and for its part, the line that divides the circle into its upper and lower halves represents the surface of the waters in the biblical sense. (2)

It is to be noted that the same complementariness is frequently represented by an equilateral triangle pointing upwards as a symbol of Heaven and the human mind, and by the same equilateral triangle but pointing downwards as a symbol of the Earth and the human heart sometimes of the Netherworlds, with the added circumstance that if united, the two equilateral triangles will then form a hexagram. In this case, the dot will be absent in both triangles save that it has been replaced in either one by an eye, for example, an eye like the ‘All Seeing Eye’ that we have recently studied (see here); and this eye will somehow give to either symbol a different connotation respectively corresponding to a divine or an earthly or even a demonic character, as the case may be.

The hexagram

Back to the circle, let me now talk about a logical derivation from all this. If instead of the rotation of a circumference around a circle we consider that of a sphere around a fixed axis, the symbolic meaning will be exactly the same, though now referred to the terrestrial and the celestial spheres and their relation to the immutable Poles. This is the reason why the representations of the world axis, or 'Axis Mundi', are so important and so frequently seen in all ancient traditions - with the added circumstance that while the general idea is essentially the same than the one behind the symbols of the center of the world, they nonetheless more directly evoke the role of the immutable Principle with regard to the universal manifestation than the other aspects in which the Center can be equally considered.

However, this all-new and interesting derivation will be the subject matter for the next and final part of this series, where our study will rather focus on the symbolism of the Pole. In the meantime, I will leave you with a picture of a beautiful painting by Hieronymus Bosch for a taste of what you will be able to see there.


Hieronymus Bosch - The Garden of Earthly Delights


Blessings,


Luis Miguel Goitizolo



NOTES

1) "I do set my bow in the cloud, and it shall be for a token of a covenant between me and the earth."

(2) Genesis 1:6. And God said, "Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters."

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Roger Macdivitt .

3169
7333 Posts
7333
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: IS THERE SUCH A THING AS A COSMIC RELIGION?
11/7/2010 10:20:04 PM

Luis,

I returned for some more information.

I found time to read some things that I had missed before.

Always interesting and uplifting.

Roger

+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!