Let's suppose I am right Geo,
Let's suppose for the past year you and yours have been tossing rocks, bombs, stones or whatever at my house, my yard, my kids, my pets and/or any family member or friend and there was death or maiming. There would be nowhere for you to hide in this world or any other. Severe retaliation is my guarantee. As far as you or anyone knows those losses have already happened to a degree in my family and circle of influence.
My former administrative secretary's son was killed, many of my friends have met there demise while there on humanitarian causes. So I have felt the loss and have mourned them.
Sensitivity has nothing to do with your statement or the picture you put up in place of real ones.
For the record, I hold with no one that harms children intentionally. The HAMAS and Palestinian combatants has caused the deaths of their own by using them as shields. There is NO Justification for those losses. But place blame where blame is due and not on those, that have been the recipients of daily bombings, suicide bombers and those that recruit and hide them.
As for aid to the Palestinians, I have no problem with that as long as it goes to those that are the non combatants and the children. HAMAS by the way are stealing those supplies from the very ones you are portraying in your fake picture.
I do pray for peace for all nations, everyday I awake and every night I go to sleep. The only way to save the children is to STOP the Aggressors and all evidence points to radical Islamics that will make peace with you if you bow to their whims, which isn't going to happen.
Joe, you are right there should be a solution. How about starting with honor of one's word. How many treaties and peace accords must be tossed aside and broken before the aggressors are treated as the curr dogs they act like? As you know talk is cheap and actions speak louder than words. I believe Israel is done talking with dishonorable folks like HAMAS and Hezbollah.
Look folks if I avowed that unless you believed the way I do, you should be eradicated, would I, be accepted? HELL NO!
So why the double standard in this instance?
Jim