Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: MADE In the USA
6/25/2011 6:58:51 PM
Bears repeating I think as folks tend to be in the dark till its too late and the reason is? Ignorance and Complacency, most say they are unaware. Well if the would get their heads out of the sand they would be able to see whats happening. Don't you agree?

Quote:
A good man taking a stand!

DeMint: Conceding Debt Ceiling Battle Will Destroy GOP

Friday, 24 Jun 2011 12:20 PM

By Martin Gould, Hiram Reisner and Abigail Walls





Tea party favorite Sen. Jim DeMint issued a rallying call to all Republicans telling them if they cave in to Democratic demands on debt ceiling talks they can kiss their future in the GOP goodbye.

The two-term junior senator from South Carolina made it clear that Republicans must stand up and say there can be no increase to the limit without a huge cut in spending.

His call came as bipartisan talks on raising the debt ceiling led by Vice-President Joe Biden broke down when Republican Rep. Eric Cantor and Sen. Jon Kyl walked out. Now it seems inevitable that the only way they will end in success is if President Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner get involved and somehow come to an agreement.

But in a series of television appearances, DeMint, a powerbroker who has proved how crucial his support can be to GOP candidates, said he won’t support anyone who caves.

“Based on what I can see around the country, not only are those individuals gone, but I would suspect the Republican Party would be set back many years,” he said in an interview for the ABC Subway Series.

"It would be the most toxic vote. I can tell you if you look at the polls, Democrats, Republicans, Independents, they do not think we should increase the debt limit.”

And he told Fox News’ Sean Hannity, “The Democrats are not able to cut spending. Their whole political base is created by giving money away – redistributing wealth; new government programs. The idea of a balanced budget to them essentially puts them out of business.

“So, the Republicans have to be prepared to fight to stop this reckless spending.”

He told Hannity that the battle over the debt limit is “the fight of our generation,” saying he found it amazing that the federal government is bringing in record amounts of revenue but “the spending line goes straight up and continues out over 10 years.”

“We don’t have a revenue problem – we’ve got a spending problem,” DeMint said. “But if we cut the spending, you would see the revenue begin to grow.”

“Republicans owe it to Americans to tell them where we stand and what we are willing to fight for,” he added.

DeMint’s threat to his fellow Republicans can be backed up. He has proven that his support can make or break members of the party. He played a key role in supporting successful conservative candidates Marco Rubio of Florida and Rand Paul of Kentucky during the 2010 midterm Senate elections. He helped two others, Christine O’Donnell of Delaware and Ken Buck of Colorado win the GOP primaries though they failed to win the election.

Now he is asking all Republican candidates for the 2012 presidential nomination to sign his “Cut, Cap and Balance” pledge on the budget. He said he will not support anyone who refuses. Three current candidates, Ron Paul, Tim Pawlenty and Herman Cain have already signed and a fourth, Rick Santorum says he will. Jon Huntsman is the only one who has flat-out said he will not sign.

"I don't have many litmus tests, but this is one: Any candidate who doesn't understand that we need to balance the budget should not be president of the United States," he said.

He is also calling for a Constitutional Amendment for a balanced budget. “The only way that we are ever going to stop this spending addiction in Washington is if we are forced to by the constitution,” he told Hannity.

The bipartisan talks on the debt ceiling reached crisis on Thursday when Leader of the House, Cantor walked out, saying Republicans and Democrats were at an impasse. Cantor called on Obama to take the lead, saying he made his move to “change the dynamic.”

“It is time for the president to speak clearly and resolve the tax issue,” he said. “Once resolved, we have a blueprint to move forward to trillions of spending cuts and binding mechanisms to change the way things are done around here.”

Kyl soon followed suit but expressed a willingness to continue bipartisan talks and has since talked to Biden.

Boehner said he understood Cantor’s frustration but said the talks could continue if the Democrats took tax increases off the table.

The Obama administration says the debt limit must be raised from its current $14.3 trillion by early August to meet the government’s obligations.

The alternative would be a market-shaking, first-ever default which, investors fear, would almost certainly cost the U.S. to lose its coveted AAA credit rating and further raise interest rates for businesses and households.


Read more on Newsmax.com: DeMint: Conceding Debt Ceiling Battle Will Destroy GOP
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: MADE In the USA
6/28/2011 2:06:20 AM
This is a great idea. I won't be able to attend but I am definitely going to see if one can happen here.

The Response: a national call for prayer for a nation in crisis

Houston – Reliant Stadium – Saturday, August 6
Attend this historic event! This is not a political event. It is a prayer event. No candidate will speak.
June 27, 2011

Dear Jim,

American Family Association is sponsoring The Response: a national call for prayer for a nation in crisis. AFA's goal is to fill the 62,000-seat Reliant Stadium on August 6.

AFA is encouraging Christians across the nation to join in a national day of prayer for our nation. Gov. Rick Perry of Texas has proclaimed Saturday, Aug. 6th, as a Day of Prayer and Fasting to seek God's guidance and wisdom in addressing the challenges that face our communities, states and nation. He has invited governors across the country to join him on Aug. 6 to participate in The Response, a non-denominational, apolitical, Christian prayer meeting hosted by the American Family Association at the 62,000-seat Reliant Stadium in Houston. Gov. Perry also urged fellow governors to issue similar proclamations encouraging their constituents to pray for unity and righteousness for our states, nation, and mankind on that day.

Gov. Sam Brownback of Kansas and Bobby Jindal of Louisiana have indicated that they plan to attend. Other governors are considering attending.

Can't go to Houston? Have a Response prayer event of your own. AFA is encouraging Christians to organize and promote a local Response prayer event in their churches and communities. We encourage local churches to organize the local event to suit their local conditions. In Houston, The Response will begin at 10:00 am and close at 5:00 pm. The will be no admission for the prayer event.

TAKE ACTION

Register Here (churches and individuals).
Plan your trip.
Spread the Word - Use these resources to invite your church, friends, and community to The Response. Share the promotional video via Facebook, your personal site or blog; post the website on Facebook; tweet about the event and encourage others to go; download the information packet that contains the who, what, where, when and why of The Response to share with your church leaders; print the bulletin insert/flyer for your church bulletin; download the power point presentation slide; and more.
Learn more about The Response.
Can't go to Houston? Ask your pastor to organize a Response prayer event in your community. Invite other churches to join in the local event. Pray for The Response at home.

We have limited funds to promote The Response. Please help us by forwarding this letter to your family and friends.

Sincerely,

Tim

Tim Wildmon, President
American Family Association

================================================

PS: Saw this on a commercial and will be purchasing on July5th. Turning the Tide by Dr. Charles Stanley http://InTouch.org I like the way this man teaches the gospel.

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: MADE In the USA House Has No Time For Cabinet Secretaries But
6/29/2011 10:58:29 PM

Yesterday, Glenn shared his story about the hostile environment he and his family experienced while attending movie night in Bryant Park Monday evening.

While trying to catch a showing of Hitchock’s The 39 Steps, fellow moviegoers were anything but friendly, shouting hateful messages and even kicking a glass of wine on Glenn’s wife’s back.

Today, we hear from the other side. Lindsey Piscitell, a young woman who says she was sitting behind Glenn and his family, has written a response letter to New York Magazine about the incident. Glenn chose to read her response on radio this morning.

“Just a quick FYI -saw your article on Mr. Beck and his numerous FALSE claims about the way that he was treated at Bryant Park last night,” Piscitell wrote. “Myself and several of my friends were seated immediately behind Mr. Beck & co (have pictures) and I can tell you that while the crowd was certainly not *thrilled* that he had shown up, his family was left completely alone, and for the most part he was too.”

Piscitell criticizes Glenn’s security detail for being “unnecessarily prickly with the crowd,” and asserts that though her friend did spill half a glass of wine on Glenn’s wife, it was a “complete and utter accident.”

That’s rather ironic because later that evening Piscitell tweeted an explicit message saying that she was seated near Glenn, to which one of her followers, Marissa Barker, responded, “Ew, can you ‘accidently’ spill something on him? Or ‘accidently’ kick him in the mouth?” (See the evidence here)

Well doesn’t that sound loving and rather timely?

“It’s amazing how she would be swearing, that’s the tolerant part she was talking about,” Stu said. “And then the odds that one of her 40 followers would suggest exactly what would happen. I mean, it’s a billion to one that that would occur. But it did. And we found out about it.”

Advertisement

Piscitell’s letter ends with her expressing her frustrations that Glenn offered his love and forgiveness on yesterday’s radio program. She wrote, “I‘m sure it’s unnecessary to point out the hypocrisy in Glen’s statements that we were being hateful. I can assure him that we don’t need his sympathy.”

Regardless of whether or not Piscitell wants Glenn’s sympathy, she is still going to get his love. “You’re still going to get my prayers because I still love you,” Glenn said. “I just don’t love your actions. But I still love you. And I believe you’re terribly misguided. But the only real truth is love. Not hate.”

Glad you liked it. Would you like to share?

Sharing this page …

Thanks! Close

Add New Comment

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: MADE In the USA House Has No Time For Cabinet Secretaries But
7/4/2011 12:30:52 AM
I thought I would share this with you folks as I know NO ONE that used this story to scare you will report that the alarm is over and folks are returning home.

http://www.newsmax.com/US/LosAlamosFire/2011/07/03/id/402346

Los Alamos Evacuation Order Lifted; 12,000 Go Home

Sunday, 03 Jul 2011 02:37 PM

LOS ALAMOS, N.M. (AP) — A smattering of summer rain gave a boost to firefighters battling a huge forest fire near Los Alamos, giving authorities enough confidence to allow about 12,000 people to return home for the first time in nearly a week.

Residents rolled into town Sunday morning, honking their horns and waving to firefighters as the word got out that the roadblocks were lifted and the narrow two lane highway cut into the side of a mesa leading to Los Alamos was open. They had fled en masse on Monday as the fast-moving fire approached the city and its nuclear laboratory.

"Thank, you! Thank, You! Thank, you!," yelled Amy Riehl, an assistant manager at the Smith's grocery store as she arrived in Los Alamos to help keep the store open for returning residents.

"It's scary, but all of the resources here this time, they were ready. They did a magnificent job," said Michael Shields, eyes tearing up as he returned home to his apartment in the heart of the town.

The town was last evacuated because of the 2000 Cerro Grande fire. That time, residents returned to a town that had lost 200 homes, several businesses and had to cope with damaged utilities and other county enterprises. This time around, residents were returning to a town that is completely intact, although the fire destroyed 63 homes west of town.

Although the threat to Los Alamos and the nation's premier nuclear research lab had passed, the mammoth wildfire raging in northern New Mexico was still threatening sacred sites of American Indian tribes.

Hundreds of firefighters were working Sunday to contain the 189-square-mile fire as it burned through a canyon on the Santa Clara Pueblo reservation and threatened other pueblos on the Pajarito Plateau.

The area, a stretch of mesas that run more than 15 miles west of Santa Fe, N.M., includes Los Alamos and the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Authorities said the fire, burning for eight days Sunday, has been fueled by an exceptionally dry season in the Southwest and erratic winds.

Crews have managed to keep the fire in Los Alamos Canyon several miles upslope from the federal laboratory, boosting confidence that it no longer posed an immediate threat to the facility or the nearby town. Crews were helped by rain on Saturday afternoon that slowed the fire.

"Hopefully we'll get two to three more days like this and we'll be fine," operations chief Jayson Coil said.

The blaze, the largest ever in New Mexico, reached the Santa Clara Pueblo's watershed in the canyon this week, damaging the area that the tribe considers its birthplace and scorching 20 square miles of tribal forest. Fire operations chief Jerome Macdonald said it was within miles of the centuries-old Puye Cliff Dwellings, a national historic landmark.

Tribes were worried that cabins, pueblos and watersheds could be destroyed.

"We were also praying on our knees, we were asking the Creator in our cultural way to please forgive us, 'What have we done?'" Santa Clara Pueblo Gov. Walter Dasheno said. "Bring moisture so that the Mother Fire can be stopped. But that was not meant to be."

About 2,800 tribe members live in a dusty village nestled in New Mexico's high desert, near the mouth of Santa Clara Canyon where aspen and blue spruce forests provide relief from the dry desert and ponds provide water for irrigation. The canyon is north of the town of Los Alamos.

Pueblo Fire Chief Mel Tafoya said it was unclear whether cabins in the canyon or the ponds survived the blaze. Members of the state's congressional delegation have promised federal help for the tribe pending a damage assessment.

The tribe also worried that 1.5 million trees planted after the 2000 fire have been destroyed, as well as work to restore the Rio Grande cuthroat trout to the upper headwaters of the Santa Clara Creek. The tribe called for emergency federal relief.

To Santa Clara's south, Cochiti Pueblo was also worried about damage to ground cover affecting its watershed.

Archaeological sites at the northern end of the blaze at Bandelier National Monument hold great significance to area tribes. About half of the park has burned, Bandelier superintendent Jason Lott said.

Meanwhile, hundreds of lab employees were returning to prepare operations and thousands of experiments for the scientists and technicians who were forced to evacuate days ago. Among the work put on hold were experiments using two supercomputers and studies on extending the life of 1960s-era nuclear bombs.

Employees were checking filters in air handling systems to ensure they weren't affected by smoke and restarting computer systems shut down when the lab closed.

"Once we start operation phases for the laboratory, it will take about two days to bring everyone back and have the laboratory fully operational," Lab Director Charles McMillan said.

The blaze remained in Los Alamos Canyon, which runs past the old Manhattan Project site and a 1940s-era dump site of low-level radioactive waste, as well as the site of a nuclear reactor that was demolished in 2003.

Firefighters had planned to burn out areas near homes west of the town to remove combustible material and ensure the fire doesn't creep through an area burned in a 2000 blaze, but the rain kept the fire away, Coil said.

For returning Los Alamos residents Leo and Lorene Beckstead, their first stop was the grocery store to buy fruits, vegetables and milk as they prepared to heed officials' request that returning residents remain home because of the firefighters battling the blaze the continues to burn north, south, and west of the town.

"They did a great job," Leo Beckstead said of the firefighters. "I think because of the Cerro Grande fire, they learned a lot."

© Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



Read more on Newsmax.com: Los Alamos Evacuation Order Lifted; 12,000 Go Home
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: MADE In the USA
7/5/2011 5:22:35 PM
Unions ain't your friend unless you are member? Really? Then WHY are they trying to cut your paycheck in congress?



Teamsters’ Push For Shorter Hours May Leave Drivers Very Short On Pay


It is axiomatic—a given, if you will—that unions do not like workers to work overtime. Sure, they’ll do it, but if unions had their druthers, the work week would be limited to 40 hours—in some cases unions prefer 35 hours. The reasoning is simple, the fewer hours worked, the more employees an employer must employ and, in a workplace where unions can require dues, the union makes more money.


How serious are unions about restricting overtime? Consider this:

According to the constitution of the International Association of Machinists, “Members shall discourage the working of overtime, in order to further the opportunities for full employment, a living wage, and a 40-hour workweek [Art. K, Sec. 3].” Translated: More members equals more dues.

Here’s a simple example: Say a company has four employees and each works an average of 10 overtime hours per week and time and one half. If a union has the ability to restrict those four employees from working overtime, the employer has to hire one more employee (at 40 hours).

For the employer, rather than paying the four workers at time and one half, it may be a break even (depending on the other ‘loaded labor costs’ such as benefits and fringe benefits).

For the union, it is a win, as the union suddenly gets a new member, plus his dues and initiation fees (which can run in the hundreds or thousands of dollars).

For the employees who lose their overtime, they get to spend more time with their families…trying to figure out how to pay the bills.

On June 14th, the House Small Business Committee Subcommittee on Investigations, Oversight and Regulations held a hearing on the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s proposed rule on Hours of Service for commercial truck drivers. At issue is the FMCSA’s proposal to return to pre-2003 hours that a truck driver can be behind the wheel—from the current 11-hours per day back to ten hours, and the current 34 hours rest period back to 50 hours at week’s end.

The return to pre-2003 hours is something the Teamsters have been lobbying for since the regulations were changed.

The Teamsters have been fighting the regulation since it was first issued in 2003. It raised the number of hours truck drivers can spend behind the wheel from 10 to 11 consecutive hours each shift, and from 60 to 77 hours of driving each week. The rule cut off-duty rest and recovery time at the work week’s end from 50 or more hours off duty to as little as 34 hours off duty.

Publicly, the Teamsters and a menagerie of liberal think tanks and activist organizations have used ‘safety’ as their rallying cry for rolling back the hours of service for drivers. This is despite the fact that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s data shows improved truck safety since the rules were changed. According to witness James Burg of the American Trucking Association:

Truck safety has improved to unprecedented levels since 2003 when the basic framework for the current hours of service regulations was first published. The numbers of truck-related injuries and fatalities have both dropped more than 30% to their lowest levels in recorded history. For instance, between 2003 and 2009:

  • The number of truck-involved fatalities declined from 5,036 to 3,380 (33%)
  • The number of truck occupant fatalities declined from 726 to 503 (31%)
  • The number of truck-involved injuries declined from 122,000 to 74,000 (39%)

Despite the improvement in truck safety, the Teamsters and their allies have pushed the Obama administration to cut drivers’ hours. In late 2009, the Obama administration agreed to revisit the rules in what some considered a ‘backroom deal.’

An agreement between the Obama administration, the Teamsters Union, and safety advocate group Public Citizen to revamp existing truck driver “hours of service” regulations was pushed by the White House to quell concerns over the controversial nomination of Anne Ferro as Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrator, according to a trucking industry executive.

[snip]

The trucking executive noted that the full committee announced it had approved Ferro’s nomination the day after news that the FMCSA would revisit the hours of service rule was made public. Her confirmation by the full Senate seems assured, the executive said. The executive added that the trucking industry was not party to the agreement and was “totally surprised” by the announcement.

According to the backroom deal, the Department of Transportation agreed to have the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) publish a new proposed rule in the Fall of 2010, and finalize a rule by July 2011.

If the Teamsters succeed in reducing the amount of time drivers can spend behind the wheel, predictably, it will result in smaller trucking companies having to add more drivers.

As Paul James, President, Rex Oil Co testified at the June 14th hearing:

A one hour reduction as proposed would have negative impacts on drivers and small business petroleum transporters. First, the reduction would hurt drivers.at an hourly rate. Reducing their maximum daily drive time would also reduce their paychecks. Thus the proposed reduction unnecessarily penalizes drivers and would reduce their overall standard of living. Short haul petroleum drivers are largely paid

With the one hour of drive time, combined with the increase of rest time from 34 to 50 hours, if the Teamsters are successful, drivers could see their hours (and incomes) cut by as much as 25%.

Meanwhile, the increased costs to trucking companies from possibly having to add trucks—not to mention drivers—would increase substantially, requiring many smaller firms to either raise their rates, delay deliveries, or go out of business.

For those non-union companies who can survive, the additional drivers make for a target rich environment for the Teamsters. More importantly, however, would be the immediate positive impact to the Teamsters’ bottom line if unionized companies are forced to hire new drivers. Those new drivers would, in many cases, be required to become Teamster members and, as a result, the Teamsters would reap the initiation fees, as well as the membership dues.

_________________

“I bring reason to your ears, and, in language as plain as ABC, hold up truth to your eyes.” Thomas Paine, December 23, 1776

X-posted.

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!