Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Dhimmocracy in America: 12 Years of War. Who Won?
6/29/2014 3:55:32 PM

12 Years of War. Who Won?!?!?!?!



Religious subjugation? U.S. troops in Bahrain get Ramadan training

 12 Years of War.  Who Won?!
Read more or continue reading below:

A dhimmi is historically defined as a non-Muslim living in a region overrun by Muslim conquest (notice this does not say living peacefully side-by-side) who was accorded a protected status and residence so long as they understood their subjugated status. If they rendered the jizya tax, they were allowed to retain their original faith. Perhaps this is the Islamic jurist interpretation of “coexistence.”

Well folks, you’ll be shocked to know personnel serving in CENTCOM AOR and the U.S. Navy 5th Fleet have succumbed to dhimmitude this Ramadan season.

According to a report in the Stars and Stripes, “U.S. personnel accustomed to drinking their coffee on the drive to work will have to put that habit on hold for about a month. It’s one of a few lifestyle changes Americans will have to make during the holy month of Ramadan.”

Yep, I suppose when in Rome, do as the Romans — except we in America ask no one to play that game. I suppose there are those who will say this is a good cultural lesson — all about multiculturalism. But it sure seems to me that tolerance is indeed becoming a one-way street heading straight to cultural suicide. Funny, why is it that “infidels” can’t enter Mecca or Medina? That would be like Americans saying certain groups can’t be allowed in Washington D.C.

Oh yeah, I can hear all those tolerant liberal progressives saying we don’t want to be like them. Nope, we don’t. But we don’t want to be told to assimilate for others when there is no reciprocal action.

Just as a little background from the report, “Ramadan is the ninth month of the Islamic calendar. Officials expect Ramadan to begin at sunrise on Saturday, depending on when the new moon is sighted. The holy month lasts for approximately 30 days — until about July 28. For Muslims around the world, Ramadan is a month of fasting and devotion to God (hmm, notice that the writer of this piece did not use Allah, displaying signs of dhimmitude). Most Muslims fast from dawn to sunset, when families gather for Iftar — the meal that breaks the fast.”

Stars and Stripes says, “for the 8,200 U.S. personnel living here, and those serving throughout the U.S. Central Command area of responsibility — including service members, civilian personnel, contractors and family members — the month may require changing some daily routines. While not required to fast during Ramadan, in Bahrain, Americans can be fined or detained by local authorities for eating, drinking or smoking in public when off-base during daylight hours.”

Navy officials are requiring U.S. personnel to dress more conservatively off-base during Ramadan. Although not a requirement by Bahraini authorities, the Navy is demanding that men wear long-sleeved shirts and women wear sleeved blouses that cover their elbows. Also, men must wear long trousers, and women should wear pants or skirts that cover the knees.

Stars and Stripes reports that base cultural advisers have spent the last few weeks conducting Ramadan briefs to educate Americans about the holy month. Ali Hassan briefed about 150 personnel Tuesday about Islam, the lunar calendar and customs and traditions during Ramadan.

“It actually made me want to do a lot more research into the religion,” said Petty Officer 1st Class James Ramirez. He said the additional requirements during the month aren’t a big deal to him. “For such a small period of time, it’s a small sacrifice,” he said — clearly a victim of dhimmitude.

Here is the list of Ramadan do’s and don’ts for our military personnel as reported by Stars and Stripes (per NSA Bahrain Public Affairs, and Ali Hassan, cultural adviser on NSA Bahrain):

  • Eating, drinking, chewing and smoking in public are civil offenses in some Islamic countries.
  • Men should wear long sleeves and pants. Women’s sleeves should extend below the elbow and pants or skirts should cover the knees.
  • Avoid critical remarks about fasting or any religious practice.
  • Most restaurants will be closed except those in 4- and 5-star hotels.
  • Businesses alter and reduce hours during the day; some open at night until early morning hours.
  • Arabs are good hosts and may offer you food or refreshments during daylight hours. Such offers should be declined.
  • All consumption of alcohol by U.S. military personnel is prohibited at any off base public venue in the U.S. Navy 5th Fleet Area of Responsibility during Ramadan.
  • It’s customary to say ‘Ramadan Kareem’ during Ramadan.

Ok, maybe I’m being overly sensitive, but when did the U.S. military start religious indoctrination training of its service men and women? Where is our ol’ buddy Mikey Weinstein on this one? Heck, he got his underwear in knots over a nativity scene in a chow hall at GITMO after all. Our personnel are deployed to these countries to provide security. How about our troops stationed in Japan having to accommodate Shinto customs and practices? What gets me is that even if Muslims are in America they demand us to provide – at taxpayer expense – foot washing stations, special accommodations at swimming pools, and special considerations of meals at schools.

I have an idea. Why don’t we give Judeo-Christian religious training for Muslims in America to abide by Christmas, Easter, Passover, and other traditions of those faiths– nah, we wouldn’t want to do that, would we? That would be intolerant and somehow violate the separation of church and state, blah, blah, blah.

This may seem irrelevant until you come to realize just how relevant it iss. Submission, subjugation, conversion, or annihilation — those were the choices offered by Muhammad in a letter to the Byzantine Emperor Heraclius. And so here we are today.


Read more at http://allenbwest.com/2014/06/religious-subjugation-u-s-troops-bahrain-get-ramadan-training/#TPbXLHZJlmDybU5r.99

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+1
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Dhimmocracy in America: 12 Years of War. Who Won?
6/30/2014 5:22:40 PM

Iraq Conflict Menaces Heritage Sites

Archaeologists and Historians Worry That a Treasure Trove of Historical Artifacts Will Become a Casualty of the Conflict.


A soldier stands guard in Hatra, an ancient city near Mosul that Iraqi officials worry will be destroyed by Islamist militants who control the region. Xinhua/Zuma Press

BAGHDAD—Archaeologists and historians worry that a treasure trove of historical artifacts and monuments are on the verge of becoming a casualty of the conflict in Iraq.

Sunni insurgents who took over Iraq's second-largest city, Mosul, and the antiquities-rich Nineveh province that surrounds it have published a decree announcing that they would destroy graves, shrines and other objects that offend their strict interpretation of Islamic law.

The insurgents, from the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham, or ISIS, have padlocked the doors of Mosul Museum and announced that they would await a fatwa, or Islamic judicial ruling, on whether to destroy the building's irreplaceable contents, Iraqi officials said.

A decade after the museum was looted in the chaotic weeks following the U.S.-led invasion of the country in 2003, Unesco and Iraqi officials are again raising the alarm over the fate of the country's antiquities and archaeological sites. But this time, with much of northern Iraq under ISIS control, Iraq's military in shambles and political uncertainty in Baghdad, experts say there is little they can do to protect many fine examples of Middle Eastern antiquity.

"Unfortunately, the fate of this cultural heritage doesn't look good," said Aymen Jawad, the executive director of Iraq Heritage, a not-for-profit advocacy group in Britain. "One of the world's oldest cities in the Middle East is about to turn into another cultural desert that radical groups are so efficient at creating, while the rest of the world sits and watches."

ISIS militants have a similarly austere view of art and antiquities as the Taliban and the Mali-based Islamist militia Ansar Dine, experts say. In 2001, the Taliban blew up two large statues of Buddha in Afghanistan's Bamiyan Valley. In 2012, Ansar Dine destroyed Sufi shrines in Timbuktu. Both were Unesco World Heritage Sites.

At stake in Iraq are nearly 1,800 sites in Mosul and 250 buildings in Nineveh province that the government classifies as historical, said Qais Hussein, the head of Iraq's State Board of Antiquities and Heritage.

The territories under ISIS control contain two Unesco World Heritage Sites—the Hatra and Ashour temples—and thousands of early and pre-Islamic texts and art objects dating to the ancient Assyrian and Akkadian civilizations, officials say.

Most worrying to archaeologists is the fate of Hatra, a sprawling, well-preserved complex that archaeologists believe was built in second or third century by the Seleucid Empire. The site is a tempting target for ISIS militants—who reject any man-made representation of God's creations—because of its stone statues of ancient gods and deities. The temple at Hatra was used as a backdrop in the opening scenes of the 1973 horror film "The Exorcist."

Mr. Hussein said he was also concerned over Nimrud, the site of many important statues of ancient Assyrian gods dating back more than 3,000 years.

Aside from intentional destruction, looting is also a serious concern, said Nada al-Hassan, the head of the Arab States Unit at Unesco's World Heritage Center. ISIS has profited from looting and trading antiquities in neighboring Syria, Unesco says, where it commands expansive territory.

ISIS's takeover of the northern Syrian city of Raqqa was followed by the looting of an important museum there, officials say. Some of those artifacts have surfaced in Turkey and Lebanon, where local law-enforcement officers returned them to Syria, Ms. Hassan said, but much of the rest has disappeared.

In an attempt to protect Iraq's heritage, Unesco issued an appeal to the combatants this month.

"I call on all actors to refrain from any form of destruction of cultural heritage, including religious sites," said Irina Bokova, Unesco director-general of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, or Unesco, referring to looting as a war crime. "Their perpetrators must be held responsible for their acts."

Ms. Hassan said the U.N. group was working with Interpol, the international policing agency, to alert neighboring countries to trafficking in artifacts.

Although some of the Mosul Museum's most valuable artifacts were moved to Baghdad's National Museum in the years after 2003, little is known about the well-being of the rest.

Mr. Hussein and other officials in Baghdad say communications with antiquities officials in Iraq's north is limited. Terrified curators and museum employees have been threatened and intimidated, and poor communications make it difficult for them to reach their supervisors in Baghdad, he said.

"I'm sure that if they continue to control this city, they will destroy all of those things," Mr. Hussein said. "They've already aggressively attacked our employees working in those sites and in the museums telling them that this is haram [forbidden] to work in a place with those statues and objects."

—Ali A. Nabhan in Baghdad contributed to this article.

http://online.wsj.com/articles/iraq-conflict-menaces-heritage-sites-1403901541


May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+1
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
The Hidden Puppet Masters of the Mid-East
6/30/2014 6:21:15 PM
It's All About the Price of Crude and More Power and Trillions of Dollars, All Centralized into the Saudi Royals.

Now let's think about this a moment...

ISIS creates an oil shock, but why?
First on ISIS agenda is controlling Iraqi crude oil

ISIS creates an oil shock, but why? By TOBIAS VANDERBRUCK forOIL-PRICE.NET, 2014/06/30

Followers of international politics were mostly taken by surprise early this month, when a hitherto unreported rebellion in Iraq suddenly threatened to shake the world's oil markets. Throughout the year, the newspapers of the Western world were focused on Syria, then the Ukraine. No one seemed to have their eye on Iraq. Where did these Iraqi rebels, called ISIS, come from? The truth is, they are the latest tool in the foreign policy of a hidden puppet master.

The Kingdom

Saudi Arabia was pieced together from a series of independent, isolated principalities around the beginning of the 20th century. The founder of the nation, ibn Saud, harnessed a group of fundamentalists, called the Wahhabis to his own cause. They placed their faith in ibn Saud's promises that he would run this new nation along strict Islamic principles. Thus was born, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The Al Saud family, descended from ibn Saud, grew rich when vast amounts of oil were discovered beneath the country. The Americans aided the Saudis to develop their resources, sending investment and expertise to help extract the oil.
The newly sophisticated younger members of the Al Saud family grew tired of the god-fearing backwater that funded their jet-set lifestyle. Following on from their Western education, they preferred yachts, Ferraris and palatial homes anywhere but in Saudi Arabia. The Wahhabis were incensed that the ruling family allowed non-Muslims into the country to exploit their oil. They were disgusted by the shallow pursuits of the newly wealthy elite. When the Wahhabis began an insurrection, the Saudi royal family was caught in a bind. They could not imprison the Wahhabis – they represent about 30 per cent of the country's population. The king ordered members of the family to curb their jet-set behavior. This, however, was a holding operation and soon, the Russians gave the Saudis the diversion they were looking for when they invaded Afghanistan.

Afghanistan

All the Afghan Mujahedin needed to rid their country of the Russians was a few billion in cash, an arms supplier and about 10,000 extra men. Saudi donors were able to supply the money the Mujahedin needed to aid the cause of Islamic freedom fighters. They also laid on free flights to enable Wahhabi youth to go and die for Islam. The Saudi Osama bin Laden was there in Afghanistan to receive, train and arm his countrymen.
Unexpectedly, the policy paid for itself. International conflict causes the oil price to rise, even when that conflict would not directly disrupt the oil supply. The possibility of a confrontation between a Russian-occupied Afghanistan and an American-backed Pakistan was enough to cause panic pricing in the oil market. The Saudis made more from the increased price of oil in one year than they paid out in the entire duration of the Russian-Mujahedin conflict. Saudi Arabia had found a winning formula.

Policy success

Saudi Arabia became vital to American interests. The US needed Saudi oil, and they needed the Saudis to spend their profits buying American made planes and armaments. The Saudi and American governments came to realize that they needed each other. Glossing over America's support for the unwelcome state of Israel, Saudi and American foreign policy in the Middle East began to coordinate. The policy worked well for a while. Repeated consignments of cannon fodder from Saudi Arabia kept Russia tied up in Afghanistan to the point that they could not cause trouble anywhere else. Russia bankrupted itself, withdrew from Afghanistan and the Communist system collapsed, scoring a win for US foreign policy.

Although the majority of Muslims are Sunni and their major shrine is in Mecca in Saudi Arabia, the next largest group is the Shia, whose shrines are in Iraq, but have their major nation in Iran. After the Shia, the Saudi's next biggest pet hate are the Ba'athists. The Ba'ath party is a pan-Arabic socialist movement that aims to topple Arabian monarchies and form republics. This plan does not go down well with the monarchy of Saudi Arabia. The Ba'athists managed to overthrow the monarchies of Syria and Iraq.

The Ba'athist leader of Iraq was Saddam Hussein. The US government liked Hussein because they preferred to deal with secular governments in the Middle East. This policy caused tension between America and its allies in Saudi Arabia. However, when the Saudi's worked out the consequences of America's backing of Hussein, they climbed on board. On the basis of "my enemy's enemy is my friend," the Saudis approved American policy of encouraging Iraq to attack Iran. So Saudi Arabia got its most hated enemy into a war with its second most hated enemy and gained itself another theatre to which it could recycle "freedom fighters" returning from Afghanistan. The price of oil shot up because Saudi Arabia's two main oil producing rivals were too busy bombing each other to fully exploit their reserves.

Rebuilding

The 9/11 attacks provoked the US government to carpet bomb Afghanistan, killing off many of the revolutionaries stationed there. It also got America back into Iraq, where the Saudis wanted the Ba'athist Hussein wiped out. Iran was becoming increasingly isolated and the Saudis had the overthrow of the Ba'athist Assad in Syria on the cards. Oil prices rose to peak levels bringing in Saudi sponsors enough money to fund the war.

The Arab Spring

In 2011 the Saudis began to foster an Egypt-based pressure group called The Muslim Brotherhood. This group became Saudi Arabia's main foreign policy tool and they funded the Brotherhood's takeover of Egypt. The USA and its allies happily aided the Brotherhood with airstrikes, enabling them to take over the governments of Yemen, Tunisia and Libya and cause disruption in Algeria. Oil supplies from Iran still hadn't recovered and disruption in Algeria and Libya knocked out supplies in those countries. Thus, shortages caused the oil price to rise.

Getting Western nations to prevent Iran exporting oil, thus increasing the price of oil further and turning the screws on an enemy of the Kingdom was a godsend for Saudi Arabia without that country having to spend a single penny on an attack. Things were going well for the Saudis and they had the Muslim Brotherhood in position to overthrow Assad in Syria. All they needed were air attacks from the US, Britain and France to repeat the formula that worked so well in Libya.

Syria

Unexpectedly, the British parliament voted down the government's appeal for support for the Syrian "rebels" and the Prime Minister dropped the issue. This undermined resolve among American and French legislators and so the USA refused to support the rebellion in Syria. This infuriated the Saudis, who declared that they would carry on alone with the effort to overthrow Assad. However, for all their talk, they never implemented air strikes with their own air force and Assad still clings to power.

Divergence

Realizing that it had created oil shortages leading to oil price rises that threatened to kill the economic recovery, the US government suddenly forgave Iran. The prospects of oil supplies resuming in Algeria, Libya, Iran and Iraq all within the same year gave analysts a reason to mark down projected Brent Crude prices to $60 a barrel. The Saudis had to act fast to prevent this fall in prices. To achieve this, and to punish the US for their weakness over Syria and Iran, the Saudis turned to Iraq.

Iraq's population is 65 per cent Shia and 35 per cent Sunni. The introduction of democracy lead to the formation of a Shia majority government, led by the Shia Nouri al-Maliki. This caused great dissatisfaction among the Sunni population, who claim that Maliki favors Shia businesses and over-funds Shia regions. The American's compounded this sense of mistreatment by awarding the towns of Mosul, Tikrit and Kirkuk to the Kurdish region. These towns originally had a Kurdish majority. However, as they sat at the heart of Iraq's oil fields, Saddam Hussein had moved much of the Kurdish populations out of these towns and replaced them with Sunnis loyal to him. The Americans ignored the dissatisfaction of the Sunnis, but the Saudis exploited it.

ISIS

The Islamic State of Iraq and the Greater Syria, abbreviated to "ISIS," wants to take over Iraq, Syria and parts of southern Turkey to form a hardline Islamic state. They are particularly harsh towards Shia and Kurds – the two other ethnic groups that occupy Iraq. ISIS was formed by an alliance of Sunni extremist group, including Al Qaeda of Iraq. Unofficially, the group is funded by wealthy donors in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Kuwait and its aims sound like a Saudi foreign policy wish list.

The Middle East has four major powers – Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Turkey and Iran. Iraq is the swing state in the middle of the group and would enhance the power of whoever controls it. Turkey used to rule the entire region and wouldn't mind getting a big chunk of its empire back, in the form of Iraq. The Shia majority of Iraq is a natural ally of the lonely Shia state of Iran, the Sunnis of Iraq would like their country to become a major player by absorbing Syria and integrating its Sunni population.

There is an obviously recurring pattern between this attempted takeover of oil resources by a militant group and Saudi Arabia's own history. Indeed the Kingdom would benefit immensely without sending a single plane or soldier.

Muslim Insurgencies

Since 2011 the Arabic and African world has seen a series of attempted coups and insurrections all aimed at forcing Islamic law on a particular country and region. In many of these theaters the motivating factor is the existence of oil. The majority Islamic nation of Sudan found it inconvenient that their nation's newly found oil reserves lay beneath Christian-dominated provinces. Their attempts to wipe out this population resulted in international intervention, creating the new Christian (and oil-rich) state of Southern Sudan. Although the Sudanese government backed down on the issue, this is a festering issue and it is likely that Sudan will invade and try to reintegrate Southern Sudan as soon as they attract sufficient funds.

The vast desert state of Mali saw an attempt by the Tuareg people in the north of the country to break away and form a separate state in 2012. This effort was soon hijacked by Muslim insurgents, including the group Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb who overpowered the Tuareg, took over Mali's oil fields and began forming an Islamic state. This resulted in a confused three-way battle between the Tuareg, the Muslim fundamentalists and the Mali government. When French troops moved in and began obliterating terrorists, the fundamentalists fled and moved to Syria, the next country on their hit list.

Oil Prices

Despite the wide range of states battling with Muslim fundamentalists in the world today, few attract the attention of the world's media, and have little impact on world oil prices.Nigeria is an oil producer, but its constant state of conflict, corruption and theft has left its contribution to the world's oil supply largely discounted. Conflicts in other states like Mali and Sudan have little interest for the world and do not interrupt oil flows right now. Only unrest in the Arabic world seems to grab the attention of the market. When speculators see unrest, they engage in panic buying which invariably lifts the price of oil above the actual price that the disruption to supplies would merit, at least initially.

End Game

Saudi Arabia has already crippled Egypt's voice in Middle Eastern politics through the turmoil created by the Muslim Brotherhood. ISIS tempts Turkey and Iran into a war over the bones of Iraq and threatens the independence of a secular Syria. The added oil output of Iraq and Iran is unlikely to emerge this year, reversing the predictions of a Brent Crude price fall to $60 a barrel. As a result, analysts including OIL-PRICE.NET now predict a rise in the index to $120 or $130.

Iraq supplies 3.4 millions barrels a day, or 4% of the world's oil. Most of Iraq's oil production occurs in the Shia south of the country, far from the current theatre of war. OPEC could possibly make up the shortfall if all Iraq's production ceased. However, this puts a lot of power in the hands of the only OPEC member that has enough spare capacity to make up the shortfall – Saudi Arabia.

http://oil-price.net/en/articles/isis-creates-an-oil-shock-but-why.php

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+1
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
This is not a true religion, “Jesus is Muslim” gimme a break
7/3/2014 1:57:26 PM

“Jesus is Muslim”

Total BS!

Jesus-is-Muslim-billboard

The Muslim world is obsessed with co-opting and falsifying the beliefs of the kuffar. The only thing more reprehensible are the useful infidel idiots who aid and abet this supremacism.

Stay on top of what’s really happening. Follow me on Twitter here. Like me on Facebook here.

“The Muslim Jesus?” By Robert Spencer, July 1, 2014

Aleteia has published an extraordinarily irresponsible piece by Philip Jenkins, entitled “The Muslim Jesus.” Jenkins is the politically correct professor who has claimed to have found that “the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible.” In this new piece he claims that the Islamic tradition has preserved some sayings of Jesus that could be authentic — basing his argument on the fact that they sound rather like other sayings attributed to Jesus, particularly in their exhortation not to value this passing world. He produces six sayings to support this, three from Islamic tradition and three from Christian non-canonical sources, claiming that the impossibility of distinguishing them from each other supports the authenticity of the Islamic sayings.

This is, of course, palpably absurd. Otherworldly sayings can be found in all manner of non-Christian traditions. The fact that they’re otherworldly doesn’t mean that Jesus said them. What’s more, his own argument cuts against itself, for he says: “Such words would have been treasured by Eastern Christian monks and hermits, in lands like Syria and Mesopotamia. We also know that from earliest times, some Christian monks and clergy accepted Islam. The Koran reports how their eyes filled with tears, as they prayed, ‘We do believe; make us one, then, with all who bear witness to the truth!’” If such words were treasured by Eastern Christian monks andhermits, and only some but presumably not all Christian monks and clergy accepted Islam, why is there no trace of these sayings in Eastern Christian traditions? It just happened that all the Christians who had preserved these sayings converted to Islam?

And even if these are authentic sayings of Jesus that have been preserved only in Islamic tradition, what are we supposed to get from that? What is Jenkins’ point? There is nothing in the supposed Islamic sayings of Jesus that he quotes that adds anything to our understanding of Jesus, or to the font of the world’s wisdom. Also, significantly, Jenkins does not bother to inform his readers that the Qur’an says that those who believe in the divinity of Christ are unbelievers (5:17, 5:72), or that Jesus was not actually crucified (4:157), or that those who say Jesus is the Son of God are accursed (9:30), or thatMuslims should wage war against Christians until they submit to Islamic hegemony (9:29). He makes no mention of this notable hadith:

Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “By Him in Whose Hands my soul is, son of Mary (Jesus) will shortly descend amongst you people (Muslims) as a just ruler and will break the Cross and kill the pig and abolish the Jizya (a tax taken from the non-Muslims, who are in the protection, of the Muslim government). Then there will be abundance of money and no-body will accept charitable gifts. (Bukhari 3.34.425)

Breaking the cross and killing the pig signifies abolishing the false Christianity, the Christianity that holds that Jesus was crucified and does not keep food laws. By abolishing the jizya, this Muslim Jesus is destroying the dhimma, the “protection” that Christians have when they submit to Islamic rule, thus leaving them with the choices only of converting to Islam or being killed.

This supremacist and violent vision is at the heart of the Islamic idea that Christianity in all its forms, Catholic, Orthodox and Protestant, is a twisting and hijacking of the original religion of Jesus, which was and is Islam. This is replacement theology par excellence, and renders all current forms of Christianity renegade and illegitimate. This idea is at the core of the Muslim persecution of Christians worldwide, from Nigeria to Libya to Egypt to Syria to Iraq to Pakistan to Indonesia. But Jenkins makes no mention of thatescalating persecution, either. The thrust of his piece appears to be that sure, they’re killing Christians and dismissing Christianity as a mutant version of the teachings of Jesus, but look, they have some of Jesus’ original sayings! It thus appears as if his article is designed to render Christians uncritical and complacent in the face of the advancing jihad.

“The Muslim Jesus: Jesus sayings we never thought we had,” by Philip Jenkins, Aleteia, June 30, 2014:

Around the year 1600, the Indian emperor Akbar built a splendid ceremonial gate at Fatehpur Sikri, and on it he inscribed words attributed to Jesus, son of Mary: “The world is a bridge: pass over it, but do not build your house upon it.”

It’s an evocative saying, one of many attributed to Jesus in the Islamic tradition. But is there any chance that such words might have any authenticity, any connection with the historical Jesus? Actually, the chances are greater than you might think, and like a good professor, I am going to illustrate that with a short quiz.

The Koran includes a good deal of material about Jesus. More relevant for present purposes are the many stories and saying gathered by Muslim sages over the following centuries, which have been collected by modern scholar Tarif Khalidi in his book The Muslim Jesus: Sayings and Stories in Islamic Literature. Khalidi argues that together, these constitute a whole Muslim Gospel.

Often, the Muslim Jesus closely recalls the language and thought of early Christian scripture, with only the slightest modifications from the familiar gospels. This is particularly true in the oldest layer of sayings and stories, from the 9th century. Jesus points to the birds of the sky and how God cares for them; he urges his followers to lay up treasures for themselves in heaven; they should not cast pearls before swine. In perhaps 30 cases, the resemblances to the Synoptic gospels are overwhelming. Also, very few of these “Muslim Jesus” sayingsinclude any distinctively Islamic ideas.

These texts seem to take us back to an authentically primitive stage in the formation of the New Testament. Scholars agree that the earliest records of Jesus took the form of sayings, or sequences of sayings, with very little of the narrative that we know from the canonical gospels. One such (hypothetical) sayings collection was “Q,” which was a critical source for both Matthew and Luke. Christians remembered Jesus’s words, and only later did authors come along and sew those isolated fragments into more complete units, which were then written down. Sayings that did not find their way into the canonical text continued to float free as agrapha, “unwritten,” or unrecorded. We know them because they appear frequently in quotations by early Church leaders, or in alternate manuscript readings of the New Testament.

And that takes us back to the Jesus sayings recorded by early Muslim commentators, which in their style and format bear a surprising resemblance not to the canonical gospels, but to a sayings source like “Q.” It looks almost as if those scholars had access to sayings and constructed a plausible narrative around them, but that was not necessarily the same framework provided by the Christian evangelists. Might they have used something like “Q,” perhaps even a now-lost Jewish-Christian sayings source?

To illustrate the “early Christian” feel of these sayings from the Muslim Gospel, I offer a random mix of sayings credited to Jesus, with some taken from the early Christian agrapha (non-canonical writings), and the rest from the Muslim Gospel. Which Jesus said what?

1. Be in the middle, but walk to the side.
2. Become passers by.
3. Those who are with me have not understood me.
4. Blessed is he who sees with his heart, but whose heart is not in what he sees.
5. I am near you, like the garment of your body.
6. Satan accompanies the world.

Here are the answers: 1, 4 and 6 are Muslim; 2, 3 and 5 are Christian. If I had not supplied that information, it would be very difficult to tell the two categories apart. Apart from New Testament textual specialists, I doubt that even most scholars of early or medieval Christianity could get a perfect score on deciding which was which.

This degree of similarity is amazing given the chronology. All the Christian examples date from the second or third centuries, none of the Muslim examples is recorded before the ninth century. Yet they breathe exactly the same atmosphere.

It’s actually not too hard to see how such early sayings would have been preserved and transmitted, and the clue might be in the world-denying quality of many sayings — the world is a bridge! Such words would have been treasured by Eastern Christian monks and hermits, in lands like Syria and Mesopotamia. We also know that from earliest times, some Christian monks and clergy accepted Islam. The Koran reports how their eyes filled with tears, as they prayed, “We do believe; make us one, then, with all who bear witness to the truth!”

But however it happened, here is a startling thought: perhaps the Muslim tradition gives us several dozen more plausible Jesus sayings than we ever thought we had.

Courtesy of PamelaGeller.com

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2014/07/03/jesus-muslim/

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
AdTech Ad ISIS Terrorists Outline Horrifying 5 Year Plan For Global Domination
7/3/2014 2:07:58 PM
AdTech Ad

ISIS Terrorists Outline Horrifying 5 Year Plan For Global Domination

If you don’t know by now about the very real threat that is the Islamic States of Iraq and Syria, then you must have been living underneath a rock. The Islamic militants have been terrorizing God-fearing Christians with merciless attacks of unspeakable violence all in the name of what liberals continue to bill as the ‘religion of peace’. Now, ISIS has released a detailed five-year plan on how they will attempt global domination, and it is particularly horrifying.

ISIS has announced that their leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi now has authority over all Muslims and they are shortening their name to simply “Islamic State”. They are calling this the ‘most significant development in international jihadism since 9/11′. That’s just lovely. Excuse me if I’m not celebrating this announcement.

(Read More: ISIS Jihadi Recruitment Video: ‘Give Up Your Nice Cars, Your Job, Your Wife And Come To Jihad’)

Now that these extremists have conquered much of the Middle East, they have set their sights on Europe. The map below depicts just how they are planning to go after our allies across the pond. This could very well turn into WWIII.

article-2674736-1F46221200000578-100_634x381

Outlined above are the lands which ISIS plans to have under it’s control within the next five years. If that doesn’t send a chill down your spine, I don’t know what will.

Just a reminder, on the off chance that any left-wing nut jobs are reading this and don’t understand the threat here: These are the scumbags who have been branded too brutal even by Al Qaeda’s standards. They behead women and children and then laugh about it. That is horribly vivid, but it’s the truth.

When will the Left wake up and realize that these extremists are the biggest and most present threat to our national security and therefore American lives? What is it going to take for them to pull their heads out of their rear ends?

Let us know how this newest report strikes you in the comments section.

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+1


facebook
Like us on Facebook!