Thanks for responding Gary, at least if a poster fully qualifies their input, like you just did, it gives the reader a better opportunity to place the reamarks in context.
I probably need to further qualify my own remak there that you cited as well, because when I say that, I'm referring not just to this thread but to forums in general.
On many various forums, I hear all manner of pro as well as cons being emotionally spouted wioth no objective information or qualifying reamks at all -- and I'm referriong both to scam screamers as well as some admins.
Additionally, while I am currently engaged, after about six months, I'll make up my own mind, based on actual experience. When you undertake an experiment with risky programs like this, you need to plan on about a 50% failure rate. You simply have to factor that into your overall analysis.
I don't mind "against" remarks at all, as long as they are maturely articulated with a rational basis and statement of experience, so that we get a fairly clear picture of how to weight the post or remark.
This kined of thing is NOT for risk averse personalities, I'll say that for sure. I personally am very competitive and like to succeed in a risk-laiden enviornment.
Greer
|