Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
Kathleen Vanbeekom

11447
13305 Posts
13305
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
7/24/2011 6:43:04 PM

This is very true...as I live in a city that claims in the newspaper that 80% of school kids are on reduced-price or free lunch and with unemployment that reached nearly 20% in recent years, as the teens and parents gather in school meetings with cell phones lighting up and beeping, with expensive sneakers, with every kid probably having a game-collection at home, and every house having a TV and probably a microwave...I love Grand Rapids! To the consternation of school teachers, this city continuously votes down school millage while over 300 new restaurants opened within 2 years, and it's a small city, with lots of overweight people...Michigan has the highest ice-cream eating population in USA, and is one of the top 3 states with snowmobile owners...in my neighborhood, the Dollar General with so much elderly shoplifting is across the street from the deli that specializes in handmade expensive sausages and imported booze & cheeses and chocolates, both are always crowded every day. I love Michigan and I love USA, where it's tough to try to "stay poor" in the eyes of the media, but most people succeed at it :)

***

Study: Americans ‘in Poverty’ Are Seldom Poor


Most of the Americans the federal government defines as “in poverty” are “not poor in any ordinary sense of the term,” according to a new study — especially when compared to the poor in less developed countries.


“To the average American, the word ‘poverty’ implies significant material deprivation, an inability to provide a family with adequate nutritious food, reasonable shelter, and clothing,” the study from The Heritage Foundation states.


“The actual living conditions of America’s poor are far different from these images.”
The Census Bureau reports that there are 43 million Americans living in poverty. To help them, taxpayers spend some $900 billion a year in federal and state dollars — over $20,000 for each person deemed poor — through more than 70 means-tested programs providing cash, food, housing, medical care and more.


But according to the government’s own survey data, in the past decade the average household defined as poor by the government lived in a house or apartment with air conditioning and cable TV, The Heritage Foundation study found.


The household had a car — one-third had two or more cars — two color televisions, a DVD player, and a microwave.


“The home of the average poor family was in good repair and not overcrowded,” the study observes.


“In fact, the typical poor American had more living space than the average European — average, not poor.


“When asked, most poor families stated they had sufficient funds during the past year to meet all essential needs.”


Study authors Robert Rector and Rachel Sheffield cite U.S. Department of Energy data showing that in 2005, the most recent year on record:


• 62 percent of poor American households had a clothes washer in the home, and 53.2 percent had a clothes dryer.
• 65.1 percent had more than one TV.
• 54.5 percent had a cellular phone.
• 38.2 percent had a personal computer.
• 36.6 percent had an answering machine.
• 29.3 percent had a video game system.
• 25 percent had a dishwasher.
• 5.2 percent had a photocopier — and .6 percent even had a Jacuzzi.


The study also found that 5.9 percent of households “sometimes” did not have enough food, and just 1.5 percent “often” did not have enough.


“Some poor Americans do experience significant hardships, including temporary food shortages or inadequate housing, but these individuals are a minority within the overall poverty population,” the study authors concluded.


“Poverty remains an issue of serious social concern, but accurate information about that problem is essential in crafting wise public policy. Exaggeration and misinformation about poverty obscure the nature, extent, and causes of real material deprivation, thereby hampering the development of well-targeted, effective programs to reduce the problem.”


Former Congressman Ernest Istook, now a distinguished fellow at The Heritage Foundation, echoed that sentiment in a recent Newsmax blog: “By defining poverty so broadly, we drain resources that instead could be focused on those who truly are in dire straits.
“And we spend billions that could be cut from the budget instead.”

+0
Kathleen Vanbeekom

11447
13305 Posts
13305
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
7/24/2011 8:42:21 PM

I have, as I've had in recent years, 90 sweaters, mostly from Goodwill, so I can wear 3 sweaters daily at the same time for a month without worrying about laundry....LOL...hearing my dear old Mom's voice in my ear "Leave some clothes for the REALLY poor people!" and the only thing that has changed is....I worked hard and now I don't have to worry...but the main thing IS...the internal difference. It comes from INSIDE, not from outside. Anyone and everyone CAN become successful at any time they want to, at any time they TRY consistently.

(People from foreign countries who don't know the meaning of "Goodwill"...that's USED clothing...and in my sense of humor I'd say "If you smell B.O. (body odor) that's the clothes, not ME! LOL!) HAHA!

Get a notebook and start advertising daily online, as much as you can, and change your life. Both of my sisters have professional jobs but I work at home and have a bigger house than they do, while supporting 2 unemployed adult sons, while wearing my 90 sweaters. LOL!!!

+0
Kathleen Vanbeekom

11447
13305 Posts
13305
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
7/24/2011 8:50:23 PM

Imagine what the money from USA could do to INSTANTLY IMPROVE this world within ONE DAY if we weren't taking care of all the millions of "poor" people in USA. How do we get that done? How can we convince all the "impoverished" Americans that they are NOT poor?

I remember school, when the nuns told us that USA is a VERY YOUNG COUNTRY. I understand them now. The people are very immature, need to be constantly entertained and have everything, even at the expense of people worldwide who truly have nothing.

Everyone in USA who's on "government assistance" (welfare) are you walking thru the desert with a heavy pot of water on your head? Of course not! You're watching game shows while munching on junkfood. What a sad situation. I hope nobody "buys a vowel" because that makes me really mad when Americans can't spell and waste $250 on buying a common letter of the alphabet. Just another day in Paradise.

+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5807
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
7/24/2011 9:38:12 PM
Charity begins at home and I refuse to send more of our charity abroad by any mandate.

I refuse to feel guilty for living in the USA at all and I think enough of my money goes to support foreign nations. Americans do plenty voluntarily to help the needy on a global scale. Much of which is misused and misappropriated by their tyrannical governments, ,Monarchs, dictators and caliphates alike.

So I refuse to feel guilty for taking care of the indigent here at home. It is those that game the system using their EBT cards for non food or non-necessary items. Clean up the abuse, enforce the laws already on the books against such abuse. There are generations of families brought up on the government dole out. Not to mention those here illegal and have learned to game our generosity to the indigent.

Securing our border is key to this. Stop shipping our manufacturing jobs overseas and paying slave labor wages for what Americans once did here. By increasing regulation and taxes so much so that it made it profitable to do this to the American people.

Sending more of America"s wealth overseas from the brow and pocket books of those that are hard working. Redistribution is already happening and causing this nation's children to be indebted before they are even born. The FED distributed Trillions of dollars to the international pool so let them take care of their poor and indigent. Charity begins at home and I refuse to send more of charity abroad.




Quote:

Imagine what the money from USA could do to INSTANTLY IMPROVE this world within ONE DAY if we weren't taking care of all the millions of "poor" people in USA. How do we get that done? How can we convince all the "impoverished" Americans that they are NOT poor?

I remember school, when the nuns told us that USA is a VERY YOUNG COUNTRY. I understand them now. The people are very immature, need to be constantly entertained and have everything, even at the expense of people worldwide who truly have nothing.

Everyone in USA who's on "government assistance" (welfare) are you walking thru the desert with a heavy pot of water on your head? Of course not! You're watching game shows while munching on junkfood. What a sad situation. I hope nobody "buys a vowel" because that makes me really mad when Americans can't spell and waste $250 on buying a common letter of the alphabet. Just another day in Paradise.

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5807
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
7/24/2011 9:46:15 PM
You are buying the Liberal Progressive guilt trip if you place any stock at all in this particular article. IMHO

Why would so many wish to come here if it weren't for our freedom to pursue personal happiness.

It is in our Constitution. Unfortunately the Social Engineers have Social Engineered us into financial mess
. The Baby Boomers didn't just appear on the scene we have been here for several generation.

Piss poor management by our elected official in pursuit of re-election led to the power, greed and corrupted bureaucratic government we have today.

Time to strip it down and overhaul it. Withing the confines and tenants of the constitution while keeping our promises to this generation of people and their children..


Quote:

This is very true...as I live in a city that claims in the newspaper that 80% of school kids are on reduced-price or free lunch and with unemployment that reached nearly 20% in recent years, as the teens and parents gather in school meetings with cell phones lighting up and beeping, with expensive sneakers, with every kid probably having a game-collection at home, and every house having a TV and probably a microwave...I love Grand Rapids! To the consternation of school teachers, this city continuously votes down school millage while over 300 new restaurants opened within 2 years, and it's a small city, with lots of overweight people...Michigan has the highest ice-cream eating population in USA, and is one of the top 3 states with snowmobile owners...in my neighborhood, the Dollar General with so much elderly shoplifting is across the street from the deli that specializes in handmade expensive sausages and imported booze & cheeses and chocolates, both are always crowded every day. I love Michigan and I love USA, where it's tough to try to "stay poor" in the eyes of the media, but most people succeed at it :)

***

Study: Americans ‘in Poverty’ Are Seldom Poor


Most of the Americans the federal government defines as “in poverty” are “not poor in any ordinary sense of the term,” according to a new study — especially when compared to the poor in less developed countries.


“To the average American, the word ‘poverty’ implies significant material deprivation, an inability to provide a family with adequate nutritious food, reasonable shelter, and clothing,” the study from The Heritage Foundation states.


“The actual living conditions of America’s poor are far different from these images.”
The Census Bureau reports that there are 43 million Americans living in poverty. To help them, taxpayers spend some $900 billion a year in federal and state dollars — over $20,000 for each person deemed poor — through more than 70 means-tested programs providing cash, food, housing, medical care and more.


But according to the government’s own survey data, in the past decade the average household defined as poor by the government lived in a house or apartment with air conditioning and cable TV, The Heritage Foundation study found.


The household had a car — one-third had two or more cars — two color televisions, a DVD player, and a microwave.


“The home of the average poor family was in good repair and not overcrowded,” the study observes.


“In fact, the typical poor American had more living space than the average European — average, not poor.


“When asked, most poor families stated they had sufficient funds during the past year to meet all essential needs.”


Study authors Robert Rector and Rachel Sheffield cite U.S. Department of Energy data showing that in 2005, the most recent year on record:


• 62 percent of poor American households had a clothes washer in the home, and 53.2 percent had a clothes dryer.
• 65.1 percent had more than one TV.
• 54.5 percent had a cellular phone.
• 38.2 percent had a personal computer.
• 36.6 percent had an answering machine.
• 29.3 percent had a video game system.
• 25 percent had a dishwasher.
• 5.2 percent had a photocopier — and .6 percent even had a Jacuzzi.


The study also found that 5.9 percent of households “sometimes” did not have enough food, and just 1.5 percent “often” did not have enough.


“Some poor Americans do experience significant hardships, including temporary food shortages or inadequate housing, but these individuals are a minority within the overall poverty population,” the study authors concluded.


“Poverty remains an issue of serious social concern, but accurate information about that problem is essential in crafting wise public policy. Exaggeration and misinformation about poverty obscure the nature, extent, and causes of real material deprivation, thereby hampering the development of well-targeted, effective programs to reduce the problem.”


Former Congressman Ernest Istook, now a distinguished fellow at The Heritage Foundation, echoed that sentiment in a recent Newsmax blog: “By defining poverty so broadly, we drain resources that instead could be focused on those who truly are in dire straits.
“And we spend billions that could be cut from the budget instead.”

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!