Hi, Mary,
You make a very good point about the number of forums.
It had not occured to me to check out all the forums in the initial list because I could only vote for one of them. Naturally I voted for one on which I am active and from which I have obtained great value and pleasure.
Looking at the list again, I see that I am only familiar with four of them.
Maybe this award needs re-thinking. I can't possibly look at every forum (even with my health improving in leaps and bounds, I still, probably, have more spare time for reading than the average Adlander) and it could well be that I have voted in ignorance of what else is available. Indeed, my vote could hardly be considered a reasoned reaction to a request - more of a knee jerk.
Wasn't the initial list also created by the forum owners putting their forums forward for selection? Hardly representative of a free and unbiased selection.
Since they are looking for the top five out of the initial list - wouldn't it have made more sense for us to be able to vote for OUR top five? That way we might have been invegled to look at some of the forums with which we were not familiar.
Just an Old Coot view
|