My apologies if you feel singled out, you are not.
Just for the record, I could have made up an identity, lied about who I am, posted a picture of some random jerkoff from the net. I could give you true and false information about myself and you would never be the wiser as to which is true and which is false.
This is the internet, you never truly know who is behind the keyboard on the other end. I choose not to disregard that fact and openly represent the truth of my anonymity on the net.
But go ahead and focus on my identity instead of the issue.
It reminds me of some old expression, what is it?
I know I know it, it is on the tip of my tongue...It is used to describe a particular form of ad hominem argument..
Oh that is right, I remember now...Shoot the messenger.
That is what you do to the bearer of bad news instead of respond to the message is it?
Obviously my anonymity allows me to place false cease and desist papers on Texas and California state servers.
Why is it that when a program stops being profitable, and starts losing investors money, promoters never go back to the postings and blog entries they made about that program they supported with updates?
Why is it a person is willing to invest in a OTC stock and when it completely tanks in less than a year, the person does not start holding the Prez, CEO, or BOD accountable? (sadly in this case, you don't have a BOD to complain to)
Maybe Greenzap would have beenvsuccessful instead of chosing to retreat into the shadows had it's investors cared to make sure that the company was even doing something with their investment (other than spend it on new homes and hummers that is) or taking steps to make sure the company was even operating legally?
Irresponsible investors, with lack of care about their investments, and not requiring accountability from the company... these are just a few of the things that tell scammers its ok to take money from others with big promises, then slowly just live off the free cash until you decide to create some other "start-up" that you have no plans of taking anywhere either.
So do you want to do a post investment/mid-program analysis to continue the story started in the thread
(a thread with no updates and no ending is sooo sad)...
or keep with the subversive ad hominem attack in an attempt to not discuss the subject matter at hand?
Ad hominem - just in case there is confusion to anyone perusing this thread.
- Person A makes claim X
- There is something objectionable about Person A
- Therefore claim X is false
I make posts with links to state documents about the subject matter of this thread.
Dave finds not knowing my identity unethical.
Thus what I say must be false and I must be a big chicken.
Dont forget that Barbara posted just before me with a complaint that you have not addressed. She put an identity there, maybe you care to keep talking to her if I bother you too much.