Hi Jenny,
First of all, I would like to let you know that I am not
from the US, although I consider the US to be a close
friend to my country, Canada.
The US democratic system is quite different from the
system in Canada. In Canada, the party who wins the most
seats in a general election is the one who forms the
government. The leader of that party becomes the Prime
Minister. As in our present situation, it is not
necessary to have more than 50% of the seats in our
parliament to form the government. As such, we can have
a minority government, as we now do, where policy cannot
simply be rammed through, as each bill before parliament
requires at least 51% to pass.
In the US, as I understand it, if there is not a clear
winner in an election, there must be another vote between
the front runners until there is a clear winner (at least
51%).
The president is considered elected when his party gains a
simple majority of the seats in Congress. His party must
have a majority in Congress, but can have a minority in
the Senate, which is presently the case in the US.
The President has very great executive powers, including
the right to veto any bill passed, but must also answer
for his own actions, as has been proven both with Richard
Nixon and Bill Clinton. In other words, one cannot simply
blame the president for the actions of any administration.
In both Canada and the US, the right to protest is honoured
and protected, although in both countries there is a risk
of losing your job if you work for the federal government
and openly oppose its policies. Both governments take the
stance that if you openly oppose any employer, including
the federal government, your employer has the right to
dismiss you.
Regarding the BBC - here in Canada, most people consider
it to be a reliable news source, although my personal
thinking is that it is dangerous to believe that no bias
is present in any news source; after all, reporters and
managers are people with opinions, too.
God bless,
Dave
|