It appears that, after a few weeks of Russian bombing in Syria, a new kind of “no-fly zone” seems to have been established. However, this “no-fly zone” is not focused on preventing Syrian planes and military forces from operating inside the country. Instead, it functions as a barrier to Israeli and American air forces seeking to enter Syria through the Mediterranean Sea in order to support terrorists and jihadists against the secular government of Bashar al-Assad.

This is because of Russia’s Naval presence in the port of Tartus and its new presence just off the coast of Latakia, particularly with ships like the guided missile cruiser Moscow. The ship left Crimea on September 24 and is part of what Russian media is referring to as training exercises.

The Russian Ministry of Defense has stated,

In the course of the training activity, the Russian ships will practice organization of anti-submarine, anti-ship, and air defense, as well as search-and-rescue activities and rendering assistance to distressed vessels.
During the exercise, the military seamen are to perform over 40 different combat, tasks including missile and artillery firings at surface and aerial targets.

Clearly, the ship is in the Mediterranean for more than simple maneuvers. But its presence is also being bemoaned by the obsessively pro-Israeli, pro-NATO, and pro-war crowds howling in the pages of mainstream media outlets about being prevented from being able to cross national borders at will and rain death and destruction down upon innocent civilians and the primary force fighting ISIS and other jihadists in Syria.

As pro-Israeli writer “Eli” from SOFREP wrote in an article that was reposted by Business Insider,

By positioning the Moskva, a cruiser armed with S300 missiles, west of Latakia, the Russians have endangered the IAF’s favorite corridor of flight into Syria. The IAF has no stealth capabilities to circumvent this anti-access/area denial — A2/AD — bubble, nor any other air force in the area.
Russian President Vladimir Putin managed to do in several days what US President Barack Obama failed to do in the last three years: He’s created a true no-fly zone. Putin’s actions suggest, in my opinion, that he’s willing to force the coalition and the Israel air force into reporting and coordinating their flights in the region — an act I’m sure no one is in favor of or willing to comply with.
The Moskva carries an estimated 64 S-300 missiles, according to foreign sources), and could intercept multiple targets up to 150 miles away, making it a serious threat in addition to other Russian assets in the region.
The presence of the Moskva essentially locks down British air assets in Cyprus, American F-16s in the southern part of Turkey, and the Israeli air force, which likes to use that particular flight corridor for penetration into Syria, or alternatively when flying over the western part of Lebanon. Any flights in or around the country will now be tricky for the IAF to accomplish.

“Eli” has made an astute observation. Unless the Israelis and NATO powers are truly willing to risk World War 3, the ability to simply fly in through and over the Mediterranean has been severely hampered by the Russian presence. NATO and Israel could indeed identify themselves and their intentions but they could be denied overflight permission to do so. They would then be forced with the choice between simply stepping back or risking a direct confrontation with Russian jets in the air.

Furthermore, “Eli” concludes that danger is indeed present. He writes,

So what happens to coalition surveillance flights? What about airdrops to parties in the region supported by the coalition? This will become another complicated situation which will require the precision of a surgeon and the creativity of artists. One thing is certain: The Kremlin’s recent move is dangerous and places us all in danger. It may be time to dust off the old Cold War books.

Yet, while “Eli” laments the Russian presence in the Mediterranean and Syria and attempts to suggest that Russia is simply expanding its empire, his thesis is concerning for three reasons.

First, it is perhaps the case that the United States and Israel have violated human rights and national borders for so long that neither their citizens nor their cheerleaders have any grasp of the difference between imperialism and self-defense.

MIKHAIL KAMAROV/FLICKR

ATTACK TO BE BLAMED ON RUSSIANS?

BY SHEPARD AMBELLAS

(INTELLIHUB) — A new report published online Sunday by the New York Times reveals how “vital undersea cables” may be vulnerable to attack and how the “Russians” have increased “spy ship” and “submarine” operations in and around such undersea installations which the Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Military consider “critical infrastructure” of the United States.

Additionally the report, written by David Sanger and Eric Schmidt, outlined the fact that these “vital undersea cables” actually carry “95 percent” of our daily Internet communications worldwide allowing for “global business worth more than $10 trillion a day” to be conducted online.

Needless to say if any portion of this undersea cable network was affected negatively the global repercussions world could be devastating as modern man is so reliant on such technology.

However what I find to be truly disturbing about the report is how the authors are pushing Russia’s alleged ‘interest in the cables’ to readers while at the same time admitting that there is absolutely “no evidence” showing that the Russians are planning an attack of any sort.

Moreover the authors of the piece document U.S. Navy Rear Adm. Frederick J. Roegge’s general concerns about the Russians but fail to substantiate that the Russian’s are up to anything unusual which lead some, like myself, to question the motives behind the release of such information.

THE SETTING OF THE STAGE

This is where we have to use our critical thinking skills and think outside the box. This could all be a grand spectacle, a great play in the works.

You see, back in early September we saw seeds being planted in the media raising concerns that the Russians may be looking into cutting ‘vital undersea cables.’ In fact the Pentagon announced publicly that the ‘Yantar’, a Russian spy ship, was engaging in reconnaissance activity off the U.S. East Coast while en route to Cuba in an attempt to “identify undersea communications trunk lines and nodes.”

But ironically isn’t this the job of every military–to find vulnerabilities? That’s what they do. I mean you can bet that the U.S. Military is trying to find vulnerabilities in Russian infrastructure as well as just about every other country’s infrastructure around the world. That’s how a tactical advantage is gained. This is Military 101, it’s nothing new, and it’s always progressing–unless of course your country’s military is in a decline.

Now bear with me for a moment and fast forward to the New York Times piece written by Sanger and Schmidt which I mentioned earlier. While it may be nothing more than just a hunch the authors had, their added personal flair, their view, their take, or just their opinion in general the authors seem to be drastically out of touch with reality–literally pushing the ‘feel’ on the readers that Russia is our enemy. After all the enemy is always lurking and doesn’t have to be Russia. And even more importantly sometimes that enemy comes from within.

THE MAKINGS OF A FALSE FLAG

Recent media rhetoric surrounding the Russians alleged ‘interest in vital undersea cables’ could just as well be an aspect of a planned false flag attack yet to come. All the telltale signs are here. However that too is just speculation–but to me the stage looks set.

I look at it this way–if these cables truly relay “95 percent” of the world’s communications and “$10 trillion” in commerce a day, don’t you think they would be protected? I mean seriously, why would the U.S. Military let a spy ship or any ship near such vital cables for that matter? And if they do our military leaders are a total failure as anyone knows that such cables should be heavily fortified.

Therefor Sanger and Schmidt may be pushing a narrative that could later reemerge and be plastered all over the press. Especially if such undersea cables were ever severed in such an ‘attack.’ It would be a good way to place blame on the Russians when all along such an attack could have been carried out by anyone. Hell, it could even be an inside job.

You have to ask yourself: why would the Pentagon inform the general public about such issues if they were truly concerned. Wouldn’t they want the element of surprise to work for them? Why would they make it public that they suspect the Russians or any nation for that matter of anything? This information would be ‘classified.’ Do you see where I’m going with this? From an intellectual standpoint it simply does not make sense, however the media would like you to believe that the Russians are the current ‘boogeyman.’

SO WHAT WOULD BE GAINED?

I guess you could argue that anything could be gained from such a false flag attack.

I could make one example using the highly polled 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate Donald Trump who is clearly an outsider of the current Clinton-Bush legacy. In fact Trump’s success in the polls may be a ‘fluke’, initially underestimated by the New World Order’s interns to some extent. He may have slipped through the cracks– a Trump Card if you will–pardon the pun. And what if Trump were to win the Presidency? Then neither one of the NWO’s draft picks could shine, it would be a total bust. So from the NWO’s standpoint; why not go as far as to install Obama for a third term?

You see if none of their bought and paid for cronies are going to get the White House seat in 2016, why not tray and retain it in advance–through executive order? You think I’m joking but I’m not. All we need is a crisis, a National Emergency, and it could be done–Obama could remain in office. The road is already paved and it’s only one pen-stroke away.

#Remember9/11WasAnInsideJob

Am I off topic here or am I on to something?

This article originally appeared on Intellihub.com.

About the author:

Shepard Ambellas is the founder, editor-in-chief of Intellihub News and the maker of SHADE the Motion Picture. You can also find him on TwitterandFacebook. Shepard also appears on the Travel Channel series America Declassified. You can also listen to him on Coast To Coast AM with hosts, both, George Noory on “Chemtrails” and John B. Wells on the “Alternative Media Special“. Shepard Ambellas has also been featured on the Drudge Report, the largest news website in the entire world, for his provocative coverage of the Bilderberg Group. Shepard is an exclusive weapon of Intellihub.

Shepard also does his own radio show, five days a week, which you can listen to here.

For media inquires, interviews, questions or suggestions for this author, email:shepard@intellihub.com.

Read more articles by this author here.

*****

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 10/29/2015 1:53:13 PM
	Russia’s “No-Fly Zone” Prevents US, Israel, UK From Bombing Syria TOPICS:Brandon Turbeville Middle East Russia OCTOBER 28, 2015 By Brandon Turbeville It appears that, after a few weeks of Russian bombing in Syria, a new kind of “no-fly zone” seems to have been established. However, this “no-fly zone” is not focused on preventing Syrian planes and military forces from operating inside the country. Instead, it functions as a barrier to Israeli and American air forces seeking to enter Syria through the Mediterranean Sea in order to support terrorists and jihadists against the secular government of Bashar al-Assad. This is because of Russia’s Naval presence in the port of Tartus and its new presence just off the coast of Latakia, particularly with ships like the guided missile cruiser Moscow. The ship left Crimea on September 24 and is part of what Russian media is referring to as training exercises. The Russian Ministry of Defense has stated, In the course of the training activity, the Russian ships will practice organization of anti-submarine, anti-ship, and air defense, as well as search-and-rescue activities and rendering assistance to distressed vessels. During the exercise, the military seamen are to perform over 40 different combat, tasks including missile and artillery firings at surface and aerial targets. Clearly, the ship is in the Mediterranean for more than simple maneuvers. But its presence is also being bemoaned by the obsessively pro-Israeli, pro-NATO, and pro-war crowds howling in the pages of mainstream media outlets about being prevented from being able to cross national borders at will and rain death and destruction down upon innocent civilians and the primary force fighting ISIS and other jihadists in Syria. As pro-Israeli writer “Eli” from SOFREP wrote in an article that was reposted by Business Insider, By positioning the Moskva, a cruiser armed with S300 missiles, west of Latakia, the Russians have endangered the IAF’s favorite corridor of flight into Syria. The IAF has no stealth capabilities to circumvent this anti-access/area denial — A2/AD — bubble, nor any other air force in the area. Russian President Vladimir Putin managed to do in several days what US President Barack Obama failed to do in the last three years: He’s created a true no-fly zone. Putin’s actions suggest, in my opinion, that he’s willing to force the coalition and the Israel air force into reporting and coordinating their flights in the region — an act I’m sure no one is in favor of or willing to comply with. The Moskva carries an estimated 64 S-300 missiles, according to foreign sources), and could intercept multiple targets up to 150 miles away, making it a serious threat in addition to other Russian assets in the region. The presence of the Moskva essentially locks down British air assets in Cyprus, American F-16s in the southern part of Turkey, and the Israeli air force, which likes to use that particular flight corridor for penetration into Syria, or alternatively when flying over the western part of Lebanon. Any flights in or around the country will now be tricky for the IAF to accomplish. “Eli” has made an astute observation. Unless the Israelis and NATO powers are truly willing to risk World War 3, the ability to simply fly in through and over the Mediterranean has been severely hampered by the Russian presence. NATO and Israel could indeed identify themselves and their intentions but they could be denied overflight permission to do so. They would then be forced with the choice between simply stepping back or risking a direct confrontation with Russian jets in the air. Furthermore, “Eli” concludes that danger is indeed present. He writes, So what happens to coalition surveillance flights? What about airdrops to parties in the region supported by the coalition? This will become another complicated situation which will require the precision of a surgeon and the creativity of artists. One thing is certain: The Kremlin’s recent move is dangerous and places us all in danger. It may be time to dust off the old Cold War books. Yet, while “Eli” laments the Russian presence in the Mediterranean and Syria and attempts to suggest that Russia is simply expanding its empire, his thesis is concerning for three reasons. First, it is perhaps the case that the United States and Israel have violated human rights and national borders for so long that neither their citizens nor their cheerleaders have any grasp of the difference between imperialism and self-defense. Second, “Eli” is lamenting the Russian presence because he views the Western support of savages raping and beheading their way across Syria as legitimate and justified. He implicitly argues that the Israeli Air Force, along with the U.S. Air Force, has and should continue to have the divine right to cross national borders at will, drop bombs on civilians and national governments as they choose, and be free from any and all consequences of doing so. The “exceptional” people and the “chosen” people thus make a very good team, complete with the blessings of God and the rest of the world. There is one major problem, however – the fact that Israel and the United States no longer have the blessing of the world to continue their slaughter unabated. Russia has had enough and so have many other nations. Which brings us to the most concerning aspect of “Eli’s” position – that he and those he represents are willing to risk World War 3 to continue settlement and colonization of the Middle East and other “non-compliant” nations. “Eli’s” article would not be so concerning if it were not for the fact that it represents the viewpoint of a ruling elite that is so committed to world hegemony that it very well might risk the literal destruction of the world in search of those aims. While “Eli” describes the “Kremlin’s recent moves” as “dangerous” and having placed us all in danger, the Kremlin is only acting in a way that defends its own self-interests. If “Eli” is concerned with the danger that we all face, he would do well to warn the White House and the Knesset. Brandon Turbeville – article archive here – is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions andDispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria, and The Difference it Makes: 36 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton Should Never Be President. Turbeville has published over 500 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com.
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+1

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 10/29/2015 2:25:42 PM
	Deep undersea cables relaying 95% of world communications, $10T in daily commerce, to be cut in coming attack? Posted on October 28, 2015 [by Jean Jaines]by Jean MIKHAIL KAMAROV/FLICKR ATTACK TO BE BLAMED ON RUSSIANS? BY SHEPARD AMBELLAS (INTELLIHUB) — A new report published online Sunday by the New York Times reveals how “vital undersea cables” may be vulnerable to attack and how the “Russians” have increased “spy ship” and “submarine” operations in and around such undersea installations which the Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Military consider “critical infrastructure” of the United States. Additionally the report, written by David Sanger and Eric Schmidt, outlined the fact that these “vital undersea cables” actually carry “95 percent” of our daily Internet communications worldwide allowing for “global business worth more than $10 trillion a day” to be conducted online. Needless to say if any portion of this undersea cable network was affected negatively the global repercussions world could be devastating as modern man is so reliant on such technology. However what I find to be truly disturbing about the report is how the authors are pushing Russia’s alleged ‘interest in the cables’ to readers while at the same time admitting that there is absolutely “no evidence” showing that the Russians are planning an attack of any sort. Moreover the authors of the piece document U.S. Navy Rear Adm. Frederick J. Roegge’s general concerns about the Russians but fail to substantiate that the Russian’s are up to anything unusual which lead some, like myself, to question the motives behind the release of such information. THE SETTING OF THE STAGE This is where we have to use our critical thinking skills and think outside the box. This could all be a grand spectacle, a great play in the works. You see, back in early September we saw seeds being planted in the media raising concerns that the Russians may be looking into cutting ‘vital undersea cables.’ In fact the Pentagon announced publicly that the ‘Yantar’, a Russian spy ship, was engaging in reconnaissance activity off the U.S. East Coast while en route to Cuba in an attempt to “identify undersea communications trunk lines and nodes.” But ironically isn’t this the job of every military–to find vulnerabilities? That’s what they do. I mean you can bet that the U.S. Military is trying to find vulnerabilities in Russian infrastructure as well as just about every other country’s infrastructure around the world. That’s how a tactical advantage is gained. This is Military 101, it’s nothing new, and it’s always progressing–unless of course your country’s military is in a decline. Now bear with me for a moment and fast forward to the New York Times piece written by Sanger and Schmidt which I mentioned earlier. While it may be nothing more than just a hunch the authors had, their added personal flair, their view, their take, or just their opinion in general the authors seem to be drastically out of touch with reality–literally pushing the ‘feel’ on the readers that Russia is our enemy. After all the enemy is always lurking and doesn’t have to be Russia. And even more importantly sometimes that enemy comes from within. THE MAKINGS OF A FALSE FLAG Recent media rhetoric surrounding the Russians alleged ‘interest in vital undersea cables’ could just as well be an aspect of a planned false flag attack yet to come. All the telltale signs are here. However that too is just speculation–but to me the stage looks set. I look at it this way–if these cables truly relay “95 percent” of the world’s communications and “$10 trillion” in commerce a day, don’t you think they would be protected? I mean seriously, why would the U.S. Military let a spy ship or any ship near such vital cables for that matter? And if they do our military leaders are a total failure as anyone knows that such cables should be heavily fortified. Therefor Sanger and Schmidt may be pushing a narrative that could later reemerge and be plastered all over the press. Especially if such undersea cables were ever severed in such an ‘attack.’ It would be a good way to place blame on the Russians when all along such an attack could have been carried out by anyone. Hell, it could even be an inside job. You have to ask yourself: why would the Pentagon inform the general public about such issues if they were truly concerned. Wouldn’t they want the element of surprise to work for them? Why would they make it public that they suspect the Russians or any nation for that matter of anything? This information would be ‘classified.’ Do you see where I’m going with this? From an intellectual standpoint it simply does not make sense, however the media would like you to believe that the Russians are the current ‘boogeyman.’ SO WHAT WOULD BE GAINED? I guess you could argue that anything could be gained from such a false flag attack. I could make one example using the highly polled 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate Donald Trump who is clearly an outsider of the current Clinton-Bush legacy. In fact Trump’s success in the polls may be a ‘fluke’, initially underestimated by the New World Order’s interns to some extent. He may have slipped through the cracks– a Trump Card if you will–pardon the pun. And what if Trump were to win the Presidency? Then neither one of the NWO’s draft picks could shine, it would be a total bust. So from the NWO’s standpoint; why not go as far as to install Obama for a third term? You see if none of their bought and paid for cronies are going to get the White House seat in 2016, why not tray and retain it in advance–through executive order? You think I’m joking but I’m not. All we need is a crisis, a National Emergency, and it could be done–Obama could remain in office. The road is already paved and it’s only one pen-stroke away. #Remember9/11WasAnInsideJob Am I off topic here or am I on to something? This article originally appeared on Intellihub.com. About the author: Shepard Ambellas is the founder, editor-in-chief of Intellihub News and the maker of SHADE the Motion Picture. You can also find him on TwitterandFacebook. Shepard also appears on the Travel Channel series America Declassified. You can also listen to him on Coast To Coast AM with hosts, both, George Noory on “Chemtrails” and John B. Wells on the “Alternative Media Special“. Shepard Ambellas has also been featured on the Drudge Report, the largest news website in the entire world, for his provocative coverage of the Bilderberg Group. Shepard is an exclusive weapon of Intellihub. Shepard also does his own radio show, five days a week, which you can listen to here. For media inquires, interviews, questions or suggestions for this author, email:shepard@intellihub.com. Read more articles by this author here. ***** Feel free to post the above article in part or in full on your website or blog leaving the byline and all original links intact.
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+1

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 10/29/2015 2:37:50 PM
	FDA Confiscates Several Thousand Chickens From KFC Farms As Mutations Worsen POSTED BY: NOW8NEWS OCTOBER 16, 2015 News 8 – KFC’s largest chicken supplier in Springdale, Arkansas was reportedly raided by the FDA on Monday due to suspicions of mass mutations taking place in their chickens. It has been no secret that KFC plumps up their chickens with the use of steroids and hormones in order to create a bigger yield to supply their restaurants around the world. However, the accusations of mutated chickens has been streaming across the Internet for years commonly referred to as a “conspiracy theory.” Now, with the FDA raid, those accusations are no longer “theories,” but proven fact. In the photos just released, you can see just how “mutated” these chickens have become due to their scientific experiments. Experiments that they were hoping would yield them twice the chicken legs for half the price. Getting four legs per chicken, was estimated to bring them an additional $12.5 million in annual revenue. But now, KFC is looking at fines half that amount. If convicted, they can face fines of $7 million, restaurant closures, and possible lawsuits from people whose health may have been affected. Click Here to LIKE us on FACEBOOK The photos below are truly shocking: Click Here to LIKE us on FACEBOOK Inform Your Friends! - See more at: http://now8news.com/fda-confiscates-several-thousand-chickens-from-kfc-farms-as-mutations-worsen/#sthash.73UKLIRy.HVdTb2wg.dpuf
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+1

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 10/29/2015 4:13:53 PM
	US, allies sending up to 4,000 more troops to Russia’s doorstep Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:56PM This photo taken on October 4, 2014 shows members of the US Army 1st Brigade, 1st Cavalry Division, unload Stryker Armored Vehicles at the railway station near the Rukla military base in Lithuania. (AFP) The United States and its allies are said to be increasing troops stationed in countries bordering Russia by deploying up to 4,000 more forces. Quoting anonymous US officials, The Wall Street Journal made the announcement in a Wednesday report. Under one plan, roughly 800 to 1,000 soldiers will be stationed in each of the four battalions to be deployed to Poland, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. US officials said the move was supposed to send Russian President Vladimir Putin a message about the presence of military forces there. “We are not picking a fight; we aren’t trying to provoke him,” said a senior US defense official. “But we are trying to make sure he understands we are engaged in Europe, we are militarily capable in Europe and we are going to defend NATO. That is the message.” US officials expressed willingness to put 150 US soldiers in each of the Baltic states for now but “are open to rotating in additional troops from the US.” One objection The release came in the wake of drills conducted by Russia in the region, which remains volatile amid a shaky ceasefire in Ukraine. Washington’s allies are also “supportive” of the new plan except for Germany, according to the international daily newspaper based in New York City. The US has been urged by Berlin in “private discussions” that putting more soldiers under NATO command in the volatile region would be commensurate to treating Moscow “as a permanent enemy.” German Chancellor Angela Merkel speaks at the Chancellery in Berlin on October 27, 2015. (AFP) “Berlin is eager to avoid any public discussion of additional troops in the Baltic states at a moment when the ceasefire in the Ukrainian conflict is holding and relations with Russia are in flux,” the report read citing military officials. A view of the past According to Russian ambassador to NATO Alexander Grushko, the “creeping increase” would further violate a 1994 agreement that forbids permanent stationing of troops on Russia’s border while it “generates confrontational approaches to security issues that in our view should belong to the past.” “From political point of view, these military activities are aimed at creating a new ‘Iron Curtain’ in Europe,” said Grushko (pictured above). The other side, however, argues that the agreement is not violated as the troops are smaller than a regular brigade and “would rotate in and out” of the region.
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+1

Menu

Forums

Leak: US to Sacrifice 3,000 Troops in Syria to Start WW3!

Russia’s “No-Fly Zone” Prevents US, Israel, UK From Bombing Syria

Deep undersea cables relaying 95% of world communications, $10T in daily commerce, to be cut in coming attack?

MIKHAIL KAMAROV/FLICKR

ATTACK TO BE BLAMED ON RUSSIANS?

BY SHEPARD AMBELLAS

THE SETTING OF THE STAGE

THE MAKINGS OF A FALSE FLAG

SO WHAT WOULD BE GAINED?

FDA Confiscates Several Thousand Chickens From KFC Farms As Mutations Worsen

Inform Your Friends!

US, allies sending up to 4,000 more troops to Russia’s doorstep