Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/20/2012 9:54:17 PM
A Legacy Of Lies: The BP Oil Spill Two Years Later








April 20th is the two year anniversary of the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon, an offshore drilling platform operated by BP. Eleven rig workers lost their lives in the initial explosion, which triggered a nearly four month-long oil spill that has been killing life in the Gulf Coast ever since.

One would think that two years later, we would be able to point out at least a few positive glimpses of hope for America’s Southern coastline. Instead, newly uncovered information proves that BP’s legacy of deceit and disregard for human life started long before they tapped the Macondo Well.

Two years before the Deepwater Horizon blow-out in the Gulf of Mexico, another BP offshore rig suffered a nearly identical blow-out, but the company concealed the first one from the U.S. regulators and Congress, according to new evidence uncovered in an investigation by EcoWatch.org. The evidence consists of an eyewitness account that they claim has been backed up by several rig workers as well as incriminating documents.

“The ultimate cause of both blow-outs was the same: the use of a money-saving technique – plugging holes with ‘quick-dry’ cement…,” explains Greg Palast. “By hiding the disastrous failure of its penny-pinching cement process in 2008, BP was able to continue to use the dangerous methods in the Gulf of Mexico causing the death of 11 men and the worst oil spill in U.S. history.”


Unfortunately, this new discover does little to comfort the Gulf Coast families and businesses who have been forever changed by the greatest environmental disaster in American history. Contrary to BP’s nauseating PR campaign claiming the Gulf is “back to normal,” oily beaches and soil water, dead dolphins, disfigured fish, and ever-shrinking seafood harvests are every day realities for those who live there, and contractors who were brought in to clean up the mess.

Recent reports show that hundreds of dolphins have mysteriously died since approximately 172 million gallons of BP’s oil gushed into the Gulf. What little fish, lobster, shrimp, and crab remain to be caught are disturbingly deformed, many missing eyeballs and claws.

Spill victims living in and around Louisiana during the spill, most of them children, are still dealing with illness brought on by BP’s excessive use of a dispersant known as Corexit, which the EPA specifically forbade them to use during the clean up, but they continued spraying anyway. The Surfrider Foundation recently released its preliminary “State of the Beach” study, which found that they Corexit that BP used to “disperse” the oil now appears to be making it tougher (not easier) for microbes to digest the oil. Additionally, “the toxins in this unholy mix of Corexit and crude actually penetrate wet skin faster than dry skin…though you’d never know it unless you happened to look under fluorescent light in the 370nm spectrum. The stuff can’t be wiped off. It’s absorbed into the skin.”

Despite continued evidence that the oil industry’s “lack of a safety culture” puts humans, the economy, and the environment at risk, almost nothing has changed since the Gulf oil spill. In fact, in the two years since the Macondo well blow out, Congress has refused to make drillers more accountable, according to members of the panel that studied the disaster. “Across the board, we are disappointed with Congress’s lack of action. Two years have passed since the explosion” and “Congress has yet to enact one piece of legislation to make drilling safer,” said Democrat Bob Graham, former co-chairman of the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill created by President Obama in 2010.

In fact, Congressional Republicans have done nothing but complain that the Obama administration is too slow to issue new offshore drilling permits and delaying exploration off Alaska’s coast (an area in which the industry would have no way how to clean up if something similar the Gulf oil spill were to occur). And President Obama, though aware of the industry’s crimes, continues to bend to their demands, even going so far as to include increased offshore drilling in his “all of the above” energy policy.

Big Oil continues to reap its massive profits and obscene taxpayer subsidies. Dirty money continues to line the pockets of politicians who are supposed to protect the general welfare. And ultimately, it is we the people who pay the price for this environmental game of Russian Roulette. When we will say that enough is enough?

Related Reading:

Gulf Oil Spill: 10 Horrifying Facts You Never Wanted To Know

Oil Dispersants Shouldn’t Harm Endangered Species

After Oil Spill, Don’t Shortchange The Gulf

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

Image via Thinkstock



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/a-legacy-of-lies-the-bp-oil-spill-two-years-later.html#ixzz1scUMHnKD

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/20/2012 9:58:00 PM

War Cover-up
Top U.S. General on Cover-up of Forces Behind War




That war is a racket has been told us by many, but rarely by one of this stature. Though he wrote the landmark book War is a Racket in 1935, the highly decorated U.S. General Smedley Butler (two esteemed Medals of Honor) deserves to be heralded for this timeless message, which rings true today more than ever. Below is an engaging two-page summary.



WAR IS A RACKET – by General Smedley Butler

War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives. In the World War [World War I] a mere handful garnered the profits of the conflict. At least 21,000 new millionaires and billionaires were made in the United States during the World War. That many admitted huge gains in their income tax returns. How many other war millionaires falsified their tax returns no one knows. [Please note these are 1935 U.S. dollars. To adjust for inflation, multiply all figures X 15 or more]

WHO MAKES THE PROFITS?

The World War cost the United States some $52 billion. That means $400 [over $6,000 in today's dollars] to every American man, woman, and child. The normal yearly profits of a business concern in the U.S. are 6 to 12%. But war-time profits, that is another matter – 60, 100, 300, and even 1,800% – the sky is the limit. Uncle Sam has the money. Let's get it. Of course, it isn't put that crudely in war time. It is dressed into speeches about patriotism, love of country, and "we must all put our shoulders to the wheel," but the profits jump, leap, and skyrocket – and are safely pocketed.

Take our friends the du Ponts, the powder people. The average pre-war earnings of the du Ponts for the period 1910 to 1914 were $6 million a year. Now let's look at their average yearly profit during the war years, 1914 to 1918. $58 million a year profit we find! Nearly ten times that of normal times, and the profits of normal times were pretty good. An increase in profits of more than 950%.

Take one of our steel companies. Their 1910-1914 yearly earnings averaged $6 million. Then came the war. And, like loyal citizens, Bethlehem Steel promptly turned to munitions making. Did their profits jump? Well, their 1914-1918 average was $49 million a year! Or, let's take United States Steel. The normal earnings during the five-year period prior to the war were $105 million a year. Then along came the war and up went the profits. The average yearly profit for the period 1914-1918 was $240 million. Not bad.

They sold your Uncle Sam 20 million mosquito nets for the use of the soldiers overseas. Well, not one of these mosquito nets ever got to France! There were pretty good profits in mosquito netting, even if there were no mosquitoes in France. When the war was over some 4 million sets of equipment – knapsacks and the things that go to fill them – crammed warehouses on this side. Now they are being scrapped because the regulations have changed the contents. But the manufacturers collected their wartime profits on them.

If anyone had the cream of the profits it was the bankers. Being partnerships rather than incorporated organizations, they do not have to report to stockholders. Their profits were as secret as they were immense.How the bankers made their millions and their billions I do not know, because those little secretsnever become public – even before a Senate investigatory body. It has been estimated that the war cost your Uncle Sam $52 billion [nearly $1 trillion with inflation]. Of this sum, $39 billion was expended in the actual war itself. This expenditure yielded $16 billion in profits. That is how the 21,000 billionaires and millionaires got that way. This $16 billion in profits is not to be sneezed at. It is quite a tidy sum. And it went to a very few.

WHO PAYS THE BILLS?

Who provides these nice little profits of 20, 100, 300, 1,500 and 1,800 per cent? We all pay them – in taxation. But the soldier pays the biggest part of the bill. If you don't believe this, visit the American cemeteries on the battlefields abroad. Or visit any of the veteran's hospitals in the United States. On a tour of the country, I visited 18 government hospitals for veterans. In them are a total of about 50,000 destroyed men – men who were the pick of the nation 18 years ago. Mortality among veterans is three times as great as those who stayed at home.

Boys with a normal viewpoint were taken out of the offices, factories, and classrooms and put into the ranks. There they were remolded. They were made to "about face," to regard murder as the order of the day.They were put through mass psychology and entirely changed. We trained them to think nothing at all of killing or of being killed. Then, suddenly, we discharged them and told them to make another "about face!" This time they had to do their own readjustment. We didn't need them any more. Many of these fine young boys are eventually destroyed, mentally, because they could not make that final "about face" alone.

Beautiful ideals were painted for our boys who were sent out to die. This was the "war to end all wars." This was the "war to make the world safe for democracy." No one mentioned to them that their going and their dying would mean huge war profits. No one told these American soldiers that they might be shot down by bullets made by their own brothers here. No one told them that their ships might be torpedoed by submarines built with United States patents. They were just told it was to be a "glorious adventure."

HOW TO SMASH THIS RACKET!

Well, it's a racket, all right. A few profit – and the many pay. But there is a way to stop it. You can't end it by disarmament conferences. You can't eliminate it by peace parleys at Geneva. Well-meaning but impractical groups can't wipe it out by resolutions. Steps must be taken to smash the war racket. We must take the profit out of war. And we must limit our military forces to home defense purposes.

I am not a fool as to believe that war is a thing of the past. I know the people do not want war, but there is no use in saying we cannot be pushed into another war. Woodrow Wilson was re-elected president in 1916 on a platform that he had "kept us out of war." Yet, five months later he asked Congress to declare war on Germany. In that five-month interval the people had not been asked whether they had changed their minds. Then what caused our government to change its mind so suddenly? Money.

An allied commission came over shortly before the war declaration and called on the President. The President summoned a group of advisers. The head of the commission spoke. Stripped of its diplomatic language, this is what he told the President and his group: "There is no use kidding ourselves any longer. The cause of the allies is lost. We now owe you (American bankers, American munitions makers, American manufacturers, American speculators, American exporters) five or six billion dollars. If we lose (and without the help of the US we must lose) we, England, France and Italy, cannot pay back this money. So..."

Had secrecy been outlawed as far as war negotiations, and had the press been invited to be present at that conference, America never would have entered the war. But this conference, like all war discussions, was shrouded in utmost secrecy. When our boys were sent off, they were told it was a "war to make the world safe for democracy" and a "war to end all wars." Very little has been accomplished to assure us that the World War was really the war to end all wars. Disarmament conferences don't mean a thing. At all these conferences, lurking in the background are the sinister agents of those who profit by war. They see to it that these conferences do not seriously limit armaments. So ... I say, TO HELL WITH WAR!




For an engaging 10-page summary of this landmark book, click here
For other powerful, reliable information on war cover-ups and manipulations, click here
For a History Channel video on how Butler stopped a plot to overthrow FDR, click here




WantToKnow.info is a PEERS empowerment website

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/21/2012 10:34:51 AM
Friends, sorry to bring to your attention two highly political and explosive articles that appeared (quite incredibly, at least for me) at DavidCameron.com.

Sunday, 1 April 2012

Cash For Access- Corruption is tearing society apart

Once again we see the sad spectacle of a Tory
treasurer beholden to the money of fund managers. No wonder there has been no prosecutions of any note amongst the banking community. No wonder the moral slant of this government is so heavily biased to special interest groups. It's a fix. Ordinary people are beginning to smell the stench and are turning away from political parties to civil disobedience. It would not be an exaggeration to say that corruption in this country has reached the levels of a second world country. Another sad watermark in the inexorable decline of collective responsibilty that has been fostered by the conservative party and New Labour previously. What Tony Blair championed, David Cameron has emboldened. Namely a political class that wants to get all it can and jump ship before the vessel starts going down. Gone are the promises of checks on the lobbying by a party that has embarassingly ditched the mantra of 'we are all in this together'. Notions of a 'Big Society' will also be best remembered by its more fitting acronym. As riots and strike action begin to take over it is our failure to clean up our politics that will be their catalyst. We've had debt before and we can probably do austerity better than most countries but it is lack of fair play that irks the population into a confrontation between the 99% and the 1%. That 1% includes the political class that has become so out of touch with the public at large that it is not aware it has become unrepresentative of the interests of any of it.
What can we do? Say no more to the mockery of a party policing itself. Cameron's latest appointment
of Lord Gold to investigate the Cruddas affair has already been flagged as flawed due to the peer's
special interest links. So we hold them to account using freedom of information requests. Follow the money trail of donations and favours granted and use the magnifying glass of transparency to burn through their varying cloaks of respectability. Oh and sign this e-petition!
http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/28681

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/22/2012 10:58:43 AM
Protests Emerge in Tahrir Square Again
















Tahrir Square, the center of last year’s massive demonstrations in Egypt, is the site of a protest once again. Tens of thousands have converged in the famed area of Cairo to voice their opposition to military rule and what they anticipate to be rigged elections.

After an interesting sequence of events, both Egyptian liberals and Islamists, two groups who often do not see eye-to-eye, came together to express their outrage. The event is thought to be the biggest display of dissent in the country since last year’s 18-day standoff in Tahrir Square that resulted in former President Hosni Mubarek departing from the country.

The liberals, who called for this protest two weeks ago, are seeking to ban Mubarek’s cronies from running for president in order to ensure real change will happen. Meanwhile, Islamists decided to join the efforts following the Egyptian election commission’s recent decision to disqualify their two top candidates from the presidential race. One of those candidates, Hazem Salah abu Ismail, was deemed ineligible because his mother is an American citizen.

With one month remaining until the election, the eligible candidates who seem to stand the best chance at winning the presidency are Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood, Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh, considered a more liberal Islamist, and Amr Moussa, the Foreign Minister.

In addition to airing their own respective grievances, both liberal and Islamist activists are also directing ire toward the current military rule. Neither group appears to trust that the military is taking the proper steps to allow for a proper transition and fair election. “People still feel like the old regime has not gone anywhere, and under the army we are living with them still,” said Mohamed Hedaya, an Egyptian student.

Just because both groups have amassed in Tahrir Square does not mean there is the same sense of unity that arose during the Mubarek protests, however. Liberals and other secularists are wary of the Islamists’ intentions. “Islamists have abandoned the revolution and left the square a long time ago in order to seek political gains, and now they’re only coming back to further abuse the revolution and achieve more political benefits,” said Egyptian Communist Party member Sayed Abdel Zaher.

Still, a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, Mahmoud Gadou, has a more optimistic perspective on the dual protest. “The strength of the revolution was in all sects coming together. Now is the time for this to happen again to ensure that the revolution continues until a fair election is carried out.”

Related Stories:

Egyptians Gather in Tahrir Square for “Victory March” to Mark One Week Anniversary of Mubarek’s Downfall

Egyptian Army Expels Protesters from Tahrir Square

Egyptian Military Vows Commitment to Civilian Rule

Read more: , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: Lilian Wagdy



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/protests-emerge-in-tahrir-square-again.html#ixzz1slWaJQVL

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
4/24/2012 12:15:15 AM

North Korea issues unusually specific threat

By Dylan Stableford

Senior Media Reporter



A North Korean military officer talks speaks at a museum in Panmunjom, North Korea, April 23, 2012. (Vincent Y …

North Korea's military vowed a new and unusually specific threat to its neighbors, saying it would reduce South Korea "to ashes" in less than four minutes.

The statement, released Monday when programming was interrupted on North Korea's state TV by a special report, comes amid rising tensions on the Korean peninsula.

Earlier this month, North Korea was unsuccessful in a long-range missile launch, prompting worries that North Korea may conduct another nuclear test. South Korean officials say new satellite images show that North Korea has been digging a tunnel in what appears to be preparation for a third atomic test.

According to the Associated Press, the statement from North Korea was unusual in promising something soon and in describing a specific period of time.

The North Korean military threatened to "reduce all the rat-like groups and the bases for provocations to ashes in three or four minutes, (or) in much shorter time, by unprecedented peculiar means and methods of our own style."

For months the North has castigated South Korean President Lee Myung-bak and the conservative administration for insulting their leadership and criticizing a new cruise missile capable of striking anywhere in the south.

South Korean officials responded, urging North Korea to end the threats. "We urge North Korea to immediately stop this practice," Unification Ministry spokesman Kim Hyung-suk said, according to the Associated Press. "We express deep concern that the North's threats and accusations have worsened inter-Korean ties and heightened tensions."

Meanwhile, in a meeting Sunday with a North Korean delegation in Beijing, China's senior official on foreign policy praised the leadership shown by North Korea's new young leader, Kim Jong Un.

The meeting follows the April 13 launch of what the United States called a disguised ballistic missile test by North Korea. The rocket disintegrated minutes after launch.

-- With reporting by Ron Recinto

Watch video

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!