Dear Sirs, I am following your discussion from the beginning, and decided to finally show up (and to sign up to this very interesting community). Even for the reader who may not be familiar to the play, so huge differences between your statements, reveal the line of the two cultures, two different times .... until the difference between subjective-objective points of view. Alas, Mr. Bogdan Fiedur shows up here as the voice from another two gentlemen`s future (without reciprocity, just because, aside all the likeness, the two of them can`t be considered similar to the shadows from his past times). In my opinion, Mr. Fiedur`s intention is not to accuse USA neither to justify Islamic fundamentalists, even though his statements cannot be accepted as a complete answer, for it is apparent that beneath a great deal of a true facts, what he still misses here looks like most important: eyes able to consume the plethora of things offered/exposed here. Personally, I am allergic on the theories of conspiracy, and need to praise you all for cutting them off. To a world already saddled with the prickly issue of combating the global menace of terrorism, it may be just refreshing to have such an interesting dialog, even between a deaf and hearing I thank you all for adding something of your personal uniqueness and charm into the basket. Sincerely, Anton Petrovci, journalist
|