Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
1/9/2011 6:21:23 AM
I hope this is not a rerun, I found it very interesting and true.....


The following is an interesting article. You might ask how long Dr. Hunt can remain at NIH once the White House gets wind of this article.

Dr. Hunt is a social and cultural anthropologist. He has had nearly 30 years experience in planning, conducting, and managing research in the field of youth studies, and drug and alcohol research. Currently Dr. Hunt is a Senior Research Scientist at the Institute for Scientific Analysis and the Principal Investigator on three National Institutes of Health projects. He is also a writer for American Thinker.
____________________________________________________

An article from American Thinker by Geoffrey P. Hunt:

Anatomy of a Failing Presidency

Barack Obama is on track to have the most spectacularly failed presidency since Woodrow Wilson. In the modern era, we've seen several failed presidencies--led by Jimmy Carter and LBJ. Failed presidents have one strong common trait-- they are repudiated, in the vernacular, spat out. Of course, LBJ wisely took the exit ramp early, avoiding a shove into oncoming traffic by his own party. Richard Nixon indeed resigned in disgrace, yet his reputation as a statesman has been partially restored by his triumphant overture to China .

But, Barack Obama is failing. Failing big. Failing fast. And failing everywhere: foreign policy, domestic initiatives, and most importantly, in forging connections with the American people. The incomparable Dorothy Rabinowitz in the Wall Street Journal put her finger on it: He is failing because he has no understanding of the American people, and may indeed loathe them. Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard says he is failing because he has lost control of his message, and is overexposed. Clarice Feldman of American Thinker produced a dispositive commentary showing that Obama is failing because fundamentally he is neither smart nor articulate; his intellectual dishonesty is conspicuous by its audacity and lack of shame.

But, there is something more seriously wrong: How could a new president riding in on a wave of unprecedented promise and goodwill have forfeited his tenure and become a lame duck in six months? His poll ratings are in free fall. In generic balloting, the Republicans have now seized a five point advantage. This truly is unbelievable. What's going on?

No narrative. Obama doesn't have a narrative. No, not a narrative about himself. He has a self-narrative, much of it fabricated, cleverly disguised or written by someone else. But this self-narrative is isolated and doesn't connect with us. He doesn't have an American narrative that draws upon the rest of us. All successful presidents have a narrative about the American character that intersects with their own where they display a command of history and reveal an authenticity at the core of their personality that resonates in a positive endearing way with the majority of Americans. We admire those presidents whose narratives not only touch our own, but who seem stronger, wiser, and smarter than we are. Presidents we admire are aspirational peers, even those whose politics don't align exactly with our own: Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Harry Truman, Ike, and Reagan.

But not this president. It's not so much that he's a phony, knows nothing about economics, and is historically illiterate and woefully small minded for the size of the task--all contributory of course. It's that he's not one of us. And whatever he is, his profile is fuzzy and devoid of content, like a cardboard cutout made from delaminated corrugated paper. Moreover, he doesn't command our respect and is unable to appeal to our own common sense. His notions of right and wrong are repugnant and how things work just don't add up. They are not existential. His descriptions of the world we live in don't make sense and don't correspond with our experience.

In the meantime, while we've been struggling to take a measurement of this man, he's dissed just about every one of us -- financiers, energy producers, banks, insurance executives, police officers, doctors, nurses, hospital administrators, post office workers, and anybody else who has a non-green job.

Expect Obama to lament at his last press conference in 2012: "For those of you I offended, I apologize. For those of you who were not offended, you just didn't give me enough time; if only I'd had a second term, I could have offended you too."

Mercifully, the Founders at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 devised a useful remedy for such a desperate state--staggered terms for both houses of the legislature and the executive. An equally abominable Congress can get voted out next year. With a new Congress, there's always hope of legislative gridlock until we vote for president again two short years after that.

Yes, small presidents do fail, Barack Obama among them. The coyotes howl but the wagon train keeps rolling along.

Margaret Thatcher: "The trouble with Socialism is, sooner or later you run out of other people's money."

"When you subsidize poverty and failure, you get more of both." - James Dale Davidson, National Taxpayers Union

"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." – Tacitus

"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own." - Unknown

God Bless Everyone
+0
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
1/11/2011 12:59:59 PM
Hi Gaby,
Excellent article. The interesting thing is that B Hussein started failing from almost day one and he either wasn't aware of the people's reaction or just doesn't give a d*amn. Personally I think it's a combination of both.
Here's a paradox for you I found on a T shirt that's being offered on the internet. I thought the points raised were very poignant.
Shalom,
Peter

Quote:
I hope this is not a rerun, I found it very interesting and true.....


The following is an interesting article. You might ask how long Dr. Hunt can remain at NIH once the White House gets wind of this article.

Dr. Hunt is a social and cultural anthropologist. He has had nearly 30 years experience in planning, conducting, and managing research in the field of youth studies, and drug and alcohol research. Currently Dr. Hunt is a Senior Research Scientist at the Institute for Scientific Analysis and the Principal Investigator on three National Institutes of Health projects. He is also a writer for American Thinker.
____________________________________________________

An article from American Thinker by Geoffrey P. Hunt:

Anatomy of a Failing Presidency

Barack Obama is on track to have the most spectacularly failed presidency since Woodrow Wilson. In the modern era, we've seen several failed presidencies--led by Jimmy Carter and LBJ. Failed presidents have one strong common trait-- they are repudiated, in the vernacular, spat out. Of course, LBJ wisely took the exit ramp early, avoiding a shove into oncoming traffic by his own party. Richard Nixon indeed resigned in disgrace, yet his reputation as a statesman has been partially restored by his triumphant overture to China .

But, Barack Obama is failing. Failing big. Failing fast. And failing everywhere: foreign policy, domestic initiatives, and most importantly, in forging connections with the American people. The incomparable Dorothy Rabinowitz in the Wall Street Journal put her finger on it: He is failing because he has no understanding of the American people, and may indeed loathe them. Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard says he is failing because he has lost control of his message, and is overexposed. Clarice Feldman of American Thinker produced a dispositive commentary showing that Obama is failing because fundamentally he is neither smart nor articulate; his intellectual dishonesty is conspicuous by its audacity and lack of shame.

But, there is something more seriously wrong: How could a new president riding in on a wave of unprecedented promise and goodwill have forfeited his tenure and become a lame duck in six months? His poll ratings are in free fall. In generic balloting, the Republicans have now seized a five point advantage. This truly is unbelievable. What's going on?

No narrative. Obama doesn't have a narrative. No, not a narrative about himself. He has a self-narrative, much of it fabricated, cleverly disguised or written by someone else. But this self-narrative is isolated and doesn't connect with us. He doesn't have an American narrative that draws upon the rest of us. All successful presidents have a narrative about the American character that intersects with their own where they display a command of history and reveal an authenticity at the core of their personality that resonates in a positive endearing way with the majority of Americans. We admire those presidents whose narratives not only touch our own, but who seem stronger, wiser, and smarter than we are. Presidents we admire are aspirational peers, even those whose politics don't align exactly with our own: Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Harry Truman, Ike, and Reagan.

But not this president. It's not so much that he's a phony, knows nothing about economics, and is historically illiterate and woefully small minded for the size of the task--all contributory of course. It's that he's not one of us. And whatever he is, his profile is fuzzy and devoid of content, like a cardboard cutout made from delaminated corrugated paper. Moreover, he doesn't command our respect and is unable to appeal to our own common sense. His notions of right and wrong are repugnant and how things work just don't add up. They are not existential. His descriptions of the world we live in don't make sense and don't correspond with our experience.

In the meantime, while we've been struggling to take a measurement of this man, he's dissed just about every one of us -- financiers, energy producers, banks, insurance executives, police officers, doctors, nurses, hospital administrators, post office workers, and anybody else who has a non-green job.

Expect Obama to lament at his last press conference in 2012: "For those of you I offended, I apologize. For those of you who were not offended, you just didn't give me enough time; if only I'd had a second term, I could have offended you too."

Mercifully, the Founders at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 devised a useful remedy for such a desperate state--staggered terms for both houses of the legislature and the executive. An equally abominable Congress can get voted out next year. With a new Congress, there's always hope of legislative gridlock until we vote for president again two short years after that.

Yes, small presidents do fail, Barack Obama among them. The coyotes howl but the wagon train keeps rolling along.

Margaret Thatcher: "The trouble with Socialism is, sooner or later you run out of other people's money."

"When you subsidize poverty and failure, you get more of both." - James Dale Davidson, National Taxpayers Union

"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." – Tacitus

"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own." - Unknown

Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
1/12/2011 5:00:01 AM
Best quote of the week


Best quote of the week:

Obama said : "Some people in DC talk about me like a dog"......

Fred Thompson replied : "Maybe it's because he keeps treating this country like a fire hydrant"

------ Way to go Fred.....
God Bless Everyone
+0
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
1/13/2011 9:16:25 AM
Hi Gaby,
Excellent!!!!!! How true isn't it? It's as he's marking his territory but the only mark you can see is the mark of Cain on B Hussein's forehead.
Shalom,
Peter

Quote:
Best quote of the week


Best quote of the week:

Obama said : "Some people in DC talk about me like a dog"......

Fred Thompson replied : "Maybe it's because he keeps treating this country like a fire hydrant"

------ Way to go Fred.....
Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
1/13/2011 9:22:44 AM
Hello Friends,

As you'll see from the below Rasmussen report the majority of Americans do not believe the ridiculous allegations of the MSM and some Democratic politicians that the Tea Party and Sarah Palin are to blame for the horrendous attack on Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and the murder of 6 innocent bystanders.

What I find inexplicable are the unfounded attacks on Sarah Palin and on all the Tea Party members. The hatred of the progressive MSM is so inbred that reality makes no difference to them and they'll go into their attack mode regardless of the realities that this was the act of an unbalanced mind and that politics had nothing to do with it. The more evidence that unfolds shows if anything that this lunatic if connected politically to any side was more a leftist then a conservative. But that's not important, what is important are the unfounded attacks against Palin and the Tea Party.

My friends this starts from the top down. Remember the Jihadi Ft. Hood slaughter??? B Hussein was out there on day one demanding that people not jump to conclusions against his beloved Muslim bretheren yet he remained silent and said nothing when the attacks were spewing from Democratics and the progressive MSM.

Is this a case of double standards or simply a pathetic attempt by B Hussein to save his political life from ending in abysmall failure as it looks as if it will? This morning I read an article where for the first time since the horrendous attack B Hussein said blame should not be thrown at any political party or entity. Possibly a bit to late or was he told he has no choice other then to look as if he's being the leader of all Americans he so obviously isn't. His failure to speak out immediately was in fact his agreement with the hatred the MSM and Democratic polititions were and are spouting against Sarah Palin and the Tea Party who so soundly trounced him and his party in the mid term elections. Was this another pathetic attempt to take advantage of a tragedy for political gain?

Thank God the American people have more sense then he, his party and the MSM give them credit for.

Shalom,

Peter




Most Voters View Arizona Shootings As Random Act of Violence, Not Politics

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Americans have closely followed news stories about the shooting of Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and the killing of six others in Arizona on Saturday, and most don’t feel politics was the cause of it.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 28% of Adults say the shooting in Arizona was the result of political anger in the country. Fifty-eight percent (58%) say instead that it was a random act of violence by an unstable person. Fourteen percent (14%) are undecided. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Sixty-eight percent (68%) of Republicans and 56% of adults not affiliated with either of the major political parties view the shooting as a random act of violence. Even Democrats by a 48% to 37% margin agree, although leading members of their party have attributed the shootings to a climate of anger they say has been generated by opponents of President Obama.

In a separate survey taken following the weekend shootings, 45% of Likely U.S. Voters said they are at least somewhat concerned that those opposed to the president’s policies will resort to violence, but 52% do not share that concern.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

The survey of 1,000 Adults was conducted on January 10-11, 2011 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

Eighty percent (80%) of Americans say they have followed recent news reports about the shooting of the congresswoman and others in Arizona, including 50% who say they have followed Very Closely.

A plurality (47%) of blacks blame the shootings on political anger in the country, while 60% of whites regard them as a random act by an unstable person.

Government workers are almost evenly divided on the question, while 57% of those who work in the private sector see the incident as a random act of violence.

There’s little difference of opinion between those who don’t own a gun and those who say someone in their household owns one.

Rasmussen Reports exit polling on Election Day last November found that 63% of those who voted were at least somewhat angry at the current policies of the federal government.

Voters continue to feel the Republican agenda in Congress is less extreme than that of congressional Democrats. Republicans hold an 11-point lead over Democrats on the Generic Congressional Ballot, the widest gap between the two parties since right before Election Day.

Fifty-four percent (54%) of Americans believe violent video games lead to more violence in society.

In a November 2009 survey, 26% of employed adults said they have seriously thought that someone in their workplace was capable of mass violence.

Additional information from this survey and a full demographic breakdown are available to Platinum Members only.


Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0