Hello Thomas & Kathleen,
I've been away for 3 days and just got back yesterday. When I logged in yesterday I saw the new POTW team and wish to congratulate both of you and wish you well in your new endeavor.
I read with interest the new criteria for the POTW and hope that this will succeed and hold the interest of the members.
There is one point I find a bit problematic. We have many active members in the community that haven't got their own forums but they participate in many forums within the community. The objective is to recognize and reward members that contribute to the community and having your own forum isn't necessarily a criteria that shows the contributing factor. There are many that have forums that are mainly advertising forums and their main purpose is to utilize Adland for their businesses which of course is acceptable and the purpose of Adland.
However the ownership of a forum of that sort doesn't make the member one that contributes to the community. I find it totally incomprehensible that a member like Phil Black not only can't be nominated but isn't even allowed to nominate others cos he hasn't got his own forum. There aren't many members that contribute to the community as he does.
I read through all the posts here and others like him haven't got their own forums and your recommendation was that they start a forum prior to the end of this weeks nominations. I wonder does that act alone make a forum an active one???
I recommend that an adjustment to the criteria be made that would allow an excellent member like Phil Black (and others like him) be eligible not only for the POTW but be allowed to nominate others.
Shalom,
Peter
|