Hello Robert,

Interesting and philosophically there might be right in some of your claims but unfortunately we are facing a different set of problems that have to be dealt with in order to protect OUR right to freedom of speech.

According to many of the laws passed in different countries and the law they are trying to pass in the UN we will not have the right to say a thing against Islam and they can say kill, behead, slaughter all the infidels (and much worse) that don't convert to Islam. This fight is one of the most important we are facing today.

So, we have to drop the philosophical arguments and get down to the nitty gritty of defending our rights to freedom of speech. If we lose that we lost the fight altogether.

Shalom,

Peter

Hi Geketa,

I agree there are moderate Muslims but where are they? Why don't we hear their voices crying out this is not our way? Why don;t we hear them stating that the extremists don't represent them or act in their name?

There a re very few willing to do that and the rest are either afraid or accept what is being preached in the Mosques, on TV and elsewhere.

The bottom line is that I am in  total agreement with Geert Wilders' statement that there might be moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam.

In the movie Obsessions one of those interviewed is a Muslim that was once a PLO terrorist and was in a Israeli prison. He realized the truth and is now fighting to stop the extreme/radical Islam. He said that around 25% io the Muslims are radicals and terrorist. But, the 25% represent close to 300,000,000 muslims world wide. Do you grasp that number?  It's close to the total population of the USA. Think about that and understand this is every bodies fight and it's about time people woke uo to the dangers they are facing.

As to your neighbors. Right now I think it's moot question when we already know there are over 25 terrorist training camps in the USA from only one faction of the extreme Islam. I'm assuming there are many more.

Shalom,

Peter

Hello Peter,

Sunday afternoon for me at present (day off! J) That comment also has something to do in the whole problematic. Yes, the problem is, as you say, no longer for philosophical considerations, but I would have preferred to have given them as I said, a theological connotation and it is precisely the lack of this understanding that we have all progressively put aside since many … many hundreds of years that has caused for today being one of urgency in which talking and smart considerations seem totally out of the current and urgent agenda. There is no point running to shut the gate once the fox has entered the chicken enclosure, other urgencies at that point need to be attended to. Yes, the knot is huge, far greater than what we currently see or understand of at present. Today nothing is caused by an individual problem, they all stem from conflicting interests from all quarters and all are in themselves essential and beyond the reasoning of a single individual. The best example I can give (Video below 4 successive videos!) of an interlaced silly little mishap that grows before you dare even to consider it, into a horror of massive proportions is that of flight 401 that crashed in the Everglades killing 100s of its passengers and crew. This had as origins the failure of a very insignificant little green light bulb worth 5 cents, informing about the plane’s nose wheel assertion for being down and locked. To me it is totally obvious that the Middle East crises today associated with the global economic crises and the lethargy of European nations that you may no longer name as nations (Politically incorrect) and add to that, religion congruities as well as huge dose of secular (non believing arrogance) is quite sufficient for doing away with any scientist trying to better the nuke bomb.

Friendly yours,

Robert.

((youtube id="EZE4GrgbGSM&feature=related"))((/youtube))