Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Helen Elias

801
1370 Posts
1370
Invite Me as a Friend
RE: Human Shields In Gaza
1/30/2012 8:43:22 PM
Hello Peter

What kind of depraved reasoning is making Christian organizations wanting to change the Bible in this way!? When an Arab gets his hands on a Bible and reads it (a rarity because it is against Saudi/Sharia law to even bring a Bible into the country) that Arab wants to see what the Bible actually says, not some distorted version. He is looking for truth. Changing the Bible in the way suggested in the article would only create confusion in the mind of the reader. I was really surprised to see Wycliffe involved in these changes.

In my opinion, it is blasphemous to put the word, Allah, in any translation of the Bible.

Why do people want to appease the Muslim anyway? Don't they know it will do no good in the end? World disapproval and outrage could not keep the Muslims from blowing up those Buddhist statues, for example. A lot of these Muslims will only be interested in preserving their own butt when push come to shove and the radical Muslim takes over.

I do not understand how people can send their young sons and daughters off to war to fight for our 'freedoms' risking their very lives! ....but these same people do not have the spine to stand up to the Muslims and tell them to their faces that Islam is wrong and sick and wrong and sick! I do it every chance I get. I am careful to let the Muslim know that I care about him/her and it is Islam that is a big lie and blasphemous. I don't use the words 'sick and wrong' until I have gotten to know them better. :))

Helen




Quote:
Hello Friends,

I was amazed when I read the below article. We're all aware that certain movements within Christianity and Judaism are pandering to Islam and causing mayhem with their publications and support of this "religion" that preaches hate, murder, suppression of women, subjugation and killing of all infidels, honor killings and as you already know the list goes on and on.

In most cases these movements and groups within Christianity and Judaism that are guilty of pandering are the left and extreme left within these religions. But the changing of the written word in the bible both Old and New Testaments is going to far in my. This seems to be the case and in the below article you'll see that there are groups that are replacing "The Father" with allah and redefining the meaning of "The Son". All this is being done by these Christian organizations in order not to offend the Muslims. This my friends is the epitome of submission and subjugation. The next step will be conversion to Islam in order not to offend these savages.

I would expect the sane and rational Judeo/Christian world to demand that Islam "edit" their hate filled book rather then change the Bible in order to placate and please the Islamic supremacists.

I must admit that the below article caught me by surprise and it's the first I heard about this issue. This is especially surprising when you consider the fate of Christians in Muslim countries. You would expect Christian organizations to strengthen their beliefs rather then to weaken them by new translations that change the original message of the Bible.

Read more about it in the below article.

Shalom,

Peter

New Bible Versions REMOVE ‘Father’ and ‘Son Of God’ Because It Offends Muslims

Mainline Christian organizations are changing their holy scripture to avoid offending Muslims. Not only does this violate their scripture, but it also defeats the purpose of their mission--to share the Gospel. If mainline Christian organizations fear Muslims so much that they have to edit what they believe to be the Word of God, how far can they be from submission? Where are the righteous, the outraged, the proud?

It is Islamic authorities who should be excising the quran and hadith of the ideology that calls for jihad, genocide, subjugation and oppression of women, Jews, Christians, Hindus, Sikhs and all non-Muslims. It is the ummah who should be calling for sharia bans. Instead, the Christians are bastardizing their scripture? The Muslims refer to Christians in their daily prayers as "those who are led astray" (Muslims curse Christians and Jews multiple times in daily prayers). This madness validates their contempt and supremacism:

Concerned Christian missionaries, Bible translators, pastors, and national church leaders have come together with a public petition to stop these organizations. They claim a public petition is their last recourse because meetings with these organizations’ leaders, staff resignations over this issue and criticism and appeals from native national Christians concerned about the translationshave failed to persuade these agencies to retain “Father” and “Son” in the text of all their translations.”

Biblical Missiology, a ministry of Boulder, Colorado-based Horizon International, is sponsoring the petition. The main issues of this controversy surround new Arabic and Turkish translations. Here are three examples native speakers give:

First, Wycliffe and SIL have produced Stories of the Prophets, an Arabic Bible that uses an Arabic equivalent of “Lord” instead of “Father” and “Messiah” instead of “Son.”

Second, Frontiers and SIL have produced Meaning of the Gospel of Christ , an Arabic translation which removes “Father” in reference to God and replaces it with “Allah,” and removes or redefines “Son.”

For example, the verse which Christians use to justify going all over the world to make disciples, thus fulfilling the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19) reads, “Cleanse them by water in the name of Allah, his Messiah and his Holy Spirit” instead of “baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” Rev. Bassam Madany, an Arab American who runs Middle East Resources, terms these organization’s efforts as “a western imperialistic attempt that’s inspired by cultural anthropology, and not by biblical theology.” (more here)

Report: American Bible translators bowdlerize scriptures to avoid offending Muslims: no "Father" and "Son" Jihadwatch

If this is true, for the parties they are trying not to offend, anything short of Islam -- of professing that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is his messenger -- would be "offensive." This is not making Christianity more palatable. It is de-Christianizing it. It is manufacturing yet another Christian heresy.

Indeed, for many denominations, the validity of baptism depends on the words used: "I baptize you in the name of the Father, and of the the Son, and of the Holy Spirit." No euphemisms, no nicknames: for example, trial balloons aiming to portray a more gender-neutral God have already been burst: the use of "Creator, Redeemer, and Sanctifier" in baptism has been rejected by the Catholic Church, if not others.

Those who truly believe they are winning souls for Christ would not risk the validity of baptism, and those who are genuinely convinced that they possess the truth will not apologize or worry it is offensive.

As a technical matter, one wonders how the translators handle the words: "Who is a liar but he that denies that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denies the Father and the Son" (1 John 2:22). And "But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father who is in heaven" (Matthew 10:33).

One last bit of holy writ: "You might as well fall flat on your face as lean over too far backward." - James Thurber

"'Father' and 'Son' Ousted from the Trinity in New Bible Translations," by Hussein Hajj Wario for the Yahoo! Contributor Network, January 27 (thanks to CGW):

A controversy is brewing over three reputable Christian organizations, which are based in North America, whose efforts have ousted the words "Father" and "Son" from new Bibles. Wycliffe Bible Translators, Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL) and Frontiers are under fire for "producing Bibles that remove "Father," "Son" and "Son of God" because these terms are offensive to Muslims." Concerned Christian missionaries, Bible translators, pastors, and national church leaders have come together with a public petition to stop these organizations. They claim a public petition is their last recourse because meetings with these organizations' leaders, staff resignations over this issue and criticism and appeals from native national Christians concerned about the translations "have failed to persuade these agencies to retain "Father" and "Son" in the text of all their translations."

Clearly, they fail to appreciate the far-reaching ramifications that Christians not only may dare, but are commanded to call on the Creator of the Universe as "Father." That fundamentally re-wires one's relationship with God and describes a unique intimacy and bond of love that ought not be squandered to score short-term points.

Biblical Missiology, a ministry of Boulder, Colorado-based Horizon International, is sponsoring the petition.

The main issues of this controversy surround new Arabic and Turkish translations. Here are three examples native speakers give:

First, Wycliffe and SIL have produced Stories of the Prophets, an Arabic Bible that uses an Arabic equivalent of "Lord" instead of "Father" and "Messiah" instead of "Son."
Second, Frontiers and SIL have produced Meaning of the Gospel of Christ , an Arabic translation which removes "Father" in reference to God and replaces it with "Allah," and removes or redefines "Son." For example, the verse which Christians use to justify going all over the world to make disciples, thus fulfilling the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19) reads, "Cleanse them by water in the name of Allah, his Messiah and his Holy Spirit" instead of "baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit." Rev. Bassam Madany, an Arab American who runs Middle East Resources, terms these organization's efforts as "a western imperialistic attempt that's inspired by cultural anthropology, and not by biblical theology."

Third, Frontiers and SIL have produced a new Turkish translation of the Gospel of Matthew that uses Turkish equivalents of "guardian" for "Father" and "representative" or "proxy" for "Son." To Turkish church leader Rev. Fikret Böcek, "This translation is 'an all-American idea' with absolutely no respect for the 'sacredness' of Scripture, or even of the growing Turkish church."

SIL has issued a public response stating "all personnel subscribe to a statement of faith which affirms the Trinity, Christ's deity, and the inspiration of Scripture." However, in the same statement, which is similar to Wycliffe's, it claims "word-for-word translation of these titles would communicate an incorrect meaning (i.e. that God had physical, sexual relationships with Mary) [sic]," thus justifying substituting "Father" and "Son" in new translations. Calls and emails to Wycliffe and SIL to clarify their positions were not returned. Frontiers responded to calls with articles that critics have already dismissed as skirting omissions of "Father" and "Son" in new Bible translations.

The point about sexual connotations is baloney. Many of these countries have, or once had indigenous Christian populations with scriptures in indigenous languages where this was not a problem. If they're coming up with something untoward, they need better translators.


Spend $4 and get back $10 every time you spend. Contact me (Helen) at this email »»» zhebee@yahoo.com
+0
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Human Shields In Gaza
1/30/2012 8:56:06 PM
Hi Helen,

Last year when they first reported about the massacre of the Fogel family I started investigating and found that they are distant relatives. I went to see them during the week of mourning after their funerals.

You weren't active when it happened cos I wrote about it extensively at the time.

Shalom,

Peter

Quote:

Peter,

Were these murdered Fogels related to you?

Those are horrific pictures. I didn't 'quote' because I didn't want to have run into them more often. :((

Helen
Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Human Shields In Gaza
1/30/2012 9:10:37 PM
Hello Helen,

It's about time that a court rules on honor killings as they should. In many cases they called the killings family disputes or some other ridiculous name other then calling a spade a spade.

The whole concept of honor killings is barbaric but so much of Islam is barbaric and savage. In the Muslim countries honor killings are almost ignored and in some not even considered a crime. This can't become the norm in western countries but many of the honor killing cases were minimized for the sake of political correctness and multiculturalism. This case in Canada might be the first step in putting a stop to that.

Shalom,

Peter

Quote:





Children are forced into marriage and raped ....or killed. What a nightmare this evil religion is ...the most evil religion in the world.


Islamic parents found guilty of murdering daughters

Associated Press - 1/29/2012 4:35:00 PM

Associated Press logo small 2KINGSTON, Ontario - A jury on Sunday found an Afghan father, his wife and their son guilty of killing three teenage sisters and a co-wife in what the judge described as "cold-blooded, shameful murders" resulting from a "twisted concept of honor."

The jury took 15 hours to find Mohammad Shafia, 58; his wife Tooba Yahya, 42; and their son Hamed, 21, each guilty of four counts of first-degree murder in a case that shocked and riveted Canadians from coast to coast.

First-degree murder carries an automatic life sentence with no chance of parole for 25 years.

After the verdict was read, the three defendants again declared their innocence in the killings of sisters Zainab, 19, Sahar 17, and Geeti, 13, as well as Rona Amir Mohammad, 52, Shafia's childless first wife in a polygamous marriage.

Their bodies were found June 30, 2009, in a car submerged in a canal in Kingston, Ontario, where the family had stopped for the night on their way home to Montreal from Niagara Falls, Ontario.

Prosecutors said the defendants allegedly killed the three teenage sisters because they dishonored the family by defying its disciplinarian rules on dress, dating, socializing and going online. Shafia's first wife was living with him and his second wife. The polygamous relationship, if revealed, could have resulted in their deportation.

The prosecution alleged it was a case of premeditated murder, staged to look like an accident after it was carried out. Prosecutors said the defendants drowned their victims elsewhere on the site, placed their bodies in the car and pushed it into the canal.

Defense lawyers said the deaths were accidental. They said the Nissan car accidentally plunged into the canal after the eldest daughter, Zainab, took it for a joy ride with her sisters and her father's first wife. Hamed said he watched the accident, although he didn't call police from the scene.

After the jury returned the verdicts, Mohammad Shafia, speaking through a translator, said, "We are not criminal, we are not murderer, we didn't commit the murder and this is unjust."

His weeping wife, Tooba, also declared the verdict unjust, saying, "I am not a murderer, and I am a mother, a mother." Their son, Hamed, speaking in English said, "I did not drown my sisters anywhere."

But Judge Robert Maranger was unmoved, saying the evidence clearly supported their conviction for "the planned and deliberate murder of four members of your family."

"It is difficult to conceive of a more despicable, more heinous crime ... the apparent reason behind these cold-blooded, shameful murders was that the four completely innocent victims offended your completely twisted concept of honor ... that has absolutely no place in any civilized society."

Outside court, prosecutor Gerard Laarhuis said the verdict is a reflection of Canadian values that he hopes will resonate. "This verdict sends a very clear message about our Canadian values and the core principles in a free and democratic society that all Canadians enjoy and even visitors to Canada enjoy," Laarhuis said to cheers of approval from onlookers.

The family had left Afghanistan in 1992 and lived in Pakistan, Australia and Dubai before settling in Canada in 2007. Shafia, a wealthy businessman, married Yahya because his first wife could not have children.

The prosecution painted a picture of a household controlled by a domineering Shafia, with Hamed keeping his sisters in line and doling out discipline when his father was away on frequent business trips to Dubai.

The months leading up to the deaths were not happy ones in the Shafia household, according to evidence presented at trial. Zainab, the oldest daughter, was forbidden to attend school for a year because she had a young Pakistani-Canadian boyfriend, and she fled to a shelter, terrified of her father, the court was told.

The prosecution said her parents found condoms in Sahar's room as well as photos of her wearing short skirts and hugging her Christian boyfriend, a relationship she had kept secret. Geeti was becoming almost impossible to control: skipping school, failing classes, being sent home for wearing revealing clothes and stealing, while declaring to authority figures that she wanted to be placed in foster care, according to the prosecution.

Shafia's first wife wrote in a diary that her husband beat her and "made life a torture," while his second wife called her a servant.

The prosecution presented wire taps and cell phone records from the Shafia family in court to support their honor killing theory. The wiretaps, which capture Shafia spewing vitriol about his dead daughters, calling them treacherous and whores and invoking the devil to defecate on their graves, were a focal point of the trial.

"There can be no betrayal, no treachery, no violation more than this," Shafia said on one recording. "Even if they hoist me up onto the gallows ... nothing is more dear to me than my honor."

Defense lawyers argued that at no point in the intercepts do the accused say they drowned the victims.


Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0
RE: Human Shields In Gaza
1/31/2012 3:33:04 AM

Peter, unfortunately I remember this heinous crime very well and like Helen, I won't quote the one with all the shocking photos. It was such a senseless crime and for no other reason than the family was Jewish. What a hate filled religion. :(

Quote:
Hi Helen,

Last year when they first reported about the massacre of the Fogel family I started investigating and found that they are distant relatives. I went to see them during the week of mourning after their funerals.

You weren't active when it happened cos I wrote about it extensively at the time.

Shalom,

Peter

Quote:

Peter,

Were these murdered Fogels related to you?

Those are horrific pictures. I didn't 'quote' because I didn't want to have run into them more often. :((

Helen
+0
RE: Human Shields In Gaza
1/31/2012 3:35:15 AM

Yes Peter, I was talking about the Holocaust. Sorry I didn't make myself clear, but you understood what I was talking about anyway. :)

Quote:
Hi Evelyn,

I agree the videos are excellent and Pat Condell doesn't mince words but tells it like it is. He is not a conformist and as far as he's concerned political correctness be d*amned.

I'm assuming you're talking about the holocaust in your post. Unfortunately you raise an important point that the subject isn't being taught in the schools and many aren't aware of it. This is part of our recent history but must be taught and remembered.

Shalom,

Peter

Quote:

GREAT videos Peter! The more I watch, read and listen tells me just how little I know and Pat Condell does an excellent job of telling the true facts. I don't remember anything being taught about any of this when I was in school and what little I did know, which I now know was very little, was what I learned in church. Keep up the good work of educating people about the real story and the truth.

Shalom

Quote:
Hello Friends,

With the demonization of Israel by the MSM, world leaders, B Hussein with his so transparent and obvious Islamic agenda, with all the Muslim Brotherhood front organizations in the USA and elsewhere and with the anti Semites and anti Israel people and organizations, I decided to post a series of Pat Condell videos. A reality check of sorts.

Pat has a way with words and I feel no need to add any comments this time. Well worth watching for those interested in reality and facts and not the PC tainted versions you see and read elsewhere.

Shalom,

Peter


http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=j1N1zhUm84w



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LeGYAfh9A1k&feature=related


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIesXORjBps&feature=related


+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!