Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
RE: HSIG - A Swiss Politician Speaks Out Against The EU & Islam
9/14/2011 2:30:37 PM

TELL CONGRESS: NO AID FOR PALESTINIANS
Published on DickMorris.com on September 13 , 2011

Dear Friend,

The Palestinians have applied to the United Nations General Assembly to be admitted as a nation. If the U.N. admits these terrorists, the U.S. Congress should cut off all direct and indirect aid to the Palestinian Authority. They are terrorists pure and simple. The Palestinian Authority gave up any pretense of renouncing terrorism when they merged with Hamas. If the General Assembly votes to admit Palestine, the U.S. can still veto it in the Security Council. But on its own, the General Assembly can and will admit the Palestinian Authority as an observer on a par with the Vatican.

Observer status entitles the Palestinians to participate in U.N. organizations like the International Court of Justice in The Hague and the Council on Human Rights. Can you imagine the travesty of admitting a terrorist group to sit on either body? The United States gives billions in direct aid to the Palestinians and in indirect aid through the United Nations. We must petition Congress to put a halt to these funds if the UN grants the Palestinian Authority observer status.

And we can succeed. The Republican House must affirmatively approve any aid to the Palestinian Authority. With enough support, we can persuade them to say no.

Please sign our online petition -
CLICK HERE.

Please give us your name, hard address, and e-address. That way we can send your signature to your Senator and Congressman directly. We can make a difference. Please encourage your family and friends to log onto
DickMorris.com and sign our petition.

Please
CLICK HERE to sign the online petition.

Thanks for your help,

Dick Morris

Subscribe to Dick's Newsletter

Other Useful Links
DickMorris.com
Follow Dick on FACEBOOK
Follow Dick on TWITTER
See Dick's YouTube Videos
+0
RE: HSIG - A Swiss Politician Speaks Out Against The EU & Islam
9/15/2011 2:53:10 PM
Hello Peter, here is an article that I found very interesting and it certainly has a ring of truth. Obama is furious that PM Netanyahu had the audacity to publicly disagree with him over his demand that Israel agree to the pre 1967 borders prior to negotiations and this is just another insidious interference in another country to cause the fall of a government. This is also a Soros funded group as is Stanley Grenberg.
EXTREMISTS ON PARADE
Obama trying to unseat Israeli leader?

Country's 'social protests' may be engineered for regime change

Posted: September 14, 2011
8:58 pm Eastern

By Aaron Klein
copyright © 2011 WND

JERUSALEM – Is President Obama attempting to unseat Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and replace him with a leftist leader who largely toes the line set by the president for the Middle East?

There are indications the so-called social protests rocking Israel were engineered for that very purpose.
According to an investigative report in Israel's Maariv's newspaper, the country's protests were engineered by a group of media strategists directed by prominent Democratic strategist Stanley Greenberg, a former adviser to Bill Clinton, John Kerry and others.

Greenberg reportedly is working with Israeli strategists who were behind left-wing leader Ehud Barak's successful race for prime minister in 1999. Greenberg himself helped to run Barak's campaign.
Barak currently is the defense minister in a coalition government with Netanyahu.

Last week, WND reported Greenberg previously ran the campaign of Bolivia's former president, who was ushered into office amid escalating social protests in that country.

After Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada took power in Bolivia, he quickly implemented an economic "shock therapy" crafted by Jeffrey Sachs, a Columbia University professor who sits on the board of an organization literally seeking to reorganize the entire global economic system.

That group is the Institute for New Economic Thinking, or INET.

Philanthropist George Soros is INET's founding sponsor, with the billionaire having provided a reported $25 million over five years to support INET activities.

Now, a closer look at Greenberg's previous work in Israel may betray his ultimate intentions with regard to the social protests here.

In 1999, after Netanyahu rebuffed President Clinton's demands for the relinquishment of strategic territory, Clinton deployed Greenberg along with veteran Democratic image maker Robert Shrum and James Carville to run Barak's campaign.

This followed the fall of Netanyahu's governing coalition, an event precipitated behind the scenes by Clinton, according to numerous Netanyahu insiders speaking to WND.

Those insiders recounted how the Clinton White House convinced Netanyahu coalition partners to abandon Netanyahu's government, thus prompting new elections.

Barak, leader of the leftist Labor party, was the main challenger against Netanyahu.

Greenberg, Shrum and Carville went to work crafting an image of Netanyahu as spurning Israel's relationships with the international community, particularly the U.S., while Barak was upheld as the clear candidate of choice.

According to media reports, Greenberg flew into Israel routinely to craft Barak's strategy and reportedly did most of the heavy lifting for Shrum and Carville.

After Barak successfully unseated Netanyahu, the new Israeli leader largely followed Clinton's major Mideast policies.

Indeed, with Clinton, Barak offered PLO Leader Yasser Arafat a state in the eastern sections of Jerusalem, reportedly including the Temple Mount, as well as the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

After Arafat turned down Barak's offer at Camp David in the summer of 2000, Barak made even further concessions while the Palestinian leader was busy starting his intifada, or terror war, against Israel.

Now, as protests reportedly engineered by Greenberg run rampant in Israel, Barak has been openly challenging Netanyahu's policies at every turn.

Netanyahu has rejected Obama's demands for a retreat from most of the West Bank, Jordan valley and eastern Jerusalem. The Israeli leader has been scornful of Obama's unprecedented demand for a halt to Jewish construction in eastern Jerusalem.

Barak, meanwhile, repeatedly has attacked Netanyahu's policies while aligning his own policies with those of Obama.

Just this week, Barak called for the immediate return to negotiations with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who has rejected talks and is instead seeking to unilaterally declare a Palestinian state at the United Nations next week.

This past weekend, Barak called for a special Knesset summit to debate what he called Israel's "diplomatic isolation," hinting Netanyahu is largely responsible for that isolation and not the recent Mideast revolutions that quickly ushered anti-Israel personalities to power.

In a report earlier this month, Haaretz columnist Akiva Eldar, a supporter of Obama's Mideast agenda, wrote that since Netanyahu has refused many of Obama's demands, the Obama administration has decided to take a page out of the Clinton guidebook and overthrow Netanyahu's government.

Wrote Eldar, "When Clinton recently invited Kadima leader Tzipi Livni to a private meeting, this signified an unofficial announcement that Netanyahu's account in Washington has been closed."

"Twelve years ago, when Hillary Clinton' husband realized that… [Netanyahu] had no intention of honoring his signature (on the Wye River Accord with Yasser Arafat), that was Netanyahu' last stop before being sent back to his villa in Caesarea,” continued Eldar.

'Our brand is crisis'

Two weeks ago saw the largest protests in Israel's history. Four hundred thousand people hit the streets in cities across the country purportedly to protest against the rising cost of living while demanding sweeping economic reforms.

That massive protest was the culmination of weeks of similar social demonstrations and protest tent cities that organized in various Israeli municipalities, mainly in Tel Aviv.

WND has reported how similar tent cities are being planned by a slew of U.S. radicals calling for a "Day of Rage" targeting Wall Street and U.S. capitalism.

Greenberg, the reported architect of the protests in Israel, founded the Democratic strategy firm Democracy Corps with Clinton advisers Carville and Shrum. Earlier, the trio ran a strategizing outfit called Greenberg Carville Shrum.

That firm in 2002 was behind a sophisticated campaign in Bolivia that helped de Lozada win his country's elections amid ongoing social protests. It was the second time de Lozada served as Bolivia's president.

In 1985, after de Lozada came to office the first time, he quickly implemented Sachs' "shock therapy." De Lozada attempted to engineer the restructuring of the Bolivian economy and the dismantling of the country's state-capitalist model that had prevailed there since the 1952 Bolivian Revolution.

Sachs is a renowned international economist best known for his work as an economic adviser to governments in Latin America, Eastern Europe, and the former Soviet Union

His "shock therapy" calls for drastically cutting inflation by scrapping all subsidies, price controls, restrictions on exports, imports and private business activity. The scheme also calls for linking each restructured country's economy with a more global currency.

Sachs' remedy for Bolivia, however, had dire consequences.

The Sachs plan did beat the country's inflation, but the price was continuing high unemployment, economic stagnation, labor revolt, a state of siege and a deepening involvement in the international drug market, reports noted.

To beat the hyperinflation under Sachs' plan, Bolivia ensured a large number of workers were laid off while others' salaries were slashed, leading to widespread worker strikes.

The Bolivian government imposed a state of siege in response to a wave of strikes.
Similar protests engulfed Bolivia when Greenberg's firm helped to orchestrate de Lozada's 2002 win. De Lozada had announced that he planned to once again implement Sachs' "shock therapy" for Bolivia.

A2005 documentary, entitled, "Our Brand is Crisis: Exporting neoliberal spin," followed Greenberg's and Carville's electioneering in Bolivia on behalf of de Lozada.

The film noted Greenberg's team saw no need to recraft de Lozada's economic policy approach based on Sachs "shock therapy" plan.

De Lozada was victorious in the 2002 elections, but was run out of office one year later amid massive opposition to his economic policies. Protesters demanded a return to the capitalist system.
Bretton Woods and 'shocking' world economy

Sachs, meanwhile, sits on the board of the Soros-funded Institute for New Economic Thinking.

This past April, Sachs keynoted INET's annual meeting, which took place in the mountains of Bretton Woods, N.H.

The gathering took place at Mount Washington Hotel, famous for hosting the original Bretton Woods economic agreements drafted in 1944. That conference's goal was to rebuild a post-World War II international monetary system. The April gathering had a similar stated goal – a global economic restructuring.

A Business Insider report on last year's event related, "George Soros has brought together a crack team of the world's top economists and financial thinkers."

"Its aim," continued the business newspaper, "to remake the world's economy as they see fit."

More than two-thirds of the speakers at the conference had direct ties to Soros.

Besides his role at INET, Sachs, a special adviser to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, is founder and co-president of the Soros-funded Millennium Promise Alliance, a nonprofit organization that says it is dedicated to ending extreme poverty and hunger.

Global taxes

With $50 million in capital from Soros, Millennium promotes a global economy while urging cooperation and investment from international banks and the United Nations Development Program.

The group helped to found the United Nations Millennium Development Goal, a move that was advanced by Sachs. He served as director from 2002 to 2006.

The U.N. Millennium Development Goal has demanded the imposition of international taxes as part of a stated effort of "eradicating extreme poverty, reducing child mortality rates, fighting disease epidemics such as AIDS, and developing a global partnership for development."

Investor's Business Daily reported the Millennium goal called for a "currency transfer tax," a "tax on the rental value of land and natural resources," a "royalty on worldwide fossil energy projection – oil, natural gas, coal," "fees for the commercial use of the oceans, fees for airplane use of the skies, fees for use of the electromagnetic spectrum, fees on foreign exchange transactions, and a tax on the carbon content of fuels."

Indeed, last September, a group of 60 nations, including France, Britain and Japan, propose at the U.N. summit on the Millennium Development Goals that a tax be introduced on international currency transactions to raise funds for development aid.

The proposed 0.005 percent tax on currency transactions would raise as much as $35 billion a year in development aid, claimed the proponents.

More Soros ties

Greenberg, meanwhile, also runs his own polling and strategy firm, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner.
A partner in the firm is Jeremy D. Rosner, who was special assistant to Clinton during his first term in office, serving as counselor and senior director for legislative affairs on the staff of the National Security Council.
Rosner's current client list, according to Greenberg's website, includes Soros' Open Society Institute.
With additional research by Chris Elliott and Brenda J. Elliott.

Read more: Obama trying to unseat Israeli leader? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=344985#ixzz1Y1uoBjyd

+0
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Human Shields In Gaza
9/15/2011 4:12:36 PM
Hi Evelyn,

First of all I'd like to wish you a very Happy Birthday. All the best on your special day.

The below article is based on an article written by an Israel investigative reporter Kalman Libskind. It was published in Maariv news paper on 9/2/11. It's a very interesting article and I'll try and find a good translation in English and post it here.

B Hussein knows no bounds when someone dares to disagree with him and do it publicly. PM Benjamin Netanyahu did just that when he wasn't willing to accept his pre 1967 border proposal (demand) and argued against it publicly at a press conference with B Hussein and then when he spoke before the joint session of Congress.

The fraud and great pretender B Hussein is well known in his pay backs and inborn pettiness. He'll do anything to get his revenge and that's what he's doing now or trying to do with his blatant attempt to cause the fall of Netanyahu's coalition government. It's not working and in the end the one who'll pay dearly for it all is Ehud Barak the Minister of Defense who's been ass kissing B Husssein lately and is the frauds present favorite choice or the ineffectual Tzipi Livni leader of the Kadima Party. So far all the polls show that Barak's party will probably not get any representation in the Knesset if elections were held today and Livni's Kadima will lose seats to other left wing parties. The Likud (Netanyhu's party) and its other coalition parties will have a majority again and become even stronger if elections were held today.

Shalom and thanks for posting the article,

Peter

Quote:
Hello Peter, here is an article that I found very interesting and it certainly has a ring of truth. Obama is furious that PM Netanyahu had the audacity to publicly disagree with him over his demand that Israel agree to the pre 1967 borders prior to negotiations and this is just another insidious interference in another country to cause the fall of a government. This is also a Soros funded group as is Stanley Grenberg.
EXTREMISTS ON PARADE
Obama trying to unseat Israeli leader?

Country's 'social protests' may be engineered for regime change

Posted: September 14, 2011
8:58 pm Eastern

By Aaron Klein
copyright © 2011 WND

JERUSALEM – Is President Obama attempting to unseat Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and replace him with a leftist leader who largely toes the line set by the president for the Middle East?

There are indications the so-called social protests rocking Israel were engineered for that very purpose.
According to an investigative report in Israel's Maariv's newspaper, the country's protests were engineered by a group of media strategists directed by prominent Democratic strategist Stanley Greenberg, a former adviser to Bill Clinton, John Kerry and others.

Greenberg reportedly is working with Israeli strategists who were behind left-wing leader Ehud Barak's successful race for prime minister in 1999. Greenberg himself helped to run Barak's campaign.
Barak currently is the defense minister in a coalition government with Netanyahu.

Last week, WND reported Greenberg previously ran the campaign of Bolivia's former president, who was ushered into office amid escalating social protests in that country.

After Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada took power in Bolivia, he quickly implemented an economic "shock therapy" crafted by Jeffrey Sachs, a Columbia University professor who sits on the board of an organization literally seeking to reorganize the entire global economic system.

That group is the Institute for New Economic Thinking, or INET.

Philanthropist George Soros is INET's founding sponsor, with the billionaire having provided a reported $25 million over five years to support INET activities.

Now, a closer look at Greenberg's previous work in Israel may betray his ultimate intentions with regard to the social protests here.

In 1999, after Netanyahu rebuffed President Clinton's demands for the relinquishment of strategic territory, Clinton deployed Greenberg along with veteran Democratic image maker Robert Shrum and James Carville to run Barak's campaign.

This followed the fall of Netanyahu's governing coalition, an event precipitated behind the scenes by Clinton, according to numerous Netanyahu insiders speaking to WND.

Those insiders recounted how the Clinton White House convinced Netanyahu coalition partners to abandon Netanyahu's government, thus prompting new elections.

Barak, leader of the leftist Labor party, was the main challenger against Netanyahu.

Greenberg, Shrum and Carville went to work crafting an image of Netanyahu as spurning Israel's relationships with the international community, particularly the U.S., while Barak was upheld as the clear candidate of choice.

According to media reports, Greenberg flew into Israel routinely to craft Barak's strategy and reportedly did most of the heavy lifting for Shrum and Carville.

After Barak successfully unseated Netanyahu, the new Israeli leader largely followed Clinton's major Mideast policies.

Indeed, with Clinton, Barak offered PLO Leader Yasser Arafat a state in the eastern sections of Jerusalem, reportedly including the Temple Mount, as well as the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

After Arafat turned down Barak's offer at Camp David in the summer of 2000, Barak made even further concessions while the Palestinian leader was busy starting his intifada, or terror war, against Israel.

Now, as protests reportedly engineered by Greenberg run rampant in Israel, Barak has been openly challenging Netanyahu's policies at every turn.

Netanyahu has rejected Obama's demands for a retreat from most of the West Bank, Jordan valley and eastern Jerusalem. The Israeli leader has been scornful of Obama's unprecedented demand for a halt to Jewish construction in eastern Jerusalem.

Barak, meanwhile, repeatedly has attacked Netanyahu's policies while aligning his own policies with those of Obama.

Just this week, Barak called for the immediate return to negotiations with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, who has rejected talks and is instead seeking to unilaterally declare a Palestinian state at the United Nations next week.

This past weekend, Barak called for a special Knesset summit to debate what he called Israel's "diplomatic isolation," hinting Netanyahu is largely responsible for that isolation and not the recent Mideast revolutions that quickly ushered anti-Israel personalities to power.

In a report earlier this month, Haaretz columnist Akiva Eldar, a supporter of Obama's Mideast agenda, wrote that since Netanyahu has refused many of Obama's demands, the Obama administration has decided to take a page out of the Clinton guidebook and overthrow Netanyahu's government.

Wrote Eldar, "When Clinton recently invited Kadima leader Tzipi Livni to a private meeting, this signified an unofficial announcement that Netanyahu's account in Washington has been closed."

"Twelve years ago, when Hillary Clinton' husband realized that… [Netanyahu] had no intention of honoring his signature (on the Wye River Accord with Yasser Arafat), that was Netanyahu' last stop before being sent back to his villa in Caesarea,” continued Eldar.

'Our brand is crisis'

Two weeks ago saw the largest protests in Israel's history. Four hundred thousand people hit the streets in cities across the country purportedly to protest against the rising cost of living while demanding sweeping economic reforms.

That massive protest was the culmination of weeks of similar social demonstrations and protest tent cities that organized in various Israeli municipalities, mainly in Tel Aviv.

WND has reported how similar tent cities are being planned by a slew of U.S. radicals calling for a "Day of Rage" targeting Wall Street and U.S. capitalism.

Greenberg, the reported architect of the protests in Israel, founded the Democratic strategy firm Democracy Corps with Clinton advisers Carville and Shrum. Earlier, the trio ran a strategizing outfit called Greenberg Carville Shrum.

That firm in 2002 was behind a sophisticated campaign in Bolivia that helped de Lozada win his country's elections amid ongoing social protests. It was the second time de Lozada served as Bolivia's president.

In 1985, after de Lozada came to office the first time, he quickly implemented Sachs' "shock therapy." De Lozada attempted to engineer the restructuring of the Bolivian economy and the dismantling of the country's state-capitalist model that had prevailed there since the 1952 Bolivian Revolution.

Sachs is a renowned international economist best known for his work as an economic adviser to governments in Latin America, Eastern Europe, and the former Soviet Union

His "shock therapy" calls for drastically cutting inflation by scrapping all subsidies, price controls, restrictions on exports, imports and private business activity. The scheme also calls for linking each restructured country's economy with a more global currency.

Sachs' remedy for Bolivia, however, had dire consequences.

The Sachs plan did beat the country's inflation, but the price was continuing high unemployment, economic stagnation, labor revolt, a state of siege and a deepening involvement in the international drug market, reports noted.

To beat the hyperinflation under Sachs' plan, Bolivia ensured a large number of workers were laid off while others' salaries were slashed, leading to widespread worker strikes.

The Bolivian government imposed a state of siege in response to a wave of strikes.
Similar protests engulfed Bolivia when Greenberg's firm helped to orchestrate de Lozada's 2002 win. De Lozada had announced that he planned to once again implement Sachs' "shock therapy" for Bolivia.

A2005 documentary, entitled, "Our Brand is Crisis: Exporting neoliberal spin," followed Greenberg's and Carville's electioneering in Bolivia on behalf of de Lozada.

The film noted Greenberg's team saw no need to recraft de Lozada's economic policy approach based on Sachs "shock therapy" plan.

De Lozada was victorious in the 2002 elections, but was run out of office one year later amid massive opposition to his economic policies. Protesters demanded a return to the capitalist system.
Bretton Woods and 'shocking' world economy

Sachs, meanwhile, sits on the board of the Soros-funded Institute for New Economic Thinking.

This past April, Sachs keynoted INET's annual meeting, which took place in the mountains of Bretton Woods, N.H.

The gathering took place at Mount Washington Hotel, famous for hosting the original Bretton Woods economic agreements drafted in 1944. That conference's goal was to rebuild a post-World War II international monetary system. The April gathering had a similar stated goal – a global economic restructuring.

A Business Insider report on last year's event related, "George Soros has brought together a crack team of the world's top economists and financial thinkers."

"Its aim," continued the business newspaper, "to remake the world's economy as they see fit."

More than two-thirds of the speakers at the conference had direct ties to Soros.

Besides his role at INET, Sachs, a special adviser to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, is founder and co-president of the Soros-funded Millennium Promise Alliance, a nonprofit organization that says it is dedicated to ending extreme poverty and hunger.

Global taxes

With $50 million in capital from Soros, Millennium promotes a global economy while urging cooperation and investment from international banks and the United Nations Development Program.

The group helped to found the United Nations Millennium Development Goal, a move that was advanced by Sachs. He served as director from 2002 to 2006.

The U.N. Millennium Development Goal has demanded the imposition of international taxes as part of a stated effort of "eradicating extreme poverty, reducing child mortality rates, fighting disease epidemics such as AIDS, and developing a global partnership for development."

Investor's Business Daily reported the Millennium goal called for a "currency transfer tax," a "tax on the rental value of land and natural resources," a "royalty on worldwide fossil energy projection – oil, natural gas, coal," "fees for the commercial use of the oceans, fees for airplane use of the skies, fees for use of the electromagnetic spectrum, fees on foreign exchange transactions, and a tax on the carbon content of fuels."

Indeed, last September, a group of 60 nations, including France, Britain and Japan, propose at the U.N. summit on the Millennium Development Goals that a tax be introduced on international currency transactions to raise funds for development aid.

The proposed 0.005 percent tax on currency transactions would raise as much as $35 billion a year in development aid, claimed the proponents.

More Soros ties

Greenberg, meanwhile, also runs his own polling and strategy firm, Greenberg Quinlan Rosner.
A partner in the firm is Jeremy D. Rosner, who was special assistant to Clinton during his first term in office, serving as counselor and senior director for legislative affairs on the staff of the National Security Council.
Rosner's current client list, according to Greenberg's website, includes Soros' Open Society Institute.
With additional research by Chris Elliott and Brenda J. Elliott.

Read more: Obama trying to unseat Israeli leader? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=344985#ixzz1Y1uoBjyd

Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: HSIG - AFDI/SIOA 911 Freedom Rally
9/15/2011 4:20:34 PM
Hello Friends,

As promised here are a few videos from participants in the AFDI/SIOA 911 10 year ceremony. To differentiate from the "official" NYC Bloomberg ceremony this one invited first responders and clergy of all faiths. The speakers at this event were from all over the United States and the world for that matter. Here you were allowed to speak the truth and not censored on what you can mention.

Shalom,

Peter


Member of the Israeli Knessett Dr. Eldad (also a retired Major General in the Israeli Military)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zf1eEwnlUFs&feature=player_embedded


Rosaleen Tallon lost her brother on 911 and Sally Regenhard her son.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0b84bb2zR4&feature=player_embedded


Ezra Levant a Canadian talk show host and brave freedom fighter.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AbgeUYQT3Ec&feature=player_embedded



Ambassador John Bolton, former Ambassador to the UN and a person many would like to see as a candidate for the GOP presidential nomination.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_x1bljjzFqk


Rene Stadtkewitz founder and Chairman of the Freheit Civil Rights party for more freedon and demoocracy. The only party in Germany dedicated to resisting JIhad activity n all its forms. He's a member of the German Parliament.

Joyce Kaufman a Florida radio host and staunch fighter against radical Islam, shariah and the many faces of Jihad.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jxlq8qo3lcE&feature=player_embedded


Ilario Pantano a US war hero and Congressional candidate in North Carolina. He's well worth listening to and suporting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4WlXy8OFeU&feature=player_embedded






Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: HSIG - David Yerushalmi Replies to Pro Sharia Oped In The NYT
9/16/2011 8:07:00 AM
Hello Friends,

There is much discussion and disagreements about Sharia Law. The Muslims proselytizing in favor of Sharia lie and say it is compliant with the Constitution which anyone with an open mind knows is as big a lie as B Hussein's fraudulent long form birth certificate (COLB). You see both are Taqiyaa at its best and the claims are lies using the rule of the Koran that lying to infidels is not only permitted it is their obligation to do so.

B Hussein's presidency is as I said many times the biggest political scam and fraud of all time (Taqiyaa big time). His ineligibility to hold the office of the President of the United States is so easy to determine yet no politician is willing to come forward and say what has to be said. Yet, the majority of the people know and will use the voting booth to put paid to this impostor and fraud. According to B Hussein's beliefs what he's done and continues doing is perfectly legitimate according to the Koran and Sharia cos he's allowed to lie to us infidels.

Recently there was an oped in the New York Times (one of the most outspoken of the MSM in favor of Sharia in addition to downplaying radical Islam's Jihadi agenda) titled "Don't Fear Islamic Law in America". How anyone in his right mind can spout rubbish like that is inexplicable cos rational people know that killing infidels, stoning women, honor killings, Jihad, killing Christians and burning their Churches and so much more, the list is virtually endless is something to fear and definitely not compliant with the Constitution. The NYT used to be one of the most respected media outlets in the world and it should surprise no one that it's turned into a rag and is close to bankruptcy. Rational people are no longer willing to pay in order to read rubbish and Islamic propaganda.

David Yerushalmi one of the leading experts on Sharia law wrote a reply to the editor (it wasn't published of course) and I found it over at Atlas Shrugs. Well worth reading.

Shalom,

Peter

David Yerushalmi Letter to the NY Times


Yesterday I was on FOX and Friends discussing, among other things, the pro-sharia oped that ran in the NY Times last Sunday.

David Yerushalmi, leading legal mind on sharia in America and my lawfare attorney, responded in a letter to the editor. The intellectual terrorists over at The Times wouldn't publish it, of course. That would violate ..... the blasphemy laws under the sharia.

Dear Letters Editor:

Eliyahu Stern’s oped of September 2 entitled, “Don’t Fear Islamic Law in America,” has its facts wrong—both contemporary and historical.


First, Tennessee’s law as passed made no reference to sharia.


Second, the historical comparison between the response to sharia in this country and Europe’s objection to Jewish law centuries earlier is a result of poor scholarship and faulty logic. Jewish law, certainly since the destruction of the Jewish Commonwealth almost two thousand years ago, has had
nothing to do with political power or the desire to effect dominion over another people. Christian Europe’s complaint against Jewish law was based on the inability and unwillingness of traditional Orthodox Jews to embrace the Enlightenment’s beckoning toward secularism.

To the contrary, the opposition to sharia is the fact that throughout the Muslim world, sharia is the call to an exclusive Islamic political power with hegemonic designs (see the two most prominent surveys cited here:
http://mappingsharia.com/?page_id=425). The war doctrine of jihad is part and parcel of sharia. It is alive and well as such throughout the Muslim world.

Indeed, the good professor implicitly recognizes that in the Muslim world
large majorities respond to surveys embracing sharia as a legal-political regime for Muslims and call for capital punishment for apostasy (i.e., religious choice) and blasphemy (i.e., free speech). He tells us that American Muslims will fix whatever problems exist in sharia because they are part of “America’s exceptionalism.” The problem with this sanguine prediction, however, is that the professor and those of this mind refuse to even acknowledge what sharia is in the Muslim world. Thus, we are told there is no such thing as sharia as a legal-political-military doctrine—and that those of us who raise the issue of sharia’s threat to Western liberty are Islamophobes and bigots. When you blind yourself to a threat, you are not likely to confront it or reform it.


David Yerushalmi


Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!