Hello Friends,
Unfortunately the Islamic groups that are financed and backed by Terrorist organizations and by major Islamic countries that fund Jihadi terrorist groups world wide are trying to cash in on the Ft. Hood Jihadi massacre.
Another very interesting point is that main stream media are giving them (CAIR for example) a platform to disguise and misinform the public and in their pathetic way convince the viewers that Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan the Jihadi terrorist was a disturbed individual and his actions had nothingto do with Islam and Islamic jihad.
All the evidence presented shows a completely different picture and MSM, the military and of course the White House are trying to white wash this jihadi massacre and turn the terrorist into the victim.
Below you'll find an article with videos showing the difference between an interview with a Muslim Dr. Jasser who works to inform and warn the world and the US of the dangers of Radical Islam and organizations such as CAIR and a representative of CAIR who was dealt with tenderly, kid gloves and much love. It's people such as this Matthews of MSNBC that are the cause of the ignorance of many all in the name of political correctness.
I think it's about time to look at the evidence and facts and not the PC gibberish of the MSM and all others that are trying to white wash this Jihadi terrorist and turn him into the victim.
Shalom,
Peter
NEWSREAL
Heartbreak in action
Editor’s Note, for Rhonda Robinson’s commentary on a different aspect of this stunning Chris Matthews segment click here.
MSNBC has a nasty habit of giving Muslim Brotherhood front CAIRa forum to apologize for extremism and deflect attention from the issueat hand whenever jihad makes the news. Not only is CAIR’s authority asa mouthpiece for American Muslims never questioned, let alone itsbackground and history, but MSNBC’s commentators rarely take issue witha single point made by CAIR’s representatives.
Nonetheless, MSNBC’s moral vacuity may never have been more apparent than when Chris Matthews interviewed Zuhdi Jasser, an American Muslim who works to combat the violent political ideology promoted by CAIR and its affiliates.
Jasser encourages Muslims to “stop complaining and stop beingingvictims,” i.e., to stop committing acts of violence and oppressingothers, then citing American foreign policy as a justification. Heexplains, plainly and succinctly, that jihad’s ideologicalunderpinnings lie in political Islam. He even cites the Muslim Brotherhood,due to its status as America’s foremost promoter and incubator ofSharia, as one of the root causes of domestic violent extremism. Finally, he points out the reddest flag in Nidal Hasan’s background,the clearest indication that he might commit an act of violence: hisunconcealed hatred for America.
Matthews briefly pays lip service to the notion that perhapsideology may have motivated Nidal Hasan to shoot over 50 people beforehe jaunts off on a diatribe in which he excuses acts of terrorism byblaming American foreign policy, particularly with regard to Israel.Instead of simply agreeing with Jasser’s self-evident point thatAmerican foreign policy does not justify acts of terrorism, Matthewsreflexively tries to see things from the most extreme point of view —that of the terrorists.
Matthews poses an interesting question in good faith: that of whenwe should start taking freedoms away from people in order to defendnational security. How about when they pose a threat to the rest us,thereby infringing on our most basic rights? The answer seems prettysimple to Jasser. We should stop tolerating intolerance, as Rhonda addressed previously.
Then Matthews actually tries to defend telephoning Al-Qaeda, whichis just about the height of extremism, shy of actually committing actsof terrorism — I would like to believe that he was playing Devil’sAdvocate. Jasser explains how Americans need to start combating theextremism which has become quite normalized, in large part due toleftists who, say, defend calling al-Qaeda and state that the US’sforeign policy toward Israel “triggered” RFK’s assassination. Did it“trigger” 9/11, too?
Matthews demonstrated less understanding when Sarah Palin won an award from the NRA than when discussing the assassination of an American leader.
Matthews clearly feels more at home with those who rationalize violentjihad using a hatred of American liberty cloaked in politicalgrievances than he does with those who fight for American liberty byconfronting the ugly truth about Sharia, about political Islam’s fifthcolumn, and about jihad. Furthermore, he seems to be more concernedwith Hasan’s imagined grievances than with those of the families of thesoldiers and first responders who were brutally slain in an act ofviolent jihad. Just watch him with Nihad Awad, trying to explain awayHasan’s actions with moral equivalence and deflection.
Jasser, instead, whitewashes nothing by identifying Sharia andpolitically correct willful ignorance of political Islam’s Americanfifth column for acts of terrorism committed on American soil. He argues that terrorism is not a reaction to (“triggered” by) Americanforeign policy, but that a hatred for America and the liberties whichmake it great are key components of the ideology which motivatesIslamic terrorists, and that this hatred is not be dismissed. In fact,Jasser may have given the single clearest, most concise crash courseever on the dangers of political Islam right there on Hardball. It’s the political Islam that’s the problem, and it’s not America’s fault.
“Political Islam has made huge advances while the Westhad been asleep against the spread of the quote, unquote ‘Islamic statemovement’ and I think that, clearly, there are parts of the ideology ofhate of the West, of America, of conspiracy theories, that this guystarted to follow that were warning signs.”
One can actually watch Jasser’s heart sink as Matthews waves awayeverything he had said by again justifying terrorism with Americanforeign policy.
“Maybe this guy should have just been given CO statusthe minute he decided … he didn’t do anything wrong until he realizedhe was going to Afghanistan. Then he acted.“
Hasan, like his political cohorts at CAIR,is “a Muslim first and an American second.” Jasser is an American aboveall else. Matthews is an apologist for evil first, an American second.MSNBC does Americans, Muslims included, a disservice by running throughthe Muslim Brotherhood playbook – putting CAIRon TV, throwing softball questions at their representatives, and eithertrying to explain away extremism or blaming American foreign policy forviolence, or both – as a matter of procedure. Sadly, in Matthews’case, this pattern seems to be more of a knee-jerk reflex than anorchestrated decision. In fact, he is a better defender of terrorismthan those who promote the ideology which underlies it. Maybe CAIR is taking notes from Matthews and not the other way around.