According to multiple experts, the Obama administration’s actions in facilitating the release of American prisoner of war Bowe Bergdahl was an obvious violation of law and could ultimately result in his impeachment proceedings.

Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew McCarthy has a new book in which he details the case of Obama’s impeachment. The recent deal with the Taliban to release five terrorist subjects for Bergdahl’s return, he explains, is yet another route that could lead to charges.

Republican leaders explain Obama himself signed a law last year requiring him to give Congress 30 days’ notice prior to releasing any Guantanamo Bay prisoner.

Aside from the fact that Bergdahl has since been accused of being an Army deserter who expressed his shame about being a soldier and an American, the administration’s handling of his return has become a controversy in itself.

In a recent statement, Rep. Buck McKeon and Sen. Jim Inhofe – both ranking members of their respective armed services committees – explained that Obama not only violated the 30-day notice law but also failed “to explain how the threat posed by such terrorists has been substantially mitigated.”

The Daily Mail cites a White House insider who was stunned by the public backlash against the move, noting administration officials expected “a January 1981 moment” of celebration, as with the release of 52 Americans being held hostage in Iran.

White House sources contended that fears for Bergdahl’s health made his release a priority; however, Press Secretary Jay Carney would not confirm that assertion in a recent press conference.

McCarthy is far more concerned about the release of five dangerous terrorist suspects than in the administration’s failure to give adequate notice to Congress.

He said that “because high crimes and misdemeanors are not statutory offenses but political wrongs that endanger the United States, the return of senior terrorists to the Taliban while we still have soldiers in harm’s way is, in my view, a ‘high crime and misdemeanor.’”

The latest scandal is just one more piece in a puzzle that adds up to a president deserving of impeachment, he explained.

“If it was a standalone, I would never impeach based solely on it,” he said; “but I would add it to a larger indictment.”

Photo Credit: Facebook/Overpasses For America

In trading five dangerous Islamic extremists for one American who had potentially collaborated with our enemy, Barack Obama has ushered in his administration’s latest scandal.

As Western Journalism reported, there are several disturbing aspects of the deal made to facilitate the return of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl. Perhaps the most shocking is the combined rap sheet of the five deadly terrorists unilaterally released by Obama without requisite congressional notice.

Sen. John McCain suggested the quintet could have been responsible for thousands of terror-related deaths. Obama himself added to existing concerns with a shockingly candid admission about his own handiwork.

“Is there the possibility of some of them trying to return to activities that are detrimental to us?” he asked Tuesday. “Absolutely.”

He explained that such a risk exists with “all of the prisoners that we released from Guantanamo Bay,” noting that “a certain recidivism” is associated with these released terrorists.

While that might seem to be an obvious admission, it fails to explain why he was so anxious to set these dangerous individuals free that he could not even run the idea through the proper channels.

“I wouldn’t be doing it if I thought that it was contrary to American national security,” he claimed.

Obama suggested the trade was “conditioned on the Qataris keeping eyes on [the released terrorists] and creating a structure in which we can monitor their activities.”

As a Reuters report out of Qatar explains, though, the nation is allowing the five dangerous individuals to live virtually unimpeded by any governmental restriction.

One source said they can “move around freely within the country.”

Not only are Qatari forces maintaining a hands-off approach to the men; the insider said that there will be no U.S. oversight of their movements within the nation, either.

After one year, the official confirmed they will be free to “go back to Afghanistan if they want to.”

Meanwhile, our nation is left to face the increased threat of their release while trying to ascertain exactly why they were freed in exchange for the America-hating Bergdahl in the first place.

Photo Credit: Facebook/Official Bowe Bergdahl is Not An American Hero