Becky,
You are assuming that part of the things you mentioned weren't taken into account which means that you haven't read the replies made by Jim in the nomination forum and by my self. BTW, Lee has neither
It's all taken into account. But the posts do have a weight factor in the deciding whether the person qualifies or not. I did not admit that the number of posts isn't a relevant criteria. I stated that there are those that have thousands of posts and don't qualify for the POTW cos of the type of posts they made. Namely advertising posts only or mainly.
We will review the criteria, maybe add on a few too but the fact that at this point in time Lee doesn't qualify is a fact. I personally will be very happy when she will.
We will review the criteria and post what they will be.
As for advising Lee to post irrelevant posts in order to get her stats up I wouldn't but feel free to do so if you wish. She can post every 5 minutes "hey guys I'm surfing" and by next week she'll certainly qualify. They would definitely be relevant and quality posts, wouldn't they?
BTW, for your information and after reading your suggestions that you assumed we didn't take into account. Lee's forum is inactive (since Jan 2008), she hasn't got a blog, hasn't got a gallery, has 4 votes & her "about me" tells us nothing about her at all. Lee's been a member since Dec 2007 and has 181 posts. According to your suggestions she doesn't qualify yet either.
I will add this though. I personally don't think that having your own active forum is all that important if you are contributing in other forums with quality posts. Not everybody wants to run his own forum but adds and contributes to many good forums here in adland. I you do have a good forum all the better but it is not a deciding criteria or factor.
After we review the criteria and decide on add ons or deletions we'll post in the relevant forums.
Thanks for your avid interest and support of the POTW.
|