5-You Can't Reason with a Liberal Mindset Laughing and Crying in the Kitchen | View Thread

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

MEDIA NOW OPENLY ADMITTING THE GOVERNMENT CONTROLS THE NEWS – AS IF WE DIDN’T ALREADY KNOW

Many people have known for a long time that the media is nothing more than a mouthpiece for the government and big business much, if not most, of the time. But they used to viciously deny it, if they addressed such accusations at all. The people who claimed that this was going on were laughed at and ridiculed as “tin foil hat” wearing buffoons. But now, suddenly, out of the blue, they openly admit that they were only regurgitating talking points given to them by the government itself.

The disturbing fact is, that the government tells the news what to tell you and the media does just that. So if the government is covering up anything or lying to the media, you will never know (if you get your information from mainstream media).

The sad, disturbing and disgusting fact is that the people who most dismiss as rabid conspiracy theorists are really some of the only people willing to do investigative journalism these days. They may not have everything right and they may go too far sometimes, but at least they are trying to figure out what your government is trying to cover up and lie to you about, which is more than we can say for most of the media. - KRISTEN WATTS

Media Now Openly Admitting The Government Controls the News

by Alexander Higgins on May 18, 2013

A trio of Obama scandals has forced the corporate media to admit its own reports are nothing more than the government-controlled talking points and not the product of a free and open press.

If you have been following the news lately you’ll notice there are 3 government scandals that the media is focusing on 1) The DOJ spying on the AP reporters 2) Benghazi gate 3) IRS targeting of activist groups.

While each of these are truly a damning indictment of the widespread corruption in our now gone rogue federal government, combing these three stories reveals an even bigger story which is recurring open admission by the media that the news they report is being controlled by the government.

These three scandals have led the media to rebel against the Obama administration in a way that it has not done in the past while at the same time forcing the media to admit some damning facts about the way news is truly originated in America. http://www.asheepnomore.net/

RUSH: There's economic news out the wazoo today. Folks, it's all over the ballpark, and none of it is good. Much of it, most of it is being portrayed as good and positive in the media, which of course in a lot of people's minds is going to mean it's good. But it isn't. From the AP, Christopher Rugaber: "US employers added 162,000 jobs in July, the fewest since March. But the gains were enough to lower the unemployment rate to a 4 1/2 -year low of 7.4 percent, a sign that's hopeful in an otherwise lackluster report." Not true. It's not hopeful. There's nothing good about it.

And speaking of CNN, let me find it here because they've done a random act of journalism again. Grab sound bite number eight. I mean, I could tell you this, but I want you to hear this on CNN. Not enough people are watching CNN for this to have impact, so we're gonna give 'em a little amplification here. This was on their program this morning that's anchored by Carol Costello. She spoke with their business correspondent Alison Kosik about the July jobs numbers. Costello said, "Investors are getting their first chance to digest the latest jobs report, Alison. Alison Kosik, the New York Stock Exchange, what do we see?"

KOSIK: The problem is that lower unemployment rate that came in, it may be for the wrong reasons because the number of people counted in the labor participation rate fell, so people literally left the labor force, they gave up looking for work. That's really not the reason you want to see the unemployment rate tip lower. You want to see people getting jobs, and that's the reason you want to see the unemployment rate go lower.

RUSH: You gotta give 'em credit. I mean, she's trying. She pretty got it right. You have to give 'em kudos. (interruption) What'd you say, H.R.? Giving up is never good. Here's the thing. Again, the labor force participation rate, that number is what I'm talking about when I tell you that nine million jobs have vanished since Obama took office. The universe of available jobs in the country is down by over nine million. They just don't exist. It's like enough factories closed that there are nine million jobs, no longer attainable. It's not the jobs are waiting to be filled. They're not there anymore. There's nothing good about jobs in this country.

There's not one bit of news of any substance whatsoever that's good. Nine million plus jobs, we lost some more. That's what she was talking about, labor force participation rate. So the unemployment rate goes down because the number of people out of work divided by the number of jobs available, of course the percentage is gonna come down. If there were nine million jobs still out there waiting to be had, the unemployment rate would be almost 12%, folks. If there were as many jobs today as when Obama took office and the number of people that were working were factored against that number, the unemployment rate would be almost 12%.

That's how bad it is, and Alison Kosik got it right. The unemployment rate went down because it's a mathematical phenomenon here. It has nothing to do with jobs being created, and it's one of the fallacies in the way this number is reported. You would think that if the unemployment rate went from 7.6% to 7.4%, that we're adding jobs -- and your average low-information doofus out there is going to think just that.

But it's the exact opposite.

The labor force participation rate makes up two things: Jobs that have vanished and people no longer looking for jobs, because there aren't any that they want. In addition, the number of jobs that were added (162,000, a modest increase) was the fewest number of jobs per month since March. But Rugaber here in the AP is entirely disingenuous (and maybe dishonest, I don't know) when he then writes, "The gain was still enough to help lower the unemployment rate."

The gain? Those 162,000 jobs have nothing to do with the unemployment rate going down. That 162,000 doesn't compensate anywhere at all for the jobs being lost and closed down. Ladies and gentlemen, we used to be told that it took 200,000 jobs a month to lower the unemployment rate. Just two months ago we were told that 175,000 jobs created in May were too few to lower the unemployment rate.

Well, to grow it -- to get on a job-creation rate that would start making a dent in the actual jobs lost beginning in 2009 -- would require 500,000 jobs a month. In fact, you go back to the eighties and the Reagan recovery, and that's what you'll find. You'll find that in any real economic recovery. There is no economic recovery when 162,000 jobs are added. So CNN, God bless 'em, swerved into the truth; AP is continuing to present BS.

Trying to make it look like, "Well, it's not a whole lot of growth, but it's growth happening out there, 'a hopeful sign in an otherwise lackluster report.'" But what of the kind of jobs are being created? We've talked about the this, so it will not come as a surprise to you. Here are the ballpark numbers. So far this year, 900,000 jobs have been, quote/unquote, "created." That's how many people have found work. How many of 'em...?

Rachel, take a wild guess. You don't pay much attention to news until you're here. You're a good case history here. I mean, you do but... (interruption) Don't misunderstand. (interruption) No, no, no. She's got a family, and she's out running around. She's really busy. Okay, 900,000 jobs created so far this year. How many of them are full time, do you think? (interruption) It's 200,000. Over 700,000 of the jobs created this year are part time, which means what?

They don't qualify for benefits.

They don't qualify for Obamacare.

Some of these jobs are part time because employers are downsizing, and they are converting full-timers to part-timers. But most of the new jobs this year are part time. Our old buddy Jim Pethokoukis at the American Enterprise Institute points out that the quality of jobs created was a big complaint by the Democrats when Bush was in office. Retail and restaurants, two of the lowest-paying sectors, accounted for more than half of all job growth in this 162,000 jobs created last month.

Retail and restaurants, two low-paying sectors, accounted for more than half of the jobs. It's a part time economy. What we really have is people leaving the job market. If the labor force participation rate were what it was in July of 2012, last year, the unemployment rate would be 7.8%. If the labor force participation rate were what it was in January 2009 when Obama took office, it would be 11%, not 7.4%.

Some people have now become comfortable not working. It's a result of government-encouraged dependency. Fully 4.2 million people have been out of a job for over six months -- 4.2 million people! Every one of them now... By the way, people are getting mad at me when I say this, when I say that they're all eating. I get e-mail, "Well, what do you expect them to do, starve?" Yeah, that'd be kind of good because maybe they'd be forced to go out and find work.

No, I don't expect them to starve.

Open your minds. I'm trying to make a point. There's no incentive to go out and find a job. There's no disincentive to being unemployed if you have very little ambition. Being unemployed in this country meant he didn't eat. It's why you had to go out and find a job. It's a number of other things. Being unemployed today, you still have your cell phone and your TV. It's a factor. It matters.

"That's not true!"

I'm giving you a fact-of-life observation.

"Yeah, but it sounds like you disagree with it. It sounds like you think people ought to be starving. It sounds like you want to go back to the days when you were a kid, when being out of work really meant pain and suffering."

Well, no. I mean, change is change, and it happens. But I understand human nature, and if you don't have to work for anything, you won't. It's not good for America, is the point, and it's not good for anybody. So 953,000 jobs created in 2013, and 77% are part time. 731,000. Another way of looking at it: For every full-time job created, there are four part-time jobs created. I don't care how you slice it, the jobs news isn't good.

Let me add one other statistic to this: The Senate amnesty bill, the Gang of Eight pathway-to-citizenship immigration bill, according to the vaunted Congressional Budget Office, says that there will be 46 million immigrants in America by 2033. That's just 20 years. In 20 more years, 46 million new people will be thrown in to this economy and job market. Stew on that while we take an obscene profit time-out.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: What do you mean? No, I've not left the economic news. I'm just moving on to this CNN thing. I've got a lot of stuff. I wish I could mention everything first today. I want to stick with the Benghazi thing, it's fascinating.

I was telling Snerdley, Snerdley came in today, and I said, "Have you heard about the latest news involving the millennials?" And he said, "No." According to a study from the Pew Research Center, 36% of the kids in the millennial generation -- that's age 18 to 31 -- 36% are living at their parents' homes. That is the largest number in 40 years. And 21.6 million young adults are still living at home. These are the people who are voting for Obama. If people under 30 weren't allowed to vote, Romney woulda won in a landslide. I'm not suggesting that. I'm just giving you interesting statistical information.

My point is, I don't want to hear about a roaring economy. I don't want to hear about great economic news. I don't want to hear about the unemployment numbers down, all kinds of jobs being created. There's nothing happening out there that equals progress in the traditional sense at all. We have a major transformation and regression taking place.

So, no, I was gonna split up the economic news.

Jim 5804 11253 Holiday	RE: You Can't Reason with a Liberal Mindset Laughing and Crying in the Kitchen 7/31/2013 11:04:20 PM
	Wednesday, July 31, 2013 MEDIA NOW OPENLY ADMITTING THE GOVERNMENT CONTROLS THE NEWS – AS IF WE DIDN’T ALREADY KNOW Many people have known for a long time that the media is nothing more than a mouthpiece for the government and big business much, if not most, of the time. But they used to viciously deny it, if they addressed such accusations at all. The people who claimed that this was going on were laughed at and ridiculed as “tin foil hat” wearing buffoons. But now, suddenly, out of the blue, they openly admit that they were only regurgitating talking points given to them by the government itself. The disturbing fact is, that the government tells the news what to tell you and the media does just that. So if the government is covering up anything or lying to the media, you will never know (if you get your information from mainstream media). The sad, disturbing and disgusting fact is that the people who most dismiss as rabid conspiracy theorists are really some of the only people willing to do investigative journalism these days. They may not have everything right and they may go too far sometimes, but at least they are trying to figure out what your government is trying to cover up and lie to you about, which is more than we can say for most of the media. - KRISTEN WATTS Media Now Openly Admitting The Government Controls the News by Alexander Higgins on May 18, 2013 A trio of Obama scandals has forced the corporate media to admit its own reports are nothing more than the government-controlled talking points and not the product of a free and open press. If you have been following the news lately you’ll notice there are 3 government scandals that the media is focusing on 1) The DOJ spying on the AP reporters 2) Benghazi gate 3) IRS targeting of activist groups. While each of these are truly a damning indictment of the widespread corruption in our now gone rogue federal government, combing these three stories reveals an even bigger story which is recurring open admission by the media that the news they report is being controlled by the government. These three scandals have led the media to rebel against the Obama administration in a way that it has not done in the past while at the same time forcing the media to admit some damning facts about the way news is truly originated in America. http://www.asheepnomore.net/
	May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you, Jim Allen III Skype: JAllen3D Everything You Need For Online Success
	+0

Jim 5804 11253 Holiday	RE: You Can't Reason with a Liberal Mindset Laughing and Crying in the Kitchen 8/1/2013 8:38:57 PM
	PRINT EMAIL TEXT SIZE THE RIGHT PRESCRIPTION Defunding: The Framers’ Remedy for Presidential Lawlessness    By BETSY MCCAUGHEY on 7.30.13 @ 6:10AM Obama’s unconstitutional actions have forced Congress’s hand. Two weeks ago, the House of Representatives Appropriations Committee voted to strip the scandal ridden Internal Revenue Service of nearly one quarter of its 2014 budget as punishment for its targeting of political groups and its costly boondoggles. Shockingly, Senate Democrats voted to increase the IRS’s budget. Last week, numerous Republicans in both houses of Congress threatened to cut off all funding for the federal government as of October 1, in response to President Obama’s unconstitutional stance that he can pick and choose which parts of Obamacare he will implement. On July 3, the Obama administration disclosed that it would not implement Obamacare’s employer mandate on January 1, 2014, though the law says the mandate “shall” go into effect that day. The administration pretended it was no big deal. But it violates the law and affects 10 million currently uninsured or underinsured workers whose employers would have been subject to the mandate. The cost of insuring these workers is shifted from employers to taxpayers, who foot the bill for subsidized insurance on the new Obamacare exchanges. At an average cost of $5,290 per subsidized enrollee, according to the Congressional Budget Office, this will add billions to the cost of Obamacare next year alone. Two days later, another whopper. On July 5, the Obama administration revealed that it would also skip the health law’s requirement that applicants seeking taxpayer subsidies to pay for their insurance have their income and insurance eligibility verified. Welcome fraudsters, too bad again for taxpayers. President Obama does not have the authority to choose which parts of the law are enforced. In 1975, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously against President Richard Nixon’s inflated claims that he could selectively carry out the law. But going to court to keep presidents in line is slow and necessitates finding litigants to sue the president. The framers gave Congress a more practical way to resist a power-hungry president: defunding. Defunding is precisely what members of Congress are supposed to do when a president breaks the law. It’s checks and balances in action. Two centuries ago, the chief architect of the U.S. Constitution James Madison declared in Federalist No. 58 that Congress’s authority over spending is the “most complete and effectual tool” to stop a president from grabbing more power than the Constitution allows.  Utah Senator Mike Lee is taking a page out of Madison’s playbook. On July 17 Lee urged Congress to vote against any continuing resolution to fund the federal government after September 30 so long as it funds Obamacare. “Laws are supposed to be made by Congress, not…[by] the president, who has now amended Obamacare twice. Once by saying individuals have to comply with the law during their first year but employers don’t. Then in saying we aren’t even going to require people to prove their income.” Lee said that if the administration is not prepared to fully enforce Obamacare as enacted, it should agree to delay the entire law and remove its funding from the budget. Eleven fellow Republican Senators and at least 60 Republican House members have signed on to Lee’s defunding stance. Lee’s constitutional case is air tight. Yet the Democratic Party and Obama’s supporters in the media are trying to label the defunding strategy “government sabotage,” “radicalism,” and “obstructionism.” They need a refresher course on the Constitution. Sadly, some Republicans are whining about the political consequences if Obama calls their bluff and allows the government to run out of money. “They’re going to shut down the Grand Canyon,” Arizona Senator John McCain warned, and he’ll hear about it from unhappy voters. Several senators who originally signed on with Lee saw the political risk, lost their nerve, and removed their names. Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.) even called withholding funding “the dumbest idea I’ve ever heard.” There is nothing dumb about protecting the Constitution. Members of Congress took an oath to uphold it. If not now, when? The more times this president is permitted to trample the Constitution, the more freedom we’ve lost. http://spectator.org/archives/2013/07/30/defunding-the-framers-remedy-f
	May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you, Jim Allen III Skype: JAllen3D Everything You Need For Online Success
	+0

Jim 5804 11253 Holiday	RE: You Can't Reason with a Liberal Mindset Laughing and Crying in the Kitchen 8/3/2013 1:08:13 PM
	The Jobs News Isn't Good August 02, 2013 Windows Media BEGIN TRANSCRIPT RUSH: There's economic news out the wazoo today. Folks, it's all over the ballpark, and none of it is good. Much of it, most of it is being portrayed as good and positive in the media, which of course in a lot of people's minds is going to mean it's good. But it isn't. From the AP, Christopher Rugaber: "US employers added 162,000 jobs in July, the fewest since March. But the gains were enough to lower the unemployment rate to a 4 1/2 -year low of 7.4 percent, a sign that's hopeful in an otherwise lackluster report." Not true. It's not hopeful. There's nothing good about it. And speaking of CNN, let me find it here because they've done a random act of journalism again. Grab sound bite number eight. I mean, I could tell you this, but I want you to hear this on CNN. Not enough people are watching CNN for this to have impact, so we're gonna give 'em a little amplification here. This was on their program this morning that's anchored by Carol Costello. She spoke with their business correspondent Alison Kosik about the July jobs numbers. Costello said, "Investors are getting their first chance to digest the latest jobs report, Alison. Alison Kosik, the New York Stock Exchange, what do we see?" KOSIK: The problem is that lower unemployment rate that came in, it may be for the wrong reasons because the number of people counted in the labor participation rate fell, so people literally left the labor force, they gave up looking for work. That's really not the reason you want to see the unemployment rate tip lower. You want to see people getting jobs, and that's the reason you want to see the unemployment rate go lower. RUSH: You gotta give 'em credit. I mean, she's trying. She pretty got it right. You have to give 'em kudos. (interruption) What'd you say, H.R.? Giving up is never good. Here's the thing. Again, the labor force participation rate, that number is what I'm talking about when I tell you that nine million jobs have vanished since Obama took office. The universe of available jobs in the country is down by over nine million. They just don't exist. It's like enough factories closed that there are nine million jobs, no longer attainable. It's not the jobs are waiting to be filled. They're not there anymore. There's nothing good about jobs in this country. There's not one bit of news of any substance whatsoever that's good. Nine million plus jobs, we lost some more. That's what she was talking about, labor force participation rate. So the unemployment rate goes down because the number of people out of work divided by the number of jobs available, of course the percentage is gonna come down. If there were nine million jobs still out there waiting to be had, the unemployment rate would be almost 12%, folks. If there were as many jobs today as when Obama took office and the number of people that were working were factored against that number, the unemployment rate would be almost 12%. That's how bad it is, and Alison Kosik got it right. The unemployment rate went down because it's a mathematical phenomenon here. It has nothing to do with jobs being created, and it's one of the fallacies in the way this number is reported. You would think that if the unemployment rate went from 7.6% to 7.4%, that we're adding jobs -- and your average low-information doofus out there is going to think just that. But it's the exact opposite. The labor force participation rate makes up two things: Jobs that have vanished and people no longer looking for jobs, because there aren't any that they want. In addition, the number of jobs that were added (162,000, a modest increase) was the fewest number of jobs per month since March. But Rugaber here in the AP is entirely disingenuous (and maybe dishonest, I don't know) when he then writes, "The gain was still enough to help lower the unemployment rate." The gain? Those 162,000 jobs have nothing to do with the unemployment rate going down. That 162,000 doesn't compensate anywhere at all for the jobs being lost and closed down. Ladies and gentlemen, we used to be told that it took 200,000 jobs a month to lower the unemployment rate. Just two months ago we were told that 175,000 jobs created in May were too few to lower the unemployment rate. Well, to grow it -- to get on a job-creation rate that would start making a dent in the actual jobs lost beginning in 2009 -- would require 500,000 jobs a month. In fact, you go back to the eighties and the Reagan recovery, and that's what you'll find. You'll find that in any real economic recovery. There is no economic recovery when 162,000 jobs are added. So CNN, God bless 'em, swerved into the truth; AP is continuing to present BS. Trying to make it look like, "Well, it's not a whole lot of growth, but it's growth happening out there, 'a hopeful sign in an otherwise lackluster report.'" But what of the kind of jobs are being created? We've talked about the this, so it will not come as a surprise to you. Here are the ballpark numbers. So far this year, 900,000 jobs have been, quote/unquote, "created." That's how many people have found work. How many of 'em...? Rachel, take a wild guess. You don't pay much attention to news until you're here. You're a good case history here. I mean, you do but... (interruption) Don't misunderstand. (interruption) No, no, no. She's got a family, and she's out running around. She's really busy. Okay, 900,000 jobs created so far this year. How many of them are full time, do you think? (interruption) It's 200,000. Over 700,000 of the jobs created this year are part time, which means what? They don't qualify for benefits. They don't qualify for Obamacare. Some of these jobs are part time because employers are downsizing, and they are converting full-timers to part-timers. But most of the new jobs this year are part time. Our old buddy Jim Pethokoukis at the American Enterprise Institute points out that the quality of jobs created was a big complaint by the Democrats when Bush was in office. Retail and restaurants, two of the lowest-paying sectors, accounted for more than half of all job growth in this 162,000 jobs created last month. Retail and restaurants, two low-paying sectors, accounted for more than half of the jobs. It's a part time economy. What we really have is people leaving the job market. If the labor force participation rate were what it was in July of 2012, last year, the unemployment rate would be 7.8%. If the labor force participation rate were what it was in January 2009 when Obama took office, it would be 11%, not 7.4%. Some people have now become comfortable not working. It's a result of government-encouraged dependency. Fully 4.2 million people have been out of a job for over six months -- 4.2 million people! Every one of them now... By the way, people are getting mad at me when I say this, when I say that they're all eating. I get e-mail, "Well, what do you expect them to do, starve?" Yeah, that'd be kind of good because maybe they'd be forced to go out and find work. No, I don't expect them to starve. Open your minds. I'm trying to make a point. There's no incentive to go out and find a job. There's no disincentive to being unemployed if you have very little ambition. Being unemployed in this country meant he didn't eat. It's why you had to go out and find a job. It's a number of other things. Being unemployed today, you still have your cell phone and your TV. It's a factor. It matters. "That's not true!" I'm giving you a fact-of-life observation. "Yeah, but it sounds like you disagree with it. It sounds like you think people ought to be starving. It sounds like you want to go back to the days when you were a kid, when being out of work really meant pain and suffering." Well, no. I mean, change is change, and it happens. But I understand human nature, and if you don't have to work for anything, you won't. It's not good for America, is the point, and it's not good for anybody. So 953,000 jobs created in 2013, and 77% are part time. 731,000. Another way of looking at it: For every full-time job created, there are four part-time jobs created. I don't care how you slice it, the jobs news isn't good. Let me add one other statistic to this: The Senate amnesty bill, the Gang of Eight pathway-to-citizenship immigration bill, according to the vaunted Congressional Budget Office, says that there will be 46 million immigrants in America by 2033. That's just 20 years. In 20 more years, 46 million new people will be thrown in to this economy and job market. Stew on that while we take an obscene profit time-out. BREAK TRANSCRIPT RUSH: What do you mean? No, I've not left the economic news. I'm just moving on to this CNN thing. I've got a lot of stuff. I wish I could mention everything first today. I want to stick with the Benghazi thing, it's fascinating. I was telling Snerdley, Snerdley came in today, and I said, "Have you heard about the latest news involving the millennials?" And he said, "No." According to a study from the Pew Research Center, 36% of the kids in the millennial generation -- that's age 18 to 31 -- 36% are living at their parents' homes. That is the largest number in 40 years. And 21.6 million young adults are still living at home. These are the people who are voting for Obama. If people under 30 weren't allowed to vote, Romney woulda won in a landslide. I'm not suggesting that. I'm just giving you interesting statistical information. My point is, I don't want to hear about a roaring economy. I don't want to hear about great economic news. I don't want to hear about the unemployment numbers down, all kinds of jobs being created. There's nothing happening out there that equals progress in the traditional sense at all. We have a major transformation and regression taking place. So, no, I was gonna split up the economic news. END TRANSCRIPT http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/08/02/the_jobs_news_isn_t_good
	May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you, Jim Allen III Skype: JAllen3D Everything You Need For Online Success
	+0

Jim 5804 11253 Holiday	RE: You Can't Reason with a Liberal Mindset Laughing and Crying in the Kitchen 8/10/2013 7:12:21 PM
	It always comes back to bite you.
	May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you, Jim Allen III Skype: JAllen3D Everything You Need For Online Success
	+0

Menu

Forums

Menu

A lusty, gusty attack on "The Law" as a curious, antiquated institution which, through outworn procedures, technical jargon and queer mummery, enables a group of medicine-men to dominate our social and political lives and our business, to their own gain.

What do you know of the BAR Association? This short article exposé's the BAR for its criminal acts and how it is destroying the rights of the People and their Constitutional government.

Mortgage Fraud

Mary Elizabeth: Croft shows us the fruad used in today's money and how to turn the fraud around to our benefit.

Treason in Government! Admiralty on Land!! Where's the Water? [outside page link]

This is a very interesting transcript of an interview with an employee of a State Marriage License Bureau. This conversation exposes the Marriage License as a Contract that cannot be broken with the State and grants the State absolute authority over your family and your property.

Devvy Kidd's Power Page [Outside Page Link]

A brief dissertation exposing the true nature and cause of modern criminal accusations by Valiant Liberty.

The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government.

The United States government became the conqueror and all states in the Union were thus reformed as Franchisees of the Federal Corporation. The key to when the states became Federal Franchisees is related to the date when such states enacted the Field Code in law.

Judge Black submits a Legal Opinion declaring that the use of the military upon any of the States of the Union exceeds the Constitutional authority of the President of the United States. For to bring the military of the United States against a State is to expel that State from the Union.

This is the infamous case of Newdow v. Congress wherein the federal judges of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that it was unconstitutional for children to recite the "Pledge of Allegiance" in public schools.

Eugene Stratemyer gives us a legal argument on the supremacy of Land Patents over any enactment of Corporate laws of any State.

Robber baron is defined in Webster’s as an American capitalist of the latter part of the 19th century who became wealthy through exploitation (as of natural resources, governmental influence, or low wage scales). Today we have a new class of these robber barons which are called "corporations."

The Truth as I see it [Outside Page Link]

Can the state require you to obtain a drivers' license or insurance to operate a vehicle on the public right-of-ways? The answer may be found in two "Legal Briefs' on your right to travel.

Do you own a gun? Did you register it? Are the Gun Registration Laws in the United States patterned after the Nazi Gun Laws of the 1930's? Enclosed are two Articles on Nazi Gun Control Laws as they are applied to the United States.

The Becraft Briefs [Outside Page Link]

Part 2. LIBERTY---THE RIGHT TO MAKE A LIVING A citizen's Right to Liberty secured by the Constitution has been repeatedly adjudicated to include the right to pursue a livelihood, and such fundamental constitutional rights are not suitable objects for taxation.

Part 4. MOTION TO DISMISS §7203 INDICTMENT A generic motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action in a willful failure to file case is based on the legal issues in Part 1. Reference books are identified for edification.

Part 5. HABEAS CORPUS/ CORUM NOBIS The motion in Part 4 is reworked and expanded into an academic post conviction relief for a willful failure to file conviction. Reference material and procedural guidelines are offered.

Herein is an index of several tax cases that were ruled upon in Federal Courts. These tax cases are listed so that you may be better informed when preparing your own case.

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

The disturbing fact is, that the government tells the news what to tell you and the media does just that. So if the government is covering up anything or lying to the media, you will never know (if you get your information from mainstream media).

Media Now Openly Admitting The Government Controls the News

Like us on Facebook!

This is the infamous case of Newdow v. Congress wherein the federal judges of the U.S. 9^th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that it was unconstitutional for children to recite the "Pledge of Allegiance" in public schools.

Robber baron is defined in Webster’s as an American capitalist of the latter part of the 19^th century who became wealthy through exploitation (as of natural resources, governmental influence, or low wage scales). Today we have a new class of these robber barons which are called "corporations."