Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: One Reason Why No Republican But Ron Paul Will Be President
4/26/2012 5:37:02 PM
Hi Jim,

Lame reply but between the two of us peanut brain Carter's semi endorsement of Romney won't harm him on any way in the long run.

It's interesting that you didn't relate to the Storm Front issue but that's understandable in a way cos there really is no answer you can give about that. For many that is ONE of the reasons Paul is not an option. You do have to take into account the people that are part and parcel of the Paul cult. I remember well how we posted negatively about B Hussein's associates, supporters and past and present ideologies he embraced etc.. Surely the same should apply to Paul.

What I have noticed lately while reading comments to the many articles I read is that the majority are now talking about the necessity to unify and unite behind the GOP nominee and there are less ronbot rants.

There is no other option if we want to rid ourselves of the guy sitting in the WH now. I believe that if we do unify behind the GOP candidate then we have a good chance to beat the fraud and great pretender if we don't we can expect another 4 years of B Hussein.

Now that Gingrich is out of the race and after the results of the primaries on Tuesday it's evident that Romney will be the GOP candidate and Paul will remain second all the time unless he too will suspend his run. I can see it now. Enormous headlines by the ronbots PAUL CAME IN SECOND!!!!!!!!! :) :) :) :)

Shalom,

Peter


Quote:
What better way to give that kiss? Of course it is another chink in the armor of the Republican Chosen One. I am yet to be sold he can beat the current tenant in the White House.

Jim

Quote:
Hey Jim,

Have you any idea how ridiculous your comment is? Ron Paul has Storm Front as supporters who claim Paul is one of them or thinks like them. Peanut brain Carter is definitely not a person whose recommendation means anything to me but neither is Storm Front and others of their ilk who are avid supporters of Paul.

Paul's response about Storm Front (Storm Front is definitely "part of what's wrong") supporting him is that he's not responsible for those that support him yet he never rejected or repudiated them for their views nor did he return their contributions. Well the same excuse goes for Romney who as you know is not my first choice but will get my support to oust B Hussein from the WH. On the other hand this could be a tactic of the progressive liberal Democrats to give Romney the kiss of death.

Shalom,

Peter

P.S. Storm Front is worse then peanut brain Carter IMO.

Quote:
This is another GIGANTIC reason to vote RON PAUL 2012! Look if Carter is for anything but Habitat for Humanity I am walking the other way! Sorry Mitt, I had my doubts before now Iam sure as hell you are part of what is wrong.
Quote:
Kiss of death: Jimmy Carter says he’d be “very pleased” to see Romney as GOP nominee


Jimmy Carter: I’d be ‘comfortable’ with Mitt Romney



AP Photo

Jimmy Carter says he would be “comfortable” with a Mitt Romney presidency, although he still expects President Barack Obama to win re-election in the fall.

“I’d rather have a Democrat but I would be comfortable,” the former president told MSNBC in a segment aired Wednesday. “I think Romney has shown in the past, in his previous years as a moderate or progressive… that he was fairly competent as a governor and also running the Olympics as you know.”

Carter went on to compliment Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee, as “a good solid family man and so forth.” And although he said Romney has taken some “extreme right-wing positions” in order to win the GOP primary, he suggested that the former Massachusetts governor is likely something of centrist at heart.

“What he’ll do in the general election, what he’ll do as president I think is different,” Carter said.

This is not the first time Carter has praised a Republican presidential hopeful. Last spring, he described former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman as “very attractive to me personally.”

Huntsman, however, recently said he found those kind words less-than-helpful as he struggled to make inroads with the GOP’s conservative base last year.

“A guy named Michael Moore who went on television and said ‘That Huntsman guy. He’s a Republican I think I could support’ to be followed up by Jimmy Carter who said ‘This Huntsman guy: I think he’s somebody I could support’ to be followed up by Bill Clinton, who went on television and said ‘He seems pretty un-hidebound. He’s a Republican I think I could’ — we were so toast in Iowa by then,” Huntsman told MSNBC’s Morning Joe on Monday.

Follow Will on Twitter


Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: One Reason Why No Republican But Ron Paul Will Be President
4/26/2012 11:39:47 PM
Hey Peter,

Don't forget my friend, second gains delegates too, in many instances. Also I don't think Sanitorum and Gainriches, have as yet released their delegates, few they may be they all add up in the end at the convention.

What don't hear as VP candidates is someone like Paul, unlikely unless he has many rungs on the platform. Whatever that may be. We have to remember Romney has supported every anti-constitutional move so far. Obamney keeps us on the same glide path. Simply buys time. Does not stop the treason, larceny, and takeover. IMV

Next your man Rubio, for VP, made a big mistake; He's no Foreign Policy genius either.


Conor Friedersdorf

Conor Friedersdorf - Conor Friedersdorf is a staff writer at The Atlantic, where he focuses on politics and national affairs. He lives in Venice, California, and is the founding editor of The Best of Journalism, a newsletter devoted to exceptional nonfiction.

Omission Accomplished: Marco Rubio's Telling Failure to Mention Iraq

By Conor Friedersdorf
Apr 25 2012, 5:19 PM ET 40
The dogma of reflexively interventionist senators cannot survive a confrontation with reality, so they simply ignore it.

rubiobrookings.banner.getty.jpg
Reuters

Perusing the text of Marco Rubio's foreign policy speech at the Brookings Institution, I notice a word that doesn't appear: Iraq. It's so hard to believe that I've read the speech twice and executed a word search three times. Did he think no one would notice? The Senator from Florida has given a lengthy address about the wisdom of American intervention without so much as acknowledging the most consequential foreign intervention that we've undertaken in decades.

This is the same Marco Rubio who says George W. Bush, whose presidency was defined by Iraq, did a fantastic job. As recently as last fall he was fearful that the United States was leaving the Iraq too quickly. Back in 2010 he avowed that the Iraq War made America safer and better off.

But Iraq has now disappeared from his analysis of American foreign policy. He manages to avoid talking about Iraq even as he frets that Iran is attempting to rule over the rest of the Middle East. Does Rubio ever ponder what recent military campaign effectively increased their influence in the region?

Says Michael Brendan Dougherty, "Rubio's speech is a remarkable political document. It shows that some Senators have learned nothing from the past decade." He's mostly right, but there is one important caveat. The interventionists have apparently learned to stop acknowledging the Iraq War, for their vague generalities about America's role in the world cannot survive a confrontation with a decade of costly, catastrophic intervention. Better to pretend the debacle never happened, even while ratcheting up the rhetoric about Syria and Iran.

It's a perfect distillation of how ideological and divorced from empiricism the neoconservative project has become. A subject is raised at length -- but the most relevant real world example isn't. Rubio making foreign policy for a fantasy world, and we'd all be better off if someone bought him a Risk board so that he could work out his delusions of strategic acumen with fewer consequences.



Quote:
Hi Jim,

Lame reply but between the two of us peanut brain Carter's semi endorsement of Romney won't harm him on any way in the long run.

It's interesting that you didn't relate to the Storm Front issue but that's understandable in a way cos there really is no answer you can give about that. For many that is ONE of the reasons Paul is not an option. You do have to take into account the people that are part and parcel of the Paul cult. I remember well how we posted negatively about B Hussein's associates, supporters and past and present ideologies he embraced etc.. Surely the same should apply to Paul.

What I have noticed lately while reading comments to the many articles I read is that the majority are now talking about the necessity to unify and unite behind the GOP nominee and there are less ronbot rants.

There is no other option if we want to rid ourselves of the guy sitting in the WH now. I believe that if we do unify behind the GOP candidate then we have a good chance to beat the fraud and great pretender if we don't we can expect another 4 years of B Hussein.

Now that Gingrich is out of the race and after the results of the primaries on Tuesday it's evident that Romney will be the GOP candidate and Paul will remain second all the time unless he too will suspend his run. I can see it now. Enormous headlines by the ronbots PAUL CAME IN SECOND!!!!!!!!! :) :) :) :)

Shalom,

Peter


Quote:
What better way to give that kiss? Of course it is another chink in the armor of the Republican Chosen One. I am yet to be sold he can beat the current tenant in the White House.

Jim

Quote:
Hey Jim,

Have you any idea how ridiculous your comment is? Ron Paul has Storm Front as supporters who claim Paul is one of them or thinks like them. Peanut brain Carter is definitely not a person whose recommendation means anything to me but neither is Storm Front and others of their ilk who are avid supporters of Paul.

Paul's response about Storm Front (Storm Front is definitely "part of what's wrong") supporting him is that he's not responsible for those that support him yet he never rejected or repudiated them for their views nor did he return their contributions. Well the same excuse goes for Romney who as you know is not my first choice but will get my support to oust B Hussein from the WH. On the other hand this could be a tactic of the progressive liberal Democrats to give Romney the kiss of death.

Shalom,

Peter

P.S. Storm Front is worse then peanut brain Carter IMO.

Quote:
This is another GIGANTIC reason to vote RON PAUL 2012! Look if Carter is for anything but Habitat for Humanity I am walking the other way! Sorry Mitt, I had my doubts before now Iam sure as hell you are part of what is wrong.
Quote:
Kiss of death: Jimmy Carter says he’d be “very pleased” to see Romney as GOP nominee


Jimmy Carter: I’d be ‘comfortable’ with Mitt Romney



AP Photo

Jimmy Carter says he would be “comfortable” with a Mitt Romney presidency, although he still expects President Barack Obama to win re-election in the fall.

“I’d rather have a Democrat but I would be comfortable,” the former president told MSNBC in a segment aired Wednesday. “I think Romney has shown in the past, in his previous years as a moderate or progressive… that he was fairly competent as a governor and also running the Olympics as you know.”

Carter went on to compliment Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee, as “a good solid family man and so forth.” And although he said Romney has taken some “extreme right-wing positions” in order to win the GOP primary, he suggested that the former Massachusetts governor is likely something of centrist at heart.

“What he’ll do in the general election, what he’ll do as president I think is different,” Carter said.

This is not the first time Carter has praised a Republican presidential hopeful. Last spring, he described former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman as “very attractive to me personally.”

Huntsman, however, recently said he found those kind words less-than-helpful as he struggled to make inroads with the GOP’s conservative base last year.

“A guy named Michael Moore who went on television and said ‘That Huntsman guy. He’s a Republican I think I could support’ to be followed up by Jimmy Carter who said ‘This Huntsman guy: I think he’s somebody I could support’ to be followed up by Bill Clinton, who went on television and said ‘He seems pretty un-hidebound. He’s a Republican I think I could’ — we were so toast in Iowa by then,” Huntsman told MSNBC’s Morning Joe on Monday.

Follow Will on Twitter


May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: One Reason Why No Republican But Ron Paul Will Be President
4/28/2012 11:46:04 AM
My reply

Quote:
Hi Jim,

Lame reply but between the two of us peanut brain Carter's semi endorsement of Romney won't harm him on any way in the long run.

It's interesting that you didn't relate to the Storm Front issue but that's understandable in a way cos there really is no answer you can give about that. For many that is ONE of the reasons Paul is not an option. You do have to take into account the people that are part and parcel of the Paul cult. I remember well how we posted negatively about B Hussein's associates, supporters and past and present ideologies he embraced etc.. Surely the same should apply to Paul.

What I have noticed lately while reading comments to the many articles I read is that the majority are now talking about the necessity to unify and unite behind the GOP nominee and there are less ronbot rants.

There is no other option if we want to rid ourselves of the guy sitting in the WH now. I believe that if we do unify behind the GOP candidate then we have a good chance to beat the fraud and great pretender if we don't we can expect another 4 years of B Hussein.

Now that Gingrich is out of the race and after the results of the primaries on Tuesday it's evident that Romney will be the GOP candidate and Paul will remain second all the time unless he too will suspend his run. I can see it now. Enormous headlines by the ronbots PAUL CAME IN SECOND!!!!!!!!! :) :) :) :)

Shalom,

Peter


Quote:
What better way to give that kiss? Of course it is another chink in the armor of the Republican Chosen One. I am yet to be sold he can beat the current tenant in the White House.

Jim

Quote:
Hey Jim,

Have you any idea how ridiculous your comment is? Ron Paul has Storm Front as supporters who claim Paul is one of them or thinks like them. Peanut brain Carter is definitely not a person whose recommendation means anything to me but neither is Storm Front and others of their ilk who are avid supporters of Paul.

Paul's response about Storm Front (Storm Front is definitely "part of what's wrong") supporting him is that he's not responsible for those that support him yet he never rejected or repudiated them for their views nor did he return their contributions. Well the same excuse goes for Romney who as you know is not my first choice but will get my support to oust B Hussein from the WH. On the other hand this could be a tactic of the progressive liberal Democrats to give Romney the kiss of death.

Shalom,

Peter

P.S. Storm Front is worse then peanut brain Carter IMO.

Quote:
This is another GIGANTIC reason to vote RON PAUL 2012! Look if Carter is for anything but Habitat for Humanity I am walking the other way! Sorry Mitt, I had my doubts before now Iam sure as hell you are part of what is wrong.
Quote:
Kiss of death: Jimmy Carter says he’d be “very pleased” to see Romney as GOP nominee


Jimmy Carter: I’d be ‘comfortable’ with Mitt Romney



AP Photo

Jimmy Carter says he would be “comfortable” with a Mitt Romney presidency, although he still expects President Barack Obama to win re-election in the fall.

“I’d rather have a Democrat but I would be comfortable,” the former president told MSNBC in a segment aired Wednesday. “I think Romney has shown in the past, in his previous years as a moderate or progressive… that he was fairly competent as a governor and also running the Olympics as you know.”

Carter went on to compliment Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee, as “a good solid family man and so forth.” And although he said Romney has taken some “extreme right-wing positions” in order to win the GOP primary, he suggested that the former Massachusetts governor is likely something of centrist at heart.

“What he’ll do in the general election, what he’ll do as president I think is different,” Carter said.

This is not the first time Carter has praised a Republican presidential hopeful. Last spring, he described former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman as “very attractive to me personally.”

Huntsman, however, recently said he found those kind words less-than-helpful as he struggled to make inroads with the GOP’s conservative base last year.

“A guy named Michael Moore who went on television and said ‘That Huntsman guy. He’s a Republican I think I could support’ to be followed up by Jimmy Carter who said ‘This Huntsman guy: I think he’s somebody I could support’ to be followed up by Bill Clinton, who went on television and said ‘He seems pretty un-hidebound. He’s a Republican I think I could’ — we were so toast in Iowa by then,” Huntsman told MSNBC’s Morning Joe on Monday.

Follow Will on Twitter


May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: One Reason Why No Republican But Ron Paul Will Be President
4/28/2012 11:51:51 AM
Could not have said it better myself

Quote:
"Kristi Dunn When Romney looses in Nov. ... Yes, he *will* loose, and you vacillating pin-heads are going to try and blame 'us' for not voting for him, remember ... we told you all along, "Ron Paul or not at all". It was *you* that dismissed us. It was *you* that ignored us. The GOP does not own my vote and I refuse to spend that vote on the "Diet Socialist candidate". Period."
Quote:
My reply

Quote:
Hi Jim,

Lame reply but between the two of us peanut brain Carter's semi endorsement of Romney won't harm him on any way in the long run.

It's interesting that you didn't relate to the Storm Front issue but that's understandable in a way cos there really is no answer you can give about that. For many that is ONE of the reasons Paul is not an option. You do have to take into account the people that are part and parcel of the Paul cult. I remember well how we posted negatively about B Hussein's associates, supporters and past and present ideologies he embraced etc.. Surely the same should apply to Paul.

What I have noticed lately while reading comments to the many articles I read is that the majority are now talking about the necessity to unify and unite behind the GOP nominee and there are less ronbot rants.

There is no other option if we want to rid ourselves of the guy sitting in the WH now. I believe that if we do unify behind the GOP candidate then we have a good chance to beat the fraud and great pretender if we don't we can expect another 4 years of B Hussein.

Now that Gingrich is out of the race and after the results of the primaries on Tuesday it's evident that Romney will be the GOP candidate and Paul will remain second all the time unless he too will suspend his run. I can see it now. Enormous headlines by the ronbots PAUL CAME IN SECOND!!!!!!!!! :) :) :) :)

Shalom,

Peter


Quote:
What better way to give that kiss? Of course it is another chink in the armor of the Republican Chosen One. I am yet to be sold he can beat the current tenant in the White House.

Jim

Quote:
Hey Jim,

Have you any idea how ridiculous your comment is? Ron Paul has Storm Front as supporters who claim Paul is one of them or thinks like them. Peanut brain Carter is definitely not a person whose recommendation means anything to me but neither is Storm Front and others of their ilk who are avid supporters of Paul.

Paul's response about Storm Front (Storm Front is definitely "part of what's wrong") supporting him is that he's not responsible for those that support him yet he never rejected or repudiated them for their views nor did he return their contributions. Well the same excuse goes for Romney who as you know is not my first choice but will get my support to oust B Hussein from the WH. On the other hand this could be a tactic of the progressive liberal Democrats to give Romney the kiss of death.

Shalom,

Peter

P.S. Storm Front is worse then peanut brain Carter IMO.

Quote:
This is another GIGANTIC reason to vote RON PAUL 2012! Look if Carter is for anything but Habitat for Humanity I am walking the other way! Sorry Mitt, I had my doubts before now Iam sure as hell you are part of what is wrong.
Quote:
Kiss of death: Jimmy Carter says he’d be “very pleased” to see Romney as GOP nominee


Jimmy Carter: I’d be ‘comfortable’ with Mitt Romney



AP Photo

Jimmy Carter says he would be “comfortable” with a Mitt Romney presidency, although he still expects President Barack Obama to win re-election in the fall.

“I’d rather have a Democrat but I would be comfortable,” the former president told MSNBC in a segment aired Wednesday. “I think Romney has shown in the past, in his previous years as a moderate or progressive… that he was fairly competent as a governor and also running the Olympics as you know.”

Carter went on to compliment Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee, as “a good solid family man and so forth.” And although he said Romney has taken some “extreme right-wing positions” in order to win the GOP primary, he suggested that the former Massachusetts governor is likely something of centrist at heart.

“What he’ll do in the general election, what he’ll do as president I think is different,” Carter said.

This is not the first time Carter has praised a Republican presidential hopeful. Last spring, he described former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman as “very attractive to me personally.”

Huntsman, however, recently said he found those kind words less-than-helpful as he struggled to make inroads with the GOP’s conservative base last year.

“A guy named Michael Moore who went on television and said ‘That Huntsman guy. He’s a Republican I think I could support’ to be followed up by Jimmy Carter who said ‘This Huntsman guy: I think he’s somebody I could support’ to be followed up by Bill Clinton, who went on television and said ‘He seems pretty un-hidebound. He’s a Republican I think I could’ — we were so toast in Iowa by then,” Huntsman told MSNBC’s Morning Joe on Monday.

Follow Will on Twitter


May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: One Reason Why No Republican But Ron Paul Will Be President
4/28/2012 1:44:11 PM
Some constructive critique

Obama's art of (political) war

What Mitt Romney can learn from the President

Comments (17)
Can Mitt Romney be a fighter?

Jae C. Hong/AP

Can Mitt Romney be a fighter?


Over the past few weeks, Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney has suddenly begun to defend his success, his family and even his wife’s decision to be a stay-at-home mom. In return, President Obama’s campaign and the media are crying foul. A lead sentence in a Politico piece on Monday said it all: “Meet Mitt Romney the victim.”

While it’s true that Romney finally appears to have realized that turning the other cheek works better as a proverb than a political strategy, he’s hardly the first of this election season to try to garner some sympathy from voters.

Rick Santorum made an entire campaign out of insisting that he’s often paid the price for putting his moral convictions before politics; Newt Gingrich unendingly blamed the media for insufficiently capturing his awesomeness on the campaign trail; Ron Paul has long made himself the victim of the Republican establishment, for rudely ignoring his advice over the past century, or however long he’s been in Congress.

But playing the victim, as cherished a political tradition as it is, won’t cut it against Obama, who’s proven that playing the aggressor is a much more effective tactic. His combination of professorial condemnation and swift kneecapping of those who would dare to disagree has made him a masterful bully.

So as Romney mounts the fight of his life against Obama, he might want to rethink the victim strategy in favor of something that looks more like Obama’s elbow-throwing. Here’s a handy guide:

Don’t complain about the press. Intimidate it.

In 2008, during the final weeks of the presidential campaign, Obama had three reporters from conservative newspapers kicked off his plane. At the time, his adviser Anita Dunn said there simply wasn’t enough room for the three national journos who’d been covering the candidate all along. But somehow, writers from Glamour, Ebony and Jet magazines managed to find seats.

After he was elected, Obama also made the unprecedented move of trying to ban an entire network — Fox News — from the White House press pool. Luckily, the other networks objected and Fox kept its creds.

Still, the message was clear: You’re either with us or flying coach.

Spare no one.

Even Obama’s friends can become the objects of his wrath if they go off-script. The Congressional Black Caucus found this out the hard way last year, when it asserted that Obama could be doing more to pass the American Jobs Act. At a dinner that they hosted, he snarkily told them to “stop complaining, stop grumbling and stop whining.” And while any President has the right to criticize his party, that kind of outright scorn is rare — but, also, very effective.


May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!