Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Is Ron Paul a racist? Hmmm... Good Questions
4/23/2012 3:50:41 AM
Hello Peter,
Yep, your summation is correct. Independents do not think Romney can win, without our help, neither can Obama, how about that $hit? Just a thought.

Ron Paul has the youth vote and it is obvious he can get them to turn out.

Romney supported a state mandate to purchase healthcare and there is nothing other than him saying "The mandate was right for Massachusetts but not right for the nation. Now if this guy has already supported such a mandate as an executive, then I have no reason to believe he would do otherwise as president.

As much as I respect your opinions this one is patently wrong. Just as wrong as when we settled for McCain as a candidate. Obama and Romney are cut from the same cloth. I do respect Romney's business acumen but he has no clue about the lives of folks earning under six figures a year. Just as Obama has no clue about those under six figure or those that earn above the poverty line.

Plain and simple neither represent the the middle class majority. Settling this time for someone with no regard for the original constitution, not the constitution of the US Corporation. There is a huge difference I am sure you know.

While I think Romney would be a slower death for the US than a second term for zero, the end would be the same. No more freedom and liberty in the USA. I would much rather be a ronbot than an Obamneybot any day.

Jim

Quote:
Hi Jim,

I realize as a true and blue ronbot (self proclaimed in one of your previous posts :)) you have to spread the talking points of the Paul campaign. BUT, and this is a big but, when you see poll results like the one you posted it raises questions and in addition has a gazillion holes in it.

What this poll says is that out of all the independents polled not one thought Santorum, Romney or Gingrich is electable. Not one!!!!! Results like that defy logic and is questionable statistically to say the least. You have to be very naive or worse totally brainwashed to accept this as a "fact" but that's only my opinion. Believe it if you wish.

Paul rules nada and is unelectable and won't win the GOP nomination. He continues running only to have a stronger bargaining base at the convention for future deals either for himself or Rand. No more no less. He's got you all hoodwinked and the sad thing is that good people are still buying into the "Paul Rules" nonsense.

I did give lots of thought whether to post my response to the "electable" poll or not but after looking at it again just now I felt that it demands a response. Now if I misunderstood the poll results please enlighten me.

Shalom,

Peter

Quote:
You hear all the poll results from the MSM including FOX and you are not privvy to the truth or real numbers that count. Independents (Third Party) will determine this election. So pay attention closely as the numbers do not lie

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Is Ron Paul a racist? Hmmm... Good Questions
4/23/2012 3:58:50 AM
Hey Michael,
We could be right on that assumption. I have long said there will be no election because of some calamity requiring the zero to enact martial law, h_ell NDAA pretty much assures it.

Everyone is afraid of Ron Paul, that makes him the BEST possible Candidate. Its time for a third party and Paul already has the boots on the ground to wage with one or both sides of the Obamney ticket. :-)

Thanks for dropping by,

Jim

Quote:
Hello Peter Jim

The conditions in the financial world may well effect who people in the USA vote for.

Paul has a large following and number of delegates. I think there will a be financial crash or debacle before the election and this could turn the tide with the general public in Ron Pauls favor.

Regards Michael



Hi Jim,

I realize as a true and blue ronbot (self proclaimed in one of your previous posts :)) you have to spread the talking points of the Paul campaign. BUT, and this is a big but, when you see poll results like the one you posted it raises questions and in addition has a gazillion holes in it.

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Is Ron Paul a racist? Hmmm... Good Questions
4/23/2012 4:03:33 AM
PS: Your only reasoning is Ron Paul's foreign policy is not to your liking, so you would settle for someone with no experience at foreign policy over someone that has 30 years worth of policy experience as a member of congress. Pretty naive too. IMV

Quote:
Hello Peter,
Yep, your summation is correct. Independents do not think Romney can win, without our help, neither can Obama, how about that $hit? Just a thought.

Ron Paul has the youth vote and it is obvious he can get them to turn out.

Romney supported a state mandate to purchase healthcare and there is nothing other than him saying "The mandate was right for Massachusetts but not right for the nation. Now if this guy has already supported such a mandate as an executive, then I have no reason to believe he would do otherwise as president.

As much as I respect your opinions this one is patently wrong. Just as wrong as when we settled for McCain as a candidate. Obama and Romney are cut from the same cloth. I do respect Romney's business acumen but he has no clue about the lives of folks earning under six figures a year. Just as Obama has no clue about those under six figure or those that earn above the poverty line.

Plain and simple neither represent the the middle class majority. Settling this time for someone with no regard for the original constitution, not the constitution of the US Corporation. There is a huge difference I am sure you know.

While I think Romney would be a slower death for the US than a second term for zero, the end would be the same. No more freedom and liberty in the USA. I would much rather be a ronbot than an Obamneybot any day.

Jim

Quote:
Hi Jim,

I realize as a true and blue ronbot (self proclaimed in one of your previous posts :)) you have to spread the talking points of the Paul campaign. BUT, and this is a big but, when you see poll results like the one you posted it raises questions and in addition has a gazillion holes in it.

What this poll says is that out of all the independents polled not one thought Santorum, Romney or Gingrich is electable. Not one!!!!! Results like that defy logic and is questionable statistically to say the least. You have to be very naive or worse totally brainwashed to accept this as a "fact" but that's only my opinion. Believe it if you wish.

Paul rules nada and is unelectable and won't win the GOP nomination. He continues running only to have a stronger bargaining base at the convention for future deals either for himself or Rand. No more no less. He's got you all hoodwinked and the sad thing is that good people are still buying into the "Paul Rules" nonsense.

I did give lots of thought whether to post my response to the "electable" poll or not but after looking at it again just now I felt that it demands a response. Now if I misunderstood the poll results please enlighten me.

Shalom,

Peter

Quote:
You hear all the poll results from the MSM including FOX and you are not privvy to the truth or real numbers that count. Independents (Third Party) will determine this election. So pay attention closely as the numbers do not lie

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Is Ron Paul a racist? Hmmm... Good Questions
4/23/2012 5:30:36 AM

Ron Paul Wins in Iowa and Minnesota, Romney in a Panic

By Doug Wead

Ron Paul supporters surged to victory in yesterday’s Minnesota and Iowa district conventions, dominating the process and picking up more delegates to the Republican National Convention. As reported last week, a number of Romney Hawks are now deeply concerned that Ron Paul has already laid the groundwork for similar success in six more caucus states. Yesterday’s results will only increase their influence inside the Romney camp.

Romney advisers are concerned that the rising total of Ron Paul delegates will lead to an unmanageable RNC. Some observers felt that the 1992 convention hurt an incumbent president George H. W. Bush and was a factor in his loss to Bill Clinton.

In most states, victories at the district conventions decide who will move onto the state conventions where most of the delegates to the Republican National Convention in Tampa will be selected.

The rules in Minnesota are slightly different and some of those final delegates were actually selected at scattered district conventions yesterday. Reports from our own Marianne Stebbins in Minnesota show that Ron Paul now has 20 out of the 24 delegates already chosen to represent the state at the Republican National Convention in Tampa and the campaign is poised to do just as good at the upcoming state convention, May 18-19, when the final 13 will be chosen.

In Iowa, Jennifer Jacobs, a reporter for the Des Moines Resister, broke into open what had been our little secret, namely, the takeover of the GOP in Iowa. “A rising tide of Republicans who share Ron Paul’s philosophy of limited government are flooding into GOP party roles in Iowa,” Jennifer wrote, reporting on yesterdays Iowa district conventions.

Actually, it is a phenomenon seen all across the country. It is viewed by many political observers as the biggest transformation of the Republican Party since 1988, when evangelical Christians joined the process and dominated state positions for a whole generation.

While the Iowa Ron Paul campaign is keeping its cards close to the vest, we all got a sneak peak from an the Des Moines Register story which reported that six of the new Iowa GOP state central committee members elected Saturday have publicly expressed support for Ron Paul. Joes Kurtinitis, Kris Thiessen, Dave Cushman, Jeff Shipley, John Kabitzke and Marcus Fedler. “Two more,” Jennifer Jacobs reports, “have close ties.” The new state chairman is also a Ron Paul supporter, who served as a co-chairman for the congressman’s Iowa state organization.

The Iowa state GOP convention is set for Jun 16, 2012.

Meanwhile, the sleepy New York Times has posted for five months and still posts, even today, that the total delegate count for Ron Paul in Iowa is one. They say that the total delegate count for Ron Paul in Minnesota is nine. In fact, Ron Paul supporters will now dominate both state conventions. And the same trend is ongoing in states across the country.

Join the discussion: http://www.facebook.com/DougWeadOfficial

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: Is Ron Paul a racist? Hmmm... Good Questions
4/23/2012 5:32:07 AM
The wheels are in motion. Looks like no media attention is the best thing to happen. Thanks MSM ;-)

Quote:

Ron Paul Wins in Iowa and Minnesota, Romney in a Panic

By Doug Wead

Ron Paul supporters surged to victory in yesterday’s Minnesota and Iowa district conventions, dominating the process and picking up more delegates to the Republican National Convention. As reported last week, a number of Romney Hawks are now deeply concerned that Ron Paul has already laid the groundwork for similar success in six more caucus states. Yesterday’s results will only increase their influence inside the Romney camp.

Romney advisers are concerned that the rising total of Ron Paul delegates will lead to an unmanageable RNC. Some observers felt that the 1992 convention hurt an incumbent president George H. W. Bush and was a factor in his loss to Bill Clinton.

In most states, victories at the district conventions decide who will move onto the state conventions where most of the delegates to the Republican National Convention in Tampa will be selected.

The rules in Minnesota are slightly different and some of those final delegates were actually selected at scattered district conventions yesterday. Reports from our own Marianne Stebbins in Minnesota show that Ron Paul now has 20 out of the 24 delegates already chosen to represent the state at the Republican National Convention in Tampa and the campaign is poised to do just as good at the upcoming state convention, May 18-19, when the final 13 will be chosen.

In Iowa, Jennifer Jacobs, a reporter for the Des Moines Resister, broke into open what had been our little secret, namely, the takeover of the GOP in Iowa. “A rising tide of Republicans who share Ron Paul’s philosophy of limited government are flooding into GOP party roles in Iowa,” Jennifer wrote, reporting on yesterdays Iowa district conventions.

Actually, it is a phenomenon seen all across the country. It is viewed by many political observers as the biggest transformation of the Republican Party since 1988, when evangelical Christians joined the process and dominated state positions for a whole generation.

While the Iowa Ron Paul campaign is keeping its cards close to the vest, we all got a sneak peak from an the Des Moines Register story which reported that six of the new Iowa GOP state central committee members elected Saturday have publicly expressed support for Ron Paul. Joes Kurtinitis, Kris Thiessen, Dave Cushman, Jeff Shipley, John Kabitzke and Marcus Fedler. “Two more,” Jennifer Jacobs reports, “have close ties.” The new state chairman is also a Ron Paul supporter, who served as a co-chairman for the congressman’s Iowa state organization.

The Iowa state GOP convention is set for Jun 16, 2012.

Meanwhile, the sleepy New York Times has posted for five months and still posts, even today, that the total delegate count for Ron Paul in Iowa is one. They say that the total delegate count for Ron Paul in Minnesota is nine. In fact, Ron Paul supporters will now dominate both state conventions. And the same trend is ongoing in states across the country.

Join the discussion: http://www.facebook.com/DougWeadOfficial

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!