It's interesting to read through all the posts in this thread and to be perfectly honest I found some of them quite amusing.
On a personal level I must be honest and admit that I stopped supporting the POTW for a variety of reasons some of which I'll explain and some I won't.
To state what I've said in the past the objective of the POTW was to award members for their participation in the community. Having your own forum was a plus but not necessary to be eligible. The important part was community participation. The criteria that John Sanchez created was set up in such a way that only members that were active in the community, participated in different forums, had a certain amount of posts (350 if I remember correctly) that were community related and not advertising posts and were members for a certain amount of time were eligible to be nominated for the POTW contest. A member was eligible to win the award once only and the exception to that was the POTY where it was possible to win more then once even though that never happened.
During the period AnaMaria, Jim and I were the admins of the POTW we carried on with the same eligibility criteria. When Kathleen took over she changed the criteria and opened it to the general Adland membership including those that never participated in the community. She also changed the format and as you all know it never took off as she thought it would. There were a few other changes that the current admin incorporated them in the present criteria and the heated discussion in this thread is a consequence of that.
Here are some of the reasons I stopped supporting the POTW.
1. I believed it was nonsensical to have members with multiple POTW awards. This started during Kathleen's stewardship and continued with the present admins.
2. I thought Adland members that didn't participate in the community shouldn't be eligible.
There are more reasons but these 2 are the most important.
That said the witch hunt in this thread is a bit funny, ridiculous and definitely not acceptable. I can understand the dismay of some that the candidates are mainly advertisers and as you can see from above it's one of the reasons I stopped supporting the POTW. BUT and this is the big but; according to the present criteria these people are eligible and certainly don't deserve to be vilified as they were here. Especially one candidate who from what I saw did not spam but used the tools Adland supplies paying members to the utmost. Where is the sin in that? Many of you use email broadcasts for different reasons and when they hit my email inbox or Adland inbox I decide which I'll open and which I'll delete. That my friends is not spamming but utilizing Adland to the utmost and more power to them for doing so. Some of the posts vilifying the one member were more ego based then anything else and it seems that they are on a power trip more then anything else.
I thought it right and proper to add my thoughts here and hope that the criteria will change and if they don't that's fine but know and understand that the bashing in this thread is out of line since they have as much right to be a candidate as any one else according to the current criteria.
Shalom,
Peter
P.S. Some of the offensive posts have been deleted and rightly so but I'm confident most of you know who I'm referring to.
|