Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/1/2011 9:44:46 PM
The Most Powerful Winds California
Has Seen in Ten Years



"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/2/2011 3:27:23 PM

Violent wind storm leaves path of destruction



Violent once-in-a-decade storm stuns West

Wind gusts up to 123 mph flip semis and rip a path of destruction through several states.'This is the worst'

PASADENA, Calif. (AP) — Several overturned semis on a Utah highway. Hundreds of thousands without power in California. A wind gust reaching 123-mph in Colorado.

The powerful winds that tore across Western states Thursday created a path destruction that closed schools, left neighborhoods with a snarl of downed trees and power lines, and prompted some communities to declare emergencies.

The storms, described as a once-in-a-decade event, were the result of a dramatic difference in pressure between a strong, high-pressure system and a cold, low-pressure system, meteorologists said. This funnels strong winds down mountain canyons and slopes.

The system brought high wind warnings and advisories for California, Utah, Nevada, Wyoming, Arizona and New Mexico. The blustery weather is expected to eventually hit Oklahoma, Missouri and Indiana.

The violent winds eased but strong gusts still blew through the region Thursday night, at times reaching 60 mph in some California mountains. Forecasters said the winds would continue to diminish through Friday.

The winds were fanning fires in northern California.

The Sacramento Bee reported that as of Thursday evening, seven fires had burned more than 130 acres in El Dorado County. Five fires had also burned more than 250 acres in Tuolumne and Calaveras counties.

In Southern California, the storm knocked out electricity to more than 350,000 utility customers. By early Friday, 270,000 of them were still without power.

Gusts, which reached 80 mph, were blamed for toppling semitrailers and causing trees to fall on homes, apartment complexes and cars.

Watch Video HERE

A state of emergency was declared in Los Angeles County, where schools in a dozen communities were closed.

In some neighborhoods, concrete light poles cracked in half. Darkened traffic signals and fallen palm tree fronds and branches snarled traffic. At a Shell station, the roof collapsed into a heap of twisted metal.

In heavily damaged Pasadena, schools and libraries closed and a local emergency, the first since 2004, was declared. Officials said 40 people were evacuated from an apartment building after a tree smashed part of the roof.

Pasadena is known for its historic homes and wide oak-lined streets that are frequently depicted in films.

Many residents Thursday blamed the city for protecting its old trees from over-trimming to such an extent that they have now become a public safety hazard.

Vince Mehrabian, the general manager at A&B Motor Cars, estimated eight Lexus, Cadillac and other luxury cars had been destroyed by fallen limbs. He said he'd been asking the city for four years to trim the trees more.

On a street around the corner, almost every tree was either cracked in half or missing limbs.

Elsewhere, Daphne Bell, a 30-year Pasadena resident, said she was kept awake by howling wind. "This is the worst, the absolute worst. There were times it sounded like a freight train was roaring down my driveway," she said.

Similar stories of downed trees and power lines echoed across the West, where winds in some areas ripped storefront awnings, filled gutters with debris and forced school closures.

In Utah, about 50,000 customers lost power along the state's 120-mile Wasatch Front as high winds took down power lines, but service was restored to more than half of them by Thursday night.

On Interstate 15, strong gusts blew more than 10 semi-trucks onto their sides, prompting authorities to temporarily close the highway to trucks. Commuter train travel was also interrupted after debris covered the tracks.

Schools closed in Centerville, where a 102-mph gust was reported. Mail delivery and trash pickup were canceled.

Davis County issued a disaster declaration to request state assistance, citing more than $3.5 million in estimated damage to infrastructure.

The Red Cross opened three centers to provide food and aid to people affected by the storm, and opened one overnight shelter in Ogden.

In Nevada, weather officials warned that blowing dust was creating visibility problems on a highway between Reno and Las Vegas.

In Steamboat Springs, Colo., the roof of a four-story condominium complex was blown off and about 100 trees were knocked over, some landing on homes. A ski area shut down its lifts after a gust of 123 mph.

Even some weather experts were surprised by the wind's force.

"It's one of the strongest events that I can remember," said Brian Edwards, a meteorologist with Accuweather. "It's rather rare."

___

Associated Press writers John Rogers and Alicia Chang in Los Angeles, Jennifer Dobner in Salt Lake City, and Oskar Garcia in Las Vegas contributed to this report.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/2/2011 4:43:58 PM
The Top 20 Climate Killer Banks


Written by Mike G, Rainforest Action Network

A new report titled “Bankrolling Climate Change” calls out the top 20 banks that are financing the dirty coal industry.

The top three “climate killers” will not come as much of a surprise: JP Morgan Chase, Citi, and none other than Bank of America top the list with $22 billion, $18.27 billion, an $16.79 billion invested in coal since 2005, respectively.

As officials from around the world are assembling in Durban, South Africa to discuss ways to combat climate change, banks around the world are busy trying to figure out how they can profit off of making the climate crisis worse.

In fact, between 2005 — the year the Kyoto Protocol went into effect — and 2010, funding for coal nearly doubled. Yes, you read that right: As the world’s leaders have been trying to get their act together and deal with the most urgent existential crisis humanity has ever faced, the biggest banks in the world have been busy sinking as much money as they can into the single largest cause of that crisis (emissions from coal-fired power plants are the biggest source of man-made carbon pollution).

As the report notes, these banks are not unaware of the climate crisis. It’s just that they see it more as an opportunity for some great PR than a problem they have a stake in solving even if it means leaving money on the table. All of the top 20 coal bankrollers have made climate commitments that are drastically contradicted by where they’re actually investing their money.

JP Morgan Chase claims it’s “Helping the world transition to a low-carbon economy”, for instance. Citi holds itself out as the “Most innovative bank in climate change” — which sounds more like Citi is gunning for Chase’s number one spot than trying to help solve the climate crisis, but who am I to quibble with how Citi chooses to word its greenwash.

Bank of America has declared that “The most formidable challenge we face is global climate change.” A fittingly purposeless statement, given that BoA has invested $4.3 billion in the US coal industry, making it the single largest underwriter of America’s coal problem.

Here is a chart showing which banks made the top 20, and the amount they’ve invested in companies that are polluting our communities and wrecking our climate:

Bankin billion EuroRanking
JP Morgan Chase16,5401
Citi13,7512
Bank of America12,5903
Morgan Stanley12,1174
Barclays11,5145
Deutsche Bank11,4776
Royal Bank of Scotland10,9467
BNP Paribas10,6948
Credit Suisse9,4959
UBS8,21710
Goldman Sachs6,77011
Bank of China6,32312
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China6,18213
Crédit Agricole / Calyon5,63714
UniCredit / HVB5,23115
China Construction Bank5,11016
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group4,98017
Société Générale4,74218
Wells Fargo4,52319
HSBC4,43220

Data provided by Profundo

An international coalition of NGOs came together to release this groundbreaking report, including urgewald, a German environmental organization; groundWork and Earthlife Africa Johannesburg, two South African social and environmental justice organizations; and BankTrack, an international network. RAN contributed research to the report.

A full copy of the study with a ranking of all the researched banks can be downloaded here. The underlying data for this research were provided by Profundo economic research. They can be found here.

This post was originally published by the Rainforest Action Network.

Related Stories:

How Big Banks And States Scheme Against The Unemployed

How To Move Your Money Out Of the Bog Banks

When Will Your Mad As Hell Moment Happen?

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

Photo from Joost J. Bakker via flickr



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/the-top-20-climate-killer-banks.html#ixzz1fOdvPaXs

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/5/2011 5:58:02 PM
New Zealand Poised to Be the Next Frontier for Fracking







Written by Lucy Brake, Earth Island Journal

Earlier this year, New Zealand’s Canterbury region was shaken to its core by a devastating earthquake that literally ripped the community apart. Today, as people there continue cleaning up, many feel like they are once again under siege. The new threat: hydraulic fracturing (or fracking) for natural gas and shale oil, a procedure that has been linked to increased seismic activity.

Because oil and gas reserves are owned by the Crown, all New Zealanders should benefit from its development. But many people are worried about increased off-shore oil drilling and natural gas and shale oil exploration, and wonder how more fossil fuel extraction will impact the environment. The Green Party has called for a moratorium on natural gas fracking, and the party’s success in the recent general election reflects public support for that position.

Fracking is not new to New Zealand. The Taranaki Basin has the country’s most developed petroleum reserves, and since 2003 around 30 wells have been fracked here. That’s a drop in the bucket by international standards. But if the industry has its way, those 30 wells will be just the beginning. TAG Oil believes the rest of New Zealand is severely under-explored and is “one of the few remaining high potential untapped oil and gas frontiers in the world.” It says the country’s oil-rich fractured shale source-rock formations are a “widespread exploration target with major unconventional oil and gas potential.”

Bernie Napp, a senior policy analyst at the natural resource lobby organization Straterra and a vocal fracking supporter, says in New Zealand this practice is used to extract coal seam gas and occasionally natural gas onshore or nearshore. Fracking in New Zealand is mainly done more than 3,000 meters below the surface, and the industry is quick to point out that without fracking some current hydrocarbon production would not be viable.

Fracking seems to have snuck very quietly into New Zealand. While the industry is busy preparing for what it hopes will be a boom decade, many citizens are getting worried. The industry insists the practice is safe. Yet there are no regulations to specifically govern fracking, and there is also a lack of independent research into impacts on the country’s environment. Fracking opponents are calling for an independent investigation.

There are some big issues getting people nervous. The foremost concern is that fracking fluids could leak into aquifers and contaminate. In response to, the Taranaki Regional Council recently investigated fracking impacts. A chief investigator publicly drank water from one of the most contentious industrial sites to rebuff water quality concerns. In a joint statement the industry suggested opponents need to get real: “Fracking is not done within or anywhere near the water table,” Straterra said in a statement. However, the Waikato community, where fracking was used as shallow as only a few hundred metres, begs to differ.

Secondly, there are concerns about fracking fluid themsevles. The Petroleum Exploration and Production Association of New Zealand has denied that the frack fluids contain the so-called

BTEX group – the highly carcinogenic chemicals benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene. Straterra’s Napp says the chemicals used in New Zealand’s fracking fluid are “non-toxic to humans.” But that surely doesn’t mean people want the chemicals in their water supplies.

And last, but most certainly not least, is a worry about earthquakes. In New Zealand the industry is forging ahead in some of the country’s most earthquake-prone areas. Canterbury University recently hosted a fracking Q&A session during which Michael Hasting, an energy industry geophysicist said “there is no doubt that fracking does cause earthquakes.” He stressed that the quakes are generally small, although the practice can trigger larger quakes. No doubt this type of comment makes locals more anxious. “Fracking is banned in France and halted in parts of United States, Canada, Australia and South Africa,” says Reuben Hunt, a frustrated local Canterbury resident. “So why are we even considering this option when we don’t have the same population or energy pressures?”

Hunt believes that fracking has every potential to spark more earthquakes. In a community that’s still shaken, fracking is something he would be much happier without.

This post was originally published by Earth Island Journal.

Related Stories:

My Water’s On Fire Tonight (The Fracking Song)

Fracking May Have Caused 50 Earthquakes in Oklahoma

Toxic Fracking Waste Could End Up In Niagara

Read more: , , , ,

Photo from Owen Crowley via flickr



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/new-zealand-poised-to-be-the-next-frontier-for-fracking.html#ixzz1fgUERyiZ

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/5/2011 6:16:11 PM
Can we believe them - especially in light of the recent US military admission to guarding and assisting lucrative opium trade in Afghanistan (HERE)?

US agents laundered drug money: report

AFPSun, Dec 4, 2011

U.S. agents helped launder drug money

Antinarcotics agents smuggled millions for Mexican cartels, a new report says.Their reason for doing it

Anti-narcotics agents working for the US government have laundered or smuggled millions of dollars in drug proceeds to see how the system works and use the information against Mexican drug cartels, The New York Times reported Sunday.

Citing unnamed current and former federal law enforcementofficials, the newspaper said the agents, primarily with the Drug Enforcement Administration, have handled shipments of hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal cash across borders.

Some 45,000 people have been killed in Mexico since 2006, when its government launched a major military crackdown against the powerful drug cartels that have terrorized border communities as they battled over lucrative smuggling routes.

According to these officials, the operations were aimed at identifying how criminal organizations move their money, where they keep their assets and, most important, who their leaders are, the report said.

The agents had deposited the proceeds in accounts designated by traffickers, or in shell accounts set up by agents, the paper noted.

While the DEA conducted such operations in other countries, it began doing so in Mexico only in the past few years, The Times said.

As it launders drug money, the agency often allows cartels to continue their operations over months or even years before making seizures or arrests, the report said.

According to The Times, agency officials declined to publicly discuss details of their work, citing concerns about compromising their investigations.

But Michael Vigil, a former senior official who is currently working for a private contracting company called Mission Essential Personnel, is quoted by the paper as saying: "We tried to make sure there was always close supervision of these operations so that we were accomplishing our objectives, and agents weren’t laundering money for the sake of laundering money."


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!