This news has to have these two panicking.

Two days ago, Conservative Daily Post reported that House Intelligence Committee Chair Devin Nunes was among those launching investigations into shady dealings between Democrats, the Obama administration, and Russia. At that time, Senator Chuck Grassley was also demanding that a nondisclosure agreement be lifted on an FBI informant that had vital information on the situation.

Last night the Justice Department lifted the gag order. This is the worst-case scenario for Democrats and likely has all of them, Hillary and Obama included, panicking. This informant is thought to be able to shed light on Obama-era uranium deals with Russia. This would include information about Rosatom, Uranium One, and the Clinton Foundation. The DOJ stated the informant can now provide;

“Any information or documents he has concerning alleged corruption or bribery involving transactions in the uranium market.”

The hard facts in just one image.

As Nunes said earlier this week, his and Congress’s objective needs to be to discover if Rosatom was under investigation for bribery, extortion, and kickbacks, at the same time Obama was handing over 20% of America’s uranium to Russia.

That deal is reported to have been influenced by collusion with Russian officials, not by President Trump of course, but by the Clintons. Donations were made to the Clinton Foundation, Bill was paid a $500,000 speaking fee AND met with Vladimir Putin. All this occurred around the same time as the uranium deal.

The informant was blocked from testifying earlier by Obama’s administration, Eric Holder and Loretta Lynch, according to the man’s attorney. They had him sign the nondisclosure agreement which was very convenient for their boss and Hillary.

Senator Grassley told “Fox & Friends” this morning that he would like to have the source brought before a public committee but that the decision to speak to Congress is a brave on;

“We ought to know about [what he knows] because transparency brings accountability,” Grassley said.

That era is over now and the bridge of lies, deceit, and betrayal built by Hillary, Obama, and the Democrats, is finally crumbling.

Source: Fox News

Tropical storm warnings have been issued in Cuba and the Bahamas as a potential cyclone forms in the northwest Caribbean Sea that will be named ‘Philippe.’

The disturbance is moving northeast from the western Caribbean Sea at a pace of 7 miles per hour and carries winds of 40 miles per hour, according to the National Hurricane Center, which is naming it ‘Potential Tropical Cyclone Eighteen’ before its formation.

While it has no defined center at present, it is a weather system that could accelerate, making landfall in Cuba on Saturday night and moving across the northwestern Bahamas. It could then move its way toward South Florida and the Florida Keys.

The southern U.S. state is expected to receive as much as five inches of rain as a result of the storm.

“Regardless of development, this disturbance will be a big rainmaker for parts of South Florida and the Keys,” FOX meteorologist Tyler Eliasen said.

“Widespread rainfall totals of two to four inches are expected, with isolated higher amounts possible. Amounts will taper off quickly further north in the state.”

Trees bend in the tropical storm wind along North Fort Lauderdale Beach Boulevard as Hurricane Irma hits the southern part of the state September 10, 2017 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.CHIP SOMODEVILLA/GETTY

Observers say there is more than an 80 percent chance that the disturbance will form into a tropical cyclone. Forecasters said it is “likely to become a tropical storm tonight (Friday) or Saturday,” New Orleans local news site NOLA.com reported.

They are warning residents and authorities in the Cayman Islands and South Florida to continue to monitor the progress of the weather system in case it becomes even stronger.

More than a month of the hurricane season remains, with its last day November 30, and it seems the Caribbean and southern U.S. states will continue to endure challenging conditions. It could become one of the busiest seasons of all time.

By the end of September, there have been 13 named storms, five major hurricanes of at least Category 3 in strength, and eight hurricanes recorded in total in the Atlantic.

The most damaging was Hurricane Harvey, a Category 4 hurricane that was the first to make landfall in the U.S. since Wilma in 2005. It caused havoc across central America before reaching Texas and Louisiana. It killed 63 people in total and caused around $70 billion in damage.

Harvey was followed by Hurricane Irma, Hurricane Jose and then Hurricane Maria. September was the most active month for Atlantic tropical cyclones in history.

(Newsweek)

The total wealth held by the world’s billionaires rose by 17 percent in 2016 to $6 trillion, and the uber-rich are concerned that growing inequality could lead to society turning against them.

There was a 10 percent rise in the number of billionaires around the world to 1,542, according to the UBS/PwC Billionaires 2017 report. And for the first time ever, the number of Asian billionaires has overtaken those in the United States.

The growth in 2016 means that the world’s richest people now control the highest concentration of wealth since the period known as the Gilded Age in the United States, where business families built vast empires in the late 19th century, the Guardian reported.

Cars on display at the Salon Privé event at the Syon House in London on September 4, 2014.DAN KITWOOD/GETTY

The Gilded Age ultimately ended in society pushing back against the wealthy. President Theodore Roosevelt came to power in 1901 and split up monopolies; and the early 20th century was known as the Progressive Era, a period of activism and reform partially aimed at bettering the lot of the common person and taking down huge companies.

According to Josef Stadler, the lead author of the report, modern billionaires are worried that a similar phenomenon could occur today.

“Wealth concentration is as high as in 1905; this is something billionaires are concerned about. The problem is the power of interest on interest—that makes big money bigger—and the question is to what extent is that sustainable, and at what point will society intervene and strike back?” Stadler, the global head of ultra-high net worth at UBS, told the Guardian.

But while billionaires may be fearing a backlash from the middle and lower classes, the report points out that the super-rich do a lot of good for society. The world’s billionaires employ at least 27.7 million people around the world—approximately equivalent to the U.K.’s working population—and Stadler said that 98 percent of their wealth found its way back into society.

Bill Gates at the Gates Foundation Inaugural Goalkeepers event in New York City on September 20. Gates is the world's richest person, with a net worth of around $86 billion, according to a 2017 report by Forbes on the world's billionaires.YANA PASKOVA/GETTY

The arts and sports in particular have benefited recently from the generosity of billionaires, as the wealthy seek to invest their fortunes in things that the wider public can enjoy. Seventy-two of the world’s top 200 art collectors are billionaires, and the report said that “public museums are also receiving more funding than ever before.”

The rich have also ploughed their money into sports clubs: More than 140 of the world’s top sports clubs in the world are owned by just 109 billionaires, with 60 coming from the United States. Two-thirds of NBA and NFL teams—and half of the MLB teams—are owned by billionaires, while nine out of 20 clubs in the English Premier League have billionaire owners, like Malcolm Glazer at Manchester United and Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed al-Nahyan at Manchester City.

The report also estimated that with more than one-third of billionaire wealth belonging to people aged 70 or older, $2.4 trillion of wealth would be transferred over the next 20 years. While most of this will likely go to the heirs of billionaires, there will also be a “huge windfall” for charities, the report said.

There is debate as to whether global inequality is growing. Some have argued that income inequality and poverty have reduced dramatically in the past few decades, while others have claimed that the global economic system disproportionately benefits the rich. In a 2016 report, Oxfam claimed that the richest 1 percent of people in the world control more wealth than the rest of the world combined.

Earlier in October, the International Monetary Fund said that raising tax rates on the rich would help to reduce inequality and would not have a negative impact upon economic growth.

(Newsweek)