Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/20/2017 10:28:10 AM

Saudi security services linked to Tehran terror attacks: Iranian official

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/20/2017 10:56:07 AM

US efforts to change Iranian government always ended in failure: Ayatollah Khamenei


(PRESS TV)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/20/2017 11:16:36 AM

HOMELESSNESS IN SPAIN IS ON THE RISE, AND OWNERS ARE GETTING ROUGH AS THEY TRY TO GET SQUATTERS OUT


BY


Veronica and her three small children live in a modernist building in a quiet, working-class Barcelona neighborhood. The apartment is perfect for the young family, except for one thing: They are living there illegally. Veronica, who declined to give her last name for fear of eviction, is among the thousands of people squatting in vacant apartments throughout Spain.

Before Veronica became a squatter, she and her children slept in two single beds in a cockroach-infested room she rented in a working-class neighborhood. “There was no space,” she says, “not even for a cot. I was so stressed.” Stressed enough, she adds, that she was willing to break the law and move into a vacant apartment in a nicer part of town. “I didn’t have any other option, especially with children,” she tells Newsweek.

Many Spaniards share her desperation. The country’s economy has recovered from 2008’s devastating global financial crisis, and its gross domestic product recently surpassed pre-crisis levels for the first time in nine years. But for the 4.25 million unemployed Spaniards like Veronica, it doesn’t feel as if the recovery has arrived. The unemployment rate is above 18 percent, while average household income has dropped 13 percent since 2009, from 30,000 euros to 26,000. Worse still, nearly 2 million Spaniards can’t afford a decent place to live, according to Habitat 3, a Spanish nongovernmental organization that works to increase affordable housing in Spain.

Over the past several years, tens of thousands of homeless Spaniards have begun to move into these empty buildings. Illegally. The owners, many of them banks the government bailed out during the crisis, have tried to kick them out, using both Spain’s sluggish court system and private security guards. As politicians push to create more public housing, the growing number of squatters has sparked a fierce debate over property rights—and how to maintain them while ensuring everyone has a decent home.

Spain’s housing woes go back to the 1960s, when the government used tax breaks to promote homeownership. The plan worked, but as a result, the country built very little public housing. Today, only about 1 percent of Spain’s housing is publicly subsidized for low-income people, according to a 2015 report by Amnesty International — the second lowest in Europe, behind Greece. In the Netherlands, by comparison, 32 percent of all residential property is social housing. In Austria, that figure is 23 percent, and in the U.K., it’s 18 percent.


After occupying a bank in protest of eviction on July 26, 2013, Ada Colau, is carried out by riot police officers in Barcelona. Since Colau's election as Barcelona's first female mayor two years ago, the city has introduced a number of subsidies for landlords to renovate old apartments, provided they agree to rent them at affordable prices.PACO SERINELLI/AP

Since the financial crisis, Spaniards have flooded the tiny public housing market with demand. Many of them came because they had lost their homes: Over the past nine years, Spanish courts have ordered between 400,000 and 600,000 home repossessions, according to estimates.

Housing is available, but much of it is owned by private banks. In 2016, 1.5 million units were for sale in Spain, according to consultancy RR de Acuña & Asociados. And many more empty properties are not on the market, as owners wait for prices to rise. Many of these empty properties need renovations or are in rural areas where there is little demand, according to housing analysts.

This imbalanced market has spurred homeless Spaniards across the country to take over entire buildings. They mark their territory with signs that designate their new homes “reclaimed.” Nationwide, almost 45,000 buildings have been squatted illegally in the past five years, according to government figures seen by local media.

Activists distribute posters offering advice for anyone at risk of eviction. “Can’t pay the rent?” reads one poster, “Have you thought about squatting?” In Barcelona, those looking to move into an empty property can visit the unofficial “office for housing” run by activists, which recently opened and is located, of course, in a squatted building.

The phenomenon has even changed the way real estate agents work. “It’s rare that we put an advert in the window or on the balcony of a property, as we used to, because it’s very likely that you will end up with an illegal occupation,” says Lorenzo Viñas, head of the Landlords Association for Barcelona and Lleida.

Another reason there are so many squatters: It’s easy to become one. If squatters remain undetected for the first 48 hours, they can avoid criminal prosecution and fight their case in civil court, with the right to appeal. In Spain’s slow-moving judicial system, it takes an average of two years to remove a squatter, according to Marta Legarreta, an expert in housing law. In the meantime, the owners are responsible for any utility bills in their name.

Spain’s banks are trying to make it harder for squatters to take over properties by working to detect them early. And landlords’ eagerness to remove squatters has created a business opportunity that is legally gray. Spain’s equivalent to Craigslist shows a half-dozen advertisements posted in recent months that offer extrajudicial evictions to private landlords, banks and real estate companies with a squatter problem.

The industry’s self-proclaimed pioneer is a Barcelona-based company called Desokupa, loosely translated in Spanish as “unsquat.” Desokupa begins by negotiating with squatters, frequently offering them money to leave. Failing that, Desokupa places a guard outside the property 24/7 to prevent the residents from returning after they go out. Or it sends in one of the large men (with a military background or experience as a professional boxer) whom the company employs to “negotiate” with tenants, Desokupa says. The price for an eviction starts at 3,000 euros ($3,360), though it can be substantially more if the squatters are dangerous.

Desokupa’s co-founder J. (who would not give his full name because the company has been receiving regular anonymous threats) likens himself to the Bill Gates of eviction. He stumbled on his methods for dealing with unwanted tenants a few years ago, after squatters repeatedly occupied several of his properties. “I don’t do anything illegal. I don’t threaten anyone,” J. says. “The only thing I do is strengthen private property.”

But not everyone agrees with that assessment of his methods. Viñas, the head of the landlords’ association, says landlords should use the court system rather than resorting to private evictors like Desokupa, which, he says, encourages squatting by paying illegal occupants to leave. Observatori DESC, a Barcelona-based NGO, has filed a lawsuit against Desokupa for an eviction last year, alleging that the company used force and intimidation, according to the organization’s director, Irene Escorihuela. Desokupa denied any wrongdoing to Newsweek, calling the allegations “unfounded.”

Landlords, of course, are also up against tenants who operate outside the law: Activists feel entitled to encourage squatting in property that belongs to banks that received taxpayer-funded bailouts. They say this property should be publicly subsidized housing. Platform for Mortgage Victims (PAH), a nationwide grassroots housing rights group, claims to have helped more than 3,500 families squat empty properties owned by banks since the crisis began. In Catalonia, banks hold more than 43,000 empty repossessed properties, of which almost 9,000 are squatted, according to Habitat 3.

Housing activists are breaking the law to make a point. They want legislation that would encourage banks to take the property they are struggling to sell and make it into public housing. “We have a great opportunity in our country to buy [surplus] housing stock at low prices and use it for social means,” said Carme Trilla, head of Habitat 3. But without legislation, she says, banks have preferred to wait out the crisis, hoping for a better return on their investment. “[The banks] always believed this would be over quickly and...would end up selling properties as they had before,” says Trilla. “But it’s been 10 years, and there’s been nothing quick about it.”

Some city councils, including Barcelona’s, have responded by slapping fines on banks that keep empty properties on their books for long periods in hopes that the market will recover, while refusing to lease them to local authorities so they can be converted into public housing.

Many banks are reluctant to discuss their empty properties. One bank, BBVA, declined to comment on squatters or its property holdings. Another, Bankia, would not reveal how much empty property it holds or how many of its properties have been squatted, for fear of encouraging the practice. But the bank said in an email that it is working with numerous regional governments to lease almost 2,400 apartments at rent-controlled prices. But even if that happens, banks leasing low-priced properties can’t be the only solution.

Barcelona Mayor Ada Colau, a former spokeswoman for PAH, has tried to implement other measures to put more people in homes. By borrowing from the European Investment Bank, among others, Barcelona aims to increase public housing from 3 percent to around 15 percent of the city’s total housing supply in the next decade. The city has introduced subsidies for landlords to renovate old apartments, provided they agree to rent them at affordable prices. It has introduced specialist teams to detect those at risk of eviction and offer subsidies to insolvent tenants unable to pay rent.

Colau’s old employer, PAH, is also calling for the introduction of rent control policies in the city, where eviction orders, which average eight to 10 every day, are mostly the result of failing to pay rent, which rose an average of 15.9 percent in 2016 while wages remained stagnant.

Since Veronica entered her current apartment last August, BBVA sold the building. Its new owners have announced plans to convert the property into luxury apartments. Veronica is once again looking for a place to live, though she is grateful to the local activists for finding her an apartment. “I don’t feel bad about having done it,” she says. “Now I just have to fight so they give me public housing.”

A single parent with young children, she may jump to the top of the waiting list. But others won’t be so lucky. They’ll have to do just what the activists did for Veronica and go looking for an empty apartment to break into.

(Newsweek)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/20/2017 11:29:31 AM

FINSBURY PARK MOSQUE ATTACK: THE MEDIA'S ISLAMOPHOBIA ADDICTION WILL ONLY LEAD TO MORE VIOLENCE AGAINST MUSLIMS


BY


“I want to kill Muslims” were the reported words of the killer last night who plowed into a crowd of worshippers outside a London mosque.

He wants to kill Muslims, and is it any surprise? Britain’s right-wing media has helped shore up hostility toward the country’s Muslim communities, playing into the hands of both Islamist and far-right extremists. The hard right of the governing Conservative Party thought they could use that anger to support their base without endangering the lives of Brits. They were wrong.

British tabloids, unlike their American counterparts, have major political muscle, and most of the biggest are closely aligned with the Conservative Party. Imagine if American tabloids didn’t just use sensationalist “journalism” to cover Brangelina’s divorce but also told its readers how to vote—and how to think and feel—during political campaigns. Imagine if theNational Enquirer was treated like the New York Post.

The Sun, Britain’s most popular tabloid, ran a false front-page headline that “1 in 5 British Muslims Sympathised with ISIS.” The Daily Star claimed that U.K. mosques were “institutionally raising money for terror.” Until recently, the Daily Mail hosted a regular column from Katie Hopkins, who called for a “final solution” to Islam.

And it’s not just the tabloids—even the more respectable side of the British media is addicted to Islamophobia. Douglas Murray, a far-right activist who has called for conditions for Muslims in Europe to be “made harder across the board,” was given an uninterrupted, prerecorded, two-minute monologue on the BBC flagship show Sunday Politics, telling British viewers that to fight terror, the U.K. must have “less Islam.”


Local residents react at the scene in Finsbury Park in north London after a vehicle hit pedestrians there on June 19.TOLGA AKMEN/AFP/GETTY

After last night’s attack on Muslims outside the Finsbury Park Mosque, we are reminded that radicalization is not just a Muslim problem. After all, it is when socioeconomic deprivation, alienation and disenfranchisement and dehumanizing ideology all fuse together in the dangerous, radicalizing concoction that extremism breeds.

It can happen in Muslim communities. And it can happen in non-Muslim communities. After all, almost a quarter of antiterror referrals investigated by British police deal with white supremacist violence.

Unfortunately, the Conservative government has long resisted the idea that radicalization is not just a Muslim problem. Theresa May herself poured fuel on the fire with her coded racism in response to the previous Islamist terror attacks, seeming to blame Muslim communities for harboring the extremists.

She did not mention that the authorities had been repeatedly warned about both the Manchester bomber and the London Bridge terrorists—by Muslims. She did not explain why the security services and police lacked the resources to respond. She did not justify cutting 20,000 police officers when she was Home Secretary.

In her statement today, May has backtracked on her own dog-whistle politics, promising to be as tough on far-right terrorism as she has been on Islamist terrorism.

The real test of May’s leadership is whether she has the courage to identify, challenge and probe far-right terror in the same way she does Islamist attacks.

And can she lead the nation in doing the same? Will white Britons condemn this heinous act just as Muslims condemn Islamist acts of violence? Will priests refuse to perform funeral services for the killer just as British Imams refused to perform funeral services for the London Bridge attackers?

We would quite rightly be horrified at suggestions that white Europe’s history of bloodshed meant that white Europeans are predisposed to violence. Or that unless we hear multitudes of white British people “speak up,” they are somehow secretly terrorist sympathisers. Or that members of the communities the attackers hailed from surely must have known something and deliberately decided not to inform the authorities. Or, at the absolute apex of bigotry, that the solution to this problem is to have less whiteness.

Most of us know such suggestions are garbage the moment we hear them—so why, then, are the same ideas taken so seriously in relation to the Muslim community?

Will Brits trust Theresa May to help them answer that question? And can she fight far-right terror while she needs an alliance with the far-right, terrorist-backed DUP party to have a majority in parliament and push through her hard Brexit?

Many Brits are shocked to see their nation on the brink of civil unrest, with an unelected leader who clings onto power through secretive deals with terrorist-linked political entities, and the irrational isolation that may be brought about by crashing out of the EU.

I fear that on the current trajectory, they may eventually feel that Britain is in danger of becoming a first-world failed state, that we have become a more developed version of the countries we used to invade. Perhaps in the next election they will decide that the solution is regime change.

Muddassar Ahmed is chair of Forum for Change, a British think tank working on issues of inclusion and diversity, and a former British government adviser.


(Newsweek)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/20/2017 4:29:17 PM



The American Empire’s War Machine Is Running out of Steam

June 19, 2017 at 5:57 pm

That’s the opening paragraph of an article published by Business Insider last week. The piece, titled “The US military is struggling to keep up with all its responsibilities,” could just as easily been titled “The American Empire is overextended,” as it thoroughly details the GAO’s negative assessment of the current state of the U.S. war machine.

Writing that “unrelenting demands from geographic commanders for particular types of forces are disrupting manning, training, and equipping cycles,” the report breaks down how each branch of the military is essentially overburdened and underprepared to fulfill its national security obligations.

The Air Force, for instance, has reported that less than 50 percent of its forces are at acceptable readiness levels. Additionally, the branch says, it’s short of 1,500 pilots and 3,400 maintenance crewmembers.

The Marine Corps is also running short of resources, with 80 percent of its aviation units lacking the minimum number of aircraft available for training — with the same trend going for the number of craft ready for wartime. The Navy, the GAO found, suffers primarily from the high pace of operations and a lack of funds devoted to maintenance.

As for the Army, the GAO found that while its level of readiness is generally favorable, the rate at which its readiness is declining is continuing to grow, due in large part to ever-increasing demands from the White House.

In reporting on the GAO’s evaluation, Business Insider points out that criticism of the United States military’s preparedness for combat doesn’t come from Washington D.C. offices alone, but also from assets on the ground.

One former trainer at the Joint Multinational Readiness Center in Germany, Captain Scott Metz, wrote in a paper published this spring that “many of our multinational partners are more tactically proficient at company level and below than their American counterparts.”

The captain writes that “several of them are significantly better trained and more prepared for war than we are,” and goes on to detail how a lack of basic training at home bases before troops are deployed overseas could potentially lead to fatal mistakes in combat:

“They will stop for long periods of time in the open with minimal dispersion. They will not effectively use their dismounted infantry and will likely leave them in the back of vehicles for too long, allowing them to be killed with the vehicle. They also will probably make little use of tactical formations and will not use terrain to their advantage.

Summarizing the GAO report, Business Insider writes that the root of the U.S. military’s problem is that it’s slowly — but surely — losing its edge:

“Though the US armed forces maintains definite advantages over peers and other forces in technology, training, and capabilities, years of operations and, according to many officials, reductions in funding have imperiled the US military’s ability overcome opponents and fulfill its missions.

And while many would rejoice at the news of an American war machine that’s running out of steam, it’s important to remember that it’s reports such as these from the GAO that are held up as justification for that very same machine to receive infusions of resources.

That is, in fact, the argument the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff made before the House Armed Services Committee this month.

“In just a few years, if we don’t change our trajectory, we will lose our qualitative and quantitative competitive advantage,General Joseph Dunford said, adding that the U.S. military needs “sustained, sufficient and predictable funding,” or else it will lose its “ability to project power.


Creative Commons
/ Anti-Media / Report a typo




"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1