3871-ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? | View Thread

BREIL-SUR-ROYA, France — The house, if you can call it that, is nearly impossible to find. Unless you happen to be a migrant — then you probably know the place. And, by word of mouth, its owner.

A self-described “extreme leftist” with the requisite beard and unruly ponytail, Cédric Herrou — once an auto mechanic, then a steeplejack — is now technically an olive farmer, living out of a crumbling, 19th-century cottage in the middle of nowhere, on a rocky incline high above a riverbed. But Herrou’s focus is no longer the picholines that grow on his trees. These days, what matters are the migrants.

For the past two years, Herrou, 37, has continually defied French authorities by shepherding undocumented migrants across the Italian border and onto his hillside farm. As many as 60, he says, have stayed on his land at one time, some after knocking on his door in the dead of night. Herrou, like other good Samaritans in Britain and Scandinavia, is now on trial, accused of “helping undocumented foreigners enter, move about and reside” in France. He faced a possible sentence of five years in prison as well as a fine of 30,000 euros ($32,000) if convicted.

On Friday, he was fined 3,000 euros and given a suspended sentence. But Herrou vowed not to give up the fight: ‘We will continue because it is necessary to continue,’ he said, speaking outside the courthouse in Nice.”

As France struggles to navigate the tidal wave of migration that has crashed onto European shores in recent years, the case of this obscure mechanic-turned-farmer has electrified a nation that has remained comparatively inhospitable to refugees. At its core is an uncomfortable question about the moral obligations of French citizenship. In times like these, does being French mean following the letter of the law, which indeed prohibits undocumented foreigners? Or does it mean upholding the lofty, humanitarian values of the French republic in spite of its laws?

Cédric Herrou has defied French authorities by shuffling undocumented migrants across the Italian border and onto his hillside farm. (James McAuley/The Washington Post)

Herrou — and the thousands who have rallied to his defense across the country — insist on the latter. As was widely reported in French media during his trial last month, he responded to a judge who asked him why he had helped migrants across the border with a simple phrase.

“I am a Frenchman,” Herrou said.

“There’s much to criticize about it today, but France is a country with values that are beautiful — the rights of man, the protection of children, and the social welfare we have,” Herrou said in an interview Wednesday, sitting on the terrace of his cottage, sipping coffee he had made in his alfresco kitchen. “All of which we are in the process of losing.”

He was brandishing a sizzling skillet in front of the last of the migrants staying on his land: Mohamed, 19, from Sudan, who had made his way into Libya and across the central Mediterranean to Lampedusa and then onto the Italian mainland. Herrou had found Mohamed wandering in the valley earlier in the week and quickly taken him in.

“I worry about this one,” Herrou said. “He doesn’t eat much.”

Typically, Herrou said, he collects migrants from a church in nearby Ventimiglia, Italy, where many — most often from sub-Saharan Africa — live in a squalid camp along a set of abandoned train tracks outside of town. Then he drives them across the French border in the same beat-up blue van he uses on the farm.

Entry into France tends to be safer on the back roads than through the train stations, where — in spectacles eerily reminiscent of the hunts for Jewish stowaways during World War II — French police repeatedly stop and comb trains for migrants without the right papers.

This is precisely what happened Tuesday afternoon at the Menton-Garavan station, the last stop in France before the Italian border. A squadron of the French National Police flanked Cheick Isaac Binate, 21, from Ivory Coast, on the platform and deposited him on the 3:40 p.m. train for Ventimiglia.

“Don’t you worry!” Binate screamed as the officers shoved him on the train and waited for it to pull out of the station.

All of the officers involved declined to comment.

Once on the Italian side, Binate — who had also arrived in Europe via Libya and Lampedusa — explained that he had crossed the French border late Sunday night with hopes of making it to the Paris suburb of Saint-Denis to find his aunt. The French police had caught him in Nice earlier on Tuesday trying to board a Paris-bound train with papers that had expired in mid-November.

When he struggled with the officers, Binate said, one of them struck him over the head, leaving a bloody gash, which he bent over to show. “I had a positive idea of France, the country of human rights, of legality,” he said. “But there’s nothing to see of that here.” Even still, he vowed to try again.

Back on the French side of the border, Herrou scoffed at the notion that many now consider him a hero.

“I’m not doing this for the money or the material benefit. When you don’t live for that, the notion of ‘your house’ and ‘my house’ being somehow separate doesn’t apply,” he said.

Herrou sees the problem on the border as less about a society shutting its doors on foreigners than about people willing to tolerate indecency beyond the scope of their immediate concerns.

“Everyone should go out in the streets and try to solve whatever problems they see,” he said. “That’s what democracy is. It’s not staying at home and sharing things on Facebook. It’s positioning ourselves to live better together.”

“And if we have to fight against the state to do it, then we have an obligation to do so.”

(The Washington Post)

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 2/11/2017 11:45:26 AM
	FEBRUARY 9, 2017 6:17 PM Should U.S. be preparing for a North Korean nuclear strike on the West Coast? BY STUART LEAVENWORTH sleavenworth@mcclatchydc.com WASHINGTON After listening to experts describe the threat posed by North Korea and its nuclear arsenal, U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman, a California Democrat, paused amid a Capitol Hill hearing earlier this week and made a suggestion. “We ought to have civil defense in this country,” said Sherman during a hearing of theHouse Foreign Affairs Committee. “Some of us are old enough to remember when we had civil defense and we were under our desks.” The congressman wasn’t calling for an immediate return to the “duck and cover” days of the Cold War. But his statement reflects heightened alarm among members of Congress – especially those from the West Coast – over North Korea’s continuing nuclear tests and advances in missile technology. In the last year alone, North Korea has conducted 20 missile tests and two nuclear tests. That’s a marked annual increase from the 42 missile tests and two nuclear tests of the previous seven years, according to Victor Cha, a Korea specialist with the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. Cha and other experts say it is highly likely that North Korea’s Kim Jong Un will launch another intercontinental ballistic missile this year, in part to gauge the response from President Donald Trump. While some of North Korea’s missile tests have ended in failure, the regime seems to be learning from each launch to improve its capability. Many arms control specialists believe that, by 2020, North Korea could have the capacity to launch a miniaturized nuclear device on an ICBM, with the range to strike at least the West Coast. It might even have that capability sooner. “The difficulty here is the lack of visibility into North Korea’s nuclear program. It’s a black hole,” said Anthony Ruggiero, a Korea researcher who previously worked in the Treasury Department, the U.S. agency tasked with enforcing sanctions on Pyongyang. North Korea remains one of the world’s most closeted countries, and international inspectors haven’t had even partial access to its nuclear facilities since 2009. To slow North Korea’s nuclear advances, the United Nations has imposed increasingly harsh sanctions. Those sanctions have deprived Pyongyang of hard cash but have received spotty enforcement, especially by China, which is wary of squeezing North Korea too hard. Within Congress, there is increasing recognition that North Korea has gotten short shrift amid the intense foreign policy attention on the Islamic State, Iran and the Middle East. “Are we as focused on this threat as we should be? If you look over the last 10 years, the answer is clearly no,” Ruggiero, a senior fellow with the Foundation for Defense of Democracy, said in an interview. “We have not focused on that threat, and it has continued to grow.” Several members of Congress from the West Coast are aiming a spotlight at North Korea, particularly Rep. Ed Royce, a Republican from Southern California who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee. On Tuesday, Royce led a hearing examining how the United States and its allies could further squeeze North Korea financially and possibly slow its nuclear weapons program. Royce said he was particularly concerned about North Korea’s bomb miniaturization efforts, along with one of its missile tests last year from a submarine. “That is what has got our attention,” Royce said. “At this point it is clear that very, very soon, North Korea is going to be able to target all 50 states in the United States, as well as target our allies.” Some analysts doubt that North Korea, as it advances its weapons systems, would launch a first strike on the United States or its allies. Kim is pursuing the weapons program, they say, as a deterrent to a U.S. attack and also to enhance his stature at home. Yet U.S. officials feel compelled to remind Pyongyang what would happen if it were to strike first. “Any attack on the United States, or our allies, will be defeated, and any use of nuclear weapons would be met with a response that would be effective and overwhelming,” Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said last week during a visit to South Korea’s Defense Ministry. Given the failure to slow North Korea’s nuclear ambitions, some Asia specialists say the United States should consider a new strategy, attempting to negotiate with Pyongyang on a freeze, or “cap,” in missile and weapons development. Others say such a move would be a disaster, even if Kim abided by a freeze. “Agreeing to a cap means the U.S. accepts North Korea as a nuclear weapons state for the indefinite future, which would destroy our credibility not only with our allies but with other rogue regimes,” said Sue Mi Terry, a Korea analyst with the consulting firm Bower Group Asia, who testified at Tuesday’s hearing. She added that the U.S. must keep highlighting North Korea’s human rights abuses while trying to reach out to elites in Pyongyang susceptible to defection. Last year, Royce and Rep. Eliot Engel, a Democrat from New York who’s the ranking member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, led passage of the North Korea Sanctions and Policy Enhancement Act, an attempt to stanch the outside cash that flows into North Korea, bolstering the regime. Such laws, however, depend on the capacity and commitment of the U.S. Treasury Department to pursue alleged violators. Last year, federal prosecutors charged four Chinese businesspeople and a Chinese company with conspiring to create a web of shell companies to evade U.S. economic sanctions and funnel money to North Korea. But critics have questioned why the Treasury Department didn’t also hold Chinese banks accountable for their role in creating the shell companies. “The fact that a Chinese bank has not been punished for that is quite appalling,” said Ruggiero. He and other analysts have criticized the Obama administration, saying it was inconsistent in the region. While Obama once counseled a policy of “strategic patience” with Pyongyang, he left office reportedly advising Trump that nuclear North Korea should be the new president’s top foreign priority. How Trump will handle Korean affairs remains a mystery. When Kim hinted in a New Year’s speech that North Korea might test another missile, Trump responded with one of his trademark Twitter blasts: “It won’t happen!” Trump sent mixed messages during the presidential campaign on his support for Asian allies, such as South Korea and Japan, who face an immediate threat from North Korea missiles. Mattis’ trip to Asia last week – the first foreign trip by a Trump Cabinet member –was widely seen as an attempt to ease allies’ concerns about the new president. Sherman, a Democrat from Northridge, raised the possibility of restarting “civil defense” in the context of raising awareness about North Korea’s actions, including its reported sharing of nuclear technologies with Iran and other regimes. “We have a foreign policy establishment that will not admit to the American people that it (deterrence) may fail to prevent us from being hit,” he said. “We could prepare to minimize casualties. We won’t, because that means we’d have to admit that there’s the possibility we will face casualties.” Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/national-security/article131808834.html#storylink=cpy
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+1

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 2/11/2017 5:10:43 PM
	ISRAEL’S NEW SETTLEMENT BILL PUTS IT ON THE FAST TRACK TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT BY DIANA BUTTU ON 2/10/17 AT 7:00 AM The approval of the “Regularization Law” by Israel’s Knesset on Monday came as no surprise to Palestinians. The move now legalizes Israel’s illegal settlement outposts built on private Palestinian land, and allows settlers to get retroactive recognition of their illegal settlements, thereby encouraging settlers to steal more Palestinian land. It came as no surprise because, for months, Israel’s settlers have pressed for the passage of this law and pressed even harder for it following the United Nations Security Council resolution condemning Israel’s settlements. For Palestinians, this type of reaction is not new. Since the beginning of 2017, Israel has announced that it intends to build 6,000 new settlement units, includinga new settlement in the West Bank, the first in 20 years. In addition, since January, Israel has demolished more than 30 Palestinian homes for “illegal construction”even though they were built on their Palestinian owners’ land. This law comes as a direct result of the Israeli court-ordered evacuation of the illegal outpost of Amona. There, the Israeli Supreme Court ordered that the theft of private Palestinian land is illegal and accordingly ordered that the settlers illegally squatting on this land be removed. But, unlike when Palestinian homes are demolished with bulldozers, accompanied by soldiers brandishing automatic weapons and batons, these settlers were evacuated by officers wearing baseball caps, who did not dare pull out a baton or automatic rifle even as the settlers threw bottles and stones at them. The evacuation of Amona was a 20-year battle, with the Palestinian landowners deprived of the use of their land for two decades as the case made its way up through the courts. And, while the landowners were deprived, the 40 squatting settler families were handsomely compensated, receiving more than $10 million in exchange for leaving land that is not legally theirs. And, in addition to the financial compensation meted out by the state to reward theft, the Knesset has given the settlers an even larger reward—legalizing the theft of private Palestinian land, despite a Supreme Court ruling that bars the theft of private land. A picture taken on February 8, 2017 shows a general view of a construction site in a new housing project in the Israeli settlement of Nili, near the West Bank city of Ramallah.GIL COHEN-MAGEN/AFP/GETTY But this is not a battle between settlers who seek to defy international law and the Israeli Supreme Court justices who seek to uphold international law. On the contrary, this is the same Supreme Court that has sanctioned the use of home demolitions as a form of punishment, that has ruled that assassinations of Palestinians, mass deportations and the cutting-off of fuel and electricity supplies to the besieged Gaza Strip are all permissible. Indeed, this is the same court that has sanctioned the construction of Israeli bypass roads and Israeli settlements, while only begrudgingly stopping the small number of outposts built on private Palestinian land. In short, it is a court that continued to allow Israel’s apartheid to flourish; indeed, it has given it legal cover. This is why today, in both the West Bank and East Jerusalem, the areas Israel captured in the 1967 Six-Day War, there are more than 700,000 Israeli settlers. In the West Bank, they control almost half of the entire territory, with much of it off-limits to Palestinians. This is why inside Israel more than 90 percent of land is considered either “state land” or land that “belongs” to the Jewish National Fund (and hence off-limits to Palestinians), according toHuman Rights Watch, even though Palestinians continue to hold claims to this very land. Yet international law is clear: These settlements are illegal and amount to war crimes, whether the settlements are built with or without government sanction, and whether a kangaroo court, such as the Israeli Supreme Court, declares them legal or not. But there is a silver lining to all of this.Whether giving the Israeli government the right to build settlements under the guise of “military necessity” or declaring Palestinian land “green spaces” or “military installations” and then later allowing the government to build settlements, this court has facilitated, rather than stopped Israel’s settlement expansion and has facilitated, rather than stopped, Israel’s theft of Palestinian land. So while international condemnation is welcome, it also stops short: for Israel’s land theft is not new—it is the country’s modus operandi. With the passage of this law, Israel has demonstrated to the world what settlements really are—a land grab. In other words, theft. And, as Israel’s opposition leader Isaac Herzog, who is also an apologist for Israel’s settlements has noted: “The train departing from here has only one stop—at The Hague,” referring to the International Criminal Court where settlements are deemed a war crime. Indeed, he is correct. Diana Buttu is a Ramallah-based political analyst and former advisor to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Palestinian negotiators. (Newsweek)
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+1

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 2/12/2017 12:33:33 AM
	Assad Rejects Trump “Safe Zone” Plan: Says Syria Will Be Safe When The West, GCC Stop Supporting Terrorists FEBRUARY 11, 2017 By Brandon Turbeville After rightly rejecting the new draft Constitution for Syria submitted by Russia, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad is wisely rejecting the Trump administration concept of the implementation of “safe zones” inside Syria. In the first interview with Western media since the election of Donald Trump, Assad decried the plan as a bad idea that would have no real ability to protect civilians or end the Syrian crisis. When asked by the interviewer about Trump’s statement that he would “absolutely” create “safe zones” in Syria “for the Syrian people,” Assad responded by saying, But actually, it won’t [protect civilians], it won’t. Safe zones for the Syrians could only happen when you have stability and security, where you don’t have terrorists, where you don’t have [the] flow and support of those terrorists by the neighboring countries or by Western countries. This is where you can have a natural safe zone, which is our country. They don’t need safe zones at all. It’s not a realistic idea at all. When the interviewer pressed Assad on the fact that so many Syrians were displaced and thus “How can you oppose safe zones?” Assad pointed directly at the root of the problem. He stated, The first thing you have to ask: why were they displaced? If you don’t answer that question, you cannot answer the rest. They were displaced for two reasons: first of all, the terrorist acts and the support from the outside. Second, the [U.S.] embargo on Syria. Many people didn’t only leave Syria because of the security issues. As you can see, Damascus is safe today, it’s nearly normal life, not completely. But they don’t find a way for life in Syria, so they have to travel abroad in order to find their living. So, if you lift the embargo, and if you stop supporting the terrorists … I’m talking about everyone who supported terrorists, including the United States during Obama’s administration. If you stop all these acts, most of those people will go back to their country. Indeed. In this short interview clip, Assad echoed the same sentiment and solutions that I and many other Syrian researchers and analysts have been saying from the beginning of the crisis; i.e. if America wants to stop terrorism in Syria, it need only stop funding it, supporting it, and directing it. It’s that simple. The U.S. could also call on its allies Saudi Arabia, Turkey, U.K., France, Qatar, and Israel to do the same. It could work with Russia to eliminate the remnants of terrorist forces and it could provide information and coordinates to both Syria and Russia on the whereabouts of terrorists and terrorist forces. We should call on the Trump administration to immediately end any and all support for armed groups in Syria, to press America’s allies to stop supporting terrorists, immediately begin rapprochement with Russia and Syria, and look toward the future of investment in rebuilding Syria as a country as well as immediately ending the sanctions currently in place against the Syrian people. This article may be freely shared in part or in full with author attribution and source link. (activistpost.com)
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+1

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 2/12/2017 1:03:41 AM
	Vaccines House Of Cards Is Tumbling Down—Fast FEBRUARY 10, 2017 By Catherine J. Frompovich If ever there were a social-political-medical and scientific myth about anything, the current state of vaccinology and vaccine ‘science’ fits the bill in more ways than healthcare consumers probably even can imagine. The myth goes back hundreds of years to the unscientific hypothesis and work of Edward Anthony Jenner (1749-1823), who is credited as being the ‘father of vaccines’ and the ‘father of immunology’. First and foremost, Jenner’s been touted as being a physician, and that ‘factoid’ has been disputed over and over again. It turns out Jenner’s first smallpox vaccination experiment (his own son) ended up with brain damage and died young, most likely from a vaccine-related immune deficiency. The medical textbook definition of a vaccine adverse reaction is encephalitis (brain inflammation) which can lead to permanent neurological damage (aka brain damage, autism, developmental delay). [….] By 1807, he [Jenner] convinced the Royal College of Physicians and the British Parliament that his once defunct and admittedly unprotective vaccine was safe and effective, and as well could produce large revenues. [1] [CJF emphasis added] Since Jenner obviously was an ‘astute’ business person, he was able to convince others that his newfangled health hypothesis was a moneymaker. Both of Jenner’s ‘dreams’ keep going on perpetually: convincing others that vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ and vaccines are grandiose money makers. In 2016, the vaccine market was worth “close to $24 billion.” [2] By 2020, profits are estimated to be worth $61 Billion! [2] CDC, alone, sells over $4.6 Billion in vaccines every year! [4] However, what most U.S. healthcare consumers probably don’t know is U.S. government agencies CDC and NIH, plus Bill Gates, own patents on vaccines, e.g., Ebola! [3] The CDC owns over 20 vaccine patents, according to Robert F Kennedy Jr., Esq. [4] Is there any wonder why vested interests push vaccines and want them to be mandatory? More information about the centuries-old fraud, which started the vaccine fiasco, can be found here. Another great resource on the authentic history of the medical scandal of all time is the book Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History and, of course, my bookVaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, which goes into detail about most of the toxic ingredients in vaccines from published scientific peer reviewed research, papers and their adverse, negative effects in vivo and in vitro. Once healthcare consumers understand what those vaccine ingredients are capable of doing in the human body, especially to infants, toddlers and children who can’t detoxify them, then vaccine issues take on a totally relevant understanding and rightful rejection, since parents don’t want hazmat materials, in many cases, injected into their children, which can precipitate cancers, sterility, and the current neurotoxic and neurological problems now affecting two generations of children since the late 1980s. However, healthcare consumers across the globe are waking up. The country of India has taken a remarkable step insofar as “Centre shuts health mission gate on Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation” as reported by Economic Times India Times [5]: All financial ties of the country’s apex immunisation advisory body, National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI), with the Gates Foundation have been cut off. Influence on vaccination strategy There were questions about the Gates Foundation’s ties with pharmaceutical companies and the possible influence this may have on the country’s vaccination strategy. Global Policy Forum, an independent policy watchdog that seeks to promote accountability in international organisations, raised some of these concerns in a study in December 2015. The study, called ‘Philanthropic Power and Development -Who shapes the agenda?’, had cautioned on “the growing influence of the large global philanthropic foundations, especially the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, on political discourse and agenda-setting in targeted fields, and fully analyze the risks and side effects — intended and unintended — of these activities on sustainable development”. The above action, unfortunately, came too late for the 47,500 children who suffered paralysis from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation polio vaccine vaccination campaign it sponsored and implemented in India during 2011-2012. [6,7] Recently, I reported on “dirty vaccines” in my article “More Scientific Proof To Refuse Vaccines” wherein I discussed the newly reported scientific findings in Gatti and Montanari’s paper “New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination” published in the International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccinations early in 2017. However, GreenMedInfo.com has published an interview Lead Author and Researcher Dr. Antoinetta Gatti gave about the study she and Researcher Montanari undertook on 44 vaccines, which I encourage everyone to read here, as it is most thought-provoking and further intimidating against vaccines as being ‘safe’ and ‘pure, unadulterated biologicals’, which contain heavy, neurotoxic metals like lead (Pb) in the HPV vaccines given to pre-teen and teenage boys and girls. And then there’s the prestigious Rand Corporation’s vaccine report “Safety of Vaccines Used for Routine Immunization in the United States” wherein it states, SOE [strength of evidence] was high for the following associations in nonpregnant adults: seasonal influenza vaccine and arthralgia, myalgia, malaise, fever, pain at injection site; 2009 monovalent H1N1 vaccine and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS); and a lack of association between influenza and pneumococcal vaccines and cardiovascular events in the elderly. Risk of GBS was estimated at 1.6 excess cases per million persons vaccinated. SOE was high for the following associations in children and adolescents: measles, mumps, rubella (MMR) vaccine and febrile seizures in children under age 5; lack of association between MMR vaccine and autism spectrum disorders; and varicella vaccine and disseminated Oka strain varicella zoster virus with associated complications (i.e., meningitis, encephalitis) in individuals with demonstrated immunodeficiencies. There is moderate SOE that vaccines against rotavirus are associated with intussusception in children; risk was estimated as 1 to 5 cases per 100,000 vaccine doses, depending on brand. Moderate-strength evidence exists regarding human papillomavirus vaccine and a lack of association with onset of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, type 1 diabetes, and GBS. Moderate-strength evidence shows no association between inactivated influenza vaccine and serious AEs in pregnant women. However, the Rand report’s Conclusions claimed, There is evidence that some vaccines are associated with serious adverse events; however, these events are extremely rare and must be weighed against the protective benefits that vaccines provide. Careful consideration should be given to the investigation of research gaps, including patient risk factors that may be associated with AEs; however, important factors must be taken into account when determining whether studies are warranted, including the severity and frequency of the AE being studied and the challenges of conducting sufficiently powered studies when investigating rare events. Rand’s conclusions that adverse events (AEs) are rare events really do not comport with what’s been filed with the CDC’s VAERS [9] reporting system (hundreds of thousands of reports with an average of 30,000 reports per year since 1990) for vaccine adverse events, plus the fact the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services HRSA has paid out $3,584,871,205.06 – that’s billion with a “B” – for Petitioners’ Awards and Attorneys’ Fees to February 1, 2017 [8] regarding vaccine injuries. “’Approximately 30,000 VAERS reports are filed annually, with 10-15% classified as serious (resulting in permanent disability, hospitalization, life-threatening illnesses or death,’ the CDC says.” [10-11] If we can take for granted that the VAERS reports average around 30,000 per year is an accurate figure, and those reports have been coming in for 26 years (1990 to 2016), the math says 780,000 VAERS reports have been filed! How can CDC, FDA, Big Pharma and medicine claim vaccines are safe? The ironic part about vaccines is the U.S. Congress absolved Big Pharma and vaccine makers—basically giving them a “get out of jail free” card—regarding product liability offenses, in The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34). That law must be rescinded and vaccine producers must be made liable for their unsafe products, as they are in other countries and are being sued; vaccine makers must provide safety proofs and not wiggle-room words on their vaccine package inserts; and ALL vaccines should be subject to the same testing protocols prior to licensure as other pharmaceuticals and drugs are mandated to go through by CDC/FDA law/regulations. What would you wager vaccines wouldn’t pass muster? And now to the probable all-time-vaccine-shocker: “World Governments Knew MMR Vaccine Caused Autism In 1970’s.” Yes! You read that correctly—since the 1970s, health authorities at all levels, including the World Health Organization (WHO), have been telling bald-faced lies about not only the MMR vaccines’ connections with Autism, but other equally as dangerous vaccines! Documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) reveal that governments around the world knew that the MMR vaccine caused autism in the early 1970’s. The CDC is not the only government organisation to have known the dangers of both the MMR combo vaccine and the seperate [sic] measles vaccine. In 1972, the UK government expressed “serious concerns” about the measles’s vaccine’s potential to cause vaccine-induced Subacute Sclerosing Panencephalitis (SSPE). [12] [When will the UK government and health authorities apologize to Dr Andrew Wakefield and reinstate him as a physician in GOOD standing?] According to the document [a copy on Reference 12] “Measles Vaccine and Sub-Acute Sclerosing Encephalitis”: This document, [Measles Vaccine and Sub-Acute Sclerosing Encephalitis] along with many others that have been uncovered, suggests that the measles vaccine was proving to be problematic from as far back as 1972, and has been associated with neurological adverse outcomes for many years. If this was the end of the matter, then it would be easy to assume that these problems had been overcome. However, the problem of vaccine-induced SSPE continued to persist even when the measles vaccination was combined with the mumps and the rubella vaccination to form the MMR triple vaccine.[12] Furthermore, U.S. physician Rebecca Carley, MD, had formulated similar inclinations about vaccines-SSPE-autism when she stated: Dr. Haley also discusses how antibiotics further accelerate the damage in these children. The question he does not address is why are the vaccinated children on antibiotics? Answer…because they have chronic infection caused by inoculation of live viruses; as quoted from Harrison’s principles of medicine in my response to the CDC (also on my website), ‘RARELY IS PREVENTION OF INFECTION PER SE CONSIDERED TO BE AN IMPORTANT GOAL OF VACCINATION. In fact, asymptomatic infection after vaccination can serve to enhance and prolong the immune response.’ (And this prolonged immune response IS prolonged production of anti-measles antibody which then continue to attack the myelin sheath, causing demyelination.) As I also quote from Harrison’s in my CDC response the symptoms of subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE), you will see that autism is a non-fatal form of SSPE. [13] Dr Carley made further remarks about Dr. Boyd Haley’s comments: Dr. Haley also discusses how mercury is more toxic in children with immune disorders. Where did these immune disorders come from? From the corruption of the immune system caused by the inoculation of live viruses. He also discusses that mercury can cause toxicity which affects genetics by decreased methylation of DNA & RNA. However, no mention is made of the genetic mutations caused by injection of plasmids of DNA from the organisms themselves and the tissues that the viruses are cultured on, which is the whole basis of DNA vaccines. That is why this court case focuses on the fact that the child had a genetic defect which caused mitochondrial dysfunction. Where this defect originated is not discussed…injection of foreign DNA in prior vaccines (You will note in the court decision that the parents were not tested for this defect, as that would have proven that this is NOT an inherited genetic defect, but rather a mutation that occurred in this child de novo. [13] [CJF emphasis added] Personally, I find it interesting and rather perceptive that Dr. Carley connects some relatively interesting dots when she says: Dr Haley blames thimerosol [49.6% ethylmercury] for Gulf War Syndrome (GWS) as well as autism. I have done many shows on GWS, which has many factors; Gulf War PLAGUE (the infectious component of the SYNDROME) is due to mycoplasma incognitas which was in the vaccines given to the soldiers. As explained in my document “Inoculation the true weapons of mass destruction” at www.drcarley.com,the injection of vaccines corrupts the immune system and prevents any infective agent from being eliminated from the body. GWS has many other aspects to it; depleted uranium, pyridostigmine pills given to the soldiers, aspartame in their beverages, etc. To blame thimerosol [s/b thimerosal] solely for GWS is disinformation in its highest form. [13] [CJF emphasis added] The vaccine house of cards not only is tumbling down, it needs an entire new, clean, and scientifically accurate assessment of the horrendous neurological problems vaccines have been contributing to, if not causing, in innocent children—the future of the human race. What ulterior motive can there be for such deliberate, clandestine and apparently evil actions other than a pre-set agenda for control purposes, one of which probably is transhumanism. Transhumanism is a cultural and intellectual movement that believes we can, and should, improve the human condition through the use of advanced technologies. One of the core concepts in transhumanist thinking is life extension: Through genetic engineering, nanotech, cloning, and other emerging technologies, eternal life may soon be possible. Likewise, transhumanists are interested in the ever-increasing number of technologies that can boost our physical, intellectual, and psychological capabilities beyond what humans are naturally capable of (thus the term transhuman). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), for example, which speeds up reaction times and learning speed byrunning a very weak electric current through your brain, has already been used by the US military to train snipers. On the more extreme side, transhumanism deals with the concepts of mind uploading (to a computer), and what happens when we finally craft a computer with greater-than-human intelligence (the technological singularity. [14] [CJF emphasis added] As with all researchers who delve into science and health issues, I have opinions based upon 40 years of research and study. One conclusion I’ve come to is vaccines just may be an integral part of the contrivance to propel humans into the transhumanist agenda. How? Well, humans who tolerate all the neurotoxins and other man-made ingredients in vaccines eventually will become the gene pool and genetic line that Adolph Hitler was striving to create – a “Master Race” – now called transhumanism. Weren’t the United States and other countries so incensed about that and what was going on that we fought a world war to liberate those whom Hitler was experimenting on in concentration camps? Now, humans are mandated legally to take those chemicals or we cannot go to work, school or whatever! Well, what’s the difference now when the United States is taking the lead in genetic engineering? References: [1] https://therefusers.com/jenners-son-became-mentally-retarded-and-died-after-smallpox-vaccination/ [2] http://www.globalresearch.ca/big-pharma-and-big-profits-the-multibillion-dollar-vaccine-market/5503945 [3] http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2014/09/17/the-cdc-nih-bill-gates-own-the-patents-on-existing-ebola-related-vaccines-mandatory-vaccinations-are-near/ [4] https://steemit.com/vaccines/@canadian-coconut/cdc-is-a-vaccine-company-not-an-independent-agency-revealed-by-activist-robert-f-kennedy-jr [5] http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/57028697.cms?from=mdr&utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst [6] http://www.infowars.com/bill-gates-and-47500-cases-of-paralysis/ [7] https://vactruth.com/2014/10/05/bill-gates-vaccine-crimes/ [8] https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/data/vicpmonthlyreporttemplate2_1_17.pdfPg. 9 [9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_Adverse_Event_Reporting_System [10] http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/feb/03/bob-sears/what-cdc-statistics-say-about-vaccine-illnesses-in/ [11] https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/index.html [12] http://www.revolutions2040.com/world-governments-knew-mmr-vaccine-caused-autism-1970s/ [13] http://www.ldonline.org/xarbb/printtopic/14933?theme=print [14] https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/152240-what-is-transhumanism-or-what-does-it-mean-to-be-human Resource: Medical response to Trump requires truth seeking and respect for patients BMJ2017356 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j661(Published 07 February 2017) Cite this as: BMJ 2017;356:j661 http://www.bmj.com/content/356/bmj.j661/rr-4 10 February 2017 Elizabeth M Hart Retired PO Box 1701, Burnside SA 5066, Australia Elizabeth Hart Image Credit: NaturalBlaze.com (activistpost.com)
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+1

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 2/12/2017 10:16:44 AM
	A French farmer fed and sheltered migrants. Today he was fined $3,200. French farmer Cédric Herrou speaks to reporters upon leaving the courthouse of Nice, southeastern France, on Jan. 4 after his trial for allegedly assisting migrants to enter and remain illegally in France. (Valery Hache/AFP/Getty Images) By James McAuley February 10 BREIL-SUR-ROYA, France — The house, if you can call it that, is nearly impossible to find. Unless you happen to be a migrant — then you probably know the place. And, by word of mouth, its owner. A self-described “extreme leftist” with the requisite beard and unruly ponytail, Cédric Herrou — once an auto mechanic, then a steeplejack — is now technically an olive farmer, living out of a crumbling, 19th-century cottage in the middle of nowhere, on a rocky incline high above a riverbed. But Herrou’s focus is no longer the picholines that grow on his trees. These days, what matters are the migrants. For the past two years, Herrou, 37, has continually defied French authorities by shepherding undocumented migrants across the Italian border and onto his hillside farm. As many as 60, he says, have stayed on his land at one time, some after knocking on his door in the dead of night. Herrou, like other good Samaritans in Britain and Scandinavia, is now on trial, accused of “helping undocumented foreigners enter, move about and reside” in France. He faced a possible sentence of five years in prison as well as a fine of 30,000 euros ($32,000) if convicted. On Friday, he was fined 3,000 euros and given a suspended sentence. But Herrou vowed not to give up the fight: ‘We will continue because it is necessary to continue,’ he said, speaking outside the courthouse in Nice.” As France struggles to navigate the tidal wave of migration that has crashed onto European shores in recent years, the case of this obscure mechanic-turned-farmer has electrified a nation that has remained comparatively inhospitable to refugees. At its core is an uncomfortable question about the moral obligations of French citizenship. In times like these, does being French mean following the letter of the law, which indeed prohibits undocumented foreigners? Or does it mean upholding the lofty, humanitarian values of the French republic in spite of its laws? Cédric Herrou has defied French authorities by shuffling undocumented migrants across the Italian border and onto his hillside farm. (James McAuley/The Washington Post) Herrou — and the thousands who have rallied to his defense across the country — insist on the latter. As was widely reported in French media during his trial last month, he responded to a judge who asked him why he had helped migrants across the border with a simple phrase. “I am a Frenchman,” Herrou said. “There’s much to criticize about it today, but France is a country with values that are beautiful — the rights of man, the protection of children, and the social welfare we have,” Herrou said in an interview Wednesday, sitting on the terrace of his cottage, sipping coffee he had made in his alfresco kitchen. “All of which we are in the process of losing.” He was brandishing a sizzling skillet in front of the last of the migrants staying on his land: Mohamed, 19, from Sudan, who had made his way into Libya and across the central Mediterranean to Lampedusa and then onto the Italian mainland. Herrou had found Mohamed wandering in the valley earlier in the week and quickly taken him in. “I worry about this one,” Herrou said. “He doesn’t eat much.” Typically, Herrou said, he collects migrants from a church in nearby Ventimiglia, Italy, where many — most often from sub-Saharan Africa — live in a squalid camp along a set of abandoned train tracks outside of town. Then he drives them across the French border in the same beat-up blue van he uses on the farm. Entry into France tends to be safer on the back roads than through the train stations, where — in spectacles eerily reminiscent of the hunts for Jewish stowaways during World War II — French police repeatedly stop and comb trains for migrants without the right papers. This is precisely what happened Tuesday afternoon at the Menton-Garavan station, the last stop in France before the Italian border. A squadron of the French National Police flanked Cheick Isaac Binate, 21, from Ivory Coast, on the platform and deposited him on the 3:40 p.m. train for Ventimiglia. “Don’t you worry!” Binate screamed as the officers shoved him on the train and waited for it to pull out of the station. All of the officers involved declined to comment. Once on the Italian side, Binate — who had also arrived in Europe via Libya and Lampedusa — explained that he had crossed the French border late Sunday night with hopes of making it to the Paris suburb of Saint-Denis to find his aunt. The French police had caught him in Nice earlier on Tuesday trying to board a Paris-bound train with papers that had expired in mid-November. When he struggled with the officers, Binate said, one of them struck him over the head, leaving a bloody gash, which he bent over to show. “I had a positive idea of France, the country of human rights, of legality,” he said. “But there’s nothing to see of that here.” Even still, he vowed to try again. Back on the French side of the border, Herrou scoffed at the notion that many now consider him a hero. “I’m not doing this for the money or the material benefit. When you don’t live for that, the notion of ‘your house’ and ‘my house’ being somehow separate doesn’t apply,” he said. Herrou sees the problem on the border as less about a society shutting its doors on foreigners than about people willing to tolerate indecency beyond the scope of their immediate concerns. “Everyone should go out in the streets and try to solve whatever problems they see,” he said. “That’s what democracy is. It’s not staying at home and sharing things on Facebook. It’s positioning ourselves to live better together.” “And if we have to fight against the state to do it, then we have an obligation to do so.” (The Washington Post)
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+1

Menu

Forums

Should U.S. be preparing for a North Korean nuclear strike on the West Coast?

Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/national-security/article131808834.html#storylink=cpy

ISRAEL’S NEW SETTLEMENT BILL PUTS IT ON THE FAST TRACK TO THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

Assad Rejects Trump “Safe Zone” Plan: Says Syria Will Be Safe When The West, GCC Stop Supporting Terrorists

Vaccines House Of Cards Is Tumbling Down—Fast

Like us on Facebook!