Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
10/26/2016 4:55:58 PM

Is Russia Killing Off Eastern Ukraine’s Warlords?

After a string of brutal murders, Donbass leaders are worried that someone very powerful wants them dead.

  • CATEGORIES:REPORT

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
10/26/2016 5:19:38 PM

Allah Wants ISIS to Retreat

The Caliphate’s propagandists are digging through the Quran to prove that getting beaten back in Mosul doesn’t stray from the preordained plan.

BY COLE BUNZEL | OCTOBER 25, 2016



Why has the Islamic State lost some of the territories under its control? And why has it lost some of its leaders?” This was the headline of an article published last week by a pro-Islamic State media outlet.

As its leaders are picked off from the sky, as its economic resources run dry, and as its prized “caliphate” slips from its grasp — Mosul likely being the next casualty — the Islamic State’s supporters are looking for explanations for why the tide of war has turned against them. The facts on the ground, after all, no longer support the Islamic State’s triumphalist slogan: Remaining and Expanding (baqiya wa-tatamaddad). How, one may well ask, does a group that projected such unbounded confidence, whose legitimacy seemed to rest on seizing and controlling large territories, adjust its message to less fortunate circumstances?

The answer is surprisingly simple: The Islamic State’s mouthpieces preach that this is a period of “trial” (
ibtila) . It is not that God has ceased to favor the Islamic State, for that is of course inconceivable. Rather, divine favor comes with ups and downs. It is God’s practice to subject His creation to trials and tests, as He subjected the prophets and the early Muslims before our time.

As a result, this misfortune is nothing to cry over. On the contrary, as the above article puts it, “we should … rejoice in God’s choice ….to extend the period of preparation, tribulation, and difficulty.”

The Islamic State, however, only began offering such explanations reluctantly. As recently as April 2016, the group was still assuring its followers that all was well in the central lands of the caliphate. That month, despite having recently lost control of the city of Ramadi, its weekly Arabic newsletter, al-Naba, downplayed the significance of its losses. “The withdrawal of the caliphate’s soldiers from areas on the ground in Iraq and Syria,” read the editorial of the April 16 issue, “in no way means that its enemies on the ground … have grown stronger and more powerful than it. The reality shows that they are in a state of great weakness and, despite thousands of airstrikes, have failed to achieve decisive victories against the army of the caliphate.”

It was a month later when the group’s leaders publicly acknowledged that the caliphate was contracting. On May 21, the official spokesperson of the Islamic State, Abu Muhammad al-Adnani, delivered a speech finally coming to terms with the battlefield setbacks. Partly because it was his last address — Adnani was killed four months later in a U.S. airstrike — his words have been memorialized in official and unofficial Islamic State media, reverberating in the videos, essays, and postings that have appeared online since. In his speech, Adnani introduced — or, rather, reintroduced — the themes of patience and resilience in the face of hardship. The Islamic State may be down, he suggested, but it most certainly was not out.

The key line, and the one most cited today by the Islamic State’s members and fanboys, concerns the true meaning of victory and defeat:

“Do you think, America, that victory is in the death of one or more leaders? For that is a false victory. Were you victorious when you killed Abu Musab [al-Zarqawi] or Abu Hamza [al-Muhajir]? Or Abu Omar [al-Baghdadi] or Osama [bin Laden]?… No way! Victory is for the adversary to be defeated. Or do you reckon, America, that defeat is the loss of a city or the loss of a territory? Were we defeated when we lost cities in Iraq and came to be in the desert, with no territory and no land? Will we be defeated, and will you be victorious, if you take Mosul, Sirte, Raqqa, and all the cities, and we return to how we were before? No! For defeat is the loss of the will and desire to fight.”

As Adnani said, and as numerous among his followers have repeated, the loss of leaders and land is immaterial to the Islamic State. So long as it has its will, it shall remain.

Significantly, while Adnani did use the term “remaining” (baqiya) in this speech, he did not pretend that the Islamic State was still “expanding” (tatamaddad), the other part of the group’s slogan. Indeed, the Islamic State’s propaganda has since then been heavy on resilience over expansion.This represents a return to the theme at the heart of the Islamic State for so many years: survival.

The desert experience to which Adnani alluded was the period between 2006 and 2012, when the Islamic State, then called the Islamic State of Iraq (ISI), was a widely ridiculed clandestine guerrilla force. It was amid these circumstances that ISI’s first leader, Abu Omar al-Baghdadi, declared in a 2007 speech that the state was “remaining,” giving birth to the original slogan. For years, it was only the promise of “remaining,” not “remaining and expanding,” that served as the group’s slogan. The second word was tacked on only in 2013 with the attempted annexation of Syria.

In his speech, Adnani recalled the group’s time in the desert as one of “trial and testing,” and it is this idea that is again taking center stage in the Islamic State’s media today. The most recent editorial in al-Naba, for example, reminds readers of God’s habit of “trying the believers with misfortune and hardship … before God’s victory will descend upon them.”

Similarly, the previous week’s editorial centered on the apparently inspiring story of “the people of the ditch,” a mythical group of early monotheists mentioned in the Quran who “flung themselves” in a burning ditch rather than submit to the polytheists. The message, the editorial argued, was that the Islamic State’s followers ought to look at the present war “through the eyes of the people of the ditch.” Then they will understand that the struggle isn’t about “cities that we rule or a land that we roam about in”; it is a matter of “the religion that we seek to stand up.”

Yet the message really isn’t as downbeat as throwing oneself in a pit of fire might suggest. The Islamic State’s media outlets still preach about their inevitable triumph, even though the triumph might be further off than previously imagined.As Adnani claimed in his final words, the Islamic State is still promised victory in the long run, and in the meantime it’s still gaining strength, being “many times more powerful” than in previous years.

A variation on this theme emerged two weeks after Adnani’s speech, when al-Naba argued that the Islamic State was winning in a generational sense: It had reared an entire generation which would have to be wiped out before its enemies could taste victory. The same sentiment was found following the loss of Manbij in northern Syria in August. A popular essay published online, titled “We Lost Manbij but We Won the Battle,” argued that the Islamic State had “won a generation” to its way of thinking through its educational efforts.

The Islamic State’s prioritization of baqiya over tatamaddad doesn’t mean that it is eagerly awaiting the loss of the territories under its control. Instead, it is laying the ideological groundwork for such a possibility, and hopes not only to console supporters but also to inspire them to keep fighting by recalibrating its message. The goal is to urge them to give their lives for the Islamic State in its time of difficulty.

As for the current battle for Mosul, the Islamic State has not yet given up hope that the city can be held. Indeed, as al-Naba and other outlets havesuggested, the struggle for Mosul could very well turn out like the famousBattle of the Trench, in which the Prophet Muhammad and his followers successfully defended the city of Medina in a drawn-out siege. As an essaymaking this comparison notes, it was at the Battle of the Trench, in the fifth year of the Islamic calendar, that the Prophet finally turned several years of misfortune around. Medina was besieged for a month by a broad coalition of forces far more numerous than the defenders, but the early Muslims prevailed.

To repeat that victory is the hope and dream of the current defenders of Mosul. Of course, they are unlikely to succeed. When the city finally falls and the dream fades, the long period of “trial and testing” will resume. If history is any guide, this is unlikely to be the last of the Islamic State.

Photo credit: TAUSEEF MUSTAFA/AFP/Getty Images


(foreignpolicy.com)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
10/26/2016 5:37:49 PM

Wake Up: We are one step closer to WW3

For those of us who are enlightened to the unflattering and, frankly, frightening events that are taking place behind the scenes all over the globe, it can be extremely frustrating that the average American is ignorant to the truth when it comes to the inevitable collapse of society that we are sure to face in the coming years.

While that may sound like a conspiracy theory on the surface, when you actually analyze everything that is going wrong in the world today, it seems more and more likely that it is all bound to come to an end in the very near future. When you look at the political climate, the amount of radical Islamic terrorism in the world and the growing tensions between the United States and Russia, it becomes clear that, whether we like it or not, World War III is on the horizon.

Claire Bernish of The Free Thought Project writes, “Months of disquieting and needless escalation between the United States and Russia over Syria and the Asia-Pacific theater quickened feverishly to near outright hostility over the past 48 hours, and — considering semantics from both ends suggestive of antebellum blame-casting — it’s past time to pay attention.”

She is absolutely right. Even though the American people have a tendency to dismiss serious events in order to make themselves feel better about impending doom, there’s no denying that there are serious problems facing the globe today — and the consequences are deadly for all of us. Because let’s face it, if nuclear war occurs, the entire world will be destroyed in the process. The technologies are so advanced that once it begins, the only way to end it is by destroying mankind as a whole.Claire Bernish of The Free Thought Project writes, “Months of disquieting and needless escalation between the United States and Russia over Syria and the Asia-Pacific theater quickened feverishly to near outright hostility over the past 48 hours, and — considering semantics from both ends suggestive of antebellum blame-casting — it’s past time to pay attention.”

Sadly, that appears to be the direction we’re headed. Russia doesn’t seem to be giving an inch and America isn’t doing too well these days either. The inevitable seems to be World War III and when that day comes, we all have to be prepared for the absolute worst, because that is precisely what this nuclear war will be.

Stocking up on the necessary supplies — food, water, shelter and forms of protection — is absolutely vital to survive this type of event. It’s also a good time to put the Second Amendment to good use. You never know when having a firearm could come in handy and if an invasion occurs, you’ll be hoping for one.

Sources:

TheDailySheeple.com

Infowars.com


(newstarget.com)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
10/27/2016 12:18:15 AM

Islamic State is stunning its adversaries with the ferocity of its counterattacks


Nabih Bulos

Islamic State militants came early in the morning, riding atop trucks that lumbered into this northern Iraqi oil town.

Masked and bristling with weapons, they were inghimasis, fighters instructed to “immerse” themselves in the enemy’s ranks, shoot till the last bullet and then detonate an explosives vest with their dying breath.

VIDEO: ISIS ASSAULT ON KIRKUK KILLS AT LEAST 80: IRAQI OFFICIAL

Hours before Friday’s attack, they had gathered for a solemn ceremony outside Kirkuk and vowed to do just that. Islamic State posted video of the event on YouTube.

“We pledge to God that we will immerse in the enemies of God,” several men shouted, repeating after a commander who exhorted them to enter Kirkuk and “not turn or run away until God conquers through us, or we die.”

They died, but not before they had executed a coordinated blitz into 10 neighborhoods of this key Iraqi city — an important oil and gas production zone — including several districts housing vital government and security headquarters.

Islamic State loyalists kill 26 Afghan civilians after kidnapping dozens, officials say

As part of the attack, the militants also seized control of a power station 19 miles north in the town of Dibis, and raided other outlying areas the group described as Kirkuk’s “first defensive lines.”

The attacks ultimately were pushed back, but they demonstrated an advanced level of training and discipline that belies any expectations that driving Islamic State out of northwestern Iraq will be either quick or painless.

The jihadis showed that they are well-equipped enough to force a standoff that lasted more than 24 hours and killed more than 99 civilians and security personnel.

The counterattack was launched in the midst of a major drive by Iraqi and Kurdish troops, aided by U.S. airstrikes, to drive Islamic State fighters out of the city of Mosul. Four days after the militant group’s counter-assault on Kirkuk, the fighters who led the operation were still being hunted Tuesday by thousands of government troops, Kirkuk Gov. Najmaldin Karim told the local Sumariyah TV network.

The brazen operation started about 3:30 a.m. Friday, when a detachment of fighters arrived in a Kia pickup truck on a side street near the Hotel Snobar, which overlooks Kirkuk’s provincial headquarters building and a small park.

Another attack had commenced almost simultaneously on the police directorate in a nearby neighborhood.

The fighters got out of the Kia and stormed the governorate building, shooting at a Humvee parked in front. They threw a grenade on a guard sleeping in a hut at the edge of the park, then shot him in the head. The guards at the gate ran for cover behind the blast walls as the jihadis hauled up a machine-gun and opened fire at the watchtower.

The noise woke up Commissioner Abdul Jalil Fateh Allah, an officer with the Emergency Police. He and three others were stationed on top of the Snobar.

“They had planned for everything. They had scoped out the area, but they didn’t know about us,” he said.

“We knew they wanted to bring down the Iraqi flag on the governorate building and raise the Daesh banner to say to the media that the province had fallen. We couldn’t let that happen.”

It was the start of a gun battle that lasted well into the evening of the next day, according to security personnel and residents.

The policemen opened fire, scattering the militants. One ran to the front door of the Snobar Hotel. It was locked, so he called in two others to break it down. Fateh Allah took aim and fired, injuring two of them.

Inside the Snobar, Mahmoud Abdul Razzaq, the 30-year-old receptionist on duty that night, was hiding behind a column after hearing the gunfire. He saw the three militants approach and run away after being shot.

“I then saw 20 of them or more pass into the side street,” he said.

Five of the fighters ran to an open-air car showroom adjacent to the Snobar that had armored SUVs on display. One of the jihadis kicked in the office door to look for the keys, said Mohammad Shaheen, a Bangladeshi worker who had hidden inside an office when he heard the gunfire.

“I thought initially it was police or army, but then I saw the masks and knew they were Daesh,” he said, using the Arabic acronym for Islamic State.

Behind him were the remains of a Dodge sedan, with globules of melted plastic where its dashboard used to be; wire innards were all that was left of the tires.

Muthafar Jalal, the brother of the showroom’s owner, gazed at an armored Toyota Land Cruiser that was also left behind. Large-caliber holes had penetrated the engine block. A powerful blow to the windshield had caused a bulge — yet it had not shattered.

“If they had taken these cars, Kirkuk would have fallen,” Jalal said. “Imagine the damage they could have done and the attacks they could have withstood.”

At some point, Officer Fateh Allah and his colleagues each had fewer than 10 rounds of ammunition left, yet they managed to shepherd the hotel guests to the Snobar dining hall. A SWAT team didn’t get to the hotel until noon.

Even after government reinforcements arrived, the militants showed no hesitation.

They sniped at the policemen from a half-finished building down the street; others clambered up the fire escape on the side of the Snobar. Another wave had reached the roof of an adjacent building and threw a bomb, a gas grenade and two sticks of TNT at the police.

“We were lucky. The TNT sticks didn’t explode or we wouldn’t be here right now,” said police officer Munther Razooqi. Behind him was a pool of dried blood where one of his colleagues, SWAT operator Ihsaan Ali, had fallen after a sniper shot him through the head.

“They were well trained. They were good fighters, and all in shape — no big bellies,” said Fateh Allah, smiling as he looked at a portly colleague.

It was a view echoed by Wajdi Hassan, a former army general who manages a construction site where the fighters had holed up. He displayed a photo of the corpse of a militant with long black hair, congealed blood on his nose and lips.

“This one was top-notch. He went from building to building, shooting at the security services,” said Hassan.

They also appeared to be well equipped. In the unfinished building where the jihadis had congregated were various syringes and medical supplies, and some of the militants appeared to have the kind of explosives used for car bombs.

At 1:30 p.m., 10 hours after the initial attack, a number of Islamic State fighters ran into the house of Najaati Mardan, a 69-year-old retired military officer. They demanded the keys to his new Land Cruiser.

“I gave them the keys, and then they started loading three disks of explosives into it to booby trap it,” he said. “They left soon after and it was blown up.”

Even those fighters who were wounded fought to the last.

When Monaly Najeeb and her six flatmates heard the initial explosions at 4 a.m. they hid in a bedroom closet.

Twelve hours later, Imad Matti, their supervisor at the construction site where they live and work, informed them there would be an airstrike on the site and told them to relocate to a room farther away and hide under the bed.

“The Daesh fighters came in and sat on the bed. Two of them were injured,” Najeeb said, speaking later from the Iraqi city of Irbil, where she fled after the attack.


Times corespondant Nabih Bulos reports from the room where an Islamic state fighter made his last stand.

Three and half hours later, some fighters left to continue the assault while the wounded stayed behind. One, who was hit in the stomach, went to the bathroom, cleaned himself up, and headed to another room along with his comrade, Najeeb said.

“Mr. Matti called us. He had sneaked with nine other policemen to an alley beside the house. He signaled to us with a cellphone light, and we came out, one by one,” she said.

It had been more than 15 hours since they had first gone into hiding.

“It was a miracle we waited so long. We were thirsty, cold, wanted to go to the bathroom … but divine strength helped us,” she said.

Later, she said, the wounded fighter detonated his vest.

In the room, blood stains splattered the walls and chunks of human flesh could be seen in the door frame.

The rest of the fighters were simply gone.

(Los Angeles Times)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
10/27/2016 9:19:46 AM

What the Media and Governments are not telling You about Fukushima


By:
Alex Pietrowski via wakingtime.com

The most important ecological crisis of the world has ever seen has been underway since March 11th, 2011, yet there is nary a mention of it in the corporate media, and no political body in the world is championing its resolution.

Widespread Denial and Willful Ignorance

The media, politicians and the world at large seem to be engaging in extreme denial regarding Fukushima. A survey of mainstream media coverage of the fallout of this event reveals the trend of covering this story as a human interest affair, not as the immediate threat it truly is.

The effects on nature are already being seen, yet even among the environmentalist factions of media, there is strong denial of the damage already done and of what is to come as the crisis approaches its sixth year. Some 300 tons of radioactive water are dumped into the Pacific Ocean each day, and signs are showing that this catastrophe is gravely affecting sea-life and wildlife in and around the Pacific.

The FDA maintains that there is no evidence of contamination by Fukushima borne radionuclides in the American food supply, yet this opinion is contested by some independent researchers. A report by the Fairewinds Energy Education says that cancer is on the rise in areas around the failed power plant, and that millions will die in coming years as a result.

“[T]he second report received from Japan proves that the incidence of thyroid cancer is approximately 230 times higher than normal in Fukushima Prefecture… So what’s the bottom line? The cancers already occurring in Japan are just the tip of the iceberg. I’m sorry to say that the worst is yet to

As election year in the U.S. approaches its dramatic climax, it has been striking to observe that neither of the major two-party candidates, or third-party candidates for that matter, have mentioned this crisis at all during the entire election run up. It is a non-issue in American politics, and if you’re listening, the silence is deafening.

The 40-Year-Plan

Thus far, all plans to stop radioactive contamination of the Pacific Ocean and the Japanese Islands have failed, the most impressive of which is the construction of a $320 million underground wall of frozen dirt to block the seepage of groundwater into surrounding areas. 1oo feet deep and over a mile long, the ‘land-side impermeable wall‘ is already failing as rainfall from recent typhoons has caused partial melting of sections of the ‘ice wall.’

A previous and ongoing cleanup effort requires the on site storage of contaminated water near the Fukushima Daiichi is merely a band-aid as radioactive water continues to accumulate by the day, with no long term plan for proper disposal.

“…the filtered water is still full of tritium, a radioactive version of hydrogen. (When two neutrons are added to the element, it becomes unstable, prone to emitting electrons.) Tritium bonds with oxygen just like normal hydrogen does, to produce radioactive “tritiated water.” It’s impractical—or at least extremely difficult and expensive—to separate tritiated water from normal water.” [Source]

The reality here is that this crisis is untouchable in its scope and unparalleled in its lethality, and TEPCO’s 40-year-plan to decommission the plant will be a failure.

Final Thoughts

No one of significant import is talking about this crisis or working to elevate it as a national and international priority. The American political scene is focused instead on the selection of the next president being chosen between two candidates who clearly have zero interest in addressing this dire issue.

Is this because nothing can be done about it? Is this because the energy industry is controlling the conversation and covering up the truth? Or is this because the agenda for the U.S. at present is geared to destabilization and a push for expansion of the Orwellian Permanent War, and ecological disasters are supportive of the global depopulation scheme in play?

In any case, the Fukushima meltdown is a slow-burning apocalyptic event that desperately needs our attention.









"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1