Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/15/2016 1:17:10 AM

Millions of Dead Fish Washing Up on Vietnam’s Shores

| May 13, 2016 12:41 pm

Vietnam has a fish problem and the government isn’t talking about it. Since April, millions ofdead fish have been washing up on Vietnam’s shores.

Since April, millions of dead fish have been washing up on Vietnam’s shores. Photo credit: Jennifer Carole

Steel or Fish?

The lifeless fish and clams—along with the odd whale—go on for miles. Researchers hired by Vietnam’s government have concluded that “toxic elements” are behind the “unprecedented” deaths, but that’s where the answers seem to stop, reports Scott Duke Harris for the Los Angeles Times.

While the government is reluctant to a point any fingers—there’s a $10-billion investment on the line—locals, particularly fishermen, blame the environmental catastrophe on Formosa, a steel plant from Taiwan that allegedly pumped untreated steel wastewater into the ecosystem. If that’s true, the environmental consequences could be devastating.

According to Satyendra Kumar Sarna, a metallurgist and veteran of the steel industry since 1965, of Ispat Guru, there are several possible environmental effects of untreated wastewater: toxicity, which affects marine life; reduced levels of dissolved oxygen, which also affects marine life and the temperature of the water; silting; and oil slicks.

Unsurprisingly, the folks at Formosa aren’t being transparent about the role they did or didn’t play in this fishy mess. On one hand, the corporation is screaming that there’s (conveniently) no proof that it’s to blame. On the other hand, in a really bad PR move, a PR rep “also suggested that Vietnam may have to accept environmental trade-offs for industrial growth—perhaps a choice between steel or fish,” reports the Los Angeles Times.

Feel free to join me in a facepalm right about now.

While it sounds horrible, Asia is preoccupied with progress at any price. As Care2′s Steve Williams recently reminded us there’s a “coal-fired standoff with Asia” at the moment, despite the recent Paris climate deal where, “Experts warn that the expansion of coal-fired plants in India, China, Indonesia and Vietnam cannot be allowed to move forward if we want any chance to achieve our pollution reduction goals.”

Even with so much at stake for our planet, Vietnam is adamant about significantly expanding its coal-fired plants. President of the World Bank Jim Yong Kim made this shocking statement to The Guardian about Vietnam’s plans: “If Vietnam goes forward with 40GW of coal, if the entire region implements the coal-based plans right now, I think we are finished. That would spell disaster for us and our planet.”

#IChooseFish

Fortunately, the people of Vietnam don’t agree with their government’s blatant disregard for the environment. In response to Formosa’s disconnected ultimatum between steel and fish, many locals choose fish, as the hashtag #ichoosefish illustrates. These locals understand: “No blue, no green.”

Many fish supporters took it a step further. This “unprecedented” fish die-off has sparked another unprecedented event in Vietnam: protests. While it may not seem revolutionary to us in the west, keep in mind that Vietnam is a communist state, so standing up to the government is a big no-no. But the price is just too high in this case. You can’t really eat steel now can you?

And this tweet illustrates how the government responds to protesters.


(
ecowatch.com)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/15/2016 1:28:09 AM

Bank of America: We are witnessing a stock market 'exodus'

Investors pulled a whopping $44 billion out of the stock market in the past five weeks.

Yahoo Finance


Moses leads the exodus. (Image: Movieclips/YouTube)


Amid the recent volatility in the markets, investors have been pulling funds out of equities.

"The 2015 retreat from US equities by retail investors appeared to be fading as 2016 got off to a less onerous start," Credit Suisse's Lori Calvasina said on Thursday. "But the improving trend has reversed, with severe outflows seen in April."

According to a new report from Bank of America Merrill Lynch, equity funds saw $7.4 billion in outflows in the past week.

View photo

.
It's an equity exodus. (Image: Bank of America Merrill Lynch)

It's an equity exodus. (Image: Bank of America Merrill Lynch)

The cumulative outflow from equity funds over the past five weeks was $44 billion. BAML's Michael Hartnett, who characterized this as an "equity exodus," noted that this was the largest redemption over a 5-week period since August 2011.

So where is that money going?

In the past week, $3.5 billion went into bond funds and $1.0 billion went into precious metals funds, which offer exposure to gold. There was also $10.9 billion poured into money market funds, the largest inflow in 13 weeks.

In other words investors are playing the safe-haven assets.

And it's not just the US experiencing an outflow in equity funds.

"Flows to international equity funds turned negative, while outflows from Europe funds persisted," Calvasina observed.

The S&P 500 (^GSPC) hasn't done much since late March, rallying on some days and falling on others.

Experts ranging from hedge fund managers to Wall Street equity strategists have become increasingly wary of the markets.

"While the current recovery cycle is often cited for its long duration (fourth longest since 1900), the fact that organic growth has been weak and unbalanced is often understated," JPMorgan's Dubravko Lakos-Bujas said in a note to clients on Wednesday.

Sam Ro is managing editor at Yahoo Finance.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/15/2016 10:08:32 AM



Our country is in an economic freefall and you’d better get ready for some pain because it’s coming
May 10th, 2016, by


(Bugout.news) The headlines last Friday on The Drudge Report should have been quite frightening to any American who gives a damn about their country and who is truly interested in seeing it thrive once more. This shouldn’t be a partisan issue, by the way, but unfortunately it seems to have turned into one.

Eight years ago a little-known U.S. senator from Illinois bested the most well-known name in the Democratic Party for its 2008 presidential nomination; at the time, Barack Obama was running largely on a platform in which he blamed President George W. Bush’s administration for the Great Recession and the destruction of wealth it caused.

It worked. That, and a false promise of “healthcare reform” propelled Obama into the White House, and he handily won reelection over a hapless GOP opponent from Massachusetts who couldn’t get out of his own way.

Now, after nearly eight years of
Obama’s policies, to say that the U.S. economy is anything but moribund and on life support is to be so intentionally disingenuous, or completely clueless, it should defy belief.

Record
citizenship renunciations in the Age of Obama. Record number of Americans (about one-third!) no longer in the workforce because they can’t find decent-paying jobs. And why not? Because job creation has slowed to a fraction of what is needed to actually grow the economy, which, as another headline indicates, is practically non-existent.

The blame for all of this cannot be laid
only at the front steps of the White House. Congress’ refusal to exert its own authority to influence many of Obama’s policies has hurt the nation as well, so there is plenty of blame to go around.

But you know what? At this point
blaming someone is meaningless because it really doesn’t matter. There will be plenty of time for discussing that later. In the meantime, it appears that the die has been cast; the death spiral of the U.S. economy has begun, and it will be enjoined by death spirals of other developed countries as well, to include China and Russia.

And what ensues is, quite frankly, not going to be pretty.

Already we’re seeing signs of how concerns over slowing economic activity and growth are manifesting. In terms of Russia and China, both appear to be outsourcing those concerns with military aggression and expansionism. Both nations are corrupt and authoritarian (yes, in many ways the U.S. is too, but not quite as bad as these other two – for now), and both have restive populations concerned about how they’re going to make their way in an era of slow (or no) growth. Militarism and nationalism are old tricks used by crumbling regimes in modern history to take the public’s mind off their own economic misery at home. It works for a time, but the end result is
never good; the world either winds up in war, or the major countries convulse into revolution. Believe it or not, that is more likely to happen in Russia, a nation full of nuclear weapons, but China – especially among its Uighur and Mongolian ethnic groups – is not beyond civil unrest and disorder.

In the U.S., meanwhile, throw a contentious presidential election into an already steaming cauldron of economic discontent and what you have is a powder keg that needs but a small spark to explode.

And this summer,
at some point, it will. Some are saying the eruption comes when Republicans gather in Cleveland, Ohio, to nominate billionaire real estate mogul Donald Trump to be their 2016 presidential candidate. A hugely polarizing figure, Trump nevertheless seems to be on a glide path now to the nomination after his last two remaining opponents, Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and Ohio Gov. John Kasich, dropped out last week.

Hillary Clinton, who appears likely to win the Democratic nomination despite the fact that the FBI is all over her for using an unsecured private email server while serving as Obama’s secretary of state, is equally polarizing to those on the right, but as evidenced thus far, it’s only the Left-wing revolutionary types using mostly rent-a-mobs
who are disrupting Trump campaign events, with promises to continue doing so throughout the summer.

Meanwhile, the U.S. economy will continue to tank throughout the summer as well, and so will those of other great powers. Job creation in America, such as it is, will be tepid. And of the jobs being created, most will allow earners to barely get by.

Fear and loathing, jealously, frustration, anger, depression, hopelessness – all of these base emotions are being fomented and then preyed upon by the same master manipulators who have always been behind the scenes pulling the strings. By keeping the population riled up and distracted, they empower themselves. But
this time, they may have created a monster they ultimately will be unable to control.

What’s coming may be unstoppable. What you do between now and then to prepare, however, is entirely in your hands. It’s valuable time. Don’t waste it.


(bugout.news)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/15/2016 10:34:43 AM

BREAKING: WikiLeaks Exposes Newly ‘Selected’ Brazilian President as Puppet for US Intelligence



The transparency organization WikiLeaks has exposed acting President Michel Temer, who ascended to the Brazilian presidency after a soft coup deposed President Rousseff, as having been an intelligence informant for the United States.

Temer, who has served as Brazil’s vice president since 2011, took power Thursday after Brazil’s parliament suspended Rousseff pending the results of impeachment proceedings.


The cables — marked “sensitive but unclassified” — contained summaries of conversations Temer, a Brazilian federal lawmaker at the time, had with the U.S. intelligence officials.


The damning evidence was provided in a series of tweets by the WikiLeaks Twitter account that linked to diplomatic cables highlighting the information provided to the U.S. military and National Security Council by Temer.


Clearly, the evolution of Unconventional War (UW), spelled out in the 2010 Special Forces Unconventional Warfare manual, has come to full fruition with the events that have unfolded in Brazil.


This has unfolded in the form of Hybrid War, which is essentially a weaponization of chaos theory – widely embraced across the U.S. military/intelligence spectrum. The UW manual highlights the perceptions of a vast “uncommitted middle population” is essential in the road to success, and that these uncommitted eventually can be turned to oppose their political leaders.


The process encompasses everything from “supporting insurgency” (as in Syria) to “wider discontent through propaganda and political and psychological efforts to discredit the government” (as in Brazil). It explains that when an insurrection takes root and begins to escalate, the “intensification of propaganda; psychological preparation of the population for rebellion” should as well, as has been the case in Brazil.





Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/wikileaks-exposes-brazilian-president-rose-power-soft-coup-u-s-informant/#zzFfpUjkMcAzYuBs.99


BRICS is the acronym for an association of five major emerging national economies: Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. The grouping was originally known as “BRIC” before the inclusion of South Africa in 2010.

According to political analyst Pepe Escobar:

“This very well-argued three-part thesis clarifies the central objective behind a major Hybrid War; “to disrupt multipolar transnational connective projects through externally provoked identity conflicts (ethnic, religious, political, etc.) within a targeted transit state…


The BRICS – an extremely dirty word/concept in the Beltway/Wall Street axis – had to be the prime targets of Hybrid War. For myriad reasons. Among them; the push for trade and commerce in their own currencies, bypassing the US dollar; the creation of the BRICS development bank; the avowed drive towards Eurasia integration, symbolized by the now converging China-led New Silk Roads – or One Belt, One Road (OBOR), in its official terminology – and Russia-led Eurasia Economic Union (EEU)”

This in large part explains the turmoil in Brazilian civic society. Although there are many structural problems inherent to the political apparatus in Brazil, these issues were exploited by external powers in an effort to create a more politically appealing environment for the U.S. and their neoliberal cronies to maneuver into positions of power as exhibited by U.S. intelligence informant, Temer ascending to the presidency of Brazil.


Brazil American political analyst Eric Draitser noted in his March article for MintPress News:


“The right wing is the driving force of the protests… Two of the principal groups responsible for organizing and mobilizing the demonstrations are the Free Brazil Movement (MBL) and Students for Liberty (EPL), both of which have direct ties to Charles and David Koch, the right-wing, neocon, US billionaires, as well as other leading figures of the far right, pro-business neoliberal establishment,” Draitser wrote.

Renowned journalist Glenn Greenwald get to the root of the matter, when writing that Temer “will faithfully serve the interests of Brazil’s richest: he’s planning to appoint Goldman Sachs and IMF [International Monetary Fund] officials to run the economy and otherwise install a totally unrepresentative, neoliberal team.”


Make no mistake that there is a massive covert effort by the U.S. to maintain their hegemonic position in global affairs — undertaken by any means necessary — and aimed squarely at the BRICS. The events in Brazul are unquestionably yet another orchestrated coup organized by Washington. This new form of sophisticated Hybrid Warfare has shown itself to be an insidious weapon that can foment regime change without firing a single shot.


Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/wikileaks-exposes-brazilian-president-rose-power-soft-coup-u-s-informant/#zzFfpUjkMcAzYuBs.99


(thefreethoughtproject.com)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/15/2016 10:53:56 AM

PORN AS SEX ED: ONLINE SMUT WARPING TEENS' VIEWS ON SEXUALITY

BY ON 5/14/16 AT 2:00 PM

Research suggests that an increased exposure to pornography at an early age influences how teens today view their own bodies, leading to body shame, negative body image, body perfectionism and the desire to change what they can.
BRIAN SHUMWAY/GALLERY STOCK

On the “Sexual Health—Teens” message board at HealthBoards.com, questions are asked anonymously, and most fall into a void, unanswered by others clamoring to be heard. Many focus on genitals. “Help, my testicle feels weird.” “I find just about every part of a woman's body attractive but the vagina.… Is this normal among males?” “My girlfriend and I are teens, and we are planning to have sex, so I was wondering…. What is a good size?”

Teens span “a huge spectrum” when it comes to feelings about their genitals, says Virginia Braun, a psychologist at the University of Auckland. “Some are perfectly satisfied or happy; others are deeply distressed.” But perhaps more and more are leaning toward the latter. Recently, The New York Times reported an 80 percent increase in labiaplasties—cosmetic surgery that trims and shapes the female genitalia—performed on teen girls. Overall, the numbers of teens getting the surgery done in the U.S. remain quite small; 400 teen girls had a labiaplasty in 2014, up from 222 in 2013. But the rate of increase is significant enough to be concerning and appears to be a sign of a growing trend.

“Over the last decade plus, we’ve heard increasing accounts of young women being concerned that their vulva is not normal,” says Braun. “But we are also seeing a newish concern that the vulva is unappealing or unattractive and that it can [or] should therefore be changed. This is the difference from 20 years ago, when girls may have worried that it didn’t look ‘that nice,’ but that was just how things were.”

Labiaplasty isn’t a new thing; various versions of these procedures have been performed in the U.S. for decades on women following childbirth. “Injuries need to be repaired,” says Lara Devgan, a cosmetic surgeon based in New York. Every week, she gets five to 10 labiaplasty inquiries from women and ends up operating on about half of them. Though she performs most of these procedures on adults, about 20 to 25 percent of her labiaplasty patients are younger than 25 and include teens bothered by “discomfort, chafing and skin irritation.” Some patients describe feeling self-conscious, but Devgan doesn’t see it as a “politicized” issue.

Others see the procedure very differently. Labiaplasty is one extreme in an overall response to increasingly invasive expectations of what bodies are supposed to look like, says Laura Lindberg, principal research scientist atGuttmacher Institute.

“Our society values how people look,” Lindberg says. “Why should we be surprised that teenagers buy into it when the adult population buys into it?”

“Body image is a big issue for teens—they have a lot of misperceptions about what’s normal for bodies, for their bodies,” says Al Vernacchio, a sexuality educator at Friends’ Central School in Wynnewood, Pennsylvania. He has worked as a high school teacher for 21 years and understands the ways in which today’s teens are similar to and different from past generations. “They really do get sucked into body shame and negative body image—and body perfectionism is really rampant.”

From her research on teen sex behaviors, Lindberg says what is really different these days is “teenage girls now have a normative expectation around what their pubic area is supposed to look like.” Assumptions about what is or is not attractive extend to intimate areas of the body—genital hair and the size of labia. She believes the root of these concerns is early exposure to pornography.

Easy access to pornography

According to Pew Research, 92 percent of teens report going online daily, and for most that means access on their personal phones—which also means no one is looking over their shoulder. Anna, 17, attends a Cleveland high school and believes “most people my age watch porn, absolutely.” The first time she watched was in school with a group of fifth-grade kids gathered around an iPod. “I think the first time I saw porn was probably when I was 10,” Justin, 16, says, adding that the same is probably true for most of his friends. A suburban New Jersey high schooler, Justin says most of the boys he knows watch porn online regularly.

Easy access to sexually explicit and pornographic material is “a game changer,” Vernacchio says. “Kids are seeing sexually explicit material far earlier and in far greater numbers than their parents’ generation.” A 2010 Dutch study, for instance, found that the more a teen is exposed to pornography, the more realistic they think it is and the more it influences expectations for their own sexual behavior. Meanwhile, a 2016 Italian survey found 10 percent of teens who watch porn reported a reduced sexual interest toward potential real-life partners, while 19 percent said they had an abnormal sexual response—but those numbers rose to 19 and 25 percent among frequent viewers.

“Many, many young people today are using porn as sex ed,” says Vernacchio. “They think what they’re watching is real sex instead of a staged performance of sex where there’s lights and camera angles and cuts in the action and repositioning.” In addition, porn often contains unusually proportioned and surgically enhanced bodies—Houston, a porn actress, reportedly auctioned off snipped pieces of her labia encased in a Lucite cube, as did Sydney Leathers, Anthony Weiner’s sexting partner and a former porn actress—and this may contribute to girls’ anxieties about their own developing physiques.

Today’s porn looks nothing like it did 10 or 15 years ago, says Gail Dines, a professor of sociology and women’s studies at Wheelock College. The titillating pictures and photos of naked women from past centuries have given way to close-up videos of sexual degradation. Teens who log on expecting to see a little tawdry if amiable sex may be challenged by what they find. As Dines describes it, much of mainstream porn is “brutal and cruel.” And it can impact their behavior: In 2013, Michelle Ybarra, president at the Center for Innovative Public Health Research, and her colleagues found that 14- to 21-year-old perpetrators of sexual violence were more likely to have watched violent X-rated content .

As Ybarra notes, though, “not all pornography is the same.” While the Internet may open the door on sexually violent porn for some teens, for others it offers a place to safely explore sexuality. The web has “done wonders” to help isolated kids identifying as gay, lesbian, trans or gender nonconforming find community, says Vernacchio. This is particularly important given that, taken as a whole, teens in sexual minority groups report significantly more sexual activity and more risk-taking than heterosexuals. “The experience of growing up LGBT is different than growing up heterosexual,” says Ybarra. Online community can ease a teen’s loneliness and possibly lead to less risky choices.

But as they explore their attractions—both online and off—teens’ questions and anxieties about their changing bodies clearly impact their experiences and ultimately their behavior. A 2010 study of undergraduate women in the U.S., some in their late teens, found that those who reported greater dissatisfaction with their genital appearance also were more self-conscious during intimacy and experienced lower sexual satisfaction. That, in turn, made them more likely to engage in riskier sex, like not using a condom.

Meanwhile, the bandwidth of acceptable sexual behavior has widened over time. One example is oral sex, which is more prevalent among today’s teens than past generations. Vernacchio believes this is due in part to the HIV/AIDS epidemic. A lot of the early AIDS education pointed to oral sex as a less risky form of sex, he says, and that seems to have influenced the entire culture. Today’s teen sees oral sex as far less intimate than their parents’ generation did, Vernacchio says—to them, it’s “not real sex.” Recent research supports the belief that oral sex is “an established component of youths’ sexual repertoires” and also suggests this form of sex slows teens’ transition to vaginal intercourse. Strange as it might sound, numbers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggest that teens overall are having typical sex less often than their predecessors: In a 2015 survey of high schoolers, 41 percent reported having had sexual intercourse, while 12 percent said they’d had four or more partners—significantly fewer students than the 54 and 19 percent who reported the same in 1991.

“It is definitely a more complex sexual landscape to navigate for youth today,” says Braun.

(Newsweek)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1