Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
2/27/2016 10:47:09 AM
WATCH: U.S.-made missile goes up against one of Russia’s most advanced tanks
(The Wahington Post)


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
2/27/2016 11:13:02 AM

Temporary Syria truce begins

By Don Melvin and Jason Hanna, CNN

Updated 1328 GMT (2128 HKT) February 26, 2016





(CNN)The proposed "cessation of hostilities" in Syria, announced jointly earlier this week by Russia and the United States, went into effect at midnight Friday in Damascus (5 p.m. ET).

U.N. Special Envoy Staffan De Mistura said at a press briefing in Geneva that immediate reports indicated "suddenly both Daraa and Damascus had calmed down."

An unusual quiet descended on major cities in Syria, said Rami Abdulrahman, director of the London-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, adding there were brief exceptions including some unexplained explosions reported in the north.

Nobody expects peace to settle over the nation overnight, De Mistura said.

"There are some high chances that we should expect hiccups," he said.

    If there are violations, he said, "the important point that we need to see is that if those incidents will be quickly brought under control and contained.

    'Our best chance'

    Another Syria task force meeting will take place Saturday afternoon in Geneva to assess whether the temporary truce is being respected, he said.

    The cessation of hostilities is the most hopeful sign in years in the nation that's been torn by civil war. At least 250,000 people have died and at least 1 million people have fled the nation.

    "The full implementation of this resolution -- including unimpeded and sustainable humanitarian deliveries -- is our best chance to reduce the brutal violence in Syria. What matters now are not the words of the resolution but whether it will make real changes on the ground and reduce the suffering of the Syrian people," U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said in a written statement.

    Earlier Friday, the Security Council voted unanimously in favor of a resolution backing the halt in fighting and asking for all parties to abide by the terms of the cessation.

    Meanwhile, a main Syrian opposition group said it will respect the two-week truce that starts with the cessation of hostilities but it warned the government and Russia not to target it under a pretense of attacking internationally recognized terror groups like ISIS.

    What's the difference between a ceasefire and a "cessation of hostilities"

    The rebel High Negotiations Committee said Friday that 97 factions agreed to abide by the deal, but it warned the Syrian regime and one of its major foreign supporters, Russia, not to attack the factions under a pretense of targeting internationally recognized terror groups in the region, such as ISIS and the al Qaeda-linked al-Nusra Front.

    "It should not be possible for the regime and its allies to exploit the ... truce by continuing hostilities against moderate opposition factions under the excuse of fighting terrorism," the panel said in a published statement Friday.

    The two-week truce does not apply to "terrorist organizations designated by the U.N. Security Council," including ISIS and al-Nusra. Military operations against them are expected to continue.

    This is an important detail because there are more than 160 armed factions on the battlefield.

    Meanwhile, United Nations Special Envoy to Syria Staffan De Mistura said Friday he planned to resume the intra-Syrian peace talks on Monday, assuming the cessation of hostilities holds. Included will be representatives of the Syrian government and opposition groups, he said.

    Syria's cessation of hostilities, explained

    The agreement

    The agreement calls for the Syrian regime and the opposition fighters to halt attacks and implement a U.N. "road map" for peace.

    Under the terms, Russia, whose warplanes have targeted non-ISIS and non-al Qaeda Syrian opposition groups, will halt those airstrikes.

    Both sides agree to allow humanitarian agencies access to the territories they hold, and to refrain from taking territory held by the other side.

    The "road map" is U.N. Security Council Resolution 2254, which the council adopted unanimously in December.

    As Friday's deadline approached, regime and Russian airstrikes continued to pound different parts of the country.

    Obama expresses little optimism for Syrian ceasefire

    On Friday, Russian President Vladimir Putin said the truce would be a difficult and "contradictive" process.

    "But there's no alternative to a peaceful settlement of the conflict," Putin told a meeting of members of the Russian federal security service, the FSB. "All conditions have to be created for the soonest end of the bloodshed and for an inter-Syrian political dialogue in the future with participation of all constructive political forces."

    Civil war has raged over Syria for five years, since protests during the hopeful days of the Arab Spring were brutally repressed.

    More than a quarter of a million people have died so far. Half the country's population has been uprooted and has fled. People in some Syrian cities are starving. More than a million people entered Europe without the required papers last year -- most of them, by far, Syrians. The European Union's commitment to the free, borderless movement of people is in danger of collapse.

    "Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

    +1
    Luis Miguel Goitizolo

    1162
    61587 Posts
    61587
    Invite Me as a Friend
    Top 25 Poster
    Person Of The Week
    RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
    2/27/2016 11:23:29 AM

    All relevant groups in Syria ready to comply with ceasefire: Putin

    Reuters


    Russian President Vladimir Putin listens to a statement from his Belarusian counterpart Alexander Lukashenko after a session of the Supreme State Council of Russia-Belarus Union State in Minsk, Belarus, February 25, 2016. REUTERS/Alexei Druzhinin/Sputnik/Kremlin

    By Denis Dyomkin and Lidia Kelly

    MOSCOW (Reuters) - All parties expected to take part in a cessation of hostilities in Syria have said they are ready to do so, President Vladimir Putin said on Friday, warning the peace process would be difficult nonetheless.

    The "cessation of hostilities," brokered by the United States and Russia, is due to take effect at midnight (2200 GMT on Friday).

    "Today by midday Damascus time all warring sides in Syria had to confirm to us or to our American partners their agreement to adhere to a ceasefire," Putin told a meeting of the FSB security service in Moscow.

    "That information has already reached us," he said, adding that from Feb. 27, Syrian government forces, Russia and the U.S.-led coalition would not strike any armed groups which had signed up.

    Putin stressed that combat actions against Islamic State, the Nusra Front and other groups would continue.

    "I would like to express the hope that our American partners will also bear this in mind ... and that nobody will forget that there are other terrorist organizations apart from Islamic State," he said.

    The U.N. Security Council is expected to vote on a resolution to endorse the planned halt in hostilities later on Friday.

    Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Friday he expected the U.N. Security Council to back the resolution, but cautioned that nobody could give a 100 percent guarantee that the ceasefire plan would be implemented.

    He warned Washington against coming up with alternative ideas for Syria.

    "Within the U.S.-led coalition there should no ambiguous talk about any ‘Plan B’, about a ground operation being planned, or about the creation of some buffer no-fly zones, which have long been recognized as absolutely unacceptable,” Lavrov told a news briefing.

    (Additional reporting by Jack Stubbs/Jason Bush; Writing by Dmitry Solovyov; Editing by Andrew Osborn)

    "Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

    +1
    Luis Miguel Goitizolo

    1162
    61587 Posts
    61587
    Invite Me as a Friend
    Top 25 Poster
    Person Of The Week
    RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
    2/27/2016 1:50:34 PM

    Truce halts most Syria fighting; Russia stops flights

    Reuters


    The United Nations Security Council votes to approve a resolution endorsing the planned halt in fighting in Syria at the United Nations Headquarters in New York February 26, 2016. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

    By Tom Perry and Mariam Karouny

    BEIRUT (Reuters) - Fighting mostly stopped across western and northern Syria on Saturday and Russia halted its air raids, under a cessation of hostilities which the United Nations called the best hope for peace since civil war began five years ago.

    Under the U.S.-Russian accord accepted by President Bashar al-Assad's government and many of his enemies, fighting should cease so aid can reach civilians and talks can open to end a war that has killed more than 250,000 people and made 11 million homeless.

    Russia, which says it intends to continue strikes against areas held by Islamist fighters that are not covered by the truce, said it would suspend all flights over Syria for the day on Saturday to ensure no wrong targets were hit by mistake.

    A Syrian rebel commander said government shelling had stopped in some parts of Syria but continued elsewhere in what he described as a violation that could wreck the agreement.

    The truce is the culmination of new diplomatic efforts that reflect a battlefield dramatically changed since Russia joined the war in September with air strikes to prop up Assad. Moscow's intervention effectively destroyed the hope his enemies have maintained for five years -- encouraged by Arab and Western states -- to topple him by force.

    The agreement is the first of its kind to be attempted in four years and, if it holds, would be the most successful truce of the war so far.

    But there are weak spots in a fragile deal which has not been directly signed by the Syrian warring parties and is less binding than a formal ceasefire. Importantly, it does not cover powerful jihadist groups such as Islamic State and the Nusra Front, al Qaeda's branch in Syria.

    "Let's pray that this works because frankly this is the best opportunity we can imagine the Syrian people has had for the last five years in order to see something better and hopefully something related to peace," U.N. Syria envoy Staffan de Mistura said at a midnight news conference in Geneva.

    He said he expected occasional breaches of the agreement but called on the parties to show restraint and curb escalation.

    Several insurgents in the western and northern part of the country said early on Saturday that it was mainly quiet so far.

    Nevertheless, Fares Bayoush, head of the Fursan al-Haqq rebel group which fights under the banner of the Free Syrian Army, told Reuters that continuing violations could lead to the "collapse of the agreement".

    "There are areas where the bombardment has stopped but there are areas where there are violations by the regime such as Kafr Zeita in Hama, via targeting with artillery, and likewise in Morek in northern Hama countryside."

    REPORTS OF VIOLENCE

    In early reports of violence, a Syrian rebel group in the northwest said three of its fighters had been killed while repelling an attack from government ground forces a few hours after the plan came into effect. Its spokesman called it a breach of the agreement; the Syrian military could not be reached immediately for comment.

    Syria's state media said at least two people were killed and several wounded when a car bomb exploded at the entrance of Salamiya, a town east of Hama city and a frontline between government forces and Islamic State group. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights which monitors the conflict said it was carried out by Islamic State.

    The Syrian Kurdish YPG militia said Islamic State fighters had attacked Tal Abyad, a town near the Turkish border.

    Damascus and Moscow say they will respect the agreement but continue to fight the Nusra Front and Islamic State. Other rebels seen as moderates by the West say they fear this will be used to justify attacks on them.

    Russia's defense ministry said it would suspend air strikes in a "green zone" -- defined as those parts of Syria held by groups that have accepted the cessation -- and make no flights at all on Saturday.

    "Given the entry into force of the U.N. Security Council resolution that supports the Russian-American agreements on a ceasefire, and to avoid any possible mistakes when carrying out strikes, Russian military planes, including long-range aviation, are not carrying out any flights over Syrian territory on Feb. 27," the defense ministry said.

    Sergei Rudskoi, a lieutenant-general in the Russian air force, told a news briefing that Moscow had sent the United States a list of 6,111 fighters who had agreed to the ceasefire deal and 74 populated areas which should not be bombed.

    Nusra Front, one of Syria's most powerful Islamist rebel groups, often operates close to other groups, making it potentially difficult to prove whether strikes have targeted it. On Friday, Nusra urged insurgents to intensify their attacks on Assad and his allies.

    "THERE IS CALM"

    A rebel fighter said government forces briefly fired artillery at a village in Aleppo province, which he said was under the control of the Levant Front, another group under the umbrella of the Free Syrian Army which has backed the truce.

    Nevertheless he said the frontline was quieter than before the agreement took effect.

    "There is calm. Yesterday at this time there were fierce battles. It is certainly strange, but the people are almost certain that the regime will breach the truce on the grounds of hitting Nusra. There is the sound of helicopters from the early morning," he told Reuters earlier on Saturday.

    Fighting raged across much of western Syria right up until the cessation came into effect but there was calm in many parts of the country shortly after midnight, the Observatory said.

    "In Damascus and its countryside ... for the first time in years, calm prevails," Observatory director Rami Abdulrahman said. "In Latakia, calm, and at the Hmeimim air base there is no plane activity," he said, referring to the Latakia base where Russia's warplanes operate.

    Some gunfire had been heard shortly after midnight in the northern city of Aleppo, and there were some blasts heard in northern Homs province, but it was not clear what had caused them, Abdulrahman said.

    After years in which any action by the United Nations Security Council was blocked by Moscow, Russia's intervention has opened a path for multilateral diplomacy while undermining the long-standing Western demand that Assad leave power.

    The Security Council unanimously demanded late on Friday that all parties to the conflict comply with terms of the plan. De Mistura said he intends to restart peace talks on March 7, provided the halt in fighting largely holds.

    U.N.-backed peace talks, the first in two years and the first to include delegations from Damascus and the rebels, collapsed earlier this month before they began, with the rebels saying they could not negotiate while they were being bombed.

    The government, backed by Russian air strikes, has dramatically advanced in recent weeks, moving close to encircling Aleppo, Syria's biggest city before the war, and threatening to seal the Turkish border that has served as the main lifeline for rebel-held areas.

    Washington said it was time for Russia to show it was serious about halting fighting by honoring a commitment not to strike Syrian groups that are part of the moderate opposition.

    (Reporting by John Davison, Mariam Karouny and Tom Perry in Beirut, Louis Charbonneau and Michelle Nichols at the United Nations in New York, Tom Miles and Stephanie Nebehay in Geneva and Andrew Osborn in Moscow; Writing by Mariam Karouny and Peter Graff)

    "Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

    +1
    Luis Miguel Goitizolo

    1162
    61587 Posts
    61587
    Invite Me as a Friend
    Top 25 Poster
    Person Of The Week
    RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
    2/27/2016 2:30:46 PM

    Max Lucado: Trump doesn’t pass the decency test

    Policy aside, shouldn't we all demand that our president at least be decent?


    Max Lucado is a pastor in San Antonio and a best-selling author of 32 books, including "Glory Days."

    As the father of three daughters, I reserved the right to interview their dates. Seemed only fair to me. After all, my wife and I’d spent 16 or 17 years feeding them, dressing them, funding braces and driving them to volleyball tournaments and piano recitals. A five-minute face-to-face with the guy was a fair expectation. For the next few hours, she would be affected by his ability to drive a car, avoid the bad crowds and stay sober. I wanted to know if he could do it. I wanted to know if he was decent.

    This was my word: “decent.” Would he treat my daughter with kindness and respect? Could he be trusted to bring her home on time? In his language, actions and decisions, would he be a decent guy?

    Decency mattered to me as a dad, and decency matters to Americans. We take note of the person who pays their debts. We appreciate the physician who takes time to listen. When the husband honors his wedding vows, when the teacher makes time for the struggling student, when the employee refuses to gossip about her co-worker, when the losing team congratulates the winning team, we can characterize their behavior as decent.

    We appreciate decency. We applaud decency. We teach decency. We seek to develop decency.

    So why isn’t decency doing better in the presidential race?

    The leading Republican candidate to be the next leader of the free world would not pass my decency interview. I’d send him away. I’d tell my daughter to stay home.

    I don’t know Mr. Trump. But I’ve been chagrined at his antics. He ridiculed a war hero. He made a mockery of a reporter’s menstrual cycle. He made fun of a disabled reporter. He referred to a former first lady, Barbara Bush, as “mommy” and belittled Jeb Bush for bringing her on the campaign trail. He routinely calls people “stupid” and “dummy.” One writer catalogued 64 occasions that he called someone “loser.” These were not off-line, backstage, overheard, not-to-be-repeated comments. They were publicly and intentionally tweeted, recorded and presented.


    On the night before the Nevada caucuses, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump shouted threats as a protester was removed from his Las Vegas rally on Feb. 22. (AP)

    Such insensitivities wouldn’t be acceptable even for a middle school student body election. But for the Oval Office? And to do so while brandishing a Bible and boasting of his Christian faith?

    I have no inside track on the intricacies of a presidential campaign. I’m a pastor. I don’t endorse candidates or place bumper stickers on my car. But I am protective of the Christian faith. If a public personality calls on Christ one day and calls someone a “bimbo” the next, is something not awry? And to do so, not once, but repeatedly, unrepentantly and unapologetically? We stand against bullying in schools. Shouldn’t we do the same in presidential politics?

    Could concerns be raised about other Christian candidates? Absolutely. But the concern of this article is not policy but tone and decorum. Prior presidents have exercised a restraint of the tongue. It’s hard to imagine George H.W. Bush using locker room language to demean an opponent on a debate stage. I didn’t vote for President Obama, but I appreciate the manner in which he has maintained the comportment of the office. At least we don’t wince when he stands to speak.

    When it comes to language, Mr. Trump inhabits a league of his own. Some of my friends tell me that his language is a virtue. But I respectfully part company with my Christian colleagues who chalk up his abrasive nature to candor. “For out of the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks,” Jesussaid. Words are a heart monitor. Christians would do well to summon any Christian leader to a higher heart standard. This includes pastors (especially this one), teachers, coaches and, by all means, presidential candidates.

    All of them.

    The stock explanation for Mr. Trump’s success is this: He has tapped into the anger of the American people. As one man said, “We are voting with our middle finger.” Sounds more like a comment for a gang-fight than a presidential election. Anger-fueled reactions have caused trouble ever since Cain was angry at Abel.

    We can only hope, and pray, for a return to verbal decency. Perhaps Mr. Trump will better manage his comments. (Worthy of a prayer, for sure.) Or, perhaps the American public will remember the key role of the president: to be the face of America. When he or she speaks, he or she speaks for us. Whether we agree or disagree with the policies of the president, do we not hope that they speak in a way that is consistent with the status of the office?

    As far as I remember, I never turned away one of my daughter’s dates. They weren’t perfect, but they were decent fellows. That was all I could ask.

    It seems that we should ask the same of these candidates.

    (hypervocal.com)

    "Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

    +1


    facebook
    Like us on Facebook!