2988-ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? | View Thread

Back before 2008 Peter Schiff was harshly criticized and laughed at for his predictions about a coming economic collapse. Among other things Schiff warned that consumer spending had hit a wall, stocks were overpriced and lax credit lending practices would lead to a detonation of the banking system. Rather than heed the warnings, the biggest names in mainstream media tried to discredit him for not toeing the official narrative. Shortly thereafter, of course, Schiff was vindicated and much of the doom he had forecast came to pass.

Today, Schiff continues to argue that the economy is on a downhill trajectory and this time there'll be no stopping it. All of the emergency measures implemented by the government following the Crash of 2008 were merely temporary stop-gaps. The light at the end of the tunnel being touted by officials as recovery, Schiff has famously said, is actually an oncoming train. And if the forecast he laid out in his latest interview is as accurate as those he shared in 2007, then the the train is about to derail.

We're broke. We're basically living off of debt. We've had a huge transformation of the American economy. Look at all the Americans now on food stamps, on disability, on unemployment.

The whole economy has imploded... the bottom hasn't dropped out yet because we're able to go deeper into debt. But the collapse is coming.

Fundamentally, America is worse off now than it was pre-crash. With the national debt rising unabated and money being printed out of thin air without reprieve, it is only a matter of time.

Schiff notes that while government statistics claim Americans are saving again and consumers seem to be spending, the average Joe Sixpack actually has a negative net worth. But most people don't even realize what's happening:

I read a statistic... The average American has less than a $5000 net worth... it's pathetic... we're basically broke... but in fact it's much less... If you actually took the national debt and broke it down per capita, the average American has a negative net worth because the government has borrowed in his name more than the average American is able to save.
...
What's happening is pretty much what we would anticipate. I don't see from the data any real economic recovery, certainly not in the United States.

We're spending more money, but it's not because we're generating more wealth. We're generating more debt. We're using that borrowed money to consume and so temporarily it feels that we're wealthier because we get to spend all that money... but we have to come to terms with paying the bill.

The bills are going to come due. Right now interest rates are being kept at zero which makes it possible to service the debt even though it's impossible to repay it... at least we can service it. But once interest rates go up then we can't even service it let alone repay it.

And then the party is going to come to an end.

The problem, of course, is that no one with any real influence over public perception, like our elected officials or the media, will do anything about it. They'll continue the party until it comes to an abrupt and irreversible end, and anyone who goes against the official narrative will be branded a lunatic gloom and doomer or extremist.

But vilifying those who are blaring the warning sirens will do nothing to change the end result:

We're going to have a crisis... There are always going to be people who say 'well, you're a stopped clocked... you keep predicting doom and eventually it happens'... but you have to back and listen to why... Why are they saying it?

If you look back at things that I've said and the things that Ron Paul has said... This is why it's happening... it's not like we're just saying negative things to be negative and then when something negative happens we can claim credit for it happening.

If you look back at the events it bears out that we're right... unfortunately our opinions are in the minority... and you have governments that have a vested interest in ignoring these opinions because they don't want to change because they're at the root cause of the problem. But they don't want to acknowledge their role in creating the problem. They don't want to acknowledge that the problem is more government and that we need less government because that's not how they stay in power. They promise something for nothing... they promise that government is the solution for your problems, not the cause of your problems.

They're never going to acknowledge people like Ron Paul for what they're saying... but they'll try to discredit you by saying 'well, you've been saying this for years and nothing bad has happened.'

But look around. A lot of bad stuff has happened. We just haven't had the final and complete collapse. But what good is it when that happens? Now it's too late to do anything about it.

The reality is that the American economy is on its last leg. Black Friday sales were pitiful, some of the world's leading companies are warning of recession, and U.S. national debt will soon surpass $20 Trillion.

Just as was the case before the Crash of 2008, all of the signs are there. And just like before, the stock market continues to hover near all-time highs.

If you've been paying attention you know what happens next.

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 12/8/2015 2:17:28 PM
	Suspected American ISIS Recruiter Turns Himself In By JUSTIN FISHEL, BRIAN ROSS, JAMES GORDON MEEK, LEE FERRAN and MIKE LEVINE 4 hours agoGood Morning America Suspected American ISIS Recruiter Turns Himself In (ABC News) An American fugitive, who officials say is suspected of recruiting impressionable young men for terroristgroups including ISIS and was linked to at least one domestic terror attack in the U.S., has turned himself in to authorities, the State Departmentannounced today. Mohamed Abdullahi Hassan, known online as “Miski,” surrendered to the government of Somaliaearly last month, a State Department spokesperson told reporters. Hassan has been wanted by the FBIsince he left the U.S. in 2009 for allegedly providing "material support" to the al Qaeda-linked terrorist group al-Shabab in Somalia, often purportedly by convincing young American recruits to join. U.S. officials accuse Hassan of since moving on to recruiting for the Syria-based terror group ISIS. Over the weekend ABC News reported that investigators were trying to determine if the couple who killed 14 people in San Bernardino last week had any online connection with Hassan in the months before he turned himself in. Prior to the tragedy in San Bernardino, Hassan was linked to another deadly incident this year in Garland, Texas, where two men attempted to attack a Mohammad cartoon event, but were gunned down by police before they could kill anyone. In the days and weeks leading up to that attack, one of the gunmen had repeated social media contact with Hassan, who was urging his American followers to “do their part” like the three men who killed 12 people in Paris in January. The American Terror Recruiter's Link to Texas Shooting The State Department spokesperson said the U.S. Mission to Somalia is discussing Hassan’s case with the Somali government. The official noted that the U.S. and Somalia do not have an extradition agreement. Since he was thought to have left the U.S. for Somalia, Hassan has popped up repeatedly online as a vocal proponent of jihad. Each time Twitter shuts down his account, he simply returned under a slightly different username and quickly reconnected with his supporters and potential recruits. "His influence is quite extensive," David Ibsen, Executive Director of the Counter Extremism Project, told ABC News after the Garland attack. "He's known as one of the go-to individuals online who individuals who want more information about how to travel to ISIS-controlled territory, who want information about what these radical groups are doing, they go to him." Ibsen said Hassan is "kind of a new wave of propagandist who is really at the forefront of using communication tools to effectively put out that extremist message… Without individuals like him who are on Twitter and inciting violence, we could think that many of these events wouldn't actually occur." An FBI wanted poster for Hassan that is still online says he is considered “armed and dangerous.”
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+1

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 12/8/2015 3:55:29 PM
	Vaccine Whistleblower book exposes 32 years of CDC's science fraud Tuesday, December 08, 2015 by: David Gutierrez, staff writer (NaturalNews) In August 2014, it was revealed that senior Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) scientist William Thompson had been having numerous conversations with vaccine critic Brian Hooker in which Thompson noted that the data from one of his studies had been massaged prior to publication in order to conceal a link between the MMR vaccine and autism in black boys. In a new book, Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing the Autism Research Fraud at the CDC, attorney Kevin Barry examines the content of ten months worth of conversations between Thompson and Hooker, which were recorded prior to September 2014. Hooker is a bioengineer and a professor of biology and chemistry at Simpson University. He has spent 12 years using Freedom of Information Act requests to obtain data on studies the CDC has conducted on a possible link between vaccines and autism, and he has submitted many of his findings to Congress. Omitted data shows autism link According to Thompson, he was unaware that his conversations with Hooker were being recorded. After his name was outed as a CDC informant without his permission, he hired a law firm specializing in whistleblower protection and released a public statement through them. "I regret that my coauthors and I omitted statistically significant information in our 2004 article published in the journal Pediatrics," the press statement reads. "The omitted data suggested that African American males who received the MMR vaccine before age 36 months were at increased risk for autism. Decisions were made regarding which findings to report after the data were collected, and I believe that the final study protocol was not followed." Thompson notes that while he considers himself pro-vaccination, he believes that the CDC's decision making and data analysis needs to be transparent. "My concern has been the decision to omit relevant findings in a particular study for a particular sub- group for a particular vaccine," his statement reads. "There have always been recognized risks for vaccination and I believe it is the responsibility of the CDC to properly convey the risks associated with receipt of those vaccines." "Crooked" agency Among the revelations in the book is the repeated admission by Thompson to Hooker that the mercury-containing thimerosal, which has long been used as a preservative in vaccines and is still used in flu shots and adult-only vaccines, causes "tics." "I can say tics are four times more prevalent in kids with autism," Thompson elaborates at one point. "There is biologic plausibility right now to say that thimerosal causes autism-like features.'" The book also reveals more details about the data coverup that Thompson referenced in his August 2014 public statement. It reveals that because the data from that study was modified to show no link with autism, the controversy was rapidly declared settled. "Because the CDC researchers omitted significant data, the flow of research was diverted away from vaccination," Barry writes. Thompson claims that his studies were "watered down" and his data was "omitted." "The whole system is paralyzed right now," he says of the CDC's research into a vaccine-autism connection. Barry's book uses Thompson's testimony to suggest that at best, the CDC is incompetent and misguided on this issue. At worst, to use Thompson's word from the tapes, the agency is actually "crooked." Rates of autism have ballooned from about 1 in 10,000 in 1960 to an astonishing 1 in 68 today. Over the same time period, the number of vaccines on the childhood schedule has also dramatically expanded. Page 107 of Vaccine Whistleblower contains the 1983 and 2015 recommended vaccine schedules; the former has ten shots for three vaccines by age four, while the current schedule has 27 shots for more than 12 vaccines by age six. Sources for this article include: AgeOfAutism.com HealthImpactNews.com MorganVerkamp.com Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/052238_vaccine_whistleblower_vaccine-autism_link_CDC_scientists.html#ixzz3tkGDvGHc
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+1

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 12/8/2015 4:30:43 PM
	Totalitarian end game is here: New York Times calls for nationwide gun confiscation from law-abiding Americans Sunday, December 06, 2015 by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger (NaturalNews) It is now obvious to nearly everyone that the leftist mainstream media is actively working on the same team as ISIS. Not only has this media -- the NYT, CNN, WashPost, etc. -- deliberately covered up the real threat of ISIS and radical Islam in America; it is now demanding that all Americans be disarmed so that ISIS terrorists will meet no armed citizens whatsoever as they escalate their terrorism and mass murder across America. CNN, for example, blacked out any mention of the word "Muslim" when covering the breaking news of the San Bernardino shooting. Every leftist media outlet in the nation has demanded the continuation of the absurd national policy of wholly unprotected borders that allow terrorists to easily enter the country. And now the New York Times is directly calling for the nationwide, government-run confiscation of firearms from all Americans. The leftist media tag-teams with ISIS to destroy America The leftist media -- much like ISIS itself -- has now become the direct enemy of the American people. Have no illusions of what the New York Times is now calling for: Squads of jack-booted government thugs going door to door, raiding private homes and demanding people surrender their firearms and thereby make themselves completely vulnerable to home robberies, violent crime and terrorism at their doorstep. This gun confiscation effort, of course, must be carried out at gunpoint, unambiguously demonstrating that gun control isn't about eliminating all the guns in America; it's about monopolizing all the guns in the hands of the government... the same government that uses the IRS as a political weapon to terrorize conservative groups... the same government that prosecutes natural healers and alternative cancer doctors who save lives... the same government that demands all your children be vaccinated or injected with chemotherapy even without parental consent and in complete violation of not just the Geneva Convention, but the core principles of human rights. The New York Times, in publishing this call for nationwide gun confiscation, is now calling for the very same monopolization of weapons in the hands of government that we see in countries like North Korea. A totalitarian society, the NYT ridiculous argues, is a "safe" society. Does the NYT honestly believe radical ISIS terrorists will turn in their guns? And yet, even if ever law-abiding citizen in America turns in their guns (or has them taken away at gunpoint by government thugs), does anyone believe ISIS terrorists will voluntarily turn in their guns, too? Of course they won't. How about violent criminals? Rapists? Muggers? Robbers? Carjackers? Kidnappers? Property thieves? Are they going to turn in all their guns, too, for the "good of society" as ridiculously demanded by the NYT? Of course not. Even more importantly, if the Obama administration were to actually call for nationwide gun confiscation, it would set off a mass citizens' revolt rooted in nationwide non-compliance and very likely an armed citizens' response against any member of law enforcement stupid enough to go busting in doors demanding everybody's guns. Mark my words: Gun confiscation is the tipping point for Civil War in America. While a few silly, obedient liberals who live in cities might be convinced to turn in their guns, rural America will simply not obey such unconstitutional, tyrannical demands by a criminal government regime. The New York Times has chosen sides... and it's siding with ISIS That the New York Times believes in such illegal behavior by the government regime currently in office is absolute proof of just how great a threat the NYT is to the freedoms and public safety of this nation. It also reveals exactly what the radical leftist media has had planned all along... this isn't "gun control"; it's "gun confiscation." And it's not just about the rifles, either. If they get away with coming for the rifles, they'll come after the handguns next. And then the knives and machetes, too, as we've witnessed in the UK. Any citizenry that surrenders a little freedom in exchange for a little security loses both (and deserves neither). The more people ISIS kills, the more the NYT wants to punish Americans At another level, the idea that legal gun owners across America are to blame for the actions of ISIS terrorists is simply asinine. The argument of the NYT is that regardless of the motives for the terrorists in San Bernardino, all gun owners in America must now be criminalized and jailed unless they surrender their rifles to the federal government. Such a truly insane, delusional argument can only come from the radical left... the same left that runs the New York Times and seeks to enslave the entire nation under socialism, communism and totalitarianism. America's answer to the New York Times on this issue will, of course, be something along the lines of "Come and take it!" Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/052220_New_York_Times_gun_confiscation_totalitarianism.html#ixzz3tkOTeolh
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+1

Luis Miguel 1162 61587 Lima	RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES? 12/8/2015 5:16:20 PM
	34 Syrian civilians reported killed in suspected US-led coalition airstrikes Published time: 8 Dec, 2015 16:53 © USAF / Tech. Sgt. Taylor Worley / Reuters The death toll from a suspected US-coalition airstrike on a Syrian village could be as high as 34, according to local sources. The US military say they are investigating the allegations. The alleged attack by US-led coalition forces on the Syrian village of Al-Khan was carried out on Monday. Western sources have put the death toll at 26, but Syrian political commentator Alaa Ebrahim said the figure is likely to be even higher. Read more NATO’s absurd denials amid acts of war in Syria “The number of casualties are likely to be larger than 27. We have a source in a hospital in Al-Malikiyah suggesting that the number is 30 dead and 17 wounded and the number is likely to rise as there are many people who would not be taken to hospital for fear of being arrested by the Kurdish or Syrian government,” Ebrahim said. A Syrian Army source, who asked not to be named, confirmed to RT that the area was struck. The source said no Syrian Army forces were in the area. Local sources say that 34 civilians, including women and children were killed, with a further 17 people receiving injuries. Colonel Steve Warren told AFP that the US is investigating claims that its coalition warplanes were responsible for the dozens of civilian deaths. "Every time we get information about the possibility of a civilian casualty incident, we always do a credibility assessment on that information," Colonel Steve Warren told AFP. "If the information is found to be credible, we'll conduct an investigation, and we'll release the results of that investigation.” However, Warren was unable to comment whether US-led coalition planes were active on Monday in the area around the village of Al-Khan, where the deadly strikes took place, due to what he said was “a lack of information.” Ebrahim believes if the US-led coalition is responsible, this would prove to be a boost for Syrian President Bashar Assad’s claims that all forces against IS must unite with Damascus in order to work effectively. “The Syrian government will try to use this incident as further proof that the US should coordinate with it in order to achieve a more active approach to eliminating ISIL from Syria and Iraq,” Ebrahim told RT. Read more Syria slams US-led coalition deadly strike against troops as 'act of aggression' Moscow has voiced its concern regarding reports of the civilian deaths and was also worried about US-led coalition forces conducting air strikes against Syrian government troops in Deir ez Zor on Sunday, a statement from the Russian Foreign Ministry reads. The act, which killed three Syrian Army soldiers was seen by Damascus as an “act of aggression.” On top of the fatalities, 13 personnel were injured and a number of military vehicles were destroyed when warplanes fired nine missiles at the Saeqa military camp. The incident is the first of its kind since the coalition started to bomb Syria more than a year ago, though the US-led alliance continues to deny it carried out the airstrike. “We’ve seen those Syrian reports but we did not conduct any strikes in that part of Deir ez Zor yesterday. So we see no evidence,” said Warren. A US military official speaking on condition of anonymity told Reuters that Washington is certain that Russia is responsible for the airstrike. Ebrahim believes this airstrike against Syrian Army troops could have been undertaken as a warning to Moscow. “Many believe this is a message not to the Syrian government, but to the Russian government to say that despite the deployment of the S-400 air defense systems in Syria – the US still gets its way in Syria and can bombard anyone it wants, including Russia’s closest ally in the group – the Syrian Army,” he said.
	"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)
	+1

Menu

Forums

Suspected American ISIS Recruiter Turns Himself In

Omitted data shows autism link

"Crooked" agency

Dire warning from Peter Schiff: "The whole economy has imploded... collapse is coming"

The leftist media tag-teams with ISIS to destroy America

Does the NYT honestly believe radical ISIS terrorists will turn in their guns?

The New York Times has chosen sides... and it's siding with ISIS

The more people ISIS kills, the more the NYT wants to punish Americans

34 Syrian civilians reported killed in suspected US-led coalition airstrikes

Like us on Facebook!