Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/5/2015 6:55:04 PM

DABOOOO777: BOMBSHELL! NASA Scientist Admits Chemtrails Are Real, Testing Conducted at Clemson

Posted on [by Jean Haines]




Published on Dec 4, 2015
Thanks to J.

http://www.undergroundworldnews.com
THIS IS TRUE BOMBSHELL INFO! WE HAVE THE SCIENTIST FROM NASA ADMITTING THAT THERE ARE “CHEMTRAILS”. THAT ALONE CHANGES THE GAME. NO ONE CAN CLAIM ANY LONGER THAT ITS JUST A CONSPIRACY! WE NOW HAVE PROOF THAT THEY ARE REAL, THEY HAVE LITHIUM IN THEM, TESTS ARE BEING CONDUCTED AT CLEMSON UNIVERSITY AND THE FLIGHTS MAY BE TAKING OFF FROM WALLOPS FLIGHT FACILITY IN VIRGINIA! GET THIS INFO OUT AND MAKE IT VIRAL QUICK!

I UPLOADED AUDIO TO J.KNIGHT CHANNEL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzrGH…

https://zeekly.com/video/7962/chemtra…

UPDATED INFO: THEY HAVE ALREADY REMOVED HIS MIGUEL’S PAGE, THEY KNOW WE ARE ON TO EM!
http://www.clemson.edu/ces/physics-as…


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/5/2015 7:04:37 PM
Bizarro Earth

Saudi Arabia Spends over $60bln in 9-Month Aggressions on Yemen

© Unknown
The Riyadh government's invasion of Yemen has cost the kingdom tens of billions of dollars and the lives of over 2,000 Saudi soldiers killed in combat with Yemeni army and popular forces over the past 9 months, a well-known source in the royal family disclosed on Friday.

"Saudi Arabia has spent over 200 billion Saudi rials (over $60 billion) for its aggression against Yemen in the past nine months," Mujtahid wrote in his latest tweets today.

Mujtahid is a Saudi political activist who is believed to be a member of or have a well-connected source in the royal family.

He noted that the Saudi army has lost over 2,000 Saudi soldiers in the war with Yemen, while over 4,850 more have been wounded.

"The daily cost of the war for Saudi Arabia is 750 million Saudi rials (over $200 million) which is spent on purchasing bullets and for logistics," Mujtahid said.

Since March, the Saudis have led a bombing campaign in Yemen killing thousands of civilians on the pretext of targeting the revolutionary forces.

Human Rights Watch has said Saudi "airstrikes have indiscriminately killed and injured civilians" in the Yemeni capital of Sana'a and elsewhere.

In November, the US State Department approved the sale of $1.29 billion in smart bombs to Saudi Arabia, despite reports that the kingdom has killed and injured civilians in airstrikes against rebels in Yemen.

The Pentagon's Defense Security Cooperation Agency (DSCA), which facilitates foreign arms sales, notified lawmakers on November 13 that the sale had been approved.

The approval cleared the way for the sale to go through - that is, unless lawmakers block it in the next 30 days, which is a rare move.

The sale included 22,000 smart and general purpose bombs, including 1,000 GBU-10 Paveway II Laser Guided Bombs, and more than 5,000 Joint Direct Attack Munitions kits to turn older bombs into precision-guided weapons using GPS signals.

The bombs are in part intended to replenish Saudi inventories that have been depleted by its air operations against the Yemeni civilians.

Saudi Arabia has been striking Yemen for 254 days now to restore power to fugitive president Mansour Hadi, a close ally of Riyadh. The Saudi-led aggression has so far killed at least 7,116 Yemenis, including hundreds of women and children.

Hadi stepped down in January and refused to reconsider the decision despite calls by Ansarullah revolutionaries of the Houthi movement.

Despite Riyadh's claims that it is bombing the positions of the Ansarullah fighters, Saudi warplanes are flattening residential areas and civilian infrastructures.

Comment: See also: Saudi Arabia to head UN Human Rights council

Saudi Warplanes Drop Cluster Bombs on Own Soil to Prevent Yemeni Forces' Advances


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/5/2015 11:18:33 PM

Syrian state media says British airstrikes are illegal

Published time: 3 Dec, 2015 17:18

RAF Tornados fly above RAF Akrotiri in southern Cyprus December 3, 2015. © Darren Staples / Reuters

Syrian state media outlets claim the British parliament’s decision to extend airstrikes against Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) from Iraq into Syria is in contravention of international law.

The claims come a day after MPs voted to bomb targets within the war-torn country and hours after the first sorties hit an oilfield in the east of the country.

The Independent reported that the Al-Baath newspaper – which reportedly answers to President Bashar Assad’s own party – said Prime Minister David Cameron was running a “PR campaign” in support of a “US-led show in violation of the UN charter.

Al-Thawra, another official newspaper, said Cameron and the House of Commons vaulted “over international legitimacy as usual.

British politics is still reeling from the decision in parliament last night to extend airstrikes to Syria.

Defence Secretary Michael Fallon claimed on Thursday that RAF bombing raids against IS in Syria have dealt “a real blow” to the financing of the terror group.

Analysis indicates “the strikes were successful,” the Ministry of Defence (MoD) claimed.

Fallon told the BBC he had approved the targets before the House of Commons vote on Wednesday evening, and gave permission for the raids to go ahead once MPs had rubberstamped extending airstrikes.

He added that airstrikes against extremists are likely to continue for years.

This is not going to be quick,” he said.


(RT)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/5/2015 11:24:34 PM
X

Iraqi PM to US: Sending foreign combat troops will be considered a hostile act, will respond accordingly

© Kirill Kudryavtsev / Reuters
Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi
Iraq has not requested that any country send ground troops into its territory and will regard any such move as a "hostile act," the country's prime minister, Haider Al-Abadi, said in view of a US decision to deploy special forces in the country. Iraq "will consider any country sending ground combat forces a hostile act and will deal with it on this basis," Al-Abadi said in a statementpublished by the prime minister's office on Thursday, adding that "the Iraqi government is committed to not allowing the presence of any ground force on the land of Iraq."

"The Iraqi government confirms its firm and categorical rejection of any action of this kind issued by any country [that] violates our [Iraq's] national sovereignty,"Al-Abadi also said in the statement.

Baghdad "did not request any side... to send ground forces to Iraq," he added, thus refuting reports that the Iraqi government had called for deployment of foreign troops to help Iraqi forces fight Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS?ISIL). Iraq does not need any foreign forces from any state or international coalition, it only needs weapons, ammunition and training from its partners and allies in the fight against IS, the prime minister's statement says.

Al-Abadi's statement comes after the US announced plans to dispatch special forces to Iraq to fight Islamic State, both in Iraq and northern Syria. On November 24, a US Combined Joint Task Force spokesman, Colonel Steve Warren, said that about 100 Expeditionary Targeting Force personnel would be sent to Iraq with some US senators proposing tripling that number, AFP reports.

Even though US President Barack Obama had repeatedly claimed that there would be no US "boots on the ground," he eventually approved the deployment of Special Forces against IS. It is still unclear how the Iraqi prime minister's statement will affect US deployment plans, with US officials yet to comment.

In October, Iraq's ruling coalition calling on the prime minister to request Russian air support in the fight against IS, criticizing the actions of the US-led coalition in Iraq.
"The largest bloc has sent a request to the prime minister to add further forces to the fight against terrorism and not only to rely on the United States and the international coalition, which has up till now been rather shy in its efforts to destroy [Islamic State] bases in Iraq," Saad Al-Matlabi, a member of the country's State of Law Coalition, told RT at that time.

"The public mood is definitely in favor of Russian involvement because it has been over a year and a half now and ISIS has flourished in Iraq under the American airstrikes. One could question the honesty and integrity of the US airstrikes," the Iraqi politician added, stressing that Russian strikes in Syria "have proved quite efficient in destroying [Islamic State] bases ..."
In earlier statements, Al-Abadi also claimed he would "welcome" Russian air support. "If we get the offer, we'll consider it. In actual fact, I would welcome it," he said in an interview with France-24 TV on October 1, referring to potential Russian air strikes against IS on Iraqi territory.

Al-Abadi also accused the US-led coalition of a lack of support in that interview and also questioned the will of the West to defeat Islamic State.

Comment: Iraq is making it perfectly clear to the US that their terrorist-sympathizing ground troops are being recognized for exactly who they are.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
12/5/2015 11:39:04 PM
Arrow Down

Hypocrisy: US demands Russia lift sanctions against Turkey.....While praising its own anti-Russian sanctions

© red-odysseus.livejournal.com
I've long been accustomed to US double standards, but I can't remember when this happened on the same day and by the same agency, "the State Department".
"The coordinator of the US State Department for sanctions Daniel Fried said the United States and the European Union should keep the anti-Russian sanctions in force to ensure the fulfillment of the Minsk agreements on the Ukraine", reports Russian international news agency RIA Novosti.
On the other hand, it says the United States wants Russia to withdraw its trade restrictions against Turkey: "We would like to see the end of measures causing collateral damage - trade embargoes and so on".

US impudence is surprising for its frankness. Not only is it a one-sided interpretation and erroneous assessment of the facts.Depending on which countries are involved, with no shame, white is called black and black is called white. International law is close to being trampled in the dust, removing the obligation to couch distortions of reality in more or less truthful terms.

When international law gives way to "might makes right", if a country wants to remain independent, it must be strong, not just militarily or economically, but ideologically. Is Russia ready?

The author is a popular Russian blogger covering international affairs. In this emotional post he vents his outrage at US double standards, which depend on whether a country is regarded friend or foe. Originally appeared at his blog.

Translated by Svetlana Kyrzhaly and Rhod Mackenzie.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1