Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/23/2015 4:16:36 PM

Russia pledges counter measures if U.S. upgrades nuclear arms in Germany

Reuters


Russian President Vladimir Putin arrives to deliver his speech during an opening ceremony of the MAKS International Aviation and Space Salon in Zhukovsky, outside Moscow, Russia, August 25, 2015. REUTERS/Maxim Shemetov

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia would be forced to take counter measures to restore the balance of power in Europe if media reports that the United States plans to upgrade its nuclear presence in Germany are true, President Vladimir Putin's spokesman said on Wednesday.

The spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, was commenting after Germany's ZDF TV Channel reported that the United States intended to place 20 B61-12 nuclear bombs at the Büchel Air Base later this year.

"This could alter the balance of power in Europe," Peskov told reporters. "And without doubt it would demand that Russia take necessary counter measures to restore the strategic balance and parity."

(Reporting by Masha Tsvetkova and Katya Golubkova; Editing by Andrew Osborn)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/23/2015 4:31:56 PM

Pentagon Plans To Go To War With Russia


Posted date:



The United States is preparing for a potential war with Russia by revising its contingency plans for the first time since the end of the Cold War, according to U.S. officials.

Russia US Barack Obama Vladimir Putin

Image Source: Wikimedia Commons

The Pentagon is going through re-evaluation of its Cold War era-old military plans amid deteriorating relations between Russia and the U.S. after Moscow has taken sudden interest in Syria earlier this month.

The U.S. Defense Department feels the need to update the plans to respond to any potential aggression against any NATO allies given “the actions of Russia,” according to one senior Pentagon official familiar with the updated plans.

Moreover, Russian President Vladimir Putin is “no longer a potential partner, but a potential threat,” another Pentagon official told the Foreign Policy magazine, warning of “potential (Russian) aggression against” the U.S. and itsNATO allies.

The reason for such major changes in Pentagon’s war plans against Russia lies in the fact that the U.S. found its current plans “pretty out of date” following Russia’s invasion of eastern Ukraine, as explained by Michèle Flournoy, a former undersecretary of defense for policy and co-founder of the Center for a New American Security.

Therefore, Washington is going to make a shift away from its post-Cold War military policy and focus on Russia’s current threats and aggression. The policy shift comes just weeks after Russia has suddenly got itself involved in Syrian Civil War by sending its artillery and seven T-90 tanks to an airfield in the Syrian province of Latakia.

Moreover, there have been reports of at least four Russian jets spotted at a Syrian airfield, including military ones.

Pentagon updates nuclear war plans against Russia

The Pentagon is also revising its hybrid warfare strategies and tactics, including nuclear strikes.

“As you look at published Russian doctrine, I do believe people are thinking about use of tactical nuclear weapons in a way that hadn’t been thought about for many years,” said a senior official who spoke with the Foreign Policy magazine on the condition of anonymity.

U.S. military plans are divided into two versions. One outlines U.S. actions, as a NATO member, in case Russia attacks one of NATO’s members, while the other version describes U.S. plans for war against Russia outside the Alliance.

Both versions are based on Russian aggression in the Baltic states, including fighting against Russia’s hybrid tactics, non-traditional warfare as well as cyberwar.

Russia’s recent actions in Syria have significantly escalated tensions between Washington and Moscow. It must be noted that even before Russia’s threatening actions in Syria earlier this month, the relations between the U.S. and Russia had already been at its worst since the end of the Cold War.

In September, the Kremlin has been increasing its military presence in Syria, supporting the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, while the U.S. wants his government removed from power.

Only Russia can destroy the U.S.

In June this year, Putin denounced U.S. “scaremongering,” saying that the U.S. is a global empire of military bases, and adding that Russia has “virtually no bases abroad.”

The ones Russia has are outdated Soviet-era relics. “I think that only an insane person and only in a dream can imagine that Russia would suddenly attack NATO,” Putin told journalists.

ValueWalk reported earlier this month that Russia is the only country in the world capable of destroying the U.S., according to U.S. Ambassador Linton Brooks.

Russia “outnumbers all U.S. and NATO troops combined 2 – 1 in terms of manpower. We are unable to defend the Baltics,” according to a former Pentagon official and current Rand Corp. strategist, David Ochmanek, as reported by the Foreign Policy magazine.

U.S. vs Russia: who will destroy whom?

However, is Ochmanek’s claim true? First of all, the advantage of the U.S. is that Russia is effectively surrounded by NATO military bases. According to the Pentagon’s estimations, the U.S. has 598 military objects stationed in 40 countries around the world as well as 4,461 bases on U.S. soil.

Russia only has a naval facility located in the port of the city of Tartus, which is in Syria, where Russia has been boosting its military presence recently. Apart from that, Russia has no more military bases outside former USSR states.

Russia has about 845,000 active-duty troops and nearly 2.5 million more in reserve, while the U.S. army accounts for about 1,400,000 active-duty troops and 850,000 more in reserve.

However, it must be noted that the U.S. would not be able to deploy all of the forces to Russia, as it would have to maintain its 598 military bases stationed around the world as well as protect U.S. soil.

NATO, for its part, has 13,000 ready-to-go troops and thousands more in reserve.

U.S. vs Russia: Nuclear capabilities

Even though there is a mutual nuclear disarmament since the end of the Cold War, Moscow and Washington still own about a thousand ready-to-go nuclear warheads each. It was reported in 2014 that the entire stockpile of U.S. intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) – about 448 active warheads – are aimed mainly against Russia.

The U.S. possesses 1,597 strategic nuclear warheads deployed on 785 ICBMs, SLBMs, and strategic bombers, according to the March 2015 New START numbers.

The U.S. possessed as many as 4,717 active nuclear warheads as of September 30, 2014, according to the U.S. State Department. Other warheads are retired and are awaiting dismantlement.

Russia, for its part, has 1,582 strategic warheads deployed on 515 ICBMs, SLBMs, and strategic bombers, according to the March 2015 New START numbers. On top of that, Russia has additional 3,200 that are awaiting dismantlement.

U.S. vs Russia war could begin today or tomorrow

In August, ValueWalk reported that analysts at the European Leadership Network think tank analyzed Russia’s large-scale military exercises that took place in March as well as NATO’s smaller military drills in June.

The analysis concluded that both sides were holding the drills with the other side’s military capabilities and war plans in mind. However, the “nature and scale” of the drills showed that “Russia is actively preparing for a conflict with NATO, and NATO is preparing for a possible confrontation with Russia.”

ValueWalk also reported that some military experts a high probability of the beginning of a large-scale war between the U.S. and Russia following an encounter between warplanes over the Baltics or the North Sea during military drills.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/23/2015 4:40:24 PM

Deeply-divided EU to hold emergency summit on migrant crisis

Associated Press

European Council President Donald Tusk addresses the media as he arrives for an emergency EU heads of state summit on migration at the EU Council building in Brussels, Wednesday, Sept. 23, 2015. The European Union hopes to provide more funds for refugees and agree short and long term measures to confront the migration crisis. (AP Photo/Martin Meissner)


BRUSSELS (AP) — European Union President Donald Tusk urged divided EU nations to set aside their differences and work together to secure the bloc's borders as Europe struggles with its biggest refugee emergency in decades.

Around half a million people have fled to Europe so far this year in search of sanctuary or jobs. As numbers swell, nations have tightened border security. Hungary has a razor-wire fence along its border with Serbia.

Countries in eastern Europe with little recent experience of migration are trading barbs over who is to blame, while Balkans neighbors Serbia and Croatia — who were at war in the early 1990s — issued threats and ultimatums.

"We must prepare a concrete plan, which must finally appear in place of the arguments and the chaos we have witnessed in the last weeks," Tusk told reporters before chairing the summit.

"The most urgent question we should ask ourselves tonight is how to regain control of our external borders. Otherwise it does not make sense to even speak of a common European migration policy," he said.

As the leaders headed to Brussels, a further 5,000 migrants were converging on the Austrian border with Hungary, police said.

Serbia, meanwhile, gave EU member Croatia an ultimatum to reopen its border for all cargo transport by midnight Wednesday or face unspecified retaliation.

Among the outstanding issues that Tusk, the summit's official host, wants addressed is increasing assistance to EU member nations that are receiving the brunt of the migrant influx, and improving cooperation with non-EU countries in the Balkans and Turkey, which is now home to almost 2 million migrants - many of whom have fled Syria's civil war.

Tusk, who recently visited the Middle East, also wants to discuss diplomatic efforts to end the Syria conflict.

The EU president said one issue requires urgent attention: increasing contributions to the U.N.'s World Food Program to help it provide critically-needed food supplies to 11 million people in Syria and the region.

Arriving for the summit, Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte said that would help prevent people feeling "almost forced to come to Europe because there is too little food."

On Tuesday, the 28-nation EU took a modest step toward dealing with the issue by agreeing to relocate 120,000 asylum-seekers to ease the strain on Greece and Italy, which are on the front line of the migrant flood. But the decision bared the wide divisions that Europe's greatest refugee crisis since World War II has spawned, with the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania and Hungary voting against it.

Even after the EU plan was adopted, Czech Prime Minister Bohuslav Sobotka denounced it as a "bad decision." On Wednesday, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico said his country will try to block the deal in an EU court.

"We won't implement this decision because we think it can't work," Fico also said.

The man who chaired Tuesday's meeting, Luxembourg Foreign Minister Jean Asselborn, said the figures were "accepted by the member states on a voluntary basis," but the European Commission signaled that the dispute is far from over.

"A decision is a decision regardless of the way you voted," its vice president, Frans Timmermans, said Wednesday. "The decision is legal, it's valid and it binds all member states."

Tusk said he recognized EU countries have "different experiences and perceptions" and that there are "no easy solutions." But he said the bloc must reach agreement on a comprehensive strategy and sound migration policy to deal with a challenge that he said will last for years. The crisis, he said, is a test of Europe's "humanity and responsibility."

"The current 'migration policy' is a sum of despair of the victims fleeing war and persecution, of their determination in searching for a better life, of the cynicism of the smugglers, and too often, of the refugees' and migrants' tragic fate," Tusk said.

Before the summit, the European Commission's top official in charge of relations with the bloc's neighbors said that he hoped that 1 billion euros ($1.12 billion) could be drummed up for a "trust fund" to help Syrian refugees.

The official, Johannes Hahn, also said that the European Commission is in discussions with Turkey about freeing up some of the funds earmarked for that country's EU membership process to use for dealing with the refugee influx there.

"We could raise up to 1 billion euros over the next two years for Turkey," he said.

___

Associated Press writers Mike Corder in Brussels and Karel Janicek in Prague contributed to this report.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/23/2015 5:58:12 PM

Company Will Lower Drug Price After Critics Called 4,000% Hike 'Unjustifiable'

Good Morning America



The CEO of a pharmaceutical company, which increased the price of a drug used for parasite infections by more than 4,000 percent, said the company would substantially lower the price.

Martin Shkreli, the CEO of Turing Pharmaceuticals, told ABC News they will lower the price days after making headlines and getting complaints from medical groups and others online.

“We’ve agreed to lower the price on Daraprim to a point that is more affordable and is able to allow the company to make a profit, but a very small profit,” he told ABC News. “We think these changes will be welcomed.”

The drug called Daraprim is used to treat parasitic infections that most often occur in those with compromised immune systems due to cancer treatments or HIV infection, and it was sold for $18 per tablet before production rights were acquired by Turing Pharmaceuticals. The company is currently selling the medication for $750 per tablet -- an increase of more than 4,000 percent.

Shkreli and Turing Pharmaceuticals made headlines this week due to the price increase leading to medical groups and others online complaining the company was making money on patients who need the medication.

In a statement released before Shkreli's announcement, the company said that it is aiming to create new medications to treat the disease in an effort to reduce side effects and that the higher price will help subsidize costs for developing new drugs.

"There have been no significant advances or research into this disease area in decades," the company said in a statement. "For toxoplasmosis and other critical, under-treated diseases, the status quo is not an option. Turing hopes to change that by targeting investments that both improve on the current formulation and seek to develop new therapeutics with better clinical profiles that we hope will help eradicate the disease."

The company also said that it would work with hospitals or patients on a case-by-case basis so that everyone can afford the medication. For privately insured patients, it said it would create a co-pay assistance program.In an interview with ABC News today Shkreli defended his company’s actions.

“I think they have a fundamental misunderstanding of the way pharmaceutical companies operate,” he told ABC News of critics. “At this price, Daraprim is not a substantially profitable drug.”

Prior to Shkreli’s announcement, medical groups wrote to the company expressing their worries with the current price. The Infectious Diseases Society of America and the HIV Medicine Association released a joint statement earlier this week calling the prices "unjustifiable.”

"Pyrimethamine (Daraprim) is currently part of the recommended first line treatment regimen for toxoplasmosis inHIV-infected patients and is a critical component of most of the alternative regimens," the groups said in the statement. "This cost is unjustifiable for the medically vulnerable patient population in need of this medication and unsustainable for the health care system."

Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease expert at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, said the disease can be acquired from cats and most often leads to symptoms in immunocompromised patients or pregnant women. It's a relatively rare disease that can be hard to treat and can cause swelling in the brain, he explained.

"It's different than average bacterial infection. It requires more prolonged therapy, in part because it's a parasite and they're harder to treat," Schaffner said. "Their bodies can't fight off this infection. We treat longer ... about 3 or 4 weeks."

Before Shkeil announced the company would lower the price, Schaffner said he was concerned doctors would look to use other drugs for treatment before starting Daraprim.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
9/23/2015 11:04:29 PM

Activist Group Says Pictures Show Moment Before Israeli Forces Shoot Dead Palestinian Woman


Activist Group Says Pictures Show Moment Before Israeli Forces Shoot Dead Palestinian Woman


A Palestinian activist group released photographs on Wednesday that they say show the moment before a Palestinian woman is shot dead by Israeli forces at a checkpoint in the West Bank city of Hebron. The Israeli military says the shooting took place after the woman attempted to stab an Israeli soldier.

The Hebron-based Youth Against Settlements group, which advocates civil disobedience and non-violent measures to protest against the Israeli occupation in the West Bank, published the photographs, which they say show Hadeel al-Hashlamon, 19, standing before an Israeli soldier who appears to be pointing his gun at her. A black bag can be seen in the images but no knife is visible.

The Israeli military confirmed to Newsweek in a statement that its personnel had shot a female Palestinian on Tuesday in Hebron. Shoham Ruvio, spokesperson for Jerusalem's Shaare Zedek Medical Center, the Israeli hospital to which Hashlamon was transported after the shooting, confirmed to The New York Times that the Palestinian teenager had died as a result of her wounds on Tuesday.

View gallery

.
IDF Israel Hebron Middle East

The shooting prompted clashes between Palestinian residents of Hebron and Israeli forces, with Palestinians throwing rocks and Israeli forces responding with tear gas.

Issa Amro, founder of the Youth Against Settlements group, told Newsweek that a local volunteer who was at the scene took the photographs. Amro said the photographer did not want to be named out of fear for his safety.

The Israeli military sent Newsweek a photograph from the scene showing a knife they say belonged to Hashlamon. Activists in the city say the young woman did not have a knife on her person and accused the Israeli military of planting the weapon.

Video footage released by PalMedia, a Palestinian media center, purported to show Hashlamon lying in the street after the incident while Israeli soldiers stand around her. She was later taken to an Israeli hospital.

An IDF official told Newsweek: "From the preliminary review regarding this morning's incident in Hebron, the perpetrator approached the checkpoint and the metal detector was activated, alerting the troops suspicion. Forces at the scene asked the perpetrator to stop, at which point she approached the forces, disregarding the instructions and raising further suspicion.

View gallery

.
Hebron IDF Middle East

"Forces called for her to halt, which she ignored, and she continued moving while also pulling out a knife," the official said. "At this point, forces fired at the ground, then at her lower extremities in attempts to stop her advancement. The perpetrator continued and at this point, recognizing a clear and present danger to their safety, the forces fired towards her."

Amro disputed the Israeli account. "Soldiers shoot Palestinians and the army spokespersons cover what their soldiers do," he said speaking from Hebron via telephone. "This morning I went to the place where she was shot. I found five bullet holes in the ground where her body was. She was shot even when she was down. How can a soldier defend himself by shooting a woman again who was wounded and had fallen down?"

The New York Times quoted a European activist who said he had witnessed the incident and spoke on the condition of anonymity because his employers do not permit him to talk to reporters as saying that a soldier had asked the teenager to open her bag for inspection and when she did he shouted and then shot her.

"When she was opening at her bag, he began shouting: 'Stop! Stop! Stop! Don't move! Don't move!'" the activist told the newspaper. "She was trying to show him what was inside her bag, but the soldier shot her once, and then shot her again." The activist added that three or four other soldiers ran to the scene and also fired.

Hebron, the West Bank's largest city, is a hotspot for tensions between Palestinians and Jewish Israelis. Jews consider it home to the second-holiest site in Judaism, the Tombs of the Patriarchs. Muslims consider the city the fourth-holiest in Islam.

After the city was occupied by Israel following the 1967 Six Day War, religious Jewish settlers established outposts there and are now protected by approximately 2,000 soldiers.

In order to protect the settlers, Israeli security forces have gradually instituted a policy of physical separation in Hebron. The movement of Palestinians is restricted by a network of checkpoints.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1