Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/24/2015 4:38:05 PM

Thank you Myrna. Actually it is no surprise at this point, is it.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Myrna Ferguson

6311
16559 Posts
16559
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/24/2015 4:43:18 PM
Hi Miguel

I was kind of surprised when I saw it because it was only around 9:30 when I got it. So things are going down hill fast. Hey isn't this what we have been waiting for.

I think of Jill, how she was waiting for this. Some days I just feel like I need to talk to her, I sure do miss that lady.
LOVE IS THE ANSWER
+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/24/2015 4:48:43 PM



A beekeeper in a field of rapeseed some 145 miles west of Bucharest, Romania
REUTERS/Radu Sigheti

JOHNNY NEONIC

Study finds a link between neonic pesticides and honeybee deaths


A new study, published on Thursday, shows a correlation between honeybee colony deaths and neonicotinoid pesticide usage in the United Kingdom.

Neonicotinoids generally come as a seed coating. When the seed sprouts, it takes in the pesticide, which then protects it against predators. But if that plant flowers, small amounts of the pesticide will linger in the pollen and nectar, which may hurt the beneficial insects, like bees, visiting those blooms to feed.

There’s some controversy about this: Scientists have found some indications that the neonics are hurting wild honeybees, but not domestic honeybees. As Maj Rundlöf, the lead author of one of those studies, told Nature: “This doesn’t mean that there aren’t any negative effects on honeybees, but so far I don’t see any evidence from field studies supporting that.”

Well, now there is a field study supporting that. This new study found a concerning association with just one neonic, imidacloprid, and the authors wrote that we shouldn’t extrapolate to others. But still, this is the first large-scale field study to suggest a link between domestic bee troubles and a neonic.

It’s always been clear that neonics are bad for bees in sufficient quantities. After all, they kill insects, and bees are insects. But before now, there wasn’t good evidence that the small amounts of neonics that hives were getting exposed to in real world situations were having a noticeable effect. That’s why this study matters.

“It is shown that the incidence of bee colony failure is higher in areas in which neonicotinoids are used more intensively. This provides important field evidence confirming earlier results of negative bee impacts in controlled studies,” Felix Wäckers, a professor at the Lancaster Environment Center, Lancaster University,told the Science Media Center.

But this study doesn’t exactly present a smoking gun. “The data on regional imidacloprid use and honeybee colony loss shows at best a weak positive relationship,” Nick Birch, entomologist and integrated pest management expert at the James Hutton Institute, told the Science Media Center.

The case against neonics is often inflated beyond all reason to suggest that they are the single most important cause of the bee-health problems (almost certainly not), or that they might threaten bees with extinction (no way).

But even if we dispense with the hyperbole, there’s still reason to worry about these chemicals. While some pesticides target their pests very specifically, neonics kill a lot of things. And neonics stick around in the environment: The U.S. Geological Survey just published a paper showing that it had found neonics in 53 percent of the water samples taken from a nationwide survey for streams. Add in this new evidence correlating imidacloprid with beehive problems, and the case for a cautionary approach now looks very persuasive.


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/24/2015 5:38:43 PM
Stock markets in Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and Qatar crashed




The Tadawul All-Shares Index in Riyadh, the Gulf's leading stock market, shed 549.51 points, or 6.86%, on Sunday
© AFP/File Fayez Nureldine

Stock prices in Gulf states nosedived on Sunday in a massive market sell-off sparked by descending oil prices, with the Saudi and Dubai bourses leading the slide.

The Tadawul All-Shares Index in Riyadh, the Gulf's leading market, shed 549.51 points, or 6.86%, to close at 7,463.32 points.

The kingdom's all-important petrochemicals industry lost 7.94%, while the real-estate sector tumbled 9.50%.

In Dubai, the leading DFM Index slumped 6.96% to close at 3,451.48 points.

Real-estate developer Emaar Properties lost 8.31% while builder Arabtec Construction, another market leader, dropped 9.6%, nearing its 10% daily limit.

The Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange plunged 5%, while Qatar Exchange, the second largest in the Gulf, lost almost 5.3%.

The Kuwait Stock Exchange shed 2.36%, while Muscat Securities Market and Bahrain lost 2.94% and 0.37%, respectively.

The falls across the region come after oil prices slid to new lows during trade Friday, with New York's light sweet crude plunging to $40.04 per barrel, the lowest level since March 2009.

World stock markets were also hammered with heavy losses on Friday, as China's economic woes triggered European and Wall Street equity sell-offs and stirred up fears for global growth.



Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/afp-gulf-stocks-plummet-as-oil-prices-plunge-2015-8#ixzz3jksOGZJR

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/24/2015 5:49:31 PM
Colorado court declares business owners have no First Amendment rights and must support gay marriage

Sunday, August 23, 2015 by: J. D. Heyes




(NaturalNews) The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution both recognizes and establishes some of the most basic of our rights, including the right to speak freely, to assemble in protest, to maintain a free and open press and to worship any deity we choose (or none at all).


But in modern times, it has become clear that some rights are being elevated over others – that some rights are being considered more important, more weighty, when it comes to interpretations by judges who seem more interested in adhering to a political ideology rather than our founding principles.

That is the only way one can interpret a recent decision by the Colorado Court of Appeals, which recently sided with a gay couple over the Christian religious and free speech rights of a store owner.

As reported by CBS Denver, the couple, Charlie Craig and David Mullins, had sued Jack Phillips of Lakewood – owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop – for refusing to bake them a wedding cake. In his 2012 refusal, Phillips cited his religious beliefs, noting that the Christian religion does not sanction homosexuality, let alone same-sex marriage. He therefore chose not to craft a cake with a message in support of gay marriage, in accordance with his religious beliefs and his right to free speech.

Mullins and Craig, who had actually married in Massachusetts, planned to celebrate their wedding in Colorado.

Courts choose 14th Amendment over 1st Amendment

A previous CBS Denver report from July noted that both parties made compelling arguments in court:

Masterpiece Cakeshop owner Jack Phillips says he's not opposed to making cakes for gay couples such as birthday cakes, holiday cakes and graduation cakes. It's cakes for gay marriages he says he can't do based on his religious beliefs.

But the American Civil Liberties Union of Colorado says if he's going to open a business to the public he has to make all services available to everyone in the public.


"We still have rights as American citizens to our faith and free speech rights," Phillips had argued.

Nevertheless, a lower state court ruled in favor of the couple after they decided to sue based on a state statute that prevents businesses from discriminating based on sexual orientation (even though he would not have crafted such a cake for persons of other sexual orientations either). And in August, so, too, did the appeals court.

"We feel like the court today affirmed the argument that we have been making that the treatment we received at Masterpiece Cakeshop was both illegal and wrong," Mullins said after the ruling, as quoted by CBS Denver.

"The court basically validated what we've been fighting this whole time," Craig added.

Phillips had said he was not opposed to making cakes for gay couples for other occasions such as birthdays, holiday and graduations – but that because of his religious faith he had to draw a line at same-sex wedding cakes.

The Colorado ACLU disagreed.

"When a business opens its doors to the public it can't discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, on the basis of race," Mark Silverstein with the ACLU said after the ruling. "It can't pick and choose customers based on who they are."

"I think that the ruling is wrong ... the constitution guarantees me the right to practice my faith, my religion, anywhere, anytime; there are no restrictions on it," Phillips said. "It also gives me the right to free speech, anytime, anywhere. I don't surrender those rights when I open my doors."

So, when do religious freedoms matter?

Now, the baker will face fines if he refuses to make wedding cakes for gay couples. However, after the state ordered him to do so, he stopped making wedding cakes for anyone – a decision, he says, that has cost him some 40 percent of his business.

"Ton of support, most people are in agreement with us that a business and an American citizen should have the right to what they want to make and what they don't want to make," Phillips said.

But that's not how courts are seeing it. Instead, judges on the state and federal level, and a majority of justices on the U.S. Supreme Court, are increasingly putting more stock in state anti-discrimination statutes and the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause than they are to the First Amendment's religious freedom provision.

[N.B.: The Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause reads, "No state shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." How this can be misconstrued as requiring business owners to support same-sex marriage is anyone's guess.]

In a way, then, the courts are discriminating against Christians when they say their religious objections to same-sex marriage have no merit – the same way the state of California did recently when lawmakers passed a measure banning religious objections as a reason for parents to opt their children out of being vaccinated.

Certainly, fighting discrimination is a worthy pursuit, but is it the most important thing? When do religious rights, if not the right to free speech, have merit? This chasm will only widen with time.

Sources:

http://denver.cbslocal.com

http://www.naturalnews.com

http://www.aclusd.org



Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/050892_First_Amendment_rights_gay_wedding_cake_Colorado_court.html#ixzz3jkv6WZfp


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+1