Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/21/2012 9:54:19 PM

Russia warns West on Syria after Obama threats


MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov warned the West on Tuesday against any unilateral action on Syria after President Barack Obama said U.S. forces could act if the Syrian leader deployed chemical weapons against rebels trying to topple him.

Russia and China have opposed military intervention in Syria throughout 17 months of bloodshed and have vetoed three U.N. Security Council resolutions backed by Western and Arab states that would have raised pressure on Damascus to end violence.

Lavrov spoke at a meeting with China's top diplomat one day after Obama, in some of his strongest language yet, said U.S. forces could move against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad if he resorted to chemical weapons against insurgents.

Russia and China base their diplomatic cooperation on "the need to strictly adhere to the norms of international law and the principles contained in the U.N. Charter, and not to allow their violation", Lavrov said at a meeting with Chinese State Councillor Dai Bingguo.

"I think this is the only correct path in today's conditions," Lavrov told Dai, who also met President Vladimir Putin and his top security adviser, Nikolai Patrushev, on Monday for consultations went unannounced by the Kremlin.

Lavrov's remarks underscored Moscow's wish to keep international efforts to end Syria's crisis within the United Nations, where Russia and China wield clout as two of the five permanent Security Council members with veto power.

Frustrated by the vetoes and by the refusal of Russia and China to join calls for Assad to leave power, the United States and other Western and Arab countries are seeking other ways to exert influence on the situation in Syria.

NO LIBYA REPEAT

Obama said on Monday he had refrained "at this point" from ordering military engagement in Syria. But when asked whether he might deploy forces, for example to secure Syrian chemical and biological weapons, he said his view could change.

Russia has also expressed concern about Syria chemical weapons, saying it had told Damascus that even the threat to use them was unacceptable.

But Lavrov said on Monday that the Security Council alone could authorize the use of external force against Syria, warning against imposing "democracy by bombs".

Russian leaders have said they are determined to avoid a repeat of what occurred in 2011 in Libya, when Moscow let NATO military operations go ahead by abstaining from Security Council resolution that authorized air operations.

Russian officials then accused the United States and its allies of overstepping their mandate and using it to help rebels overthrow longtime leader Muammar Gaddafi. Putin, prime minister then but now back in official charge of foreign policy, likened the U.N. resolution to "medieval calls for crusades".

Russia denies that it is propping up Assad and says it would accept his exit in a political transition decided by the Syrian people, but that his departure must not be a precondition and he must not be pushed out by external forces.

Putin, who has faced frequent U.S. and European criticism over his treatment of dissent, has made opposition to foreign intervention in sovereign states on human rights grounds a central plank of his foreign policy in his new presidency.

China has issued similar warnings to the West.

In remarks at the start of his otherwise private meeting with Dai and other officials, Lavrov said the opportunity to discuss coordination on global affairs was "very, very timely".

Dai, speaking through an interpreter, said he was in Russia for "consultations on strategic security" and had had a "very good, friendly and important meeting" with Putin.

A Syrian delegation led by Qadri Jamil, deputy prime minister for economic affairs, was also in Moscow on Tuesday and was expected to meet Foreign Ministry officials. It was Jamil's second visit this month.

(Additional reporting by Nikolai Isayev; Editing by Gabriela Baczynska and Mark Heinrich)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/21/2012 9:59:10 PM

Iran unveils new missile, other weapons


DUBAI (Reuters) - Iran unveiled upgrades to six weapons on Tuesday, including a more accurate short-range missile and a more powerful naval engine, Iranian media reported, in what seemed to be its latest response to international pressure over its nuclear program.

The hardware was presented at a ceremony marking Defence Industry Day and attended by President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Defence Minister Ahmad Vahidi.

Israel has said it is considering air strikes on Iran's nuclear sites if the Islamic Republic does not resolve Western fears it is developing the means to produce atomic weapons, something the Islamic Republic denies.

Iran says it could hit Israel and U.S. bases in the region if it comes under attack.

It has also threatened to block the Strait of Hormuz, the neck of the Gulf through which 40 percent of the world's sea-borne oil exports pass. Such a move would probably invite a military response from the United States.

Ahmadinejad said on Tuesday that Iran's military advances are purely for defensive purposes and should not be taken as a threat, but said they would dissuade world powers from imposing their will on Iran.

"Defensive advances are meant to defend human integrity, and are not meant to be offensive moves toward others," Ahmadinejad said, according to Mehr news agency.

"I have no doubt that our defensive capabilities can stand up to bullying and put a halt to their plans."

The United States has also not ruled out military action against Iran but says the priority of world powers remains the use of diplomacy and sanctions to rein in its nuclear activity.

Among the upgrades was a fourth generation of the Fateh-110 missile, which boasts a range of about 300 km (180 miles).

Iran said earlier this month that it had successfully test-fired the new model and that it was equipped with a more accurate guidance system.

"This missile is one of the most precise and advanced land-to-land ballistic missiles using solid fuel," Vahidi was quoted as saying by Fars news agency. "In the last decade it has had a significant role in promoting the Islamic Republic of Iran's defence capabilities."

In July, Iran said it had successfully test-fired medium-range missiles capable of hitting Israel, and tested dozens of missiles aimed at simulated air bases.

It also presented a more powerful, 5,000-horsepower sea-borne engine, the Bonyan-4, Fars quoted Vahidi as saying. A previous version had 1,000 horsepower, the Iranian Students' News Agency (ISNA) said.

SCEPTICISM

Military experts have cast doubt on Iran's claims of weapons advances, especially its assertions about its missile program, saying Tehran often exaggerates its capabilities.

"The Fateh-110 has a crude guidance and control system that operates during the missile's ascent" rather than during final descent, said Michael Elleman, senior fellow for missile defence at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

"The Fateh-110 appears to lack the subsystems needed to effect terminal steering," he said in an email.

Iran also presented Armita, an "airborne laboratory" to help test aircraft launch systems and oxygen generation and train fighter pilots, Fars reported.

Vahidi said it was named after the daughter of Dariush Rezaeinejad, an Iranian scientist who was shot dead last year.

Iran believes agents working with foreign intelligence services including the American CIA and Israel's Mossad are behind the assassinations of several of its nuclear scientists.

(Reporting by Yeganeh Torbati; Editing by Mark Heinrich)

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/21/2012 10:06:34 PM
Aug 16, 2012 6:00am

Billionaires Soros, Paulson Bet Big on Gold


George Soros, founder of Soros Fund Management LLC, attends the Azim Premji University Public Lecture Series in Bangalore, India, Monday, Jan. 9, 2012. (Credit: Namas Bhojani/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Once again John Paulson is choosing to heavily invest in gold and fellow billionaire George Soros is making a similar bet.

According to Bloomberg News, Paulson & Co. and Soros Fund Management bumped up exposure to SPDR Gold Trust to 21.8 million shares and 884,000 shares, respectively. Paulson & Co. now has 44 percent of its $24 billionfund exposed to bullion.

On Wednesday, according to Reuters, gold began to rebound after two straight losing days with spot gold climbing to $1,604.35 an ounce, up 0.4 percent. According to CNBC, in the previous four months gold has had a difficult time moving beyond a $1,525 and $1,680 range.

Known for making big bets, between 2007 and early 2009, Paulson invested heavily in the housing market garnering $20 billion in profits, according to the Wall Street Journal.

A spokesperson for Paulson & Co. did not return our request for comment. Soros Fund Management did not return our request for comment.

The decision by Soros is an interesting one. In 2010, Soros called gold “the ultimate bubble” during an appearance on Reuters television. “It may be going higher but it’s certainly not safe and it’s not going to last forever,” he stated.

And, some portfolio managers aren’t so sure gold is a smart bet in 2012.

“I’m not sure gold as an outsized bet is the place to be right now unless you believe in hedging against greater unrest or a deepening credit crisis in Europe, ” said Kevin Starkey, a partner at Capstone Investment Financial Group.

” We currently believe that 3 to 5 percent of gold exposure is the right exposure for most of our clients. We are big believers in gold as defensive play. To make it an offensive play, or make a big bet on gold, means [Paulson] sees something we do not see,” Starkey added.

Peter Sorrentino, a senior portfolio manager at Huntington Funds, which manages more than $13 billion in assets, said consumers should not rush out and buy gold.

“Historically these moves span roughly a decade and while the last phase is typically the most explosive, the risk is getting out before it rolls over. For individual investors buying physical gold involves paying sales tax both in and out as well as considerations for storage, insurance, transportation and assay fees. These can be considerable expenses,” Sorrentino said in statement to ABC News.

Sorrentino said gold has been in a “consolidation phase since the end of February and has traditionally moved higher after such periods.”

He continued, “the fundamentals behind gold such as available supply coming to market and end demand have not changed in any material way. In fact, gold purchase by central banks in the pacific rim, India and Russia have reached new highs. So from an investor psychology and supply/demand perspective, this looks like every cycle before it during the last decade.”

“The big question is whether or not this time it’s different. Every commodity-driven cycle ultimately comes to an end, and ten years is generally the average duration for these market moves,” said Sorrentino.

But, despite big bets by two of the nation’s billionaires, he continued, “…There is an old saying among Wall Street trader; ’It’s said with a whisper and not with a shout, when the widows and orphans get in, it’s time to get out.’”

Gold exchange-traded fund holdings topped 77.7 million troy ounces this week to another record high. ETFs are investment funds traded on stock exchanges, much like stocks. Many of them have low management costs and there is not the need to take physical possession of the gold.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/21/2012 10:09:48 PM

Democracy falling prey to big money

Updated 10:16 p.m., Friday, August 10, 2012

Who's buying our democracy? Wall Street financiers, the Koch brothers, and casino magnates Sheldon Adelson and Steve Wynn, among others. And they're doing much of it in secret.

It's a perfect storm - the combination of three waves that are about to drown government as we know it.

The first is the greatest concentration of wealth in America in more than a century. The 400 richest Americans are richer than the bottom 150 million Americans put together. The trend started 30 years ago, and it's related to globalization and technological changes that have stymied wage growth for most people. It's also a product of "trickle-down economics," the Reagan and Bush tax cuts and the steady decline in the bargaining power of organized labor.

The second is the wave of unlimited political contributions, courtesy of Republican-appointed Supreme Court Justices John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy. They were the majority in one of the worst decisions in Supreme Court history, Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, the 2010 ruling that held that corporations are people under the First Amendment.

Lower-court rulings have since expanded Citizens United to mean that virtually any billionaire can contribute as much to a political campaign as he wants.

The third is complete secrecy about who's contributing how much to whom. The failure of the Internal Revenue Service to properly enforce our tax laws has given rise to political fronts posing as charitable, nonprofit "social welfare" organizations that don't have to disclose their donors.

As a result, outfits like the Chamber of Commerce and Karl Rove's Crossroads GPS are taking in hundreds of millions from corporations that don't even tell their own shareholders what political payments they're making.

Separately, any one of these three would be bad enough. Put the three together, and our democracy is being sold down the drain.

With a more equitable and traditional distribution of wealth, far more Americans would have a fair chance of influencing politics. As the great jurist Louis Brandeis once said, "We can have a democracy or we can have great wealth in the hands of a comparative few, but we cannot have both."

Alternatively, inequality wouldn't be as much of a problem if we had strict laws limiting political spending - or, at the very least, laws requiring that the identities of big donors be disclosed.

But we have an almost unprecedented concentration of wealth and unlimited political spending and secrecy.

I'm not letting Democrats off the hook. Democratic candidates are still too dependent on Wall Street casino moguls and real casino magnates. (Wynn has been a major contributor to Nevada Democratic Sen. Harry Reid, for example.) George Soros and a few others have poured big bucks into Democratic coffers. So have a handful of trade unions.

But make no mistake: Compared with what the GOP is doing this year, Democrats are conducting a high school bake sale. The mega-selling of American democracy is a Republican invention, and Mitt Romney and the GOP are its major beneficiaries.

And the losers aren't just Democrats. They're the American people. Our democracy is the most precious thing we have, and we're allowing it to be bought and sold like oceanfront property.

What can you do? Make a ruckus.

Demand that the Obama administration get the Internal Revenue Service to do its job and not allow political front groups to pretend they're nonpolitical charities that don't have to disclose their donors.

Insist on legislation that forces the full disclosure of all campaign contributors. (Last month, Senate Republicans blocked the "Disclose Act," which would have gone some way toward achieving this.)

Support efforts to reverse Citizens United with an amendment to the Constitution making it clear that corporations are not people under the First Amendment.

Back legislation that would provide public financing to candidates who agree to strict limits on campaign donations - enough to erase any advantage their opponents might get from raising large sums from a few mega-donors.

Even if you disagree with one or more of these proposals, at least fight to protect our democracy from the big-money corruption it's now prey to.

Don't fall into the seductive trap of cynicism - the assumption that our democracy is hopelessly corrupt, available to the highest bidder. That kind of cynicism is what the buyers and sellers of American democracy are counting on.

If you give up on our system of government, they win everything.

Robert Reich, chancellor's professor of public policy at UC Berkeley and former U.S. secretary of labor, is the author of the newly released "Beyond Outrage: What Has Gone Wrong With Our Economy and Our Democracy, and How to Fix It," a Knopf e-book original. To comment, use the online form at www.sfgate.com/chronicle/submissions/#1.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/opinion/reich/article/Democracy-falling-prey-to-big-money-3779428.php#ixzz24DlmUhmE

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
8/22/2012 5:20:40 PM
Cows Electrocuted, Abused at California Slaughterhouse













After seeing an undercover video of shocking cruelty to cattle at California slaughterhouse Central Valley Meat Company, the USDA shut the plant down, according to the Associated Press and National Public Radio. At least two USDA inspectors worked on-site at the facility; both have been suspended.

View a four-minute excerpt of the video here.

Compassion Over Killing taped the torture at Central Valley Meat Company over the course of two weeks this summer. It showed workers abusing cows who could not walk by shocking them withelectric prods, shooting them repeatedly with captive bolt guns, kicking them, pulling them by their tails, and prodding them with forklifts. Workers also killed conscious animals, leaving them to bleed to death while hoisted in the air by one ankle.

The USDA visited the slaughterhouse after receiving the video from animal advocacy group Compassion Over Killing and found “egregious inhumane handling and treatment of livestock.”According to the USDA, this means “an act or condition that results in severe harm to animals,” and it includes seriously repulsive conduct:

1. Making cuts on or skinning conscious animals;

2. Excessive beating or prodding of ambulatory or nonambulatory disabled animals or dragging of conscious animals;

3. Driving animals off semi-trailers over a drop off without providing adequate unloading facilities (animals are falling to the ground);

4. Running equipment over conscious animals;

5. Stunning of animals and then allowing them to regain consciousness;

6. Multiple attempts, especially in the absence of immediate corrective measures, to stun an animal versus a single blow or shot that renders an animal immediately unconscious;

7. Dismembering conscious animals, for example, cutting off ears or removing feet;

8. Leaving disabled livestock exposed to adverse climate conditions while awaiting disposition, or

9. Otherwise causing unnecessary pain and suffering to animals, including situations on trucks.

Slaughterhouse owners Brian and Lawrence Coelho denied any wrongdoing. According to theBetter Business Bureau, Central Valley Meat Company has been in business since January 1989.

Central Valley Meat Company provides ground beef to the USDA for its food programs, including school lunches. The cows it slaughters are dairy cows who no longer produce enough milk to be profitable to their owners. Dairy cows make up approximately 2.8 million of the 150 million cattlewho are slaughtered for meat each year in the United States.

It is illegal to slaughter sick cows for human consumption. The USDA’s investigation of the slaughterhouse includes ascertaining whether the cows abused because they could not walk were weak from illness.

Compassion Over Killing’s undercover investigators have documented abuses of animals raised for food at many facilities, including those producing chicken, eggs, turkey and foie gras.

Related Stories:

ALL Downers Deserve Better

FSIS Vet Blows Whistle On Agency For Ignoring Cruelty Reports

Videotape a Farm in Iowa: Go to Jail

Read more: , , , , , ,,

Photo credit: flinkthink



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/cows-electrocuted-abused-at-california-slaughterhouse.html#ixzz24IRsJjNy

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!