Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
7/13/2012 6:11:04 PM
Shell's Inadequate Oil Spill Response Plans Threaten America's Arctic
  • by
  • July 12, 2012













  • The Center for Biological Diversity and a coalition of conservation organizations have filed a lawsuit challenging the federal government’s approval of Shell Oil’s spill response plans for Arctic drilling.

    The Center and Alaskan allies have successfully blocked offshore oil development in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas since the Bush administration first tried to open the Arctic to development through a series of lawsuits over poor environmental review and failure to consider environmental sensitivity and air quality. As a result, Shell Oil — slated to drill in the Arctic every year since 2007 — has not yet stuck its drills in the water.

    Until now. At this moment, Shell’s drill rigs are headed for the Arctic and could be in place in a matter of weeks.

    The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) rubber-stamped plans that rely on unbelievable assumptions, include equipment that has never been tested in Arctic conditions, and ignore the very real possibility that a spill could continue through the winter. The agency has failed to ensure Shell’s plans could be effective and that Shell has sufficient boats, resources and spill responders to remove a “worst-case” oil spill in the Arctic Ocean to the “maximum extent practicable.” Even after Deepwater Horizon, Interior Secretary Salazar brushed aside concerns about Shell’s spill response capabilities, stating recently that “there is not going to be an oil spill.”

    The American people deserve more. There have been no tests of spill response equipment in US Arctic waters since 2000 and those equipment tests were “a failure.” Today, Shell relies on much of that same equipment, and bases its plans on the assumption that it will clean up more than 90 percent of any spilled oil. Even in relatively favorable conditions, less than 10 percent of spilled oil was recovered after the Deepwater Horizon and Exxon Valdez spills. In the Arctic, sea ice, harsh weather, high seas, darkness and wind may render even that level of cleanup impossible.

    The Center will continue to fight drilling in the Arctic, a place teeming with species found in few other places, including polar bears, caribou, Pacific walrus, bowhead whales, and numerous species of seal. Learn more about the Arctic and the threats Arctic drilling poses here.

    Polar bears, the first species to receive Endangered Species Act protections due to threats from global warming, are especially at risk. Not only would polar bears be devastated by an oil spill, but burning that oil will only accelerate global warming and speed their journey to extinction.

    Related Stories:

    More Than 1 Million People Urge White House to Stop Shell’s Arctic Drilling

    Drill, Baby, Drill: Shells Arctic Madness

    Breaking: Shell Sues the Center for Biological Diversity… Again

    Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

    Photo courtesy of Flickr Commons/ShanePapaDiesel



    Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/shells-inadequate-oil-spill-response-plans-threaten-americas-arctic.html#ixzz20WjrywkV

    "Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

    +0
    Luis Miguel Goitizolo

    1162
    61587 Posts
    61587
    Invite Me as a Friend
    Top 25 Poster
    Person Of The Week
    RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
    7/13/2012 6:20:02 PM

    Antarctica Surrounded by Threats


    Warming and human visitors threaten Antarctica.

    Antarctica and its surrounding waters are under pressure from a variety of forces that are already transforming the area, scientists warn.

    The most immediate threats are regional warming, ocean acidification and loss of sea ice, all linked to global levels of carbon dioxide. Sea ice cover, crucial to the survival of virtually every animal that lives on and near the continent, already has been reduced by warming, according to a new study published in the July 13 issue of the journal Science. Visits by tourists, researchers and other people also threaten to change Antarctica, as does the harvesting of animals like krill that are key to the Antarctic food chain.

    The continent is governed by the Antarctic Treaty System, a series of international agreements that regulates research and tourism. So far the treaty has done a good job of conserving Antarctica's environment and resources, said study co-author Diana Wall, a researcher at Colorado State University. But changes are happening so fast that they need extra attention, said Wall, who has conducted research for more than 20 years on nematodes and worm-like creatures in Antarctica's dry valleys.

    Melting ice

    The Antarctic Peninsula, only a few days' sea voyage from South America, is changing particularly quickly. The peninsula's Palmer Research Station, run by the United States, is experiencing the fastest winter warming of any place on Earth, and 87 percent of the peninsula's land-bound glaciers are in retreat, according to research cited on the station's website. [Album: Stunning Photos of Antarctic Ice]

    In some areas of the Antarctic Ocean, sea ice is absent three months longer than it was a few decades ago. "The foundation of the ecosystem is melting away," said Hugh Ducklow, a biological oceanographer at the Marine Biological Laboratory in Woods Hole, Mass., who wasn't involved with the study. For example, loss of sea ice has hurt the Adelie penguin, which lives on the ice; its populations have decreased by 80 percent since 1975. Krill in the area (a primary food source for Adelies) also have decreased by 80 percent since 1991, according to a 2011 study in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    Krill feed on Antarctic phytoplankton, microscopic organisms that use photosynthesis and provide the basis for the whole ecosystem. Loss of ice changes the abundance, timing and location of phytoplankton blooms, and not for the better, Ducklow told OurAmazingPlanet. Krill larvae feed beneath ice sheets, so loss of ice means fewer krill, he said.

    More people

    While there's less ice, there are more people. Last year nearly 20,000 tourists visited the Antarctic Peninsula, according to the International Association of Antarctica Tour Operators. There are also more researchers, and there is more exploration for minerals and other resources.

    There are "more scientists, more tourists, more research stations, more countries doing Antarctic research, and greater access to the continent in general, including the once-remote interior," said study co-author Mahlon Kennicutt, a scientist at Texas A&M University who has been involved in Antarctic research for 35 years. [Video: Life on the Antarctic Ice]

    An increase in visitors means more disturbances to the fragile ecosystem, more pollution and more opportunities to bring organisms onto the continent from elsewhere in the world.

    "It's impossible to keep people from bringing other organisms with them," Ducklow said. These organisms could include invasive species that significantly affect delicately balanced ecosystems.

    With the visitors come the boats and other modes of transportation they use.

    An increase in boats means a greater chance of an oil spill in an area that would be very difficult to clean up. More than a dozen "vessel emergencies" have been reported in the Southern Ocean in the past six years, according to a study cited in the new paper. That includes a Chilean vessel that went down in 2007 carrying 50,000 gallons (190,000 liters) of diesel. A Brazilian ship sank in April.

    Species also can be more directly affected. For example, fishing boats target krill and other species, stressing vulnerable populations.

    The Southern Ocean surrounding Antarctica is particularly vulnerable to acidification, since carbon dioxide from the atmosphere dissolves more quickly in cold water than in hot water, Ducklow said. This makes it difficult for mollusks and other shell-forming animals to grow, since acid eats away at these shells.

    The future

    While the Antarctic Treaty forbids commercial mineral extraction on the continent, this provision is subject to change and doesn't stop the countries that haven't signed onto the treaty, the study warns. Ducklow sees this as a major challenge in the long term.

    "With the increasing impact of climate change and need for fossil fuels and mineral resources, it seems inevitable to me that political and economic forces will lead people to consider exploiting Antarctica," Ducklow said.

    The treaty also doesn't prevent offshore exploration, which is becoming more feasible as technology advances and demand for oil and other resources grows.

    Areas such as the McMurdo Dry Valleys are some of the world's most extreme environments, with Mars-like conditions created by the cold and lack of moisture. Here a footprint can last centuries, due to the lack of disturbance.

    Warming has changed the makeup of the unique organisms that can exist here, at the very limits of life. Co-author Wall said it's vital to preserve this continental laboratory, which has so many characteristics that exist nowhere else.

    "Our whole thing is how to conserve Antarctica as a unique continent, and we hope the concerns we raise will be addressed by policymakers," she said.

    Reach Douglas Main at dmain@techmedianetwork.com. Follow him on Twitter @Douglas_Main. Follow OurAmazingPlanet on Twitter @OAPlanet. We're also on Facebook and Google+.

    Copyright 2012 OurAmazingPlanet, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    "Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

    +0
    Luis Miguel Goitizolo

    1162
    61587 Posts
    61587
    Invite Me as a Friend
    Top 25 Poster
    Person Of The Week
    RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
    7/13/2012 6:25:04 PM

    JPMorgan says trading loss grew to $4.4 billion

    JPMorgan says trading loss grew to $4.4 billion, more than double original estimate

    JPMorgan: We lost $2.4 billion more

    The largest bank in the U.S. said its loss from a trading blunder had grown to $4.4 billion.Still made money, though

    NEW YORK (AP) -- JPMorgan Chase, the largest bank in the United States, said Friday that its loss from a highly publicized trading blunder had grown to $4.4 billion in the most recent quarter, more than double the bank's original estimate of $2 billion.

    The bank also said that it was reducing its net income for the first quarter by $459 million because it had discovered information that "raises questions about the integrity" of values placed on certain trades.

    "We don't take it lightly," CEO Jamie Dimon told Wall Street analysts on a conference call. He added: "We're not making light of this error, but we do think it's an isolated event."

    Dimon said the bank had closed the division of the bank responsible for the bad trade and moved the remainder of the trading position under its investment banking division.

    Overall, JPMorgan said it earned $5 billion, or $1.21 per share, for the second quarter, which covers April through June and includes the bank's disclosure of the trading loss on May 10.

    Analysts surveyed by FactSet, a provider of financial data, had expected JPMorgan to earn 76 cents per share. JPMorgan stock was down 49 cents, or 1.4 percent, at $33.55 in premarket trading.

    Just three months ago, JPMorgan was viewed as the top American bank, guided by Dimon's steady hand. Since the disclosure of the trading loss, however, that reputation has been eroded.

    Dimon, who originally dismissed concerns about the bank's trading as a "tempest in a teapot," appeared before Congress twice to apologize and explain himself, and several government agencies have launched investigations.

    Dimon was to speak before Wall Street analysts later Friday.

    JPMorgan has lost about 15 percent of its in market value since the loss came to light.

    The bank could take back pay from executives in charge of the division where the losses occurred. That procedure is known as a "clawback." It would be the first time JPMorgan exercised such a procedure.

    The most likely candidate would be Ina Drew, JPMorgan's chief investment officer, who oversaw the division responsible for the loss and left the bank days after the disclosure. In 2011, her pay package totaled $15 million.

    The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that three other employees of the bank tied to the trade, including one who was known as the "London whale," had left the bank.

    Under close questioning from lawmakers in June about his own role in setting up the investment division responsible for the mess, Dimon declared: "We made a mistake. I'm absolutely responsible. The buck stops with me."

    The trading loss has raised concerns that the biggest banks still pose risks to the U.S. financial system, less than four years after the financial crisis erupted in the fall of 2008.

    "Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

    +0
    Luis Miguel Goitizolo

    1162
    61587 Posts
    61587
    Invite Me as a Friend
    Top 25 Poster
    Person Of The Week
    RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
    7/13/2012 6:28:42 PM

    Is Meat The World’s Most Inefficient Food?
















    I’m pretty confident that there will never be a day when all the world is in agreement about the best human diet. I’m an omnivore myself, but I have friends who swear by their paleo, vegetarian, and vegan diets. All of us can make compelling arguments about why we eat the way we do, and all of us can make valid criticisms of diets that are unlike our own.

    For me, deciding how and what to eat required a close examination of the values and principles that truly matter to me. The type of food we consume has immediate health and economic consequences, but it also has a significant impact on our environment.

    As the infographic below explains, the manner and scale at which our society currently raises animal for human consumption contributes to climate change in major way. It also wastes water, pollutes our soil, and contaminates fresh water supplies.

    Now, I’m not saying that you’re to blame for climate change because you enjoy hamburgers. But if you’re really trying to live a low-impact life, eating less meat (and ensuring that the meat you do eat is raised by responsible farmers and ranchers) could help you shrink your carbon footprint a lot faster than buying a hybrid or skipping showers.

    Veganism by the numbers.

    Related Reading:

    The Importance Of Being Vegan

    Subway Goes Vegan: Rolls Out 3 New Sandwiches

    10 Arguments Against A Vegan Lifestyle


    Read more: , , , ,

    Top Image via Thinkstock Infographic by CulinarySchools.org



    Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/is-meat-the-worlds-most-inefficient-food.html#ixzz20WoGDiKY

    "Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

    +0
    Michael Caron

    9348
    2248 Posts
    2248
    Invite Me as a Friend
    Top 100 Poster
    Person Of The Week
    RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
    7/13/2012 7:49:39 PM

    Hi Luis,

    I'm still experimenting with different browsers so my little Trash can has to take a rest for awhile. our past articles have been very informative. On the heat chart, it shows that North East Indiana is suffering the most from the heat. Shirley and I live in Central, Indiana and the conditions are just the same if not worse. There is still no rain in sight. Rain is predicted for this weekend, starting later today, however it does not look promising. Actually, no one believes the predictions anymore. Some of the bigger cells that were predicted have already dried out, the resevour that we depend on for drinking water is drying out (I will try to get some pictures to post) and water bans with penalties are now in place. For the past two weeks, I have tried to get to my garden as much as possible to try to save some of my vegetables, watering as much as possible (we are still able to water small gardens) My friend Steve takes me out to the garden and then goes inside the air conditioned church while I work in heat of 90's to 105 degrees. I would abandon it all together, but I can't do that.

    As you have reported, Indiana is doing it's part on cracking down on human trafficking. Indiana is a state that does not wave banners and toot their horns to get attention. We just do what needs to be done. The Sister of the Mary of the Woods are very quite people who love what they do and they do not drive around in expensive vehicles. When they visit different Catholic Churches to ask for donations, (there are usually two or four sisters that visit each church)they usually can be seen driving up in an older model car, and it's usually a small car and they are crammed in. No stretch Limousine, no smug attitude, just a determination to do what is right.

    Some recent news in the Quest to right that which is wrong is a bust that was accomplished recently. Just on the outskirts if the city of Indianapolis is a two story house that housed the members of a Motorcycle gang called the Outlaws. There is even a big sign on the outside of the house that says "Support you local Outlaws" They felt that they were above the law. An early morning raid rounded up the whole gang except for a couple of members who later turned themselves in. All of their motorcycles, guns, and cash were confiscated. I believe this was one of the largest motorcycle gangs in existence, but I'm not sure. The point is, positive action is taken place in Indiana because, unlike other states that know that human trafficking is taken place and that motorcycle gangs exist under their very noses, those that take an oath to protect the citizens of their state are doing so. Imagine if other states did the same, instead of looking the other way when they know that people are being abused or gangs are terrorizing neighborhoods?

    GOD BLESS YOU

    ~Mike~

    http://www.countryvalues65.com

    Michael J. Caron (Mike) TRUTH IN ADVERTISING!! Friends First. Business Later.
    +0


    facebook
    Like us on Facebook!