Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/6/2012 10:12:42 PM
Who Is Behind the Conspiracy Against Climate Change Science?











Written by Richard Schiffman

In a special message to Congress, a president of the United States made the following statement: “This generation has altered the composition of the atmosphere on a global scale through … a steady increase in carbon dioxide from the burning of fossil fuels.”

Who was that president? Not Barack Obama, although he has said similar things, and not George W. Bush, whose standard line was that we needed to study the problem more. It was President Lyndon Johnson, issuing what may have been the first ever warning by a political leader on the potential for what we now call climate change – way back in 1969.

Johnson, of course, had a foreign war on his hands and other more pressing issues to deal with at home. And while there was already a scientific consensus at that early date that the burning of fossil fuels would gradually warm the planet, nobody could say for sure how soon the impacts would be felt or how significant they were likely to be.

Fast forward to today. Climate change is no longer a theory about the conjectured future, but a fact documented by climatologists and apparent to just about anyone who has been paying attention to their local weather. Yet if you have been following the story in the media, you can be forgiven for thinking that the researchers are not yet agreed on what is taking place. A recent poll found that 40 percent of Americans believe the scientists are still arguing about whether climate change is real.

This is simply not true. The science only gets better with time, and climate change is now virtually undisputed – by the people who are doing the science, at any rate. That it remains a “controversial issue” long after the results are in is thanks to a well-funded cabal of free-market think tanks, corporations and business groups that hope to win in the political arena a fight that they have long since lost in the halls of science. They are abetted by a media whose relish for conflict and a scientifically nonsensical sense of supposed “balance” has led them to give the deniers equal airtime.

In May, the Heartland Institute put up a billboard on the Eisenhower Expressway outside of Chicago comparing believers in climate change to the Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski. A firestorm in the press quickly convinced the Institute to pull the plug on the offensive billboard campaign.

While the efforts of the Heartland Institute and other likeminded groups have so far not managed to convince – over 70 percent of Americans believe that climate change is either happening now or will be soon – many remain divided about how serious the problem is; 42 percent of those polled by Gallup in Marchbelieved that the impacts were being exaggerated.

This confusion seems to have been the intention of the denialists all along – not to disprove climate change (the evidence is too strong for that) but to cast just enough paralyzing doubt to muddy the waters and prevent the United States from getting serious about restricting greenhouse gas emissions. The appearance of controversy has given our elected officials the political cover to do nothing.

Another likely intentional result has been to put a damper on public discussion of the issue. Newspaper coverage of global warming dropped more than 40 percent in 2011 since its peak two years earlier, according to a study by The Daily Climate. Environmentalist author Bill McKibben says that in 2011, ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox spent twice as much time discussing Donald Trump as climate change.

Read more: , , , , , ,

Image from Heartland Institute website



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/who-is-behind-the-conspiracy-against-climate-change-science.html#ixzz1x3NKadYV


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/6/2012 10:16:45 PM

Uncertain Future For Brazilian Forests
















As Brazil gears up to host the Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, it is being strongly criticized for a failure to stop the destruction of the Amazon rain forest.

At the end of last month, in a partial victory for massive international pressure, Brazilian President Dilma Roussef partially vetoed a logging bill. The bill would have allowed large scale destruction of the Amazon forest to resume and pardoned illegal loggers.

Rousseff opposed the bill, but the country’s powerful farming lobby won over enough MPs in Brazil’s Congress last month to over-rule her.

Rousseff rejected 12 articles from the bill and made 32 modifications to the text.

The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) said that the partial veto broke up “an already complicated piece of legislation [and] will make the revised Forest Code extraordinarily difficult to implement.”

WWF director general Jim Leape said:

For the last decade, Brazil has been on a path of economic and environmental progress. President Rousseff’s statement creates an uncertain future for Brazilian forests, considering that Congress could still cut forest protections even further.

One vetoed element reportedly included amnesty provisions, which were conditional in that perpetrators must enroll in a government-sponsored conservation program and abide by the rules — though there were no clear guidelines for these programs. But the coalition group Comitê Brasil in Defense of the Forestssaid that amnesties in the new Forest Code will absolve previous illegal deforesters of fines, and remove obligations to completely restore illegally deforested areas.

They also say that:

Illegal deforestation carried out around springs and headwaters, in mangrove swamps and other wetlands, has been pardoned.

Protections for hilltops and other sensitive areas have been reduced, which will increase the risk of landslides.

The amount of forest that must be left intact along riverbanks – previously ranging from 30-500 meters wide – has been severely reduced, and now ranges from only 5 metres to 100 metres, which will increase the risk of flooding.

The restoration of vegetation alongside rivers and other sensitive areas can now be accomplished using eucalyptus and other non-native species, allowing biodiversity-rich forests to be replaced by monoculture plantations.

For the BBC, Paulo Cabral wrote that:

President Rousseff opted for a solution often used here for controversial issues: try to leave everybody more or less reasonably satisfied, if not totally happy, and postpone tough discussions for later.

She vetoed some aspects of the new law that most concerned environmentalists, such as loopholes reducing mandatory reforestation and an amnesty for past deforestation.

Cabral notes that Presidential degrees replacing some bill articles still have to go through a divided Congress.

Increased enforcement of the Forest Code, which dates back to 1965, and that this law amends, has slowed deforestation in recent years, with authorities using satellite images to track clearance. Under that code, landowners must keep a percentage of their terrain forested, ranging from 20% in some regions to 80% in the Amazon.

Greenpeace blocked a freighter from being loaded with iron in the port of Sao Luis in the northern Brazilian state of Maranhao in protest against the partial veto and because the pig iron industry is driving destruction in the Amazon as it requires huge amounts of wood charcoal to be produced.

Said Kenzo Juca Ferreira, of WWF-Brazil:

With the eyes of the world on Brazil for Rio+20, we will keep up the pressure to protect our forests. The whole world needs to know of the huge discrepancy between talk and action in Brazil.

Related stories:

Brazil Goes Backwards on Amazon Deforestation

Dangerous Forestry Law Partially Vetoed By Brazil

Scientists Warn Climate Change May Be Irreversible

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Map by visionshare



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/uncertain-future-for-brazilian-forests.html#ixzz1x3OaEzB8

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/7/2012 11:48:18 PM
Syria's latest developments here and in the next post

Syria Expels Diplomats; Assad Denies Houla Massacre
















Syria has announced that the US, UK, French, Swiss, Italian, Spanish Turkish ambassadors are “personae non gratae” and barred them from the country. Last week, a number of Western nations had expelled Syrian envoys, in response to the massacre in Houla that left 108 dead. Many of the countries mentioned in Syria’s extradition order had already recalled their diplomats. The latest move by Damascus underscores the extent to which diplomatic relations among Syria and other countries have declined.

Syria did announce that it had signed an agreement to allow humanitarian aid into the country. Within days, nine UN agencies and seven other non-governmental organisations should be allowed to enter Deraa, Deir el-Zour, Homs and Idlib, all cities that have been centers of anti-government protest and of some of the fiercest crackdown by the regime of President Bashar al-Assad. John Ging of the UN office for the co-ordination of humanitarian affairs said in the Guardian that it is not clear if this was a “breakthrough” or not. Some one million Syrians are in need of aid; they have been injured during the assaults or their families have lost jobs and homes.

In addition, more than 78,000 Syrian refugees have fled to Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon and Turkey where they are receiving aid.

These announcements occurred as China and Russia restated their opposition to foreign intervention in Syria. A representative from China’s foreign ministry emphasized that both countries do not support a forced regime change in Syria and called for all sides to back the United Nation envoy’s six-point peace plan.

On Monday, the rebel Free Syrian Army had announced that it was no longer honoring the ceasefire called for in Annan’s peace plan. Over the weekend, the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights reported that the FSA had killed 80 Syrian soldiers. FSA leaders had announced last week that they would be “free of any commitment” to Annan’s peace plan if Assad did not end the violence on Friday.

Assad has blamed the rebels for the Houla massacre, saying that “monsters” would not commit such a crime. This week the Syrian president, who studied opthalmology in London, defended his regime’s crackdown on protesters and dissent in Syria by comparing his army to a surgeon saving the life of his patients: “When a surgeon … cuts and cleans and amputates, and the wound bleeds, do we say to him your hands are stained with blood? Or do we thank him for saving the patient?”

Previous Care2 Coverage

Unrest in Syria Spreading to Lebanon

Obama Wary of Using Force in Syria, Romney Urges Arming Rebels

13 Found Executed in Syria; Young Filmmaker Killed in Homs (video)

Read more: , , , , , , , , , ,

Photo of mourners at a funeral in Duma, a suburb of Damascus, from FreedomHouse2



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/syria-expels-diplomats-assad-denies-houla-massacre.html#ixzz1x9byIGyF

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/7/2012 11:54:51 PM

U.N. monitors shot at in Syria, Annan plan crumbles

U.N. barred from new Syrian massacre site

Syrian troops halt inspectors as they try to reach the village where dozens reportedly have died. More details

BEIRUT/UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - U.N. monitors came under fire on Thursday while trying to investigate reports of a new massacre that raised the pressure on world powers struggling to halt the carnage in Syria, where a U.N.-Arab League peace plan has all but collapsed.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon described as "unspeakable barbarity" the reported killing of at least 78 villagers by forces loyal to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

Speaking at a special session of the U.N. General Assembly on Syria, international envoy Kofi Annan acknowledged his peace plan was not working and said there must be "consequences" for those who do not comply with it.

Ban said hopes for consolidating the peace plan were fading and Annan himself warned the U.N. Security Council that the crisis in Syria could soon spiral out of control, diplomats said. Annan, Ban's predecessor as U.N. Secretary General, called for "substantial pressure" on Damascus to stop the violence.

Opposition activists said up to 40 women and children were among those killed in the Sunni Muslim village of Mazraat al-Qubeir on Wednesday, posting film on the Internet of bloodied or charred bodies.

"There was smoke rising from the buildings and a horrible smell of human flesh burning," said a Mazraat al-Qubeir resident who told how he had watched Syrian troops and "shabbiha" gunmen attack his village as he hid in his family's olive grove.

"It was like a ghost town," he told Reuters by telephone, asking not to be identified because he feared for his safety.

"After the shabbiha and tanks left, the first thing I did was run to my house. It was burned. All seven people from my house were killed. I saw bodies on the stairs, the bathroom and bedroom. They were all burned," the witness said.

The latest killings, less than two weeks after 108 men, women and children were slain in the town of Houla, piled pressure on world powers to stop the bloodshed in Syria. They have been paralyzed by rifts pitting Western and most Arab states against Assad's defenders in Russia, China and Iran.

Despite growing pressure on Moscow, those rifts appeared no closer to resolution on Thursday as leaders of a bloc grouping China, Russia and Central Asian states called for dialogue to resolve the Syria conflict, rather than any firmer action by the Security Council.

The latest reports from the ground cast a long shadow over a day of consultations and debate on Syria at the United Nations.

"Today's news reports of another massacre in (Mazraat) al-Qubeir ... are shocking and sickening," Ban told the 193-nation assembly. "A village apparently surrounded by Syrian forces. The bodies of innocent civilians lying where they were, shot. Some allegedly burned or slashed with knives.

Ban said U.N. monitors, in Syria to check compliance with a truce declared by Annan on April 12 but never implemented, had come under small-arms fire on their way to Mazraat al-Qubeir.

There was no mention of any of the monitors being injured.

The chief of the monitoring mission, General Robert Mood, said Syrian troops and civilians had barred the team, stopping them at checkpoints and turning them back. Officials said the monitors would try again on Friday to visit the site.

A Syrian official denied reports from the village, telling the state news agency that residents had asked security forces for help after "terrorists" killed nine women and children.

Assad, who has yet to comment on Wednesday's violence, decried the Houla killings as "monstrous" and denied his forces were responsible.

Video purportedly from Mazraat al-Qubeir showed the bodies of at least a dozen women and children wrapped in blankets or white shrouds, as well as the remains of burned corpses.

"These are the children of the Mazraat al-Qubeir massacre ... Look, you Arabs and Muslims, is this a terrorist?" asks the cameraman, focusing on a dead infant's face. "This woman was a shepherd, and this was a schoolgirl."

A Hama-based activist using the name Abu Ghazi listed more than 50 names of victims, many from the al-Yateem family, but said some burned bodies could not be identified. The bodies of between 25 and 30 men were taken away by the killers, he said.

Shabbiha, drawn mostly from Assad's minority Alawite sect that is an offshoot of Shi'ite Islam, have been blamed for the killings of civilians from the Sunni Muslim majority. That has raised fears of an Iraq-style sectarian bloodbath and worsened tensions between Shi'ite Iran and mainly Sunni-led Arab states.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague told reporters there was evidence of "escalating criminality" by pro-government forces. "Syria is clearly on the edge ... of deeper violence, of deep sectarian violence; village against village, pro-government militias against opposition areas and of looking more like Bosnia in the 1990s than of Libya last year," he said.

Events in Syria's 15-month-old uprising are difficult to verify due to tight state curbs on international media access.

YEMEN-STYLE TRANSITION?

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States was willing to work with all U.N. Security Council members, including Russia, on a conference on Syria's political future, but made clear that Assad must go and his government be replaced with a democratic one.

Moscow has used its U.N. Security Council veto and other tools to protect Assad, who has given Russia a firm foothold in the Middle East and is a buyer of Russian weapons.

A senior Russian diplomat said Moscow would accept a Yemen-style power transition in Syria if it were decided by the people, referring to a deal under which Yemeni leader Ali Abdullah Saleh stepped down in February after a year of unrest.

"The Yemen scenario was discussed by the Yemenis themselves. If this scenario is discussed by Syrians themselves and is adopted by them, we are not against it," Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Bogdanov said, according to the Interfax news agency.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said Russia "most decisively condemns the barbarous acts of violence" reported on Wednesday but he did not assign blame.

Rebel groups in Syria say they are no longer bound by Annan's truce plan and want foreign weapons and other support.

Western leaders, wary of new military engagements in the Muslim world, have offered sympathy but shown no appetite for taking on Assad's military, supplied by Russia and Iran.

Speaking at the U.N. General Assembly, Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin warned countries arming Syria's opposition that such weapons could end up in the hands of "terrorists."

(Additional reporting by Dominic Evans and Oliver Holmes in Beirut, Khaled Yacoub Oweis in Amman, Steve Gutterman in Moscow, Arshad Mohammed in Istanbul; Peter Griffiths in London, Andrew Quinn at the United Nations and Balazs Koranyi, Gleb Bryanski and Chris Buckley; Writing by Alistair Lyon and Claudia Parsons; Editing by Michael Roddy and Doina Chiacu)


A Shaam News Network image is said to show a street blocked with burning tires during an anti-regime demonstration in Damascus on Thursday. UN chief Ban Ki-moon has warned that Syria risks a "catastrophic civil war" following a massacre that sparked global outrage, as the US slammed Russia for resisting UN action against Damascus. (AFP Photo/-)

View Gallery

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
6/8/2012 12:00:43 AM
Violence Against Black Africans Escalates In Israel












Ten African refugees had a lucky escape
on Sunday when their apartment was firebombed in another escalation of violence against Africans in Israel. They were trapped in a ground-floor apartment when the blaze began at 3 am. Four are in the hospital suffering from burns and smoke inhalation; the rest had fled.

Police described the firebombing as “racially motivated.”

It follows riots after a rally in Tel Aviv in which shops were looted and individuals attacked, including Jews of Ethiopian origin, as well as a previous Molotov cocktail attack on a center with a kindergarten. One member of the Knesset (MK), Israel’s parliament, called the riots a “pogrom.”

A number of other MKs have made incendiary speeches and comments, which many have blamed for inciting the attacks on black Africans.

MK Miri Regev, who led the protest which resulted in riots and has referred to the refugees as a “cancer,” told the Knesset:

How come after African workers went to a swimming pool in North Tel-Aviv they had to clean it for two days?

Another, Amnon Cohen, said that “most infiltrators carry infectious diseases.”

Yulia Shamalov Berkovich, from the supposedly liberal Kadima party, called for human rights workers, those who support the refugees, to be put into camps.

Another, Aryeh Eldad, said:

Anyone that penetrates Israel’s border should be shot, a Swedish tourist, Sudanese from Eritrea, Eritreans from Sudan, Asians from Sinai. Whoever touches Israel’s border — shot.

Interior minister Eli Yishai suggested that HIV-infected migrants were raping Israeli women. “This country belongs to us, to the white man,” he said in an interview.

This led to unprecedented harsh criticizm from Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman against Yishai.

Lieberman said that every interview or statement against Africans “takes us back six months” in efforts to reach agreements to return refugees to their countries of origin (principally South Sudan).

“I ask all my colleagues — and I already spoke to them personally — to talk less. Especially ministers and MKs,” Lieberman said.

Poriya Gets of the Hotline for Migrant Workers, based in Tel Aviv, told the Guardian that violence against blacks was getting worse and was being stoked by politicians and right wing organizations.

We’ve had phone calls, people cursing and saying ugly things, like, ‘We hope you will be raped and we are coming to burn you.’ The politicians must take responsibility. They are trying to make the fire bigger.

Ethiopian Jewish MK Shlomo Molla told the Jerusalem Post that his community identifies with the migrants and that they have long suffered from racism in Israel. He said:

We know that if these foreigners were Scandinavians, with blue eyes and blond hair, then they would not be treated in this way.

Prime Minister Netanyahu and the government refers to the refugees as “infilitrators” and most Israelis believe that the around 60,000, mostly Eritreans and Sudanese, are migrant workers not refugees. A new law means that the refugees can be imprisoned and the government is building large camps, but these will not be able to house all the refugees. Israel is also building a fence along its border with Egypt.

Related stories:

“Pogrom” On African Refugees in Tel Aviv

Israel Passes Harsh Immigration Law (Video)

Israel Proposing Indefinite Detention of Refugees (Video)

Read more: , , , , , , ,

Picture by Physicians for Human Rights - Israel



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/violence-against-black-africans-escalates-in-israel.html#ixzz1x9fD8qwb


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!