Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/29/2012 9:28:08 PM
How To Purchase the Arctic With Only $4 Billion









Written by Brian Merchant

Do you happen to head up a massive multinational oil concern? Curious just how much it’d cost you to snag the long-desired right to drill in the Arctic? Well, have I got a number for you: $4 billion. That’s about how much you’ll have to fork over to wage a successful all-out lobbying campaign on multiple fronts. Thankfully, if you’re a respectable Big Oil outfit, $4 billion is probably what you dig up between the couch cushions when you’re doing laundry.

So let’s say that you’re, oh, some giant oil conglomerate called ‘Shell.’ Here’s all you’ll have to do to get drilling access to one of the most sensitive, pristine, and traditionally protected areas in the US:

First, in D.C., where you’ve got to convince a surprisingly eager moderate Democratic president that there’s a bounty of oil up there, and that it can be extracted “safely.”

Your crack team of three dozen lobbyists will do full court press, sidling up to environmentalist coalitions and wheeling and dealing with Democrat insiders. Pretend that you want to fight climate change, join “anti-global warming groups,” and get inside access to how the opposition works. Hold your tongue when necessary, sated by the knowledge you will soon make fools of them all.

Second, you’ll have to go to the front lines, in Alaska, where there’s a long legacy of conservationism in the local Eskimo communities. The Eskimo leader, in fact, is a fierce opponent of oil drilling—and rightfully so, because that stuff is almost certain to wash up on his homeland’s shores at some point. But no matter.

Deploy your best company stooge, and have him go on a “charm offensive,” getting to know the locals and dumping money into the community. Meanwhile, slowly undermine that feisty leader by “funding local colleges, village parties and whaling equipment.” By the time that silly ol’ Eskimo figures out that you’ve bought off the town’s opposition, he’ll have little choice but to negotiate a deal.

Third, you wait. There are PR problems with some other oil spill down south, and the president will probably want to cite your project as proof that he’s pro-drilling when he’s campaigning. But it’s just a matter of time, and you’ll know it. Nothing can stand up to the kind of cash you’re throwing around. Not piddly green groups or whiny progressives. No, they’ll all be forced to cower from the sheer might of your capital.

The Bureau of Investigative Journalism puts it this way: “Recognising the blunt force power of Shell’s lobbying blitz, environmental groups have backed off, … choosing to focus on projects where victory is more feasible.”

Congratulations, ‘Shell’! You’ve just earned yourself the first rights to drill in the Arctic, one of the last remaining refuges from human resource extraction out there. It will be incredibly tough to clean up oil from the inevitable spills, and ecosystems are sure to be devastated, but who cares? The government will foot most of the bill for that, anyways. The important thing is that you’ve won. That you’ve kicked off perhaps the last great oily gold rush of our times. To the Arctic!

To get the rest of the facts on Shell’s lobbying blitz, see the New York Times and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism—but that’s pretty much exactly how it went down.

This post was originally published by TreeHugger.

Related Stories:

Endangered Beluga Whales At Risk From Destructive Oil and Gas Drilling

One Million for the Arctic

Big Oil’s Profits Show They Don’t Need Tax Breaks

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

Photo from knowmoore via flickr



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/how-to-purchase-the-arctic-with-only-4-billion.html#ixzz1wIQ1gtCa


"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/29/2012 9:33:06 PM

Fukushima Radiation Reaches US in Bluefin Tuna









Pacific bluefin tuna carrying radioactive cesium from the Fukushima nuclear plant have been found off the coast of California. Fifteen young tuna caught off San Diego last year showed radiation that is not at dangerous levels, but offers a window to scientists studying the migration patterns of marine life. Researchers were surprised to find the cesium in all 15 fish sampled; the radioactive isotope had not been detected in fish caught before 2011, nor in yellowfin tuna native to California waters.

The Los Angeles Times quotes researcher Daniel Madigan, a doctoral candidate at Stanford: “We showed that a bluefin tuna is capable of picking up radioactive material and transporting it across the ocean. That’s new. Traditionally people don’t think of migratory animals as transport vectors for radioactive materials.”

This is not the first time that evidence of the Fukushima power plant meltdown has reached North America. Very low radioactivity was detected in milk in Washington and California last year.

The radiation levels are extremely low and do not pose a health risk to humans — the bluefin tuna have far more to fear from us, since they are being fished to near extinction, with international action slow in coming. However, what it does demonstrate are the far-reaching, systemic consequences of human actions. As we saw with the tsunami debris, there is no “away;” whether materials are swept away or thrown away, they still end up in someone’s back yard. That’s true for plastic bottles, air pollution and, as this has demonstrated, for nuclear waste residue.

Related Stories:

Post-Fukushima, Nuclear Policies in Flux Around the World

Fukushima Fallout: Low Levels of Radiation in US Milk, Contaminated Marine Life in Japan

Japan Says It Will Ignore A Ban On Bluefin Tuna

Read more: , , , , , ,

Image: Pacific bluefin tuna by aes256 via Creative Commons license



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/fukushima-radiation-reaches-us-in-bluefin-tuna.html#ixzz1wIRUoIJ1

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/29/2012 9:45:46 PM
Spent Fuel Rods Drive Growing Fear Over Plant in Japan
Tomohiro Ohsumi/Bloomberg News

Reporters and Tepco workers at Reactor No. 4 at Fukushima Daiichi, which the environment and nuclear minister visited Saturday.

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/30/2012 5:39:05 PM
BP Will Spend $400M To Reduce Pollution At Indiana Refinery










Chicago has long been a poster child for the fossil fuel industry’s negative effects on health and the environment. The Chicago metropolitan region still violates federal air quality standards for harmful ozone and particulate matter pollution, mostly due to the many coal-fired power plants in the area.

Now, BP, one of the worst offenders, has announced that it will spend $400 million to install new controls that will significantly reduce noxious air pollution from its massive refinery in northwest Indiana. Controls include a state-of-the-art system to reduce the flaring of refinery gas as well as additional controls and practices to lower emissions from process equipment throughout the refinery. In addition, BP says it will implement a refinery fence line monitoring system to provide air quality information to the local community. The results will be posted online weekly, providing those who live nearby with facts about how dirty their air actually is.

The announcement is part of a settlement with the government and environmental groups which accused BP of violating a 2001 legal deal over previous pollution problems and cited the company for repeatedly exceeding emissions limits on refinery flares that release harmful chemicals during frequent malfunctions. In addition to its agreement to install the preventative equipment, BP will also pay $8 million in fines resulting from these violations.

According to the Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, and other environmental organizations that participated in the agreement, BP’s investment should reduce harmful air pollution by about 4,000 tons annually at the plant. Those who worked on the agreement are hopeful that it will serve as an example for dealing with large refineries in other states.

Related Reading:

Shocking Photos: Endangered Wildlife Killed By BP Oil Spill

BP Hailed As “Sustainability Partner” In London Olympics

Melting Sea Ice Causes Spike In Arctic Air Pollution

Read more: , , , , , ,

Image via Thinkstock



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/bp-will-spend-400m-to-reduce-pollution-at-indiana-refinery.html#ixzz1wNL1kUv5

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0
Luis Miguel Goitizolo

1162
61587 Posts
61587
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: ARE WE NOW IN THE END TIMES?
5/30/2012 5:42:34 PM
Spring 2012 Likely To Be The Hottest Ever










The
spring of 2012 is due to be the hottest in 117 years, since 1895. Considering this past winter was the fourth-hottest on record (with an average temperature of 42 degrees Fahrenheit in the contiguous US states), March simply the hottest and April the third-hottest, that may come as no surprise.

University of Maryland professor Steve Scolnik offers a closer look at the changes in the temperature on his blog Climate Capital, drawing on “over half a century of weather watching.” It was back in 1910 that there were record high temperatures in spring; back then, the national average temperature was 55.1 degrees. But as Scolnik’s analysis reveals, the average temperatures for March and April of this year exceed those of March and April in 1910: March 2012 was 0.5 degrees higher and April 2012, 1 degree higher.

So, says Scolnik, for spring 2012 not to break spring 1910′s record, this May would have to be 1.5 degrees cooler and the likelihood of such is “somewhere between slim and none.” Scolnik finds that, in May of 1910, most of the country’s temperatures were below average — but this year, “nearly all of the country is above average, with large areas over 2°C higher.”

Yes, that is 2 degrees Celsius — this May has been a scorcher indeed. Earlier today, riding bikes in the late afternoon with our son in northern New Jersey, my husband Jim saw that one thermometer read 93 degrees and another one, 96 degrees, just about where record highs for this time of year in New Jerseyindeed are.

In view of all this, The Atlantic Wire suggests the only thing to do is “buy an air conditioner because this summer is going to be brutal.”

Though for all those climate-change deniers out there: Perhaps one way to encourage them to change their minds would be to suggest they consider foregoing air conditioning units temporarily this summer or perhaps right now, in the month of May which already feels like summer.

Related Care2 Coverage

BP Will Spend $400M To Reduce Pollution At Indiana Refinery

NOAA Wants You to Be A Force of Nature This Hurricane Season

Germany Breaks Solar Power Record

Read more: , , , , ,

Photo by Mr. T in DC



Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/spring-2012-likely-to-be-the-hottest-ever.html#ixzz1wNM1FQOL

"Choose a job you love and you will not have to work a day in your life" (Confucius)

+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!