Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
Patricia Bartch

2952
9394 Posts
9394
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: OIL SPILL - Responsibility
6/24/2010 3:41:14 AM
I strange emails from friends all the time. WE ALL need to hear news from ALL sources and not just FOX.
Pat
INTERESTING IF TRUE. (BUT IT ISN'T TRUE. )

Note: Forwarded message is attached.

Obama Lovers, Put this in your pipe and smoke !!!!!!

Q: Did Obama loan $2 billion to Brazil’s oil company to benefit China and George Soros?

A: The president had nothing to do with the loan, which the Export-Import Bank approved for Brazil to buy U.S.-made equipment and services.

FULL QUESTION

I received this in an e-mail. Is it true?

Today even though President Obama is against off shore drilling for oil for this country. He signed an executive order to loan 2 Billion of our taxpayers dollars to a Brazilian Oil Exploration Company (which is the 8th largest company in the entire world) to drill for oil off the coast of Brazil. The oil that comes from this operation is for the sole purpose and use of China and not the USA. The Chinese government is under contract to purchase all the oil that this oil field will produce, which is hundreds of millions of barrels of oil".

We have absolutely no gain from this transaction whatsoever.
⬐ Click to expand/collapse the full text ⬏

FULL ANSWER

This claim stems from a "preliminary commitment" made back on April 14 by the board of directors of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. The bank intends to loan up to $2 billion to finance exports to the Brazilian oil company Petróleo Brasileiro S.A., known as Petrobras, over the next several years.

The e-mail is false on two counts.

  • The message falsely says the decision was due to an "executive order" by the president. No presidential order was required. Furthermore, none of President Obama’s appointees had joined the Ex-Im board at the time of the vote, which was unanimous, and bipartisan. The Ex-Im Bank states: "In fact, at the time the Bank’s Board consisted of three Republicans and two Democrats, all of whom were appointed by George W. Bush."
  • The message falsely claims that "we have absolutely no gain" from the loan. In fact, the loan is being made specifically to finance purchase by Petrobras of U.S.-made oilfield equipment and services. The mission of the Ex-Im Bank is to encourage exports by making such loans.

The bank’s chairman and president, Fred P. Hochberg, underscored the purpose of the loan during a trip to Brazil at the end of July:

Ex-Im Bank President Hochberg, July 29: I chose Brazil as my first international destination for good reason: Brazil is a powerhouse among South American economies and offers tremendous opportunities for U.S. exporters in many sectors. I want Brazilians to know that Ex-Im Bank has the will and the capacity to finance their purchases of U.S. equipment, products and services

Obama appointed Hochberg to the Ex-Im Bank on April 20, nearly a week after the board voted to approve the loan. He was confirmed May 14 and sworn in May 21.

The message claims that George Soros would "benefit most" from the loan, but that is also a baseless accusation. Soros is a favorite whipping boy of conservatives because of his early financial help to the liberal group MoveOn.org. And he is indeed a major investor in Petrobras, through his New York-based hedge-fund firm, Soros Fund Management LLC. But the hedge fund recently sold 22 million shares of common stock in the company (which carry voting rights) while buying 5.8 million shares of preferred stock (which is non-voting.) As reported by Bloomberg News, Soros reduced his stake in the company before any of the Ex-Im Bank’s promised loan has been dispensed.

There is some truth to the claim that China would benefit, but not much. Brazil recently agreed to export 200,000 barrels of oil per day to China in coming years. But that was in return for a loan by China of $10 billion, five times more than the U.S. Ex-Im Bank is lending to finance purchase of U.S. gear.

The Ex-Im Bank also would like it known that no loan has yet been made, and that the "preliminary commitment" could eventually result in either a direct loan or a loan guarantee. Either way, the Ex-Im Bank states, "no taxpayer dollars are involved." The bank is self-sustaining.

-Brooks Jackson

Sources

Export-Import Bank of the United States. "Facts About the Proposed Ex-Im Bank Loans for Petrobras’ Brazilian Offshore Oil Exploration and Development." 20 Aug 2009, acccessed 17 Sep 2009.

"Ex-Im Bank Chairman Fred Hochberg in Brazil to Promote Financing for Purchases of U.S. Exports." News Release. Export-Import Bank of the United States. 29 Jul 2009.

Kishan, Saijel and Andres R. Martinez. "George Soros Cut Petrobras Stake in Second Quarter." Bloomberg.com. 14 Aug 2009.

-Brooks Jackson

Sources

also check out the same information on SNOPES: http://www.snopes.com/politics/gasoline/braziloil.asp

I'm Your AVON LADY: http://youravon.com/pbartch *Ask me how to get FREE Shipping.
+0
Roger Macdivitt .

3169
7333 Posts
7333
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: OIL SPILL - Responsibility
6/24/2010 7:24:03 AM

This is all good stuff.

Right or wrong, research and questions are essential.

Thanks guys.

Roger

+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5805
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: OIL SPILL - Responsibility
6/24/2010 12:35:16 PM
Very True and source of the information having ties to the same players they are clearing with their rhetoric just keep getting richer, more powerful and more embolden in its NWO. SOROS is the biggest NWO proponent, think about it!

On another note Snopes has its own agenda hard to be a watchdog when you are sitting at your masters side. Just thinking outloud.

Where do you think all that idle equipment in the Gulf will be in 6 Months? NOT IN THE GULF drilling American Oil!

Quote:

This is all good stuff.

Right or wrong, research and questions are essential.

Thanks guys.

Roger

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
RE: OIL SPILL - Responsibility
6/24/2010 1:28:21 PM

Pat, very interesting information. Yes, I have a few of those 'hate Obama' emails arriving but they get deleted.

One source you quote -

also check out the same information on SNOPES: http://www.snopes.com/politics/gasoline/braziloil.asp


I have not done extensive research on this one but there was an internet RUMOR that Snopes was owned by 'a flaming liberal' 'who is in the tank with Obama'. This one is from About.com (now we have to check out who owns About.com!).

As I stated, I don't much like just to copy and paste but in this case just want to get your attention.

"Anyway just FYI please don't use Snopes.com anymore for fact checking and make your friends aware of their political leanings as well. Many people still think Snopes.com is neutral and they can be trusted as factual. We need to make sure everyone is aware that that is a hoax in itself. "

That is just part of the message from an anonymous emailer, but David Emery, Urban Legends Guide, made factual statements (according to his knowledge and research) to counteract the remarks made.

One such remark is this:

First off, Snopes.com is owned by two people, not one. They are husband and wife David and Barbara Mikkelson of Agoura Hills, California.

SNOPES EXPOSED


Roger, forgive me for getting a little off subject. WHAT is happening in the Gulf now with the oil geyser?? Seems there was a problem with a robot making a bad move and they had to remove cap (more oil!) and replaced it either last night or this morning - sorry I missed the timing on that one.

Oil on those beautiful white beaches of Pensacola made me sick. Spent much time there back in the days...

May there be a permanent solution soon.

Sara

+0
Roger Macdivitt .

3169
7333 Posts
7333
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: OIL SPILL - Responsibility
6/24/2010 9:04:47 PM

Sara,

It makes me weep that so much is still escaping.

We all need to pressure governments to be transparent with regards to resources.

If only we knew the truth about so many things we take for granted.

Even our refuse ends up half way around the world being picked over by children.

Eco-friendly is essential but this should not be made i nto a profit making business.

Roger

+0