A month sounds excrutiatingly long, it's not a presidential election, most people already know who they want to vote for, it doesn't take a month to get someone to click in here. If the nominees want votes, they should post the election link and deadline to Facebook and Twitter and other networks and stockpile their followers at those other networks to be highly compiled from Adlandpro members. Besides that, will the nominees have to be actively socializing for the entire month they're on the ballot? Some probably don't want to. Some nominees only show up shortly before the election to start socializing because they want a better chance of winning, and then disappear after they win, as if they think nobody notices that short-time schmooze to try to win and then run off into the sunset afterwards. ==>>I think it would be better to make it a 2-person election because for most of the past year it's mainly been between 2 nominees and the other 2 usually have no idea they're on the ballot, don't show up to vote or make comments, and are basically just extra photos and names that only get 0 or 1 or 2 votes anyway. A 2-person election would just be making it what it already is anyway. Sometimes I think we may as well put 2 mannequins up there with the 2 people who are getting the majority of the votes. Why keep having 4 nominees when half of them are just photos on the wall next to the 2 main vote-getters? This current election #293 is one of the few in the past year that's had a more even spread of votes. Nominees should at least show up during the election and make a comment at the poll, people need to do something if they want to win, and stick around for the longterm after they win, not just a couple weeks to look good and then disappear.
|