Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
1/21/2011 7:50:28 PM

Team Obama desperately needs a distraction from the laundry list of failures

Mourning in America

By Joan Swirsky Friday, January 21, 2011

Our entire country, indeed the world, mourns the victims of the savage attack in Tucson that left six dead, including an esteemed federal judge and beautiful nine-year-old Christina Taylor Green; 14 seriously wounded; and Rep. Gabrielle Giffords fighting for her life after a bullet from the gun of her crazed killer and apparent stalker Jared Loughner entered and then exited her brain.
While millions of words have been written about this unspeakable tragedy, I write here of another mourning, specifically the agony of the left at having irrevocably lost the American public, and with that loss their grandiose ambitions of turning our Democratic Republic into a Communist stronghold.
Simply, the leftists-cum-progressives among us have never recovered from their thundering defeat in the midterm elections of November 2—not just 63 seats in the House and six in the Senate, but also an overwhelming number of Republican governorships and control over more state legislative seats than any time since 1928.
As Daniel Henninger explains in Why the Left Lost It, “The tea partiers’ fiscal concerns were real” but a leftist Democrat president and his Congress “spent 2009 and 2010 passing the biggest economic entitlement since 1965 and driving U.S. spending to 25%. They expected to take losses in November. What they got instead was Armageddon.”
If Democrats can’t regain the Independents they lost in the midterms, Henninger adds, “they could be looking in from the outside for as many years as some of them have left to write about politics. A wilderness is a terrible place to be.”
Panic time! The left simply cannot believe that virtually all of Mr. Obama’s domestic policies—malevolently designed, I believe, to bankrupt Americans and to create their dependence on Big Government—were thoroughly repudiated at the polls, as were his foreign policies, which have been engineered to weaken both our military and our country. One must go back more than 70 years to find another such decisive drubbing.
This mortifying defeat left the leftists smarting, stinging, inflamed, incredulous and vengeful. They didn’t know what hit them or what to do about it.
It’s not like their supporters weren’t suggesting—encouraging? hoping for?—that something horrible happen. Right after the midterm meltdown, Mark Penn, the former chief strategist forHillary Clinton’s failed presidential campaign, told a TV audience that it took the Oklahoma City tragedy for President Clinton to “reconnect” with the American people and that maybe Democrats needed “a similar event” to help Obama. Vile, yes, but then again typical leftism.
TIMING IS EVERYTHING
Well, what do you know! Like manna from heaven, along came the Tucson massacre, which roused the leftists from their paralyzing depression. Only a tragedy could have that effect—leftists are not good at good news. But give them an attack on our homeland, a mass murder (except if it’s committed by a Muslim U.S. Army officer and the victims are other officers), or simply a gorgeous Republican woman with a resonating message, and they become maniacally animated.
This is because the left sees in any and all disasters that befall our nation the opportunity to regain the political traction they invariably lose when a naive public gives them yet another chance to prove they are grown-ups who actually like America.
The timing of the tragedy fell right into the left’s area of expertise: Exploiting a crisis for political leverage by blaming it on the opposition, particularly those like Sarah Palin and conservative radio commentators who are perceived as threats to the very survival of liberalism. In addition to blame, their strategy is always to work toward shredding the U.S. Constitution, in this instance to stomp on the first and second amendments by seeking to limit the free speech of conservatives and to take away the right to own a gun.
At exactly the time they are facing the systematic undoing of all the punishing laws that were passed by a leftist Democrat Congress, starting with the socialized-medicine scheme that, among other monstrosities, puts radical flunkies in charge of every citizen’s health care, and extending to the cap-and-tax scheme based on the now-proven fraudulence of man-made global warming, along comes a mass murder in Arizona. For leftists, just what the death-panel doctor ordered!
And what better time than when Team Obama desperately needs a distraction from the laundry list of other failures that Clarice Feldman writes about when she channels Leni Riefenstahl in advice to Mr. Obama, in which she mentions that:
  • Oil is reaching $100 a barrel
  • Jobless claims are jumping
  • Consumer confidence is down
  • Foreclosures are increasing
  • Wholesale food prices are soaring
  • The USA’s AAA credit rating is in jeopardy
  • The public is catching on that the taxpayers are unlikely to recoup on the GM bailout
  • One half of the states are suing to have ObamaCare declared unconstitutional
  • The Lebanese government fell at the hands of the Iranian and Syrian-led Hezb’allah

THE PLAN

To distract an increasingly disaffected public from these failures, the Obama minions promptly launched into the strategy that in 2008 resulted in a man of highly-questionable credentials and zero experience in domestic issues and foreign affairs occupying the White House. When you see the kind of choreographed, premeditated hysteria the left has generated since the first shots in Arizona were fired, the paroxysms of uncontrollable rage spewing non-stop from leftist media hacks, and their relentless accusations toward Tea Party activists, conservative media, and Sarah Palin for having “caused” the Tucson tragedy, it is, as Yankees catcher Yogi Berra once said: “deja vu all over again!”

In short order, they reactivated the JournoList of 400 exclusively leftwing so-called journalists who colluded during the 2008 election season to, collectively

  • Attack anyone who questioned the mountain of Obama’s missing d ocuments (birth certificate, medical records, college transcripts, etc.), and his close relationships with his self-described “mentor,” the black-liberation-theology- (i.e., Marxism) spewing Rev. Wright, convicted slumlord Tony Rezko, the unrepentant-domestic-terrorist William Ayers, whose Weather Underground fellow thugs left two NY policemen and the Brinks truck driver dead and five children without fathers. That’s the short list!
  • Target all of Obama’s opponents by engaging in the Big Lie technique refined by Hitler, which is to fabricate untruths, slanders, malicious gossip, and outright lies—yes, blood libels—against all opposition.
  • Accuse the opposition of the vitriol and duplicity they themselves routinely engage in. If there is one thing that embodies leftist pathology, it is the psychological defense mechanism of projection, where a person ascribes his or her own attributes, thoughts and emotions to other people.
THE PLAN
To distract an increasingly disaffected public from these failures, the Obama minions promptly launched into the strategy that in 2008 resulted in a man of highly-questionable credentials and zero experience in domestic issues and foreign affairs occupying the White House. When you see the kind of choreographed, premeditated hysteria the left has generated since the first shots in Arizona were fired, the paroxysms of uncontrollable rage spewing non-stop from leftist media hacks, and their relentless accusations toward Tea Party activists, conservative media, and Sarah Palin for having “caused” the Tucson tragedy, it is, as Yankees catcher Yogi Berra once said: “deja vu all over again!”
In short order, they reactivated the Journo List of 400 exclusively leftwing so-called journalists who colluded during the 2008 election season to, collectively:
•Attack anyone who questioned the mountain of Obama’s missing documents (birth certificate, medical records, college transcripts, etc.), and his close relationships with his self-described “mentor,” the black-liberation-theology- (i.e., Marxism) spewing Rev. Wright, convicted slumlord Tony Rezko, the unrepentant-domestic-terrorist William Ayers, whose Weather Underground fellow thugs left two NY policemen and the Brinks truck driver dead and five children without fathers. That’s the short list!
•Target all of Obama’s opponents by engaging in the Big Lie technique refined by Hitler, which is to fabricate untruths, slanders, malicious gossip, and outright lies—yes, blood libels—against all opposition.
•Accuse the opposition of the vitriol and duplicity they themselves routinely engage in. If there is one thing that embodies leftist pathology, it is the psychological defense mechanism of projection, where a person ascribes his or her own attributes, thoughts and emotions to other people.
MEDIA MADNESS

In an article entitled Political Vultures, historian Victor Davis Hanson writes that of all the leftwing media bias in reporting the Tucson massacre, “the three worst offenders” were Paul Daly of the New York Daily News, the NY Times’ Paul Krugman, and Andrew Sullivan, a longtime Palin obsessive. Hanson could have thrown in The New Yorker‘s George Packer as well, along with a raft of others who produced an avalanche of words which amounted to variations of a single theme: those big bad scary right wingers caused the problem!
Writer Michael Filozof agrees with Hanson and says that Krugman’s immediate response was “perhaps the most egregious” when Krugman wrote: “We don’t have proof yet that this was political, but the odds are that it was.(The newspaper that published plagiarized and fabricated accounts of the `D.C. sniper’ by affirmative-action hire Jayson Blair in 2003 is still publishing unsubstantiated suppositions without `proof,’ eh?).”
Filozof then documents extensively the degree to which the left, not the right, owns political violence, with examples ranging from:
•The leftist anarchist who inspired the assassination of President William McKinley.
•The leftists who to this day lionize Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, Malcolm X, and Eldridge “rape is an insurrectionary act” Cleaver and his Black Panthers.
•The leftist Weathermen who perpetrated multiple bombings.
•The Communist who was said to have murdered President John F. Kennedy.
•The pardoning by President Clinton of the Marxist-Leninist-inspired Puerto Rican terrorist group FALN.
•The pardoning by President Clinton of radical Susan Rosenberg, who was imprisoned for her role in the murder of two police officers and a security guard.
•The leftist playwrights in New York who created a stage performance about killing president Bush.
In a not-too-subtle suggestion that Obama’s own bellicosity may have contributed to the AZ disaster, Hanson writes: “Why would a president boast about figuring out `whose ##### to kick,’ or, in a climate of fear about terrorism, call his opponents `hostage takers’? In a post-9/11 world, is it prudent for the commander-in-chief to say of his political opponents, `Here’s the problem: It’s almost like they’ve got—they’ve got a bomb strapped to them and they’ve got their hand on the trigger. You don’t want them to blow up’? What about, `But you’ve got to kind of talk them, ease that finger off the trigger’?
Charitably, Hanson omitted the following Obama rants, all of them far more inflammatory than anything a Tea Party participant or conservative Talk Radio host or Sarah Palin ever said:
•Obama on ACORN supporters: “I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
•Obama to supporters: “Hit Back—Twice as hard”
•Obama at a Philadelphia fundraiser two years ago how to deal with Republicans: “They Bring a Knife—We Bring a Gun.”
•Obama to his followers: “Get in Their Faces!”
•Obama on the private sector: “We talk to these folks…so I know whose ##### to kick.”
•Obama to voters: Republican victory would mean “hand-to-hand combat.”
•Obama to Latino supporters: “Punish your enemies.”
•Obama to Democrats: “I’m itching for a fight.”
Dr. Jack Wheeler, a Washington insider, writes that the mass murderer Jared Loughner is both sick and “evil,” as are the leftists in what he calls the Enemedia.
“Their clinically around-the-bend fascist politicalization of the Arizona Massacre is final confirming proof,” he says. “We always suspected as much, and now, with their claim that “Rep. Gabrielle Giffords’ blood is on Sarah Palin’s hands” we know for sure and certain. What moral code they do possess is straight Marxist-Leninist:the ends justify the means.”
The good news, Wheeler adds, is that “now we know what they look like. From this moment on, the face that will appear in our mind’s eye whenever we read what they write or hear what they say is the Face of the Loughner Left.”
The Loughner Left is on full display in a report from the Media Research Center, including some sputum from left-wing hosts:
•Mike Malloy (“Michele Bachmann…would have gladly rounded up the Jews in Germany and shipped them off to death camps…This is an evil ##### from Hell.”...and “I’m waiting for the day when I pick up the newspaper or click on the Internet and find that [Rush Limbaugh] has choked to death on his own throat fat, or a great big wad of saliva or something, whatever.”).
•Montel Williams (”So, Michele, slit your wrist! Go ahead! I mean, you know, why not? I mean, if you want to—or, you know, do us all a better thing. Move that knife up about two feet. I mean, start right at the collarbone”).
•MSNBC’s Ed Schultz (”I really think there are conservative broadcasters in this country who would love to see Obama taken out.”)
Is that the kind of “civil” tone Mr. Obama was touting at the Tucson pep rally…oops, I mean memorial service?
Did I leave out Chris Matthews? When I saw his splenetic ravings on TV, I actually felt sorry for the guy. He must look at himself in the mirror and wonder, as I do, how a man with such a keen intellect and impressive political credentials could preside over a show that is so consistently in the ratings cellar. Hint: the public isn’t buying what you’re selling, Chris…the hate, the vitriol, the far-left views that are so blatantly at odds with the overwhelming majority of Americans.
As one of the main targets of the “blame conservatives” mantra, Rush Limbaugh wasted no time in dispensing with the leftist blather: “When I think of the left wing,” he said, “I think civil, don’t you? Code Pink, the New Black Panthers, union bosses beating up black conservatives in St. Louis, ACORN, illegal alien marches…why, it doesn’t get more civil than that!”
Columnist Michelle Malkin also dispensed with the myth of Democrat civility, exhaustively documenting (including stunning graphics) the left’s ongoing and historical orgy of hate.
THE MEMORIAL SERVICE THAT NEVER WAS

Why did Mr. Obama wait a full two days (or was it three?) before he said even one word about this horrific national tragedy? It only took him five minutes to accuse the policemen of Cambridge, MA—on national television—of being “stupid” for detaining one of his pals, and even less time to tell people “not to jump to conclusions” after the Fort Hood massacre.
Was Obama’s indefensible delay in responding to the tragedy to allow time for Arizona State University to acquire all the accoutrements of the pep rally they cravenly advertised as a memorial service, including the t-shirts on every chair emblazoned with what appeared to be a 2012 presidential kickoff campaign theme: “Together We Thrive”?
The managing editor of CanadaFreePress.com, Judi McLeod, explains the origins of this slogan...and it’s not pretty. In short, it goes back to Obama’s 2008 campaign. What a coincidence that it made its inappropriate return at the saddest time in Arizona’s recent history.
One Internet wit suggested that the slogan should have been “Together We Connive.” And Jim Hoft blogged, “The White House wants you to believe that they had nothing to do with the planning of the Tucson pep rally…even though the president, the First Lady and several top members of Congress attended the event. Of course, that’s utter nonsense.”
“Together we writhe would have been a more appropriate `sloganeering,’” blogged Pamela Geller of atlasshrugs.com, who followed the rally here: The Cheering in Arizona.
If, indeed, the White House did not help to coordinate this shameful event, then why did Mr. Obama fail to depart even one syllable from his speechwriter’s words to stop the rah-rahing and hooting and cheering and to remind the raucous crowd that the event was to memorialize the dead and pray for the injured?
Even before he spoke, the “service” took on surrealistic qualities. Only the left—who worship before the divisive icon called multiculturalism and whose every breath is steeped in political correctness—could plan a memorial for the murdered Catholics, Federal Judge John Roll and nine-year-old Christina Taylor Green, for murdered 30-year-old Gabe Zimmerman, who was Jewish and an aide to the gravely injured Jewish Congresswoman (among the other dead and wounded), and have neither a Catholic priest nor a rabbi nor a Protestant minister anywhere in sight. Instead a Native American blessing was recited without once mentioning the word God! This is the alternative universe the left would like to inflict on the rest of us!
THE KING’S SPEECH

As for Mr. Obama’s speech, of course the left touted it. They are desperate to regain the momentum they lost—I think forever—on November 2nd, but their praise sounded more like relief to me. The conservatives who joined in the touting reminded me of the group-think crowd who told the naked emperor that his clothes were oh-so beautiful.
More troubling were the prompts on the Jumbotron—the gigantic screen on which Obama appeared while delivering his speech—prompts saying APPLAUSE.
Did the same prompter—a human being, no doubt—post the directive to BOO when Arizona Governor Jan Brewer was introduced? Do the parents who send their children to Arizona State University think they’re getting their money’s worth?
Why did Patti H, who apparently took the Flickr picture of the Jumbotron, take down the picture and threaten to sue the BigFurHat site that ran with it?
MORNING IN AMERICA

Less than two weeks after the devastating Tucson tragedy, respectful mourners—unlike the pep-rally crowd—continue to blanket the lawns of University Medical Center with flowers, candles, and fervent prayers for the survivors of Loughner’s rampage as well as the victims who died.
Congresswoman Giffords is reported to be on the mend, her husband, U.S. Navy Captain and astronaut Mark E. Kelly unfailingly by her side. The parents of the little Christina Taylor Green had the strength to donate their daughter’s organs.
The sheriff of Pima County, AZ, Clarence Dupnik, who essentially launched the myth that conservatives caused Loughner’s actions, was effectively slapped down by Megyn Kelly of Fox News, who exposed him as just another leftist crank spouting the tired talking points of the left.
Poll after poll showed an uptick in popularity and approval for Sarah Palin, the belief that the worse political rhetoric comes from the left , and every indication that the American public bought none of the toxic blather that the left and their evil twins in the media were hawking.
For me, witnessing the behavior of leftists throughout the entire Arizona tragedy was like watching the death throes of a huge beast that continues to flail, even after a harpoon has hit an artery. The midterm elections was that harpoon. The second blow was struck by leftists themselves during the Arizona tragedy when they displayed for the entire world to see the depths of their classlessness and meanness, dishonesty and hypocrisy.
By now, the American public is on to them, their orchestrated outrage, their unsubstantiated accusations, their lack of accountability, their self-consuming jealousy, and also the stark terror they’re now experiencing at being relegated to that wilderness Mr. Henninger wrote about. When that happens, I’ll be the first to say Good Riddance

Joan Swirsky is an award winning author and journalist. Her work can be found at joanswirsky.com

Joan can be reached at mailto:joanswirsky@gmail.com?bcc=letters@canadafreepress.com

+0
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
1/24/2011 2:28:29 AM
Here is something to think about:


The people didn't know Castro was a communist when he took over...look at what happened. I maintain Obama is no different from Castro and we are headed down the same road. Read the following note if you have time and see how it went for Cuba.


A must read.
Yes, we did produce a near perfect republic. But will they keep it? Or will they, in the enjoyment of plenty, lose the memory of freedom? Material abundance without character is the path of destruction.
Thomas Jefferson



. .. I remember asking dad about Castro when I was about 9 years old. I asked , "Is Castro a good guy or bad?" Dad said he couldn't tell!! This was about 1955. We were living in Louisiana at the time. Dad was in the army there. Cuba was fairly close andin the news a lot. The Cubans were asking the same question! Ike was president.

This past July, we had the pleasure of sharing a summer barbecue with a refugee from Cuba. Our dinner conversation was starkly different than most. This refugee came to the United States as a young boy in the early 1960s. His family was more fortunate than most as they were able to bring a suitcase and $100 when they fled Castro's newly formed revolutionary paradise.

Our dinner consisted of all-American fare: hamburgers, potato salad, watermelon and fresh ears of sweet corn. This is a menu shared with family and friends nationwide, while celebrating the birth of our beloved America on the Fourth of July.

We began with a simple discussion about our country and the direction it has taken since Barack Obama came to power. We shared the usual complaints about the sour economy and liberal social engineering emanating from the rulers in Washington.

But then he said it. The sentence came naturally. I assume it was unplanned. But it carried the weight of a freight train. "You know when Castro took power, none of us knew he was a Communist."

We sat stunned. He continued, "Yes, we all thought he was a patriot, a nationalist. Before the revolution he didn't sound like a radical."

The comparison at this point was easy, and I interjected, "You mean just like Barack Obama?" He responded, "Yes, just like Barack Obama."

He continued, "We were all shocked as the government just continued to grab more power. First they said the revolution is over, so please turn in your guns. We all complied."

"I remember my uncle saying after it started, 'Castro will only nationalize some of the big industries, he will never come and take our family hardware store. 'But that is exactly what happened, Castro started with the sugar mills and the large industries, but they eventually came and knocked on the door of our family hardware store. My family had run this store for generations. They said we now own the hardware store, you work for us. And that nice, large four-bedroom home you own, it is now our property also, and you can move yourself and five children into two rooms of the house because others are moving in with you."

The lesson learned from this discussion is a lesson most Americans refuse to hear. Political leaders can lie about their agenda and once in office they can take totally unexpected turns.

If you had asked us three years ago if we thought General Motors would be nationalized, we would have never believed it. We could never contemplate a country where the rule of law, the most fundamental building block of a justice society would be evaporating just like it did in Castro's Cuba in the early 1960s.

But the news of injustice keeps increasing. Black Panthers are not charged with wrongdoing by the U.S. Department of Justice because their crimes are against whites. The bondholders of GM are stripped of their assets without due process by the government. Governmental leaders are bribed in full daylight only to have all investigation of the crimes stifled by the Attorney General. The U.S. borders are overrun with crime and illegal activity and the leaders in D.C. act as if it is important to protect the lawbreakers while the innocent are killed and overrun.

When local communities attempt to enforce the law, they are ridiculed and threatened as racists and bigots. They are sued by the very administration entrusted with enforcing the law.

Without the rule of law the U.S. Constitution is a sham. Without the rule of law our beloved America is swiftly becoming a country where only the well connected and politically powerful will be safe. As Michelle Malkin has so eloquently explained in her recent book, a culture of corruption has replaced honest government.

The only way this problem will be fixed is by massive citizen action. All honest citizens that want to be treated equally must come together and demand that the favoritism, the bribes, the uneven enforcement of law end now. And yes, it can happen here.

PLEASE SEND THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW ... And may God save the United States of America!

God Bless Everyone
+0
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
1/24/2011 6:51:27 AM
I just received this from a good friend and I thought it was really worth sharing.


THE UNITED STATES NAVY SALUTES OUR US. . MARINE CORPS....


THE MARINES WANT THIS TO ROLL ALL OVER THE U.S. , Canada and The World
Please don't delete this until you send it on, Let's send it around the world.
FRIENDS ARE BORN, NOT MADE

This is a poem being sent from a Marine To his Dad. For those who take the time To read it, you'll see a letter from him to His dad at the bottom. It makes you truly thankful for not only the Marines, but ALL of our troops.

THE MARINE

We all came together,
Both young and old
To fight for our freedom,
To stand and be bold.

In the midst of all evil,
We stand our ground,
And we protect our country
From all terror around..

Peace and not war,
Is what some people say.
But I'll give my life,
So you can live the American way.

I give you the right
To talk of your peace.
To stand in your groups,
And protest in our streets.

But still I fight on,
I don't *****, I don't whine.
I'm just one of the people
Who is doing your time.

I'm harder than nails,
Stronger than any machine.
I'm the immortal soldier,
I'm a U..S. MARINE!


So stand in my shoes,
And leave from your home.
Fight for the people who hate you,
With the protests they've shown.
Fight for the stranger,
Fight for the young.
So they all may have,
The greatest freedom you've won.

Fight for the sick,
Fight for the poor.
Fight for the cripple,
Who lives next door.
But when your time comes,
Do what I've done.
For if you stand up for freedom,
You'll stand when the fight's done
By: Corporal Aaron M. Gilbert , US Marine Corps
USS SAIPAN, PERSIAN GULF

July 23
Hey Dad,
Do me a favor and label this 'The Marine' and send it to everybody on your email list. Even leave this letter in it. I want this rolling all over the US and Canada and The World. I want every home reading it. Every eye seeing it. And every heart to feel it. So can you please send this for me? I would but my email time isn't that long and I don't have much time anyway.
You know what Dad? I wondered what it would be like to truly understand what JFK said in his inaugural speech. 'When the time comes to lay down my life for my country, I do not cower from this responsibility. I welcome it.' Well, now I know. And I do.. Dad, I welcome the opportunity to do what I do. Even though I have left behind a beautiful wife, and I will miss the birth of our first born child, I would do it 70 times over to fight for the place that God has made for my home. I love you all and I miss you very much. I wish I could be there when Sandi has our baby, but tell her that I love her, and Lord willing, I will be coming home soon. Give Mom a great big hug from me and give one to yourself too.
Aaron
Please let this marine (and all our military) know we care by passing his poem onto your friends even if you don't usually take time to forward mail..do it this time!
Thanks,
Let's help Aaron's dad spread the word ......FREEDOM isn't FREE
Someone pays for you and me.

God bless you!





God Bless Everyone
+0
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
1/24/2011 8:06:41 AM
Although not many people will agree with me, but I will Hooray! for Granny.


The Rambo Granny of Melbourne , Australia



Gun-Toting Granny Ava Estelle, 81, was so ticked-off when two thugs raped her 18-year-old granddaughter that she tracked the unsuspecting ex-cons down... And shot off their testicles.

"The old lady spent a week hunting those men down and, when she found them, she took revenge on them in her own special way," said Melbourne police investigator Evan Delp.

Then she took a taxi to the nearest police station, laid the gun on the sergeant's desk and told him as calm as could be: "Those bastards will never rape anybody again, by God."

Cops say convicted rapist and robber Davis Furth, 33, lost both his penis and his testicles when outraged Ava opened fire with a 9-mm pistol in the hotel room where he and former prison cell mate Stanley Thomas, 29, were holed up.

The wrinkled avenger also blew Thomas' testicles to kingdom come, but doctors managed to save his mangled penis, police said. "The one guy, Thomas, didn't lose his manhood, but the doctor I talked to said he won't be using it the way he used to," Detective Delp told reporters. "Both men are still in pretty bad shape, but I think they're just happy to be alive after what they've been through."

The Rambo Granny swung into action August 21 after her granddaughter Debbie was carjacked and raped in broad daylight by two knife-wielding creeps in a section of town bordering on skid row.

"When I saw the look on my Debbie's face that night in the hospital, I decided I was going to go out and get those bastards myself 'cause I figured the Law would go easy on them,"' recalled the retired library worker. " And I wasn't scared of them, either - because I've got me a gun and I've been shootin' all my life. And I wasn't dumb enough to turn it in when the law changed about owning one."

So, using a police artist's sketch of the suspects and Debbie's description of the sickos, tough-as-nails Ava spent seven days prowling the wino-infested neighborhood where the crime took place till she spotted the ill-fated rapists entering their flophouse hotel.

"I knew it was them the minute I saw 'em, but I shot a picture of 'em anyway and took it back to Debbie and she said sure as hell, it was them," the oldster recalled...

"So I went back to that hotel and found their room and knocked on the door, and the minute the big one opened the door, I shot 'em right square between the legs, right where it would really hurt 'em most, you know. Then I went in and shot the other one as he backed up pleading to me to spare him. Then I went down to the police station and turned myself in."

Now, baffled lawmen are trying to figure out exactly how to deal with the vigilante granny. "What she did was wrong, and she broke the law, but it is difficult to throw an 81-year-old woman in prison," Det. Delp said, "especially when 3 million people in the city want to nominate her for Mayor."

DEPORT HER TO AMERICA - WE NEED HER!
********************************************************************************
Australian Gun Law Update

Here's a thought to warm some of your hearts....

From: Ed Chenel, A police officer in Australia


Hi Yanks, I thought you all would like to see the real figures from Down Under.

It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Australia were forced by a new law to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed by our own government, a program costing Australia taxpayers more than $500 million dollars.

The first year results are now in:

Australia-wide, homicides are up 6.2 percent,
Australia-wide, assaults are up 9.6 percent;
Australia-wide, armed robberies are up 44 percent (yes, 44 percent)!

In the state of Victoria alone, homicides with firearms are now up 300 percent. (Note that while the law-abiding citizens turned them in, the criminals did not and criminals still possess their guns!)

While figures over the previous 25 years showed a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, this has changed drastically upward in the past 12 months, since the criminals now are guaranteed that their prey is unarmed.

There has also been a dramatic increase in break-ins and assaults of the elderly, while the resident is at home.

Australian politicians are at a loss to explain how public safety has decreased, after such monumental effort and expense was expended in 'successfully ridding Australian society of guns....' You won't see this on the American evening news or hear your governor or members of the State Assembly disseminating this information.

The Australian experience speaks for itself. Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws affect only the law-abiding citizens.

Take note Americans, before it's too late!

Will you be one of the sheeple to turn yours in? WHY? You will need it.


FORWARD TO EVERYONE ON YOUR EMAIL LIST. [I DID]
DON'T BE A MEMBER OF THE SILENT MAJORITY.
BE ONE OF THE VOCAL MINORITY WHO WON 'T STAND FOR NONSENSE


God Bless Everyone
+0
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
1/29/2011 12:01:58 PM
Hello Friends,

B Hussein once again gave his annual SOTU address and as usual he obfuscated, tried to pull the wool over your eyes and plain showed he's not really connected to what's happening in the United States.

Throughout his speech he used a new term, namely government "investment". Now even a first grader knows government doesn't invest but SPENDS. Changing the name of what he does best .......... creating debt and then more debt might fool some of the people but the majority are to smart to be conned by this person. He did it once with his "change" and the people showed him what they think of it and him in the mid term elections.

He wants to cut $100 billion (a drop in the bucket) in expenses and then in the same breath he says we have to "invest". OK, we got the point more of the same but with a name change. Who knows he might outlaw the word "spending" like he has Jihad, Muslim Extremists, Terrorism and Terrorists.

Shame we have to suffer this guy for another 2 years. 2012 hurry up we gotta vote this poor excuse of a president outta office.

Shalom,

Peter

P.S. Just remembered, this SOTU address was really a campaign address. Seems like this guy doesn't know the difference between the two.
Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!