Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Lydia Fokina

1456
2042 Posts
2042
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 100 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
4/1/2012 7:11:41 AM
Hi again Peter!
Sorry for not very good translation.
I wrote speech in Russian and translated using http://translate.google.com
It was deep night, and I didn't edit translation.
If You are interesting, I'll try to do more accurate translation.
Or to state it more simple sentences.
What parts of speech are unclear there?
Frendly, Lydia


Quote:
Hi Lydia,

I read through the transcript of the video but the trans literal translation is not a very good one and the meaning is unclear in many parts.

I'd appreciate an accurate translation if you can find one.

Shalom,

Peter

Quote:
Hi Peter!

Threat or thought out plan of a military attack on Iran

The nuclear issue of Iran is not the main reason that the West and the U.S. is preparing to strike.
The American geopolitical doctrine called "national security strategy," defined by the target system for all U.S. agencies, non-governmental organizations, and of course for the armed forces. This target setting - unipolar world led by the United States.
In the "U.S. national security strategy" in the 21st century is described in detail an implementation of the unipolar world. It is written that the installation of American dominance requires monitoring (secure access) for key areas of the world, strategic communications and global resources.
Iran meets all these requirements.
In the event of an attack on Iran's leading powers will not go away.
About ready to go to war in the event of an attack on Iran has already warned in China.
Conflict can result in a third world war, and it is possible that it will be nuclear.
If there is a war waged against Iran, he will have the right to defend themselves using all means at its disposal.
And the aggressor strikes against targets on foreign soil are not only possible but mandatory.
The Iranians know that to stop the aggression can only be a great loss of people to the American public opposed the war.
Where no rockets fly so far, there may sabotage actions.
For Russia and the Caspian Five consequences will be severe.
This is a huge refugee flows, strengthening radical elements, reduction of economic cooperation.
Gen. Ivashov assesses the possibility of war 50 to 50.
He believes that the Obama administration and U.S. military
do not want war. The military is already tired of war, and Obama is afraid that this adventure will prevent his election.
But there are powerful financial circles, who want to earn on this war, there is a Republican neocons who insist on this beat, there is a pro-Israeli circles in the U.S. who advocate an immediate hit.
But this can happen that will make a decision on aggression. This is a provocation, or that pripishut Iran, for example, a terrorist act, the right-wing supporters of the outbreak of war could trigger rapid whether attacks on Israel, or whether there is a terrorist attack, or a fifth column in Iran could trigger such as closing the Strait and it would be a provocation and the United States an excuse to unleash the war.


Chairman - Leonid Ivashov, president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of International Journalism, MGIMO, Colonel-General.

He was born August 31, 1943 in Kyrgyzstan. He graduated from the Tashkent Higher Military Command School named after VI Lenin Military Academy named after MV Frunze. Since 1976, he served in the central office of the Ministry of Defense, served as Secretary of the Council of CIS Defense Ministers, was chief of the Main Directorate of International Military Cooperation of the Ministry of Defense. He was awarded orders and medals of the Soviet Union, Russia and foreign countries. Passion for life - Poetry.

+0
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
4/1/2012 7:57:27 AM
Hi Lydia,

Many times the source for an article gives an option for other languages and then the translation is an accurate one.

This translation aside from being trans literal also lacks the flow of the arguments in it. I found he whole read difficult and the usage of words that are incomprehensible to me like
Quote:
pripishut
.

So, in order to correctly understand and respond a much better translation would be appreciated.

Shalom,

Peter

Quote:
Hi again Peter!
Sorry for not very good translation.
I wrote speech in Russian and translated using http://translate.google.com
It was deep night, and I didn't edit translation.
If You are interesting, I'll try to do more accurate translation.
Or to state it more simple sentences.
What parts of speech are unclear there?
Frendly, Lydia


Quote:
Hi Lydia,

I read through the transcript of the video but the trans literal translation is not a very good one and the meaning is unclear in many parts.

I'd appreciate an accurate translation if you can find one.

Shalom,

Peter

Quote:
Hi Peter!

Threat or thought out plan of a military attack on Iran

The nuclear issue of Iran is not the main reason that the West and the U.S. is preparing to strike.
The American geopolitical doctrine called "national security strategy," defined by the target system for all U.S. agencies, non-governmental organizations, and of course for the armed forces. This target setting - unipolar world led by the United States.
In the "U.S. national security strategy" in the 21st century is described in detail an implementation of the unipolar world. It is written that the installation of American dominance requires monitoring (secure access) for key areas of the world, strategic communications and global resources.
Iran meets all these requirements.
In the event of an attack on Iran's leading powers will not go away.
About ready to go to war in the event of an attack on Iran has already warned in China.
Conflict can result in a third world war, and it is possible that it will be nuclear.
If there is a war waged against Iran, he will have the right to defend themselves using all means at its disposal.
And the aggressor strikes against targets on foreign soil are not only possible but mandatory.
The Iranians know that to stop the aggression can only be a great loss of people to the American public opposed the war.
Where no rockets fly so far, there may sabotage actions.
For Russia and the Caspian Five consequences will be severe.
This is a huge refugee flows, strengthening radical elements, reduction of economic cooperation.
Gen. Ivashov assesses the possibility of war 50 to 50.
He believes that the Obama administration and U.S. military
do not want war. The military is already tired of war, and Obama is afraid that this adventure will prevent his election.
But there are powerful financial circles, who want to earn on this war, there is a Republican neocons who insist on this beat, there is a pro-Israeli circles in the U.S. who advocate an immediate hit.
But this can happen that will make a decision on aggression. This is a provocation, or that pripishut Iran, for example, a terrorist act, the right-wing supporters of the outbreak of war could trigger rapid whether attacks on Israel, or whether there is a terrorist attack, or a fifth column in Iran could trigger such as closing the Strait and it would be a provocation and the United States an excuse to unleash the war.


Chairman - Leonid Ivashov, president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of International Journalism, MGIMO, Colonel-General.

He was born August 31, 1943 in Kyrgyzstan. He graduated from the Tashkent Higher Military Command School named after VI Lenin Military Academy named after MV Frunze. Since 1976, he served in the central office of the Ministry of Defense, served as Secretary of the Council of CIS Defense Ministers, was chief of the Main Directorate of International Military Cooperation of the Ministry of Defense. He was awarded orders and medals of the Soviet Union, Russia and foreign countries. Passion for life - Poetry.

Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
4/1/2012 8:00:22 AM
Hello Friends,

Sheriff Joe Arpaio held a second press conference on Saturday 31/3/12 and released additional information about B Hussein's eligibility to hold the office of president of the United States.

It is a long video BUT, if you're interested in seeing and hearing the truth well worth watching. The fraudulent long form birth certificate, SS (selective service issue) and Social Security # from a state he never resided in are just the tip of the iceberg.

BTW, Sheriff Arpaio showed why he was reelected 5 times for 4 year terms. Aside from doing his job he's smart and quite amusing. He has a great sense of humor and I personally like that. If I was a resident of Maricopa county he'd certainly get my support and vote.

Shalom,

Peter


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uICO4l5PRcs&feature=player_embedded

Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0
Lydia Fokina

1456
2042 Posts
2042
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 100 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
4/1/2012 9:41:07 AM
Hi Peter, I edited translation, I hope it will be more clearly.

Threat or thought out plan of a military strike on Iran

The nuclear issue of Iran is not the main reason that Western European countries and the U.S. is preparing to strike.

America has a geopolitical doctrine called "National Security Strategy."
This doctrine defines the goal for all U.S. agencies, nongovernmental organizations and, of course, for the armed forces.
This goal - a "unipolar world" led by the United States.

Achieving the "unipolar world" is described in details.

Installation of American dominance requires access to key regions of the world, strategic communications and global resources.

Iran has one of the key areas of the world.

In the event of an attack on Iran, other countries also participate.
China has warned of a willingness to go to war in the event of an attack on Iran.
The conflict could lead to World War III, it is possible that the war would be nuclear.
Iran will have the right to defend themselves, using all means at its disposal.
And the aggressor strikes against targets in a foreign country, not only possible but necessary.
The Iranians know that to stop the aggression can only be a great loss of people and the American public protests against the war.
Where no rockets fly so far, can be subversive action.
Effects of war on Russia and the Caspian Five consequences will be severe.
This is a huge refugee flows, strengthening radical elements, the reduction of economic cooperation.
Gen. Ivashov assesses the possibility of war between 50 and 50.
He believes that the Obama administration and U.S. military does not want war.
The military are already tired of the war. Obama is afraid that this adventure would prevent his election.

But there are powerful financial interests who want to make money on this war, there are Republicans and neocons who insist on this beat, there is a pro-Israeli circles in the U.S. who advocate an immediate hit.
And something can happen that will make a decision about the beginning of the aggression.
This can be either some kind of provocation, or, for example, a terrorist act, which accuse Iran, or right-wing supporters of the war could trigger a fast attack on Israel, or a fifth column in Iran could cause the closure of the Strait.
These provocation excuse to unleash the U.S. war against Iran.


Chairman - Leonid Ivashov, president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of International Journalism, MGIMO, Colonel-General.

He was born August 31, 1943 in Kyrgyzstan. He graduated from the Tashkent Higher Military Command School named after VI Lenin Military Academy named after MV Frunze. Since 1976, he served in the central office of the Ministry of Defense, served as Secretary of the Council of CIS Defense Ministers, was chief of the Main Directorate of International Military Cooperation of the Ministry of Defense. He was awarded orders and medals of the Soviet Union, Russia and foreign countries. Passion for life - Poetry.


Quote:
Hi Lydia,

Many times the source for an article gives an option for other languages and then the translation is an accurate one.

This translation aside from being trans literal also lacks the flow of the arguments in it. I found he whole read difficult and the usage of words that are incomprehensible to me like
Quote:
pripishut
.

So, in order to correctly understand and respond a much better translation would be appreciated.

Shalom,

Peter

Quote:
Hi again Peter!
Sorry for not very good translation.
I wrote speech in Russian and translated using http://translate.google.com
It was deep night, and I didn't edit translation.
If You are interesting, I'll try to do more accurate translation.
Or to state it more simple sentences.
What parts of speech are unclear there?
Frendly, Lydia


Quote:
Hi Lydia,

I read through the transcript of the video but the trans literal translation is not a very good one and the meaning is unclear in many parts.

I'd appreciate an accurate translation if you can find one.

Shalom,

Peter

Quote:
Hi Peter!

Threat or thought out plan of a military attack on Iran

The nuclear issue of Iran is not the main reason that the West and the U.S. is preparing to strike.
The American geopolitical doctrine called "national security strategy," defined by the target system for all U.S. agencies, non-governmental organizations, and of course for the armed forces. This target setting - unipolar world led by the United States.
In the "U.S. national security strategy" in the 21st century is described in detail an implementation of the unipolar world. It is written that the installation of American dominance requires monitoring (secure access) for key areas of the world, strategic communications and global resources.
Iran meets all these requirements.
In the event of an attack on Iran's leading powers will not go away.
About ready to go to war in the event of an attack on Iran has already warned in China.
Conflict can result in a third world war, and it is possible that it will be nuclear.
If there is a war waged against Iran, he will have the right to defend themselves using all means at its disposal.
And the aggressor strikes against targets on foreign soil are not only possible but mandatory.
The Iranians know that to stop the aggression can only be a great loss of people to the American public opposed the war.
Where no rockets fly so far, there may sabotage actions.
For Russia and the Caspian Five consequences will be severe.
This is a huge refugee flows, strengthening radical elements, reduction of economic cooperation.
Gen. Ivashov assesses the possibility of war 50 to 50.
He believes that the Obama administration and U.S. military
do not want war. The military is already tired of war, and Obama is afraid that this adventure will prevent his election.
But there are powerful financial circles, who want to earn on this war, there is a Republican neocons who insist on this beat, there is a pro-Israeli circles in the U.S. who advocate an immediate hit.
But this can happen that will make a decision on aggression. This is a provocation, or that pripishut Iran, for example, a terrorist act, the right-wing supporters of the outbreak of war could trigger rapid whether attacks on Israel, or whether there is a terrorist attack, or a fifth column in Iran could trigger such as closing the Strait and it would be a provocation and the United States an excuse to unleash the war.


Chairman - Leonid Ivashov, president of the Academy of Geopolitical Problems, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of International Journalism, MGIMO, Colonel-General.

He was born August 31, 1943 in Kyrgyzstan. He graduated from the Tashkent Higher Military Command School named after VI Lenin Military Academy named after MV Frunze. Since 1976, he served in the central office of the Ministry of Defense, served as Secretary of the Council of CIS Defense Ministers, was chief of the Main Directorate of International Military Cooperation of the Ministry of Defense. He was awarded orders and medals of the Soviet Union, Russia and foreign countries. Passion for life - Poetry.

+0
Peter Fogel

1470
7259 Posts
7259
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The President That Hates His Country By Joan Swirsky
4/1/2012 12:06:29 PM
Hello Friends.

B Hussein and his regime are sabotaging Israel's options to attack the lunatic Iranian regime. It's up to Israel to decide if a preemptive strike is necessary if the sanctions don't have the positive effect we all would like them to have.

So far they might have tickled the Iranians a bit but overall their policies and threats haven't decreased but quite the opposite. Israel has agreed in the past to give diplomacy a chance and time is running out.

Over the past few months B Hussein and his goon squad have been leaking statements about Israel's plans for a preemptive attack culminating this past week with the leak about using Azerbaijani air force bases as attack bases. Whether this is true or not is irrelevant but by leaking what might be secret information they are directly sabotaging Israel's chances for a successful strike if all else fails and the attack found to be the last option. All for the sake of his reelection and backstabbing Israel yet again. Another direct result of these leaks is strengthening the hand of Iran and this in my opinion is also part of B Hussein's plan and agenda.

The below article gives us Ambassador John Bolton's take on this situation.

Shalom,

Peter

‘Washington leaked information to prevent Israeli attack on Iran’

Former U.S. Ambassador to U.N. John Bolton says the leak about Israeli activities in Azerbaijan was orchestrated by the administration, not a rogue source • Israeli sources tell Time magazine that the Mossad has been curtailing its covert operations in Iran by “dozens of percent.”

Yoni Hirsch

Former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton says the U.S. is actively trying to stymie a possible Israeli strike on Iran.
|
Photo credit: AP

Former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton said Thursday that the Obama administration leaked a story about covert Israeli activity in Azerbaijan to thwart plans for potential military action against Iran’s nuclear program.

Speaking to Fox News, Bolton said he believes the U.S. government is actively working to prevent Israel from launching an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities. The former ambassador was responding to an article published last week in Foreign Policy magazine that quoted senior U.S. officials claiming Israel had been granted access to airfields in Azerbaijan along Iran’s northern border.

“I think this leak is part of the administration’s campaign against an Israeli attack,” Bolton told Fox News.

According to the Foreign Policy report, in 2009 a U.S. Embassy official in Azerbaijan sent a memo to the State Department that quoted Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev, who reportedly said that nine-tenths of his country’s ties with Israel are “below the surface.” The memo was later made public by WikiLeaks.

An intelligence official quoted in the Foreign Policy article said the U.S. is monitoring events in Azerbaijan and is “not happy” with the developments.

While the officials quoted in the article were not explicitly said to be White House officials, Bolton said he has no doubt they were. Bolton noted that the source of the leak was not likely to have been a single individual with his own agenda. “Clearly, this is an administration-orchestrated leak. This is not a rogue CIA guy saying I think I’ll leak this out.”

Bolton accused the U.S. administration of orchestrating a campaign to prevent Israeli military action against Iran, while admitting that he has no concrete evidence to support his claim. However, he cited a February statement by U.S. Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta who said he believed an Israeli strike on Iran could take place in April. “If that’s the case, then it would be entirely consistent for the administration to try to avoid that impending outcome,” Bolton said.

Meanwhile, according to another report published Saturday, the Mossad has scaled back its covert activities in Iran in recent months by “dozens of percent.”

Senior Israeli officials reportedly told Time magazine that the reduction covers a wide spectrum of operations, including assassinations and detonations at Iranian missile bases, but also efforts to gather firsthand intelligence on the ground and recruit spies.

One senior Israeli source said Mossad officials are “not satisfied” with the new policy. Another official attributed the curtailment to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu whom the article says was “worried about the consequences of a covert operation being discovered or going awry.”

“Netanyahu was traumatized by Israel’s failed attempt to assassinate [Hamas political bureau chief Khaled] Mashaal and does not want another failure on his hands,” the official said. Netanyahu was prime minister when the Mossad botched an attempt to assassinate Mashaal in Jordan in 1997.

Meanwhile U.S. government officials continue to emphasize that Iran still constitutes a potential threat to U.S. interests. In an interview with a U.S. Marine Corps reporter on Friday, Panetta said. “If Israel decides to act, we will have to defend ourselves. We may be involved earlier than we would want to be.”

After Panetta’s remarks, a spokesman for the U.S. Department of Defense said however that the U.S. still views diplomacy as its first option.


Peter Fogel
Babylon 7
+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!