Monday, January 25, 2010

In Whose Apartment were the Blueprints for Auschwitz found? Why the Secret?

ATLAS EXCLUSIVE: This post will continue to be updated as fresh evidence emerges. The blueprints for Auschwitz went on display yesterday after being discovered in November 2008. The location of their discovery is being kept secret. They were ‘discovered in a apartment behind a wall when a renovation/remodel was taking place’. No one will say whose apartment. Germany does not hide information like this after WWII……why are they hiding it now? If the location were revealed to incriminate the Grand Mufti, this would be the ONLY reason to keep this location secret. There are no other reasons. Everyone is speaking of the ‘plans’, yet no one is speaking of the ‘location,’ and location is everything.

UPDATE 3:38 am: Armaros opines, "So Rommel gets beaten in 1942 in N Africa. The Nazis fail to take Palestineas a result and as such cannot build their death camps there. Plan B.Mufti. Mufti is invited to Berlin and proceeds to plan a camp forNablus starting the killing in 1945. The Nazis lose, he flees Berlinand probably doesn't want to be arrested by the Britishwith these docs on his person. He obtains immunity from the British,ends up in Egypt, and when Eichmann is arrested they hope to exposehim. But Eichmann keeps his silence, which the Mufti thanks him for.(They should have water boarded Eichmann.)"

Nazis planned Holocaust in Palestine: historians 12 April 2006

STUTTGART, GERMANY - The Nazis made plans to conduct a Holocaust of Jews living in Palestine during the Second World War, according to German historians who have examined secret archives. The Nazis stationed a unit of ruthless troops in the Greek capital Athens with the task of landing in Palestineand murdering about 500,000 European Jews who had taken refuge there,the historians at the University of Stuttgart said Wednesday. But itnever deployed.

The rapid-deployment unit was answerable to the Afrika Korps, theGerman army in North Africa headed by Field Marshal Erwin Rommel.

Klaus Michael Mallmann of the University's Ludwigsburgresearch team and his assistant Martin Cueppers said they had spentthree years studying German wartime archives including those at theForeign Office in Berlin.

The Allied defeat of Rommel at the end of 1942 had prevented theextension of the Holocaust to Palestine, they said. If Rommel hadbeaten the Allies in the desert and invaded Egypt, a push into Palestine would have followed and the unit would have deployed there.

The researchers, whose findings appear in a new book entitled Germans,Jews, Genocide, said the Athens unit was intended to operate like Naziunits that hunted for Jews in eastern Europe and either massacred themor sent them to the Nazi death camps.

Mallmann and Cueppers said the Nazis had planned to exploit Arab friendship for their plans.

"The most important collaborator with the Nazis and an absolute Arabanti-Semite was Haj Amin al-Husseini, the mufti of Jerusalem," theysaid in the book. He was a prime example of how Arabs and Nazis becamefriends out of a hatred of Jews.

All of the evidence is ****ing:

UPDATE: 2:13 am: They are covering for Islam. The Naziswere decimated and Islam was given a free pass to take over ..... theworld. The evidence mounts: (hat tip Armaros)

Iwon't let go of this until we find out who the German authorities areprotecting? There is no one else they would fear offending.

Read it from pp 5-12:

There was a whole network of Arabs in Berlin around him along with Nazis who handled him regularly.

Husseini was a spy. He spied on the British for the Germans using other Arab heads of state.

Now a spy is a spy. So if he so admired and so keenly observed Auschwitz,as documents and accounts suggest, it is likely that he came intopossession of designs of the Nazi death machines. It was said that hewanted to set up a concentration camp near Nablus. So it can beinferred that he obtained plans with or without German consent for thegas chambers and crematoria when visitingAuschwitz as he was onfriendly terms with the managers there. That would explain the walledin drawings hidden in the property. Provided they were hidden during orat the very end of the war. The Germans did not want these designs toget out. They wanted to hide the Holocaust, especially the industrialside to it.

If this wasn't his, then we are dealing with something more generallike the Arbeit Macht Frei sign stolen a while ago. But then why thesecrecy. Any German owner of the property would or could just say : Ididn't know they were in the walls and remove responsibility. If theperson in question was from Nazi family, still the same would apply.

There need not be a match in properties where he stayed. There weremore than one properties hosting his people in and around Berlin,Frankfurt and even Rome.

Kuntzel points to a property South of Berlin where the Mufti was broadcasting his incitements(like the OBL tapes now) to Jihad. But his residence was not the same.Could not have been, as that would have been a security risk for himand the Germans.

This Hungarian site states Address @ Klopstock Strasse in Berlin SO CHECK ON THIS LEAD.......

http://www.hetek.hu/hatter/200209/az_arab_hitler So see this:"Jeruzsálem fõmuftija, HadzsAmin Muhammad al-Husszeini 1941. november 6-án érkezett meg a HarmadikBirodalom fõvárosába, Berlinbe. A náci állam vezetõi a legmagasabbszinten fogadták, s kényelmes szállást biztosítottak számára aKlopstock Strasse egy hatalmas háztömbjében, ahol 1939-ig egy cionistazsidó iskola m?ködött. Miután minden egykori zsidó ingatlantállamosítottak, Himmler "Zsidó Intézetet" rendeztetett be az épületben,amit Husszeini megérkezése alkalmával "A Zsidókérdés a Muszlim VilágbanKutatóintézet" névre kereszteltek át. Nem ok nélkül. "

This says that the Muftimoved in to the Klopstock Stasse property on Nov 6 1941. The propertyis a large building block where until 1939 was home to a ZionistSchool. When the building was confiscated (probably '39), Himmlerinstalled a 'Jewish institute" which was named "The Jewish Question in the Muslim World Research Institute" at the Mufti'srequest. This can be verified through a title search and this propertywas probably taken by the Russians or the Allies in '45 and documentedas such. Also was probably documented by theNazis.

Thiswas an alliance, the Nazis and the Muslims. We decimated the Nazis, butwe left Islam intact and gave the Muslims run of the West?

In whose apartment were the blueprints for Auschwitz found?

UPDATE: As Husseini wrote in his memoirs:

“Ourfundamental condition for cooperating with Germany was a free hand toeradicate every last Jew from Palestine and the Arab world. I askedHitler for an explicit undertaking to allow us to solve the Jewishproblem in a manner befitting our national and racial aspirations andaccording to the scientific methods innovated by Germany in thehandling of its Jews. The answer I got was: “The Jews are yours.”

The Mufti was apparentlyplanning to return to Palestine in the event of a German victory and toconstruct a death camp, modeled after Auschwitz, near Nablus. Husseini incited his pro-Nazi followers with the words “Arise,o sons of Arabia. Fight for your sacred rights. Slaughter Jews whereveryou find them. Their spilled blood pleases Allah, our history andreligion. That will save our honor.” In 1944, a German-Arab commando unit, under Husseini’s command, parachuted into Palestine and poisoned Tel Aviv’s wells.

________________________________________________________________________

Original blueprints of the Auschwitz death camp, discovered by chance in a Berlin apartment last year,have gone on display in the German capital. Wladyslaw Bartoszewski, anAuschwitz survivor, said they give a glimpse of "true hell."

The owner's asking price for the blueprints was so high that the Federal Archive refused to purchase them. Bild bought the blueprints instead. (Spiegel)

"The horrific thing about them lies in their systematic nature. Intheir cold perfectionism. In their professional quality. The plans ofAuschwitz shake the soul of every thinking and feeling individualbecause they're the expression of an inhumanity created by humans. Theyare the construction plans of true hell."

Yesterday I posted the heinous blueprints for the annihilation of the Jewish people.

The location of their discovery is being kept secret. The only forthcoming information was that they were ‘discovered in a apartment behind a wall when a renovation/remodel was taking place’. An anonymous source tells me that with all of the ‘slight’ tid-bits of information, it points to a possible location where the Grand Mufti lived during WWII. If it were the residence of the Grand Mufti, this would point to the muslim participation in and possible creation of the Final Solution, as was testified in the Nuremberg Trials (witnesses testified that the Grand Mufti was the Originator/Creator of the idea).

Germany does not hide information like this after WWII……why are they hiding it now? If the location were revealed to incriminate the Grand Mufti, this would be the ONLY reason to keep this location secret. There are no other reasons. Everyone is speaking of the ‘plans’, yet no one is speaking of the ‘location,’ and location is everything.

My source has worked with several people in Germany over the last few months, trying to get the ‘location’ of this remodeled apartment…..with no success.

Arethere any Atlas Shruggers who can help us get to the bottom of this"secret"? All sources will be kept confidential. But this terriblesecret cannot be kept any longer. If you know something, say something.

There are many who would want this to be kept secret, including many in the WJC….and if the WJC would like to prove us wrong, then we would love their participation.

Albert Speer reports in his memoirs on a similar statement made by Hitler: "The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"- (hat tip Al S)

UPDATE: All Atlas posts on Hitler and the mufti here.

UPDATE: China Confidential picked up on my story and weighs in here.

UPDATE: More from reader Al S:" I came home and read the actual Speer Memoirs-- It is important to note the context: that Hitler gave a similar talk at the Berghof over and over (in fact, Speer could practically recite the talk by memory after awhile and was bored by the repetition)":

"Hitler had been much impressed by a scrap of history he had learned from a delegation of distinguished Arabs. When the Mohammedans attempted to penetrate beyond France into Central Europe during the eighth century, his visitors had told him, they had been driven back at the Battle of Tours. Had the Arabs won this battle, the world would be Mohammedan today. For theirs was a religion that believed in spreading the faith by the sword and subjugating all nations to that faith. The Germanic peoples would have become heirs to that religion. Such a creed was perfectly suited to the Germanic temperament [according to Hitler]. Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire.

"Hitler usually concluded this historical speculation by remarking, 'You see, it's been our misfortune to have the wrong religion. Why didn't we have the religion of the Japanese, who regard sacrifice for the Fatherland as the highest good? The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?"

Atlas, Goebbels, in his diaries, had several similar quotes. Goebbels even said Hitler considered Christianity as just another sect of Judaism.

UPDATE: More love letters between the ummah and the Nazis. Here's a telegram from Himmler to the Mufti:

November 2, 1943 -- Himmler's telegram to the Mufti:

To the Grand Mufti: TheNational Socialist movement of Greater Germany has, since itsinception, inscribed upon its flag the fight against the world Jewry.It has therefore followed with particular sympathy the struggle offreedom-loving Arabs, especially in Palestine, against Jewishinterlopers. In the recognition of this enemy and of the commonstruggle against it lies the firm foundation of the natural alliancethat exists between the National Socialist Greater Germany and thefreedom-loving Muslims of the whole world. In this spirit I am sendingyou on the anniversary of the infamous Balfour declaration my heartygreetings and wishes for the successful pursuit of your struggle untilthe final victory.' Reichsfuehrer S.S. Heinrich Himmler (hat tip bunch)

UPDATE: "The Nazis gave the Mufti a mansion to live in, on fashionable Klostock Street in Berlin, one that had been confiscated from a Jew who was sent to a concentration camp..." (more here) hat tip Hal

UPDATE: A year ago they were trying to hide the Nazi-Muslim connection. Think they knew something then?

Aug 28, 2009 0:03 | Updated Aug 28, 2009 17:12

Hiding the truth about Husseini

The curator, Karl Rössler, told The Jerusalem Post that it is a "scandal" that the director of the Werkstatt, Philippa Ebéné, sought to censor the exhibit.
"One must, of course, name that al-Husseini, a SS functionary, participated in the Holocaust," said Rössler.
The exhibit covers the "The Third World during the Second World War" and three exhibit panels of 96 are devoted to the mufti's collaboration with the Nazis.
The grand mufti delivered a talk to the imams of the Bosnian SS division in 1944, and was a key Islamic supporter of Nazi Germany's destruction of European Jewry.
Ebéné denied that there was an "agreement " reached with the local German-Muslim community to shut down the exhibit. She termed media queries regarding an agreement as "Eurocentric."

More documents...........this was an alliance. The Nazis and the Muslims. Again: we decimatedthe Nazis, but we left Islam intact and gave the Muslims run of theWest. WTF?

Where are those Nazis now? (hat tip Armaros)

Hello Friends,

Geert Wilders is on trial in Holland for supposedly defaming Islam by criticizing it's teachings and mainly for the film Fitna that he produced.

This is part of Radical Islams plan to force upon the infidel world the supremacy of Islam over all other religions. We've seen their nefarious plans through the OIC in the UN to make it illegal to criticize Islam and make it an International law. So far that has only been a recommendation passed by the UN every year and not a law but the future may deal us a different deck of cards.

That's why Geert Wilders' trial is so important cos this man is not only fighting for his freedom but for the freedom of speech that Islam is trying to deny the world and whether you realize it or not that includes you.

Here's an interesting article about Geert Wilders trial in the Dutch courts.

Shalom,

Peter

Stop the Trial of Geert Wilders

By LEON DE WINTER

Whatstarted as a trial against Geert Wilders for alleged Islamophobia hasnearly turned into its opposite: a historical case about the message ofthe Quran. The Amsterdam court trying the controversial Dutchpolitician is now preoccupied with the question of whether this book,sacred to more than a billion believers, can be compared to one of themost vile publications in the history of Western civilization—Hitler's"Mein Kampf." What could possibly go wrong?

In his writing and speeches, Mr. Wilders has found these two worksto be similar in terms of their anti-Semitism and incitement to hatred,and has thus called for a publishing ban on the Quran similar to theone in place for "Mein Kampf." This is what triggered Mr. Wilders'sprosecution for discriminatory and insulting remarks against Muslimsand Islam. The Dutch politician, though, denies having insultedMuslims. He insists his focus is on radical Islam and the Quran, whichhe considers to be not only a religious text but also a politicalpamphlet encouraging Muslims to discriminate against and, if necessary,kill Jews, Christians, apostates and other unbelievers. That's why Mr.Wilders claims the right to criticize and condemn Islam.

Following complaints brought by mostly Muslim and radical leftistactivists, Amsterdam's district attorney in 2008 at first found nolegal basis for prosecuting Mr. Wilders. Prosecutors were forced tochange course only after an activist appeals court last year orderedMr. Wilders's prosecution—basically condemning the politician beforeany trial could even begin and before Mr. Wilders had a chance todefend himself. The court's unusual intervention illustrates the Dutchconfusion about the conflict between two essential rights: the right tofree speech and the right to protection from discrimination.

View Full Image

Accordingto polls, Mr. Wilders's Freedom Party, a libertarian-conservativemovement with populist tendencies, is currently the most popularpolitical party in the Netherlands. If elections were held today, Mr.Wilders would be a serious contender for the position of primeminister. Mr. Wilders's detractors are mistaken if they think aconviction would hurt him politically. The trial is a win-win situationfor him: If the court rules to restrict Mr. Wilders's right to freespeech, many Dutchmen will interpret this as an effort by thepolitically correct establishment to limit the growing strength of theFreedom Party, which would widen its appeal to many voters. If, on theother hand, the prosecution fails to prove that Mr. Wilders haspurposely insulted Muslims because of their religion, Mr. Wilders'sviews will be seen as vindicated. Again, he will gain politically.

More importantly, Mr. Wilders'sprosecution may in the end inadvertently create a crisis between theNetherlands and the Islamic world. On trial is not so much GeertWilders, but the Holy Book of Islam. On Jan. 20, the first day of thecase, Mr. Wilders's defense team presented the court with a list ofexpert witnesses. It is indicative of his strategy. The expertwitnesses, a group of internationally renowned academics on the onehand and, on the other, radical Islamists (among them Mohammed Bouyeri,the killer of Theo van Gogh, and the influential Iranian AyatollahMesbah Yazdi, an outspoken anti-Semite and religious mentor of Iranianpresident Mahmoud Ahmadinedjad), are requested to testify about theQuran's message and Mr. Wilders's comparison of the Quran to "MeinKampf." As Mr. Wilders stated on the first and, so far only, session incourt, if his statements about the Quran and "Mein Kampf" are correct,he cannot be convicted for telling the truth. So Mr. Wilders's defenseteam will concentrate on the extreme and violent paragraphs in theQuran, and compare them to paragraphs in "Mein Kampf."

The prosecution did not object to calling the witnesses for thepurpose of shedding light on the Quran and "Mein Kampf" and onlyobjected to the high number of witnesses named (17). The court willthus most likely allow most witnesses on the list to testify. Withoutdoubt, there are many anti-Jewish remarks in the Quran. According tosome researchers, there may be more of these in the Quran than in "MeinKampf." So it is quite conceivable that the court will judge that GeertWilders was within his right to compare the Quran to "Mein Kampf."Anything is possible in this absurd trial.

The three judges hearing the case—no doubt decent, modest,postmodern Dutchmen with a minimum knowledge of Islam and its cultureand traditions—will now be forced to debate the nature of a religioustext, something that should have never been heard in the court of anenlightened society. In front of the judges and television cameras, theancient founding text of an entire civilization will be criticized andweighed against one of the most inhumane texts written in the 20thcentury—without any doubt a deep insult to Muslims, radical or not.

There is a way out. The district attorney's office has complied withthe appeals court's order to prosecute Mr. Wilders. The trial hasstarted. It should now ask the court for an acquittal. Thispreposterous trial needs to be stopped right now.

Mr. de Winter is a Dutch novelist and adjunct fellow at the Hudson Institute.