Menu



error This forum is not active, and new posts may not be made in it.
PromoteFacebookTwitter!
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The Case Against Barack Hussein Obama -- Go Ahead Call me a BIRTHER.
6/21/2013 1:44:47 PM
Divine intervention against Obama? as reported on Lunatic Outpost ;-)
container ship carrying weapons for Syrian rebels splits in half/sinks-update
'MOL Comfort sank due to yet unclear reasons, sailing from Singapore to Jeddah and after that to North Europe, leaving behind hundreds of drifting containers and a huge aftershock hitting liner sector and all of the maritime industry.

Even the scale of the consequences is hard, impossible, to estimate, not to mention consequences themselves. This is the 1st case in liner sector, when modern ocean-going liner container vessel (built in Japan!) sank in the ocean after breaking in 2 parts, like a poorly built and managed bulk carrier or over aged coaster. Nothing like this ever occurred, and no one believed it was possible, even theoretically. It just could not happen, but still, here it is.'

http://www.vesselfinder.com/news/1223-UP...mfort-Sank

(I posted some more information on page 14 of this thread, please look)


------------------------------------
these are fresh reports coming in from Syrian News:

'A large fleet named "Mol Comfort" carrying Arms for FSA from the U.S. has crashed in the Indian Ocean as it made its way from Singapore to Jeddah, on board were 4,500 containers loaded with arms for the Syrian rebels'

thats all the info so far for now... they are waiting for more info.



[Image: 51c3063f21a3e.jpg]

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
RE: The Case Against Barack Hussein Obama -- Go Ahead Call me a BIRTHER.
6/23/2013 3:03:38 PM
Who better to question Obama's "surveillance" tactics than the Anointed one hissef!

Candidate Obama Debating President Obama On Civil Liberties vs. Government Surveillance


The difference is stark. Not only is there a massive difference in what's being said, but also in how it's being said. The Candidate Obama spoke clearly, directly strongly and without equivocation about protecting civil liberties and not giving up our freedoms. President Obama's speech, on the other hand, sounds weak, vague and unpresidential in comparison. In the first one, he makes these clear, declarative announcements:
This administration puts forth a false choice between the liberties we cherish and the security we provide.
But as President, he says (while rolling his eyes -- the video is incredible):
You can't have 100% security... and then also have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience.... We're, we're going to have to make some choices.
As a candidate:
I will provide our intelligence and law enforcement agencies the tools they need to take out the terrorists without undermining our Constitution and our freedoms. That means no more illegal wiretapping of American citizens. That means no more national security letters to spy on Americans who are not suspected of committing a crime. No more tracking citizens who do no more than protest a misguided war. No more ignoring the law when it is inconvenient. That is not who we are. That's not what is necessary to defeat the terrorists.
As President, he talks vaguely about how his team made an "assessment" and that these programs keep people safe, and "in the abstract" people might claim these programs are "Big Brother" but he thinks there's a "balance" to be struck. It's funny how different dictatorial surveillance powers look when you're the guy in charge of them.

Originally from TechDirt
David Weed President,
+1
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The Case Against Barack Hussein Obama - Usurper n Chief
6/23/2013 6:23:43 PM

I tell ya David, the plot thickens even more. With Limbaugh saying we are in the middle of a coup and Columbia professors speaking up and out about the Usurper n Chief

This Distinguished Professor From Columbia Has Come Forward Saying Obama Never Attended The University...

AP

AP

Professor Graff:I’m very upset by the whole story. I am angry when I hear Obama called ‘the first President of the United States from Columbia University’. I don’t consider him a Columbia student. I have no idea what he did on the Columbia campus. No one knows him.”

My comment about the Professor’s statements and Wayne Allen Roots latest report:

When oh when is a Congressional investigation going to be convened and the call for testimony of people like

Chief Investigator Michael Zullo of the AZ Cold Case Posse

, Wayne Allen Root, and Professor Henry Graff of Columbia, and many others, in regards to the falsified and forged life narrative and documents of the man who now calls himself Barack Hussein Obama. Ignoring the glaring evidence of identity fraud by Obama, is an extreme national security issue and high crimes and misdemeanors are being committed by the very presence of Barack Obama being in the Oval Office as the defacto President and Commander in Chief of our armed forces. High Treason by Obama is being permitted to continue daily with every day the U.S. Congress does not take action and convene a special select committee to investigate who really is the man in the Oval Office and what is the truth about his life and ID documents — CDR Charles Kerchner (Retired)

Source Article:

Ghost of Columbia- Part II: Legendary Columbia Professor Never Heard of Obama by Wayne Allen Root @ TheBlaze.com

An excerpt from the full article:

” … until now, I was the only one publicly voicing my suspicions. That just changed in a big way. Meet Professor Henry Graff, perhaps the most legendary and honored professor ever at Columbia University. He was THE American History and Diplomatic History professor at Columbia for 46 years. And he is more emphatic than yours truly that there are no Obama footprints at Columbia.

I was put on Professor Graff’s trail by another Columbia classmate, skeptical about Obama’s story. He told me that Professor Graff had been the speaker for the Class of ’53 last weekend at Columbia. My friend was watching Graff answer questions from the crowd when he was asked about Obama at Columbia. Graff said, “I have my doubts he ever went here.”

I did some digging and located Graff’s home phone number. I called him yesterday. Now retired, he was delighted to hear from me. He agreed to go on the record about Obama. Unlike Obama, Professor Graff clearly remembered me. He was thrilled to hear from his former student. I was in several of Graff’s classes and he remembered me like it was yesterday. He sounded great- like he hasn’t lost any of his trademark sharpness in 30 years since we last met.

I was honored to learn that this legendary historian has been following my political career for many years. But he had no such cheery things to say about the President. Graff said, “I taught at Columbia for 46 years. I taught every significant American politician that ever studied at Columbia. I know them all. I’m proud of them all. Between American History and Diplomatic History, one way or another, they all had to come through my classes. Not Obama. I never had a student with that name in any of my classes. I never met him, never saw him, never heard of him.”

Even more importantly, Professor Graff knew the other history and political science professors. “None of the other Columbia professors knew him either” said Graff.

Graff concluded our interview by saying, “I’m very upset by the whole story. I am angry when I hear Obama called ‘the first President of the United States from Columbia University.’ I don’t consider him a Columbia student. I have no idea what he did on the Columbia campus. No one knows him.” “

Read the full essay and report here: http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/ghost-of-columbia-part-ii-legendary-columbia-professor-never-heard-of-obama

A warning from the past — some conspiracies are very real and are also large and well organized and in process for a long time. The target of the one we are currently faced with is to destroy our U.S. Constitution, our Republic, and our military. Remember this quote from history: “We must now face the harsh truth that the objectives of communism are being steadily advanced because many of us do not recognize the means used to advance them. … The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a Conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst.” Quote by: J. Edgar Hoover former FBI director. Source: Elks Magazine (August 1956).

Rush Limbaugh states today — We are in the midst of a coup! (video): http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/limbaugh-we-are-in-the-midst-of-a-coup/print

When will we return to the rule of law and enforce our identity theft protection laws and the U.S. Constitution in regards to

Obama, the Usurper and Fraud-in-Chief residing in the White House? When will Congress take action!?

CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Lehigh Valley PA USA
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
http://www.protectourliberty.org
http://www.scribd.com/protectourliberty/collections


Quote:
Who better to question Obama's "surveillance" tactics than the Anointed one hissef!

Candidate Obama Debating President Obama On Civil Liberties vs. Government Surveillance


The difference is stark. Not only is there a massive difference in what's being said, but also in how it's being said. The Candidate Obama spoke clearly, directly strongly and without equivocation about protecting civil liberties and not giving up our freedoms. President Obama's speech, on the other hand, sounds weak, vague and unpresidential in comparison. In the first one, he makes these clear, declarative announcements:
This administration puts forth a false choice between the liberties we cherish and the security we provide.
But as President, he says (while rolling his eyes -- the video is incredible):
You can't have 100% security... and then also have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience.... We're, we're going to have to make some choices.
As a candidate:
I will provide our intelligence and law enforcement agencies the tools they need to take out the terrorists without undermining our Constitution and our freedoms. That means no more illegal wiretapping of American citizens. That means no more national security letters to spy on Americans who are not suspected of committing a crime. No more tracking citizens who do no more than protest a misguided war. No more ignoring the law when it is inconvenient. That is not who we are. That's not what is necessary to defeat the terrorists.
As President, he talks vaguely about how his team made an "assessment" and that these programs keep people safe, and "in the abstract" people might claim these programs are "Big Brother" but he thinks there's a "balance" to be struck. It's funny how different dictatorial surveillance powers look when you're the guy in charge of them.

Originally from TechDirt

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The Case Against Barack Hussein Obama -- Go Ahead Call me a BIRTHER.
6/28/2013 9:10:31 PM

Obama's Eligibility Attorney Bob Bauer Behind Illegal IRS Targeting

Published on Jun 19, 2013

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0
Jim
Jim Allen

5804
11253 Posts
11253
Invite Me as a Friend
Top 25 Poster
Person Of The Week
RE: The Case Against Barack Hussein Obama -- Go Ahead Call me a BIRTHER.
6/28/2013 9:12:15 PM

GGlenn Beck: Shocking Video- THIS Is Who We Are Helping In Syria?

May Wisdom and the knowledge you gained go with you,



Jim Allen III
Skype: JAllen3D
Everything You Need For Online Success


+0


facebook
Like us on Facebook!