Hi John and Kathy and Everybody,
Now I understand. I've got a few mails about this nomination and I thought it was about the blog where we were last week. Now I see what were those about.
Concerning all I've read here and in mails, I think it would be more effective if you'd (or we'd) set up some criterias as Emmanuel has done. This way all this would be more objective (if it can be said so) than some other considerations and backstage games.
Hope that there will be no one offended but last weeks or some days anyhow I've spent my time reading posts rather than responding in Forums. And my feeling is that as this is not anymore a "game", but it has stake, and this is not only about recognition but other benefits... I think it would give birth to a lot of ... who knows what. Do not forget, "money are devil's eyes"
I think that Beverly is completely right. And it would be better to benefit only of the good part of this initiative rather than the negative one.
Hope you've got my idea here, and I manage not to heart someone's feelings minwhile.
Have a great day,
Anamaria
PS: I would be so pleased to find out that all this post of mine is a big aberration! And believe me the most I hate myself is when I talk rot.
|