[endif]

Quit trashing Obama!

Quit trashing President Obama's Accomplishments! He has an impressive list of accomplishments!

First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.

First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.

First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States.

First President to violate the War Powers Act.

First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

First President to defy a Federal Judge's court order to cease implementing the Health Care Reform Law.

First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.

First President to spend a trillion dollars on 'shovel-ready' jobs when there was no such thing as 'shovel-ready' jobs.

First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.

First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.

First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.

First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.

First President to terminate America 's ability to put a man in space.

First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.

First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.

First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke-out on the reasons for their rate increases.

First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory.

First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).

First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.

First President to fire an inspector general of Ameri-corps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.

First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.

First President to golf 73 separate times in his first two and a half years in office, 90 to date.

First President to hide his medical, educational and travel records.

First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.

First President to go on multiple global 'apology tour'.

First President to go on 17 lavish vacations, including date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends; paid for by the taxpayer.

First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.

First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.

First President to repeat the Holy Quran, tells us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.

First President to take a 17 day vacation.

And the list goes on.

So, how is this "CHANGE" working out? ENJOY YOUR DAY!

Hey Guys,

Is this going to be the new trend?

May 09, 2012• Vol. 7, No. 19

Sarkozy, Obama, Romney, Ron Paul and the recent European elections
by Newt Gingrich

Dear Fellow Conservative,

In the past few weeks, a number of elections in Europe have offered telling signs for American politics about the effect of the current pain on voters.

Two consistent patterns are emerging in virtually every European country where citizens have the opportunity to make their voices heard.

First, incumbent parties are being punished without regard to ideology. Whichever side is in power, the right or the left, it is being punished for failure.

Second, centrist parties everywhere are losing ground to anti-establishment parties.

These patterns are holding firm in France, Britain (local elections), Germany (one major local election), Greece, Spain and Italy.

Again and again voters are protesting bad economies with their votes. And they are increasingly rejecting policies of austerity and pain.

In significant numbers, they are also repudiating the establishment parties and moving to both right and left wing protest parties.

These rising protest parties indicate that more and more European voters are rejecting the performance, the ideas and the authority of the traditional establishment parties.

The results in France in particular offer some interesting suggestions for American politics--and it isn't good news for President Obama.

First, the defeat of French President Nicolas Sarkozy very much follows the pattern of the 2006 and 2010 American elections. In both cases the opposition party (Democrats in 2006 and Republicans in 2010) were able to ride a wave repudiating the failed reform efforts of the incumbent party.

Sarkozy ran as a reformer in 2007. In fact, his book "Testimony: France in the 21st Century" was the best conservative statement in the last decade of the need for fundamental reform. His defense of the work ethic as essential to French prosperity was a clearer case than any American has offered since Ronald Reagan.

Unfortunately, Sarkozy was unable to deliver on his reforms. His personality overwhelmed his policies. The French economy's failure overwhelmed his personality.

The French Socialist Hollande won in part by deemphasizing his personality and focusing on his desire to serve France rather than dominate it.

President Obama has every reason to be worried by European results. They offer solid proof that high unemployment, high gasoline prices, weak growth and big deficits can overwhelm his billion dollar campaign.

They also suggest that picking his NCAA bracket and flying off to Afghanistan may not count for much when voters look at their own pocketbooks.

For Gov. Mitt Romney, there is solid evidence in these results that his "it's-the economy-and-we're-not-stupid" message is the right focus for his campaign.

His recent call for the goal of 4 percent unemployment--a full employment economy--is exactly the right one.

The voters want a balanced budget through growth and opportunity and will reject austerity and pain. The governor and his team are working to build this positive contrast based on policy, not personality--much as Hollande did in France, though his politics could not be more different from Romney's.

The European results also put the popularity of Ron Paul in a wider context. The support for his ideas and his anti-establishment campaign is not a uniquely American phenomenon. He is, in fact, challenging the establishment in exactly the same manner as the various protest parties of the right and left in Europe.

These election results suggest the tea party movement and the support focused on Ron Paul is not a small development. It betrays historic discontent, and I doubt we have seen the last of it.

If Gov. Romney succeeds in giving voice to that discontent in a serious discussion with the American people, he has a strong chance in the fall. Indeed, the European elections suggest President Obama faces a much steeper mountain to climb as the choice clarifies over the next few months.

Your friend,

Newt Gingrich

Hey Rick,

I was reading that same article today too, great minds think alike in a calm rational way finishing each train of thought, independent of the other till there seems to be no option but to put them all together and then the puzzle is complete. Just like puzzles the closer you get to finishing the clearer the picture becomes.

Quote:
[endif]

Quit trashing Obama!

Quit trashing President Obama's Accomplishments! He has an impressive list of accomplishments!

First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner.

First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in.

First President to preside over a cut to the credit-rating of the United States.

First President to violate the War Powers Act.

First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

First President to defy a Federal Judge's court order to cease implementing the Health Care Reform Law.

First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party.

First President to spend a trillion dollars on 'shovel-ready' jobs when there was no such thing as 'shovel-ready' jobs.

First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters.

First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat.

First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U.S., including those with criminal convictions.

First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees.

First President to terminate America 's ability to put a man in space.

First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present.

First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it.

First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly spoke-out on the reasons for their rate increases.

First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state it is allowed to locate a factory.

First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (AZ, WI, OH, IN).

First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago.

First President to fire an inspector general of Ameri-corps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case.

First President to appoint 45 czars to replace elected officials in his office.

First President to golf 73 separate times in his first two and a half years in office, 90 to date.

First President to hide his medical, educational and travel records.

First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it.

First President to go on multiple global 'apology tour'.

First President to go on 17 lavish vacations, including date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends; paid for by the taxpayer.

First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife.

First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000 a year at taxpayer expense.

First President to repeat the Holy Quran, tells us the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.

First President to take a 17 day vacation.

And the list goes on.

So, how is this "CHANGE" working out? ENJOY YOUR DAY!

Hi Rick,
I believe the biggest problem with this shift in elections is the people being elected are being elected by a lot of angry people that do not have a clue about what it takes to run a country. this is my opinion . They are mad because they have lost jobs, houses and some of them are just mad in general. It's pretty easy to take a crisis and wipe a bunch of ill informed people into a frenzy. I see this shift much like the movement around the globe in the sixties. They are protesting just to protest. The American Anti movement ! They just want to stick it to the man and don't care about the outcome. In the US there are a lot of Democrats involved in the TEA party. I find it very doubtful they have left their liberal ideas behind in less then four years. Yes ,a lot of them probably were Conservative Democrats but ideologies die hard .

Then you have the TEA PARTY , Libertarian Paul Bots , when Paul left that party his loons followed him, unfortunately. He knew he could never get elected as a Libertarian so he decided to move into the Republican party and wreak havoc there. A lot of states have bought into it like and so we have a HUGH Democrat / Libertarian influx into the Republican party. They do not think like Republicans , act like Republican nor are they Republicans. They want nothing better then to destroy the party and remake it into G-d only knows what. None of them until now have ever been actively involved in anything political. They read a few books , glazed the Constitution a couple of times, flipped though the federalist papers and now they are experts. Really ?????

They did nothing to help build the Republican party but now they want to run it??? These folks are anti everything. They are unyielding and most of them are just plain crazy. I do not see this movement as any thing positive for the direction the US should be moving ,it is a movement to further divide an already divided nation.
G-d forbid if that moon bat Paul ever gets any real power. I really believe a lot of these folks are still looking for that change Obama promised them. LOL
Shalom,
Geketa

Quote:
Hey Guys,

Is this going to be the new trend?

May 09, 2012• Vol. 7, No. 19

Sarkozy, Obama, Romney, Ron Paul and the recent European elections
by Newt Gingrich

Dear Fellow Conservative,

In the past few weeks, a number of elections in Europe have offered telling signs for American politics about the effect of the current pain on voters.

Two consistent patterns are emerging in virtually every European country where citizens have the opportunity to make their voices heard.

First, incumbent parties are being punished without regard to ideology. Whichever side is in power, the right or the left, it is being punished for failure.

Second, centrist parties everywhere are losing ground to anti-establishment parties.

These patterns are holding firm in France, Britain (local elections), Germany (one major local election), Greece, Spain and Italy.

Again and again voters are protesting bad economies with their votes. And they are increasingly rejecting policies of austerity and pain.

In significant numbers, they are also repudiating the establishment parties and moving to both right and left wing protest parties.

These rising protest parties indicate that more and more European voters are rejecting the performance, the ideas and the authority of the traditional establishment parties.

The results in France in particular offer some interesting suggestions for American politics--and it isn't good news for President Obama.

First, the defeat of French President Nicolas Sarkozy very much follows the pattern of the 2006 and 2010 American elections. In both cases the opposition party (Democrats in 2006 and Republicans in 2010) were able to ride a wave repudiating the failed reform efforts of the incumbent party.

Sarkozy ran as a reformer in 2007. In fact, his book "Testimony: France in the 21st Century" was the best conservative statement in the last decade of the need for fundamental reform. His defense of the work ethic as essential to French prosperity was a clearer case than any American has offered since Ronald Reagan.

Unfortunately, Sarkozy was unable to deliver on his reforms. His personality overwhelmed his policies. The French economy's failure overwhelmed his personality.

The French Socialist Hollande won in part by deemphasizing his personality and focusing on his desire to serve France rather than dominate it.

President Obama has every reason to be worried by European results. They offer solid proof that high unemployment, high gasoline prices, weak growth and big deficits can overwhelm his billion dollar campaign.

They also suggest that picking his NCAA bracket and flying off to Afghanistan may not count for much when voters look at their own pocketbooks.

For Gov. Mitt Romney, there is solid evidence in these results that his "it's-the economy-and-we're-not-stupid" message is the right focus for his campaign.

His recent call for the goal of 4 percent unemployment--a full employment economy--is exactly the right one.

The voters want a balanced budget through growth and opportunity and will reject austerity and pain. The governor and his team are working to build this positive contrast based on policy, not personality--much as Hollande did in France, though his politics could not be more different from Romney's.

The European results also put the popularity of Ron Paul in a wider context. The support for his ideas and his anti-establishment campaign is not a uniquely American phenomenon. He is, in fact, challenging the establishment in exactly the same manner as the various protest parties of the right and left in Europe.

These election results suggest the tea party movement and the support focused on Ron Paul is not a small development. It betrays historic discontent, and I doubt we have seen the last of it.

If Gov. Romney succeeds in giving voice to that discontent in a serious discussion with the American people, he has a strong chance in the fall. Indeed, the European elections suggest President Obama faces a much steeper mountain to climb as the choice clarifies over the next few months.

Your friend,

Newt Gingrich

Hi Rick & Geketa,

Gingrich did a good job analyzing the political situation in Europe and I hope it bodes ill for the fraud and great pretender B Hussein.

The question whether the US will follow in the path of Socialistic European countries is a moot one under B Hussein. It already is!!!! If he's reelected it will only get worse, much worse.

I'd like to point to another issue that Newt didn't mention in his article. In the recent elections (not the presidential elections) in France the extreme right party under the leadership of Marie La Pen won a historic 20% of the vote which gives them much more power then they had in the past. They made a decision not to support Sarkozy in the presidential elections. Had they supported Sarkozy he would've easily won. What they gained by that decision was an extreme socialistic president who will bankrupt France before you know it with his spending plans which will include spending sprees similar to B Hussein's.

This reminds me of all the ronbots who claim they will not support the GOP nominee unless it's the kook Ron Paul. Yeah, they claim that without them Romney can't win so it's either Paul or no vote for Romney. Makes perfect sense doesn't it? The threat is ridiculous and I believe most of those supporting Paul will vote for Romney but just think of the consequences if they don't. It'll be a mirror of what happened in France with their new extreme socialist president. We already have that in the US and if B Hussein is reelected he'll go the extreme Marxist route cos he can and has no elections fears anymore.

The bottom line is that together we have to get rid of B Hussein and only by uniting behind Romney can we insure that that happens.

As an aside it should be obvious even to the most brainwashed of the ronbots that all Paul's doing now is a power play to have more influence in the GOP convention and make behind closed doors deals empowering himself and his son.

So France is a good example of what might happen in the US in the coming elections and is a warning that should be taken seriously unless they really want 4 more years of the fraud and great pretender B Hussein.

Shalom,

Peter

Quote:
Hi Rick,
I believe the biggest problem with this shift in elections is the people being elected are being elected by a lot of angry people that do not have a clue about what it takes to run a country. this is my opinion . They are mad because they have lost jobs, houses and some of them are just mad in general. It's pretty easy to take a crisis and wipe a bunch of ill informed people into a frenzy. I see this shift much like the movement around the globe in the sixties. They are protesting just to protest. The American Anti movement ! They just want to stick it to the man and don't care about the outcome. In the US there are a lot of Democrats involved in the TEA party. I find it very doubtful they have left their liberal ideas behind in less then four years. Yes ,a lot of them probably were Conservative Democrats but ideologies die hard .

Then you have the TEA PARTY , Libertarian Paul Bots , when Paul left that party his loons followed him, unfortunately. He knew he could never get elected as a Libertarian so he decided to move into the Republican party and wreak havoc there. A lot of states have bought into it like and so we have a HUGH Democrat / Libertarian influx into the Republican party. They do not think like Republicans , act like Republican nor are they Republicans. They want nothing better then to destroy the party and remake it into G-d only knows what. None of them until now have ever been actively involved in anything political. They read a few books , glazed the Constitution a couple of times, flipped though the federalist papers and now they are experts. Really ?????

They did nothing to help build the Republican party but now they want to run it??? These folks are anti everything. They are unyielding and most of them are just plain crazy. I do not see this movement as any thing positive for the direction the US should be moving ,it is a movement to further divide an already divided nation.
G-d forbid if that moon bat Paul ever gets any real power. I really believe a lot of these folks are still looking for that change Obama promised them. LOL
Shalom,
Geketa

Quote:
Hey Guys,

Is this going to be the new trend?

May 09, 2012• Vol. 7, No. 19

Sarkozy, Obama, Romney, Ron Paul and the recent European elections
by Newt Gingrich

Dear Fellow Conservative,

In the past few weeks, a number of elections in Europe have offered telling signs for American politics about the effect of the current pain on voters.

Two consistent patterns are emerging in virtually every European country where citizens have the opportunity to make their voices heard.

First, incumbent parties are being punished without regard to ideology. Whichever side is in power, the right or the left, it is being punished for failure.

Second, centrist parties everywhere are losing ground to anti-establishment parties.

These patterns are holding firm in France, Britain (local elections), Germany (one major local election), Greece, Spain and Italy.

Again and again voters are protesting bad economies with their votes. And they are increasingly rejecting policies of austerity and pain.

In significant numbers, they are also repudiating the establishment parties and moving to both right and left wing protest parties.

These rising protest parties indicate that more and more European voters are rejecting the performance, the ideas and the authority of the traditional establishment parties.

The results in France in particular offer some interesting suggestions for American politics--and it isn't good news for President Obama.

First, the defeat of French President Nicolas Sarkozy very much follows the pattern of the 2006 and 2010 American elections. In both cases the opposition party (Democrats in 2006 and Republicans in 2010) were able to ride a wave repudiating the failed reform efforts of the incumbent party.

Sarkozy ran as a reformer in 2007. In fact, his book "Testimony: France in the 21st Century" was the best conservative statement in the last decade of the need for fundamental reform. His defense of the work ethic as essential to French prosperity was a clearer case than any American has offered since Ronald Reagan.

Unfortunately, Sarkozy was unable to deliver on his reforms. His personality overwhelmed his policies. The French economy's failure overwhelmed his personality.

The French Socialist Hollande won in part by deemphasizing his personality and focusing on his desire to serve France rather than dominate it.

President Obama has every reason to be worried by European results. They offer solid proof that high unemployment, high gasoline prices, weak growth and big deficits can overwhelm his billion dollar campaign.

They also suggest that picking his NCAA bracket and flying off to Afghanistan may not count for much when voters look at their own pocketbooks.

For Gov. Mitt Romney, there is solid evidence in these results that his "it's-the economy-and-we're-not-stupid" message is the right focus for his campaign.

His recent call for the goal of 4 percent unemployment--a full employment economy--is exactly the right one.

The voters want a balanced budget through growth and opportunity and will reject austerity and pain. The governor and his team are working to build this positive contrast based on policy, not personality--much as Hollande did in France, though his politics could not be more different from Romney's.

The European results also put the popularity of Ron Paul in a wider context. The support for his ideas and his anti-establishment campaign is not a uniquely American phenomenon. He is, in fact, challenging the establishment in exactly the same manner as the various protest parties of the right and left in Europe.

These election results suggest the tea party movement and the support focused on Ron Paul is not a small development. It betrays historic discontent, and I doubt we have seen the last of it.

If Gov. Romney succeeds in giving voice to that discontent in a serious discussion with the American people, he has a strong chance in the fall. Indeed, the European elections suggest President Obama faces a much steeper mountain to climb as the choice clarifies over the next few months.

Your friend,

Newt Gingrich