|
I really do not like to be one of the people throwing a monkey wrench in the latest posted outcome of business meetings; however, I do think that because of the post, I need to respond.
Previous to this meeting, the G2 Managers had a meeting. This consisted of 4 persons with one attending later in the evening. At which time, it was discussed and whittled down (a rather draining meeting, but one that was believed to be a successful outcome.) to ONE program. .. WE promote ONE program.
From reading the above, I count way more than one. Which means, that the meeting that was held previous to this one last night was just canned and not even given the chance to get started.
I am sorry, but, I am rather confused. I was under the impression that we'd be trying out a test, so to speak, and that test was to have all G2 members promoting the url for the extravaganza blaster program only --- utilizing all platforms of marketing possible.
If the programs above are designed to help us promote, that is one thing, if they are asking us to join and promote their link, then we are trailing off into different directions... again. If they are requiring a 'small' fee for upgrading,etc, again, we are trailing off into different directions. I have nothing against keeping avenues open for promotion. but to promote those avenues in addition to the main focus of a selling tool, seems to dilute the purpose intended.
The above recap post on last nights meeting merely indicates that the some of the G1 members and managers have voted to revamp the meeting and decisions of the G2 managers meeting held a few days before.
It is like the managers of G1 (some of them) are telling G2 what is best for G2...when G2 already made this decision.. to promote ONE url, the blaster software program that Terry purchased under Joyce.
We only need the url for the sales link that reflects Terry's referral/sale for this software purchase.
All G2 members would then focus on promoting that sales link (exclusively) to see determine this can turn revenue into the group. With the above post, not to be critical, but it defines this decision as non existant from my review.
As a G1 manager and a G2 manager. I do not feel that these additional re-added promos for the G2 team can help the focusing aspect which seems to be the problem we called the meeting on in the first place. Having too many programs to choose from, makes a person choose not to decide at all.
Currently, we were awaiting the domain verifications from Terry before given the link to promote. Terry indicated that Joyce can help us with Terry's resell link. I am waiting on that information and hope that someone can post a reply with the information needed.
Again, the focus of the team still appears to be scattered allbeit programs you wish to stand behind. The demand for networkers is definitely in getting their programs and/or services sold. Joining all of them defeats the purpose as we are then expected to promote thier links, instead of selling them all the tools we know they need.
We might as well throw in all the programs we deleted for the number of choices I see given in the above list already.what's a few more?
This is NOT the point... and I am certainly not asking to add the programs taken out. .. but just for a scenario.. the above denotes more than one program which is not what the G2 managers decided. It makes it confusing to be promoting so many sites. Put em all on one page.. that's fine too - when the person gets there they see too many and off they click.
Sorry to be the one to raise this issue but because I was part of the original G2 meeting about what to get rid of and what to keep, given that the Commando in the HIVE told me that we'd go with ONE program and to choose wisely.. this just doesnt make any sense .. continue to do what you are doing and expect different results.. we all know what that means.
HIVE TEAM HOSTESS
|