Hi, Bill,

That is quite a remarkable debunking - it is also possible to debunk the debunker by quoting equally credible and authoritative alternative sources.

There is no point at all in simply starting a 'yes', 'no', 'yes', 'no' style of exchange because that will simply continue a debate that has been going on ever since the towers collapsed.

I have read a great deal from experts supporting both aspects and, on balance, it seems to me that there is a case to answer. Even more so when you consider the physical evidence at the Pentagon site.

Whether the twin towers have anything at all to do with Mr Zebari and his emotive letter, I do not know, but I doubt it.

The Old Coot 

DISCLAIMER

THE VIEWS EXPRESSED IN THIS POST ARE THE HONESTLY HELD OPINIONS OF ARTHUR WEBSTER. (aka THE OLD COOT) THEY ARE ADDRESSED TO ALL OF THIS COMMUNITY AND, IN NO WAY, CONSTITUTE A PERSONAL ATTACK UPON PERSONS LIVING, DEAD OR FICTIONAL. IF YOU THINK THAT YOU HAVE BEEN ATTACKED AND YOU CAN LOOK INTO YOURSELF AND SEE THAT IT IS NOT PARANOIA THAT DRIVES THIS THOUGHT - CONTACT HIM AND TELL HIM WHY.

You know you sound almost disappointed that I'm here, hummmm?  :)

Much the worse for wear but still here!

My heart goes out to you Kathy!

Yes, "I am Still Kicking, but not too high as yet". :)  I will never get hired for the "Rockettes" I'm afraid, but I am enjoying life a bit better now.

HUGS to you and yours, MsBeverly

Hello Again,

You said:

That is quite a remarkable debunking - it is also possible to debunk the debunker by quoting equally credible and authoritative alternative sources.

I would agee with that asessment.

I would, JUST ONCE, like to see these EQUALLY credible authorative sources.

Therein, as I have maintained from the first, is where the conspirators catch the innocent. Most people don't know their hidden agenda. They have a life and don't have time to check their misquotes mixed with lots of truths.

Take care Old Coot,
Do you like to fish?

Bill